Topic: Craig wright claims as satoshi? (Read 1896 times)
I would believe Craig is Batman, before I would believe he is satoshi.
why are we even still arguing about this!
it is very simple. if you go to the bank and want to close your account for example they will ask you some identification, you can't tell the bank clerk i am me and you have to take my word for it, or say i showed my ID to some random guy and he approved i am me! you have to show proper identification to the bank clerk.
in bitcoin this is simple and verifiable by everyone and it is called signing a message with the private key, and it can not be forged like regular IDs.
All Satoshi would need to do is prove that he mined block zero (this would show that he accessed Bitcoin before anyone else and therefore was Satoshi). It's pretty easy and Wright could just do it but he claims to have to "jump through hoops" to verify his identity.it is very simple. if you go to the bank and want to close your account for example they will ask you some identification, you can't tell the bank clerk i am me and you have to take my word for it, or say i showed my ID to some random guy and he approved i am me! you have to show proper identification to the bank clerk.
in bitcoin this is simple and verifiable by everyone and it is called signing a message with the private key, and it can not be forged like regular IDs.
Satoshi is better off as pseudonymous. He doesn't need the attention.
why are we even still arguing about this!
it is very simple. if you go to the bank and want to close your account for example they will ask you some identification, you can't tell the bank clerk i am me and you have to take my word for it, or say i showed my ID to some random guy and he approved i am me! you have to show proper identification to the bank clerk.
in bitcoin this is simple and verifiable by everyone and it is called signing a message with the private key, and it can not be forged like regular IDs.
it is very simple. if you go to the bank and want to close your account for example they will ask you some identification, you can't tell the bank clerk i am me and you have to take my word for it, or say i showed my ID to some random guy and he approved i am me! you have to show proper identification to the bank clerk.
in bitcoin this is simple and verifiable by everyone and it is called signing a message with the private key, and it can not be forged like regular IDs.
so far widely circulated claiming to be the inventor and actors satoshi bitcoin history,
although some of them are not able to show proof of facts in favor of the discovery of bitcoin.
although some of them are not able to show proof of facts in favor of the discovery of bitcoin.
Wow, this is old news.
It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.
and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.
It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.
and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.
You're right. Unless the government support new technology and idea, he shouldn't reveal himself until he is more comfortable. Bitcoin is doing well for the past few years without a "founder" but a "foundation"*. Bitcoin will continue to do well in the coming years. So, if you are not comfortable to reveal yourself, we understand you, Satoshi Nakamoto.
* does not mean Bitcoin will turns back if the founder reveal his real identity though. Maybe it will makes Bitcoin and Crypto technology better - for example, his government accept his invention and put in a lot of investment into it.
(for easier reference, I am referring to Satoshi Nakamoto as Male in this post).
Wow, this is old news.
It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.
and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.
Yeah it's an long back news. Often someone claim themselves as Satoshi. It doesn't make an impact upon the price or any structured progressing of bitcoin. As the identity is still unknown, people to be popular use his name as the innovation is something which is gonna make lot changes. It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.
and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.
Wow, this is old news.
It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.
and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.
It doesn't really matter who satoshi is, it's best if no one knows because bitcoin is better without a leader.
and if the government knows who satoshi is he might be in trouble.
Anyone that is expert on computers and technology or even people who only have knowledge can proclaim as satoshi nakamoto since satoshi nakamoto is still anonymous to the users and bitcoin enthusiast.Everyone can claim that they are him and claim that bitcoin network is made by him but the true lies behind,
Craig Wright has lost all credibility with his claims.
If he really was Satoshi and wanted to convince the world, it would have been easy for him to do so. Unfortunately, he only tried fooling a few journalists.
If he really was Satoshi and wanted to convince the world, it would have been easy for him to do so. Unfortunately, he only tried fooling a few journalists.
I think Craig was probably friendly with or knows who satoshi is. That being said I dont think that he himself is satoshi.
Anyone can claim anything. Does not proof anything.
Craig is not Satoshi.
I am.
I am.
I think the guy is a troll. It's hard to believe he has been naive to believe that people wouldn't disprove what he said.
god. it is right there and wright has you all not even checking.
I think the guy is a troll. It's hard to believe he has been naive to believe that people wouldn't disprove what he said.
yea
all of you who believed the story he wanted you to.
http://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/R?RN=384570219
it is all searchable
wright tryed to hide it and made us think it bs
but it is there
he got all the ppl thinking it lies so not a one now check
he make us all think not satoshi and we just not think and just dismiss
all of you who believed the story he wanted you to.
http://researchoutput.csu.edu.au/R?RN=384570219
it is all searchable
wright tryed to hide it and made us think it bs
but it is there
he got all the ppl thinking it lies so not a one now check
he make us all think not satoshi and we just not think and just dismiss
*** A real computer scientist would not give a shit. ***
satoshi was not a normal computer scientist h
he was a generalist.
ecominiocs
statistics
law
computer science.
Wright is tring to hide it and make ppl think he is not, but wrights PhD is in the uni library. so, they say no wright but ti is listed there
wright is in newcastle as a post grad stats - same wright
wright is in northumbria as postgrad law - same wright
U London has wright but cannot find details and nobody talks....
wright taught computer science...
i think wright is just trying to make us ignore him
satoshi was not a normal computer scientist h
he was a generalist.
ecominiocs
statistics
law
computer science.
Wright is tring to hide it and make ppl think he is not, but wrights PhD is in the uni library. so, they say no wright but ti is listed there
wright is in newcastle as a post grad stats - same wright
wright is in northumbria as postgrad law - same wright
U London has wright but cannot find details and nobody talks....
wright taught computer science...
i think wright is just trying to make us ignore him
And some bamboozled
It even defies common sense for Craig Wright to be claiming he is Satoshi because how on earth will someone who claims to have invented this technology leave it open,
it make perfect sense
you mazke it open but you own a shiteload
people use it
your horde goes up
if you have a patent, it is not used as much
it less valuable
so wright got us all using and now wants to exploit
*** A real computer scientist would not give a shit. ***
satoshi was not a normal computer scientist h
he was a generalist.
ecominiocs
statistics
law
computer science.
Wright is tring to hide it and make ppl think he is not, but wrights PhD is in the uni library. so, they say no wright but ti is listed there
wright is in newcastle as a post grad stats - same wright
wright is in northumbria as postgrad law - same wright
U London has wright but cannot find details and nobody talks....
wright taught computer science...
i think wright is just trying to make us ignore him
satoshi was not a normal computer scientist h
he was a generalist.
ecominiocs
statistics
law
computer science.
Wright is tring to hide it and make ppl think he is not, but wrights PhD is in the uni library. so, they say no wright but ti is listed there
wright is in newcastle as a post grad stats - same wright
wright is in northumbria as postgrad law - same wright
U London has wright but cannot find details and nobody talks....
wright taught computer science...
i think wright is just trying to make us ignore him
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=nChain&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=ncip&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=eitc&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date
3 7 73
that is 83 now that i can find
seeing how wright and ayre operate
maybe more?
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=ncip&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date
https://www.ipo.gov.uk/types/patent/p-os/p-journal/p-pj?startYear=2013&startMonth=June&startDay=26th+-+6475&endYear=2017&endMonth=March&endDay=8th+-+6668&filter=eitc&perPage=100&sort=Publication+Date
3 7 73
that is 83 now that i can find
seeing how wright and ayre operate
maybe more?
It even defies common sense for Craig Wright to be claiming he is Satoshi because how on earth will someone who claims to have invented this technology leave it open, only after some years when you now see the potentials then come back to start fighting over it. Then it means you never believe in the project from the beginning and even though you invented it which is even not ascertained, then you dont deserve any credit for it.
If Craig is Satochi, why even bother with patent when one owe 40% of the coins around ?
That logic elude me.
A real computer scientist would not give a shit.
Theo Chino
Fighting the New York Man on Thursday http://www.article78againstNYDFS.com (Tipping gladly accepted)
I agree with you ..but this is my only real 'black swan' once in a generation shot at hitting something venture capital wise
so OF COURSE THE ASIC/btc GODS shall smite me!!!!!! aragh.....
of course craig wright the 'twit' would be satoshi we would find out on a trust on jan 1st 2020 and he would flush 15-20% of all BTC just
to watch btc open source universe burn..because the majority of us mocked him as satoshi ..live on the patent money....be big man like trump
in a little man manner....argh!
don't really believe it but it gives me the shudders even thinking about it
..(grrr.....must man up..its just a fable..btc boogeyman is not real) Jump to: