I will be ready here to watch how the drama unfolds...
Topic: Craig Steven Wright - Satoshi, MtGox Hacker or just a fraud ? - page 2. (Read 599 times)
February 08, 2020, 01:31:44 PM
The guy is definitely a fraud. He thought he could fool everyone until blockchain forensics became a thing. Well, he is still fooling a handful of people and I cannot wait for the bsv shills to defend him here now. I hope they do
I will be ready here to watch how the drama unfolds...
I will be ready here to watch how the drama unfolds...
February 08, 2020, 10:50:00 AM
I gotta admit, Craig's my favourite villain among all existing crypto bullshitters right now. His legacy won't last long though especially with current lawsuits going on
he is not satoshi
he is not a hacker
he does not own any funds of stash 2009-2010(satoshi)
he does not own any funds of other stashes 2011-2013(mtgox/others)
no hacking occured. no private key is owned
all he done was grabbed publicly available information the PUBLIC ADDRESSES. and PRETENDED they were of importance and pretended they were his.
he just made a text file of PUBLIC ADDRESSES and told a naive second party that they were security keys attached and to notorise the PUBLIC addresses as collateral to then scam the aussie tax office and then rescam private investors.
right now he is trying to patent and case law create proof of something to then try selling these patents and his 'story'(book deal) to repay debts.
he is a scammer doing scam after scam pretty much a 'rob peter to pay paul' to scam person after person to scam scam scam.
he has no collateral originating as his own. its all scam and trickery to syphon money from investors and try repaying bits out to try keeping them calm and prolong it as long as possible
...
the latest legal stuff about the tulip collateral. is just delaying it by holding it up in court. so that the 'statue of limitations' runs out so that the aussie government can no longer chase after him because of a time limit
ira klieman and wright are not enemies. they are frenemies(freinds pretending to be enemies) just trying to keep the collaterals status of ownership in question so that australian cant do anything. then when the statue of limitation elapses. craig will pay his friend some money as a thank you for playing his game..
only issue is craig has leaped passed just civil limitations and is stepping foot into criminal actions.. meaning he can still get in alot of trouble.. but hey.. thats future drama
he is not a hacker
he does not own any funds of stash 2009-2010(satoshi)
he does not own any funds of other stashes 2011-2013(mtgox/others)
no hacking occured. no private key is owned
all he done was grabbed publicly available information the PUBLIC ADDRESSES. and PRETENDED they were of importance and pretended they were his.
he just made a text file of PUBLIC ADDRESSES and told a naive second party that they were security keys attached and to notorise the PUBLIC addresses as collateral to then scam the aussie tax office and then rescam private investors.
right now he is trying to patent and case law create proof of something to then try selling these patents and his 'story'(book deal) to repay debts.
he is a scammer doing scam after scam pretty much a 'rob peter to pay paul' to scam person after person to scam scam scam.
he has no collateral originating as his own. its all scam and trickery to syphon money from investors and try repaying bits out to try keeping them calm and prolong it as long as possible
...
the latest legal stuff about the tulip collateral. is just delaying it by holding it up in court. so that the 'statue of limitations' runs out so that the aussie government can no longer chase after him because of a time limit
ira klieman and wright are not enemies. they are frenemies(freinds pretending to be enemies) just trying to keep the collaterals status of ownership in question so that australian cant do anything. then when the statue of limitation elapses. craig will pay his friend some money as a thank you for playing his game..
only issue is craig has leaped passed just civil limitations and is stepping foot into criminal actions.. meaning he can still get in alot of trouble.. but hey.. thats future drama
I agree with your opinion. They have a few options that are not subject to statute of limitations:
https://www.cdpp.gov.au/crimes-we-prosecute/fraud/tax-fraud
Wasnt there somebody creating magic the gathering type cards like these of forum members?
Could of sworn there was a post here about it but dont have the stamina to go through the 100s of pages to find it right now.
Hahahaha that is so him !
Just look at the answer to his security question that he posted in the court documents.
It's funny how he's literally covering himself with shit and the more shit he puts on himself, the deeper he gets buried inside the ground.
Everything is just full of lies, but remember these are documents he's sending IN COURT. This will bury him deeper than his own imagination could ever conceive. Lying in court is not a funny thing to do.
Now that he's linked himself to one of the theft addresses, let the fun begin because the court will surely hear of it too. Send this to a few Crypto news websites and it'll hit the headlines in no time. I'm waiting for BShitV supporters to come outside their little cages with some more stupid excuses... come on, 3rd of February has passed already. Where are the keys?
Everything is just full of lies, but remember these are documents he's sending IN COURT. This will bury him deeper than his own imagination could ever conceive. Lying in court is not a funny thing to do.
Now that he's linked himself to one of the theft addresses, let the fun begin because the court will surely hear of it too. Send this to a few Crypto news websites and it'll hit the headlines in no time. I'm waiting for BShitV supporters to come outside their little cages with some more stupid excuses... come on, 3rd of February has passed already. Where are the keys?
CSW is neither. He just wanted to take the fame, use it for his (dis)advantage and fool people and the government for money and profit.
Even I can say that I control the richest address in bitcoin, write a sworn statement in presence of my lawyer even without proving that I control the said address. He has given himself too many loopholes that it's hard to keep the facts in check and he sometimes say lapses on some of his interviews. The man can't even hold himself off on a tight argument against Roger Ver regarding technicalities of bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash prior to the split of Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV.
Conclusion: CSW only wants attention, and that's it. He got that, and he's going to jail just because of that.
Even I can say that I control the richest address in bitcoin, write a sworn statement in presence of my lawyer even without proving that I control the said address. He has given himself too many loopholes that it's hard to keep the facts in check and he sometimes say lapses on some of his interviews. The man can't even hold himself off on a tight argument against Roger Ver regarding technicalities of bitcoin and Bitcoin Cash prior to the split of Bitcoin Cash and Bitcoin SV.
Conclusion: CSW only wants attention, and that's it. He got that, and he's going to jail just because of that.
Snip
Haven't seen anyone mention this before, nice find. To answer your question, Craig is neither. He is a pathological who keeps digging a deeper hole for himself.
Wasnt there somebody creating magic the gathering type cards like these of forum members?
Could of sworn there was a post here about it but dont have the stamina to go through the 100s of pages to find it right now.
This is a nice find. This will put Craig Wright in an unpleasant situation. Randomly picking BTC address that has a huge amount on it will probably backfire on him. It seems he does not do his own research about those random addresses he picked. I thought this case is getting old but this recent event make it more interesting. I wonder how he will react on this one, once this issue regarding owning the BTC address that holds the stolen BTC of Mt. Gox becomes the new focus of the investigation.
Craig is a fraud. This is true. There was still no evidence that Craig was Satoshi.
he is not satoshi
he is not a hacker
he does not own any funds of stash 2009-2010(satoshi)
he does not own any funds of other stashes 2011-2013(mtgox/others)
no hacking occured. no private key is owned
all he done was grabbed publicly available information the PUBLIC ADDRESSES. and PRETENDED they were of importance and pretended they were his.
he just made a text file of PUBLIC ADDRESSES and told a naive second party that they were security keys attached and to notorise the PUBLIC addresses as collateral to then scam the aussie tax office and then rescam private investors.
right now he is trying to patent and case law create proof of something to then try selling these patents and his 'story'(book deal) to repay debts.
he is a scammer doing scam after scam pretty much a 'rob peter to pay paul' to scam person after person to scam scam scam.
he has no collateral originating as his own. its all scam and trickery to syphon money from investors and try repaying bits out to try keeping them calm and prolong it as long as possible
...
the latest legal stuff about the tulip collateral. is just delaying it by holding it up in court. so that the 'statue of limitations' runs out so that the aussie government can no longer chase after him because of a time limit
ira klieman and wright are not enemies. they are frenemies(freinds pretending to be enemies) just trying to keep the collaterals status of ownership in question so that australian cant do anything. then when the statue of limitation elapses. craig will pay his friend some money as a thank you for playing his game..
only issue is craig has leaped passed just civil limitations and is stepping foot into criminal actions.. meaning he can still get in alot of trouble.. but hey.. thats future drama
he is not a hacker
he does not own any funds of stash 2009-2010(satoshi)
he does not own any funds of other stashes 2011-2013(mtgox/others)
no hacking occured. no private key is owned
all he done was grabbed publicly available information the PUBLIC ADDRESSES. and PRETENDED they were of importance and pretended they were his.
he just made a text file of PUBLIC ADDRESSES and told a naive second party that they were security keys attached and to notorise the PUBLIC addresses as collateral to then scam the aussie tax office and then rescam private investors.
right now he is trying to patent and case law create proof of something to then try selling these patents and his 'story'(book deal) to repay debts.
he is a scammer doing scam after scam pretty much a 'rob peter to pay paul' to scam person after person to scam scam scam.
he has no collateral originating as his own. its all scam and trickery to syphon money from investors and try repaying bits out to try keeping them calm and prolong it as long as possible
...
the latest legal stuff about the tulip collateral. is just delaying it by holding it up in court. so that the 'statue of limitations' runs out so that the aussie government can no longer chase after him because of a time limit
ira klieman and wright are not enemies. they are frenemies(freinds pretending to be enemies) just trying to keep the collaterals status of ownership in question so that australian cant do anything. then when the statue of limitation elapses. craig will pay his friend some money as a thank you for playing his game..
only issue is craig has leaped passed just civil limitations and is stepping foot into criminal actions.. meaning he can still get in alot of trouble.. but hey.. thats future drama
In his attempt to claim he is Satoshi - Craig Wright has made claims in court filings that he owns certain Bitcoin addresses. This was before blockchain forensics was common.
In one of his claims in 2013 he claims to own the bitcoin address that contains the bitcoins from the first MtGox hack in 2011 ended up in.
He used the bitcoins from that wallet as collateral for his business.
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/05/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-2.html
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/07/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-3.html
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/08/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-4.html#more
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/08/kleiman-v-wright-part-5.html
He claimed to own the following addresses that were actually owned by MtGox. He used the funds held in some of the addresses as collateral in transactions for his businesses until the Australian Tax Office shut him down.
Court document can be seen here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4462663-24-4.html#document/p5/a423127
1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a: MtGox user
1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF: first major MtGox theft receiving address
18JPragfuDVHWWG8ABQ15cghJFetnXUjBD: MtGox user
1F34duy2eeMz5mSrvFepVzy7Y1rBsnAyWC: from MyBitcoin.com
1HtTw9zR9wWFfgV8Jy8MqsaeVi7ZXrjdq6: part of a long chain of transactions that send minor amounts into a BTC-e deposit address
12fZ2HxkLjG9zn1u44XYsFFYKHM4A2zCea: MtGox user
16Ls6azc76ixc9Ny7AB5ZPPq6oiEL9XwXy: MtGox cold storage
12HddUDLhRP2F8JjpKYeKaDxxt5wUvx5nq: MtGox cold storage
1P3S1grZYmcqYDuaEDVDYobJ5Fx85E9fE9: MtGox cold storage
1MyGwFAJjVtB5rGJa32M6Yh46cGirUta1K: MtGox cold storage
1A6SDef1TJAM8Saw2SqmqFGhkWR1y3qMx2: MtGox deposit address
16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT: MtGox user
Wizsec was in the unique position that he was given access to the databases of MtGox by Mark Karpeles after the collapse.
If Craig Steven Wright really controlled 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF as certified by his lawyer and presented in the Supreme Court of New South Wales then he would be the hacker involved in the first major MtGox theft.
Court document can be seen here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4462663-24-4.html#document/p5/a423127
From chatlog beween mccaleb and Karpeles used in evidence in the court documents against mccaleb:
[3/3/2011 7:45:26 AM] Mark Karpelès: I also located the bitcoin transaction causing all the bitcoins to disappear
[3/3/2011 7:45:34 AM] Mark Karpelès: in the wallet
[3/3/2011 7:45:45 AM] Jed McCaleb: which was it?
[3/3/2011 7:45:57 AM] Mark Karpelès: http://blockexplorer.com/tx/e67a0550848b7932d7796aeea16ab0e48a5cfe81c4e8cca2c5b03e0416850114
https://courts.ms.gov/appellatecourts/docket/sendPDF.php?f=dc00001_live.SCT.17.M.1681.102741.5.pdf&c=87490&a=N&s=2
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/e67a0550848b7932d7796aeea16ab0e48a5cfe81c4e8cca2c5b03e0416850114
So to recap:
1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF received the coins from MTGox when it was hacked in 2011
A sworn statement by Craig Wrights lawyer from 2013 that Craig Wright showed him on his phone that he controlled 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF presented by Craig Wright to the Supreme Court of New South Wales as proof that it was used as collateral for his business
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4462663-24-4.html#document/p5/a423127
https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1196794848852037632
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF
In one of his claims in 2013 he claims to own the bitcoin address that contains the bitcoins from the first MtGox hack in 2011 ended up in.
He used the bitcoins from that wallet as collateral for his business.
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2018/02/kleiman-v-craig-wright-bitcoins.html
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/05/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-2.html
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/07/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-3.html
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/08/kleiman-v-craig-wright-part-4.html#more
https://blog.wizsec.jp/2019/08/kleiman-v-wright-part-5.html
He claimed to own the following addresses that were actually owned by MtGox. He used the funds held in some of the addresses as collateral in transactions for his businesses until the Australian Tax Office shut him down.
Court document can be seen here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4462663-24-4.html#document/p5/a423127
1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a: MtGox user
1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF: first major MtGox theft receiving address
18JPragfuDVHWWG8ABQ15cghJFetnXUjBD: MtGox user
1F34duy2eeMz5mSrvFepVzy7Y1rBsnAyWC: from MyBitcoin.com
1HtTw9zR9wWFfgV8Jy8MqsaeVi7ZXrjdq6: part of a long chain of transactions that send minor amounts into a BTC-e deposit address
12fZ2HxkLjG9zn1u44XYsFFYKHM4A2zCea: MtGox user
16Ls6azc76ixc9Ny7AB5ZPPq6oiEL9XwXy: MtGox cold storage
12HddUDLhRP2F8JjpKYeKaDxxt5wUvx5nq: MtGox cold storage
1P3S1grZYmcqYDuaEDVDYobJ5Fx85E9fE9: MtGox cold storage
1MyGwFAJjVtB5rGJa32M6Yh46cGirUta1K: MtGox cold storage
1A6SDef1TJAM8Saw2SqmqFGhkWR1y3qMx2: MtGox deposit address
16cou7Ht6WjTzuFyDBnht9hmvXytg6XdVT: MtGox user
Wizsec was in the unique position that he was given access to the databases of MtGox by Mark Karpeles after the collapse.
If Craig Steven Wright really controlled 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF as certified by his lawyer and presented in the Supreme Court of New South Wales then he would be the hacker involved in the first major MtGox theft.
Court document can be seen here:
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4462663-24-4.html#document/p5/a423127
From chatlog beween mccaleb and Karpeles used in evidence in the court documents against mccaleb:
[3/3/2011 7:45:26 AM] Mark Karpelès: I also located the bitcoin transaction causing all the bitcoins to disappear
[3/3/2011 7:45:34 AM] Mark Karpelès: in the wallet
[3/3/2011 7:45:45 AM] Jed McCaleb: which was it?
[3/3/2011 7:45:57 AM] Mark Karpelès: http://blockexplorer.com/tx/e67a0550848b7932d7796aeea16ab0e48a5cfe81c4e8cca2c5b03e0416850114
https://courts.ms.gov/appellatecourts/docket/sendPDF.php?f=dc00001_live.SCT.17.M.1681.102741.5.pdf&c=87490&a=N&s=2
https://www.blockchain.com/btc/tx/e67a0550848b7932d7796aeea16ab0e48a5cfe81c4e8cca2c5b03e0416850114
So to recap:
1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF received the coins from MTGox when it was hacked in 2011
A sworn statement by Craig Wrights lawyer from 2013 that Craig Wright showed him on his phone that he controlled 1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF presented by Craig Wright to the Supreme Court of New South Wales as proof that it was used as collateral for his business
https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4462663-24-4.html#document/p5/a423127
https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1196794848852037632
https://bitinfocharts.com/bitcoin/address/1FeexV6bAHb8ybZjqQMjJrcCrHGW9sb6uF
Jump to: