Topic: Craig Wright is once again claiming he's Satoshi - page 2. (Read 507 times)
After wikileaks he is very quiet, do we need to say something, or we already know that he is just using Satoshi brand for his own benefit? I think that we will never find out who is really Satoshi. Craig gone too far in his pretending and I`m afraid that he is not the only one that is doing that, he is just the most familiar one. Old members here, and oldtimers in crytpo knows that Craig is just a silly guy that wish to take a throne, but newcomers don`t know that, and they can get hook in his web of lies. Don`t trust in people pretending to be Satoshi.
I also can easily say that I'm real Satoshi but I won't because it's very dangerous if anyone think it's not just a joke. LOL. If anyone believe in my joke so they'll think that I'm holding big amount of BTC then they'll find out the way to steal it from me even they can kill me. LOL. It's very stupid when you let anyone know the real you. But if Craig wanna make everyone believe that he really is Satoshi so he just need to sign in Satoshi account in this forum and admit it.
I personally think Craigh Wright’s connection to bitcoin is a very cumbersome one. Research shows that sometimes 2015, Wired and Gizmodo announced within hours of each other that the then-obscure Aussie was likely Satoshi Nakamoto.
Nevertheless, subsequent interrogation has seen it may all have been a detailed joke. In spring 2016, Wright brazenly came out as Satoshi, but quickly begged off providing conclusive proof that he was the creator of bitcoin, writing on his website, “I know now that I am not strong enough for this.People in the crypto environment saw him as a impostor|fake, and somewhere along the way he got the nickname Faketoshi.
It hasn’t helped Wright’s status that he has extremely high self-regard and, when challenged, has been known to elopesed 4w the handle.
Nevertheless, subsequent interrogation has seen it may all have been a detailed joke. In spring 2016, Wright brazenly came out as Satoshi, but quickly begged off providing conclusive proof that he was the creator of bitcoin, writing on his website, “I know now that I am not strong enough for this.People in the crypto environment saw him as a impostor|fake, and somewhere along the way he got the nickname Faketoshi.
It hasn’t helped Wright’s status that he has extremely high self-regard and, when challenged, has been known to elopesed 4w the handle.
He who must say he is king is no king. As already mentioned by many people, there are several ways he can prove he is satoshi. He obviously have lots of bitcoins, how hard is it to transfer to one of "his" original accounts if he truly is who he say he is. Thing is, he can't.
This is all a publicity stunt, one which I have no idea what the end goal is. It's not like he's gonna fool some rich investor.
This is all a publicity stunt, one which I have no idea what the end goal is. It's not like he's gonna fool some rich investor.
This could be a just a joke or something to stir the public of nonsense claim or could as realistic as it gets. The question that we might be asking next is why did he came out to claim it? Was it about for personal fame or conflicting interest on the ownership? or Was it to serve justice or explanation to his invention as people are really now doing scams riding the popularity of cryptocurrency being started by bitcoin? We would not know unless he could tell everybody about it starting from the very beginning with accuracy and detail.
I might be a little out of the loop on this one but I think it's related to his 'tulip trust'.
He gathered a bunch of public keys and sold it as a trust. I think he's even getting sued for this.
This could be a just a joke or something to stir the public of nonsense claim or could as realistic as it gets. The question that we might be asking next is why did he came out to claim it? Was it about for personal fame or conflicting interest on the ownership? or Was it to serve justice or explanation to his invention as people are really now doing scams riding the popularity of cryptocurrency being started by bitcoin? We would not know unless he could tell everybody about it starting from the very beginning with accuracy and detail.
Ignore the clone of cryptocurrency A.K.A Craig Wright ( Fake Toshi ). Several article was really expose how Craig Wright manipulation of the data he edited by himself and try to claim Satoshi.
Yes right, I also read in the article that Craig Wright made and compiled his own fake documents to claim that he was Satoshi, but it seemed that the public was very angry with FakeToshi's behavior, hopefully he would get the awareness to stop claiming to be Satoshi. 
If satoshi will reveal himself, he will probably create a thread here since his/her account is still existing in bitcointalk and I think those people who claim as satoshi are being paid to make a propaganda. Why would satoshi reveal himself? He's a millionaire now and sleeping on a castle, why would he bring himself down just to make this statements.
I also wanted to know it from theymos 'cause i think they know each other or maybe themos know how to contact satoshi. CW is super fake and i hope there's a statement from the higher ups because there's a lot of people thinks he is satoshi now.
I also wanted to know it from theymos 'cause i think they know each other or maybe themos know how to contact satoshi. CW is super fake and i hope there's a statement from the higher ups because there's a lot of people thinks he is satoshi now.
Ignore the clone of cryptocurrency A.K.A Craig Wright ( Fake Toshi ). Several article was really expose how Craig Wright manipulation of the data he edited by himself and try to claim Satoshi.
He has a following that deems every one of these articles as fake and an attempt to make him look bad. I'm not sure how CSW managed to get such a loyal but at the same time delusional following, but he knows how to play this game.I saw his recent chat with Ran Neuner from CNBC trader, and the way he threatened to end the live stream was just silly. I really thought he would have taken care of difficult questions more appropriately, but it seems that he's exhausted.
Pretending to be Satoshi and constantly repeating the same nonsense must be tiresome.
Quote
do not trust
verify
verify
He doesn't have to claim anything. There's one thing he can do and it will prove beyond any doubt that he is the founder, but we and him know that he can't do it because he doesn't have access to founder's coins, hence he's not who he claims to be. Craig is running out of money and he's trying to earn some on popularity. If he could somehow make the world believe that he is Satoshi he could become a celebrity. People would pay big money to have him on their tv shows, podcasts, youtube interviews, and so on.
He was one of the first people involved and this confuses many people, because he knows some details and his name appears here and there. Fortunately for the whole crypto community, he's not the one.
He was one of the first people involved and this confuses many people, because he knows some details and his name appears here and there. Fortunately for the whole crypto community, he's not the one.
Ignore the clone of cryptocurrency A.K.A Craig Wright ( Fake Toshi ). Several article was really expose how Craig Wright manipulation of the data he edited by himself and try to claim Satoshi.
I'll probably believe if he logs in to satoshi's bitcointalk account and proves it by signing a message.
I believe Theymos has locked the account which Satoshi used after the hack that happened a few years back.Otherwise, if no further evidence and proof shown we all knew that CW is just playing around and just having fun to mislead people faking everyone that he's the real Satoshi Nakamoto. There's no lead on who really is the real one.
I dont get it. Why is he forcing this idea? Is he really that much crazy to claim it? His imagination is way to far than a normal person. 
Does he really want to go to jail?
Because that is where he will go if proven he is really Satoshi Nakamoto. (which I doubt highly to happen)
I never followed this guy and I just found out about his name in this forum.
Why dont he move a single bitcoin in Satoshi's stash then maybe it will be the time that people will believe.
I don't know what is the problem with this guy but he must have shown something that could prove his claim.Does he really want to go to jail?
Because that is where he will go if proven he is really Satoshi Nakamoto. (which I doubt highly to happen)
I never followed this guy and I just found out about his name in this forum.
Why dont he move a single bitcoin in Satoshi's stash then maybe it will be the time that people will believe.
If he is really a part of it then why he can't touch the Satoshi's wallet address and start moving some Bitcoin?
Maybe this guy wants something that he likes to be the center of attraction.
This guy is a true psycho. He lies constantly and he went to some crap college that no one has heard to get some useless degrees because he thought that would make himself more credible. all he had to do was send a single coin from one of those early addresses but he obviously can't.
How we could all say that we are Satoshi, dont we. I mean we can love him or hate him but every once a while someone is saying he is or he saw him/her there. This is for me really stupid to say but is he normal or want some additional popularity.
I dont get it. Why is he forcing this idea? Is he really that much crazy to claim it? His imagination is way to far than a normal person.
Does he really want to go to jail?
Because that is where he will go if proven he is really Satoshi Nakamoto. (which I doubt highly to happen)
I never followed this guy and I just found out about his name in this forum.
Why dont he move a single bitcoin in Satoshi's stash then maybe it will be the time that people will believe.
Does he really want to go to jail?
Because that is where he will go if proven he is really Satoshi Nakamoto. (which I doubt highly to happen)
I never followed this guy and I just found out about his name in this forum.
Why dont he move a single bitcoin in Satoshi's stash then maybe it will be the time that people will believe.
Again? he never stops with this claim.
I agree with this. Craig is a rich relentless jerk that knows some stuff and probably was in the narrow circle of early bitcoin enthusiasts, but not more than that. I don't think he's Satoshi, because his values don't seem to match the values of whoever Satoshi is. It should be noted, though, that Satoshi might be a group of people, and in that case Craig could be one of the members. Even is Craig and Satoshi are the same person, Craig is not Satoshi for me. Satoshi in that case is just dead to me, kind of like when Obi-Wan told Luke that his father was dead. IMO there is only 1 way to prove he is Satoshi, unlock one of
Satoshi's wallets and move some tokens to another wallet,
or simply sign a message from one of the wallets. why is this
nonsense continuing?
The wallets are public knowledge and so any movement can be
monitored and recorded
I'll probably believe if he logs in to satoshi's bitcointalk account and proves it by signing a message.Satoshi's wallets and move some tokens to another wallet,
or simply sign a message from one of the wallets. why is this
nonsense continuing?
The wallets are public knowledge and so any movement can be
monitored and recorded
I don't think its impossible to find out who real Satoshi is as long as he wants to come out, he doesn't really want to be known and wants to hide and I am sure he has his reasons as well. With him on the floor bitcoin would have shaped a lot differently, he created a "decentralized" coin just for this purpose and he will not tell who he is because that would take away the "decentralized" part of bitcoin and everyone would listen to what he has to say.
Nevertheless, if he ever wanted to come out and say who he is he can just prove us with many different ways (and wallets) who he is and just go on live television showing who he is. It wouldn't be impossible since technology to prove who he is can be proved and he has that chance. I just think we won't be capable of finding out who he is without him actually wanting it.
Nevertheless, if he ever wanted to come out and say who he is he can just prove us with many different ways (and wallets) who he is and just go on live television showing who he is. It wouldn't be impossible since technology to prove who he is can be proved and he has that chance. I just think we won't be capable of finding out who he is without him actually wanting it.
The man doesn't stop. I'm more inclined to believe that Hal Finney is Satoshi based on his in-depth understanding on the workings of bitcoin. While people are just asking for CW to move his funds from the known Satoshi addresses, he can't do it, and tries to circumvent the public attention into other reasons that he could be the real satoshi. Needless to say, he's just wasting the public and the media's time to feed his ego, and anyone shouldn't be listening to his claims anymore. A number of few reliable and easy ways to prove his identity is available on the bitcoin client he himself devised yet he won't use it. 
Jump to: