Topic: Craig Steven Wright: A False Prophet in Crypto (Read 454 times)
What really surprises me the most is not him claiming that he is the creator of bitcoin, because we knew that at first because there were many before him that were claiming the same thing , but him going as far as taking it to the court and providing false evidences of early address that the first transactions were sent from and with him having any of the private keys for them, i personally hope that he gets sewed and punished for his false claims in order to make an example from him to anyone who is trying or think about doing it in the future, besides people are giving him attention which exactly what his kind really wants.
I really don't know what Craig aims to get from all this lies and conspiracy. I see it as unnecessary attention to the the BSV project which will never get him the reference his seeking in the crypto space.. I just wish he move on from this silly games and focus on developing his project and contributing to the blockchain community..
Maybe Craig Wright needs to sign in to the wallet of the Satoshi so we could know that he is the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
Unfortunately it's not that simple and what you said is just a basic knowledge. I have a simple question for you... do you know which addresses are belong to Satoshi? 
So he is not the first to do this. Everybody want to be associated with good things in life, so it is of no any surprise to me seeing Craig Wright claiming to be Satoshi. I think the real Satoshi needs to comeforth and keep to an end all these dramas
All he had to do was sign the early private keys and he failed to. Of course there is speculation that Dave had those keys and they are lost. CSW was definitely around those early bitcoin guys but if he really had a role in the creation remains to be seen. I'll admit that I do sometimes watch his Youtube videos though.
Signing does not do anything except showing access at the moment of signing, aka Troll prove.Quote
Possession of a key is not evidence of ownership. It was never the intent of Bitcoin. It is the intent of people like Greg Maxwell, James Donald, and others who seek a system that acts outside the law. If you have a stolen asset, possession doesn’t make it yours. It applies to Bitcoin equally. If bitcoin is stolen through stolen keys, they do not give the receiver ownership. They do not act as proof. In monetary law, money is fungible and transferable only when it is exchanged without knowledge of fraud or malpractice and for good consideration. It is critical. To be money, Bitcoin does not rely on the mere possession of keys, which is the aim and desire of those seeking a new version of Liberty Reserve coin or e-gold. There are some who will tell you that the mere possession of a key is definitive evidence. They are avoiding the rules of evidence and courts, and seek to alter their nature. They seek a precedent and to change the narrative to one that favours a more anarchist approach.
I will sign after I have definitively proven I created Bitcoin. Not before. The problem with the so-called “experts” is that they have no expertise. They seek to create a narrative and change reality such that it aligns with their beliefs, and believe that doing so will make them experts. Bitcoin is not bit gold, and it never will be.
‘Doing anything you want’ is not a system that is free. Freedom comes within society, and it comes with rules.
I will sign after I have definitively proven I created Bitcoin. Not before. The problem with the so-called “experts” is that they have no expertise. They seek to create a narrative and change reality such that it aligns with their beliefs, and believe that doing so will make them experts. Bitcoin is not bit gold, and it never will be.
‘Doing anything you want’ is not a system that is free. Freedom comes within society, and it comes with rules.
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/shades-of-black/
I am terribly disturbed by his distraction and I dont know he want plans to gain from this outcry. One of the advantage he has is the money from this space to sponsor this law suit, which I wish he could be controlled, and he is facing a terrible negligence from the space. If he is really satoshi, this forum is within his confers because he created this.
I don't even know why we or the Bitcoin world are giving so much attention to this chap. As we can see, he thrives on our attention. Once we start caring less and stop discussing him then he will be dead and gone.
Seriously, he adds Zero Value to Bitcoin so why even bother bringing him up here in Bitcoin Discussion.
"Let the Dead remain Dead"
Seriously, he adds Zero Value to Bitcoin so why even bother bringing him up here in Bitcoin Discussion.
"Let the Dead remain Dead"
Obviously, Craig only wants to gain people's trust but that would never happen again after that Bsv failure.
He always wants to ruin the reputation of Bitcoin but he will always fail because Bitcoin is well established and too strong for false news and controversies.
The Ultimate fail that he had done was proclaiming that he's Satoshi Nakamoto but eventually he cant provide any proofs with those claims thats why this dude is utterly bullshit on any angles.He always wants to ruin the reputation of Bitcoin but he will always fail because Bitcoin is well established and too strong for false news and controversies.
And now he do said recently about not calling Bitcoin as BTC? He do just like trolling anywhere and none of the community would take this dude seriously.
All he had to do was sign the early private keys and he failed to. Of course there is speculation that Dave had those keys and they are lost. CSW was definitely around those early bitcoin guys but if he really had a role in the creation remains to be seen. I'll admit that I do sometimes watch his Youtube videos though.
I never believed he was the real Satoshi. I don't understand why he's doing this. We really should not pay attention to it, because the more it will be discussed, the more he will try.
If Craight wright can activate satoshi account in this forum, there may be many who will admit that he is the real satoshi.. this will be something very interesting
This can't be strong evidence, many bitcoin fans don't use this forum. If CSW could activate Satoshi account then they might think he has working with this forum administrator. it's possible if CWS agreed to pay a mountain of money and make Theymos tempted. But Theymos won't do that anyway, it will just make this forum reputation bad. And if he is the real, I think he doesn't need to wait for a long time to prove himself as the real one.
Why he needs to wait until now if he can sign in to the wallet from a long time ago, besides that, it doesn't make sense if he cannot sign in into his own wallet address if he is the real of Satoshi Nakamoto.
In our generational history, we do get to see such controversial characters who try to forcefully get followers by peddling lies and working on their psychology. I hope time will show that wright is nothing more than a confusionist". If he's tired of cryptocurrency, he should get something else and peacefully walk away.
Copyright, Craig this Craig are just page fillers.
At the end of the day what matters is technology.
BSV defs are of the opinion massive blocks and light speeds is the way forward.
BTC defs are of the opinion floppy disc size blocks in conjunction with hoppy computers (dinky-toy raspberry pi) is the way to go.
WiFi is on its last legs and its time of usefulness is limited.
Light speed communication is a proven technologies for year, not mainstream as of now. Li-Fi (light fidelity) is hundreds of times faster than WiFi and tens of times cheaper. It does not go through walls which is good from a hacking point and bad as signal is lost going to next room unless it has data transmitting led also.
On the BSV Scaling Testnet (STN) a 1.42 GB block has been mined, in stark contrast to the regular 1.4 MB on BTC
Investing in technology https://www.agora.icu/
At the end of the day what matters is technology.
BSV defs are of the opinion massive blocks and light speeds is the way forward.
BTC defs are of the opinion floppy disc size blocks in conjunction with hoppy computers (dinky-toy raspberry pi) is the way to go.
WiFi is on its last legs and its time of usefulness is limited.
Light speed communication is a proven technologies for year, not mainstream as of now. Li-Fi (light fidelity) is hundreds of times faster than WiFi and tens of times cheaper. It does not go through walls which is good from a hacking point and bad as signal is lost going to next room unless it has data transmitting led also.
On the BSV Scaling Testnet (STN) a 1.42 GB block has been mined, in stark contrast to the regular 1.4 MB on BTC
Investing in technology https://www.agora.icu/
The Modern Investor has produced a good video with links in the description pointing out the many inconsistencies of Craig Steven Wright. The recent copyright registration of the bitcoin whitepaper, as he points out, could have been done by anyone. Here is the clip:
It is true that anyone could file a copyright for codes and if there are many people with the same filing i am sure it will reach the court and the court will have the final verdict, Craig was a smart person but there are many inconsistencies in what ever he says when it comes to his claims as the creator of bitcoin, majority of this proofs were made up shit and now he is playing with the court system, i wonder how things will end. 
If Craight wright can activate satoshi account in this forum, there may be many who will admit that he is the real satoshi.. this will be something very interesting
Satoshi's account is locked, all it takes to activate is a signed message to theymos.
The man is really confuse about his life and what he should do because I don't think he really think straight by doing all these nonsense he is into .
Having a copyright will not stop the fact that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto and only a signature signing in just one block can solve all these nonsense he is doing .
I just do know what those who follow him think by supporting a fraud man who claim what is not his.
Having a copyright will not stop the fact that he is not Satoshi Nakamoto and only a signature signing in just one block can solve all these nonsense he is doing .
I just do know what those who follow him think by supporting a fraud man who claim what is not his.
If Craight wright can activate satoshi account in this forum, there may be many who will admit that he is the real satoshi.. this will be something very interesting
This can't be strong evidence, many bitcoin fans don't use this forum. If CSW could activate Satoshi account then they might think he has working with this forum administrator. it's possible if CWS agreed to pay a mountain of money and make Theymos tempted. But Theymos won't do that anyway, it will just make this forum reputation bad. 
A confirmed false prophet, and a confirmed impostor, where he is taking the guts to do this, is it because he has a coin to hype and he needs a lot of money to satisfy his greed, why people keep supporting his Bitcoin version, people and exchange should unite and end his madness.
Obviously, we all know that Craig Wright is a false prophet and claiming the bitcoin whitepaper is anyther step of him to really tell everyone that he is Satoshi. But nah, we all know he is not Satoshi, and this dick ass move doesn't prove anything. I agree that anyone can claim the whitepaper, but without signing any of the supposedly addresses of Satoshi, this has zero credibility. Again, he literally shoot his feet with this claims and the more he really try hard, the more fraudster he looks like.
Jump to: