Congratulations to Craig Wright for suing someone he truly knew that Cobra wouldn’t fight back in court. Someone point him to these other sites that host the white paper.
https://squarecrypto.org/bitcoin.pdf
https://chaincode.com/bitcoin.pdf
https://paradigm.xyz/bitcoin.pdf
https://coincenter.org/bitcoin.pdf
https://novi.com/bitcoin-paper
https://nydig.com/research-and-insights/bitcoin-a-peer-to-peer-electronic-cash-system/
https://keys.casa/bitcoin.pdf
I believe if Elon Musk should do it as well.
Topic: Craig Wright is real Satoshi？ No way！ (Read 254 times)
It's too bad the fraudster won the case by default because the other person didn't appear. There should be a way to throw out the case for being absurd and not just give the decision to the person doing the deceitful/harmful thing.
How crazy is it that a compete fraudster got the court to force someone to take down a non-copyrighted document in the public domain that is the founding document of a free and open technology not controlled by anyone. Bizarro world right there.
How crazy is it that a compete fraudster got the court to force someone to take down a non-copyrighted document in the public domain that is the founding document of a free and open technology not controlled by anyone. Bizarro world right there.
I think this is a big joke，https://u.today/craig-wright-wins-bitcoin-copyright-lawsuit-against-pseudonymous-developer
Bitcoin.org, a prominent website that supports the development of the leading cryptocurrency, will have to remove all references to the Bitcoin white paper in the U.K. following the court’s decision.
Cobra, a pseudonymous Bitcoin developer behind the project, chose not to reveal his identity to defend himself in front of the court. Hence, a default judgement was given to Wright.
Apart from taking down the flagship cryptocurrency’s founding document, Cobra will also have to pay £35,000 ($48,655) in legal fees.
In January, lawyers representing nChain’s chief scientist demanded that Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org remove the white paper due to alleged copyright infringement.
Their letters sparked a major outcry within the cryptocurrency community, with companies and even governments moving to publish the copies of Bitcoin’s white paper on their websites in a rebuke to Wright.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I even think this thing is a means of BSV marketing.
If this thing is true, then it proves that bsv is the real Bitcoin，
Please log in your bitcointalk account，Then verify your identity, otherwise I won’t believe you are Satoshi！
Bitcoin.org, a prominent website that supports the development of the leading cryptocurrency, will have to remove all references to the Bitcoin white paper in the U.K. following the court’s decision.
Cobra, a pseudonymous Bitcoin developer behind the project, chose not to reveal his identity to defend himself in front of the court. Hence, a default judgement was given to Wright.
Apart from taking down the flagship cryptocurrency’s founding document, Cobra will also have to pay £35,000 ($48,655) in legal fees.
In January, lawyers representing nChain’s chief scientist demanded that Bitcoin.org and Bitcoincore.org remove the white paper due to alleged copyright infringement.
Their letters sparked a major outcry within the cryptocurrency community, with companies and even governments moving to publish the copies of Bitcoin’s white paper on their websites in a rebuke to Wright.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I even think this thing is a means of BSV marketing.
If this thing is true, then it proves that bsv is the real Bitcoin，
Please log in your bitcointalk account，Then verify your identity, otherwise I won’t believe you are Satoshi！
To hack or administrate BitcoinTalk account is the easiest thing to do. Unfortunately it won't prove who is Satoshi.
No one knows who Satoshi Nakamoto is, and perhaps the first person who came into contact with Bitcoin may not always know who Satoshi Nakamoto is. He is like a god, he is very powerful.
Please log in your bitcointalk account，Then verify your identity, otherwise I won’t believe you are Satoshi！
That's easy for satoshi but oops, he's not.I do not what it is worse, if China banning bitcoin mining and bitcoin trading or Craig Wright claiming rights on things he has nothing to do about. The guy is becoming a huge disturbance for the community and he does not give up. Still throwing petrol on the fire and trying to make himself recognized as satoshi.
If one thing is for sure, from what we have read and from what we know, satoshi was not such a crazy lunatic.
He surely is making a big ruckus in the community and he's been like that. I thought that there's already a case against him and he had to seriously face those cases filed against him. But with this and other negative news that came later, they're combining altogether that creates FUD to the market and in the community. He sure does not know when to stop and where is this going. I guess he's been living just for this and focusing on this matter. If one thing is for sure, from what we have read and from what we know, satoshi was not such a crazy lunatic.
This guy is just doing all these things because he knows very well that Satoshi Nakamoto and other Bitcoin developers are not ready to show their face in public, so that’s why he is just taking advantage of it to misbehave. This is so damn annoying because I thought that we have finally passed the Craig Wright story since I have stopped seeing stories about on this forum. I am surprised to see this one again.
This shows that this guy is not ready to give up until he finally learns the hard way. If he is claiming to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, why not just do something that will make everyone to believe, like signing the address that holds the Satoshi coins? And moreover , if he is the real Satoshi, then why did he abandon the project to create BSV?
This shows that this guy is not ready to give up until he finally learns the hard way. If he is claiming to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto, why not just do something that will make everyone to believe, like signing the address that holds the Satoshi coins? And moreover , if he is the real Satoshi, then why did he abandon the project to create BSV?
We've talked about this a hundred times, the answer is NO.
Exactly and for those noobs out there on reading up these things are big lies and shouldnt really be taken off seriously.This had been always a discussion and its been cleared out and CW had some stinky reputation here on crypto space and this is why it isnt surprising that anytime he do make out some claims and some dramas then it turns out that its been mostly ignored because
the community does know on whats the truth. I wont be surprised if this man would also commit some suicide once this guy would be insider prison.
I do not what it is worse, if China banning bitcoin mining and bitcoin trading or Craig Wright claiming rights on things he has nothing to do about. The guy is becoming a huge disturbance for the community and he does not give up. Still throwing petrol on the fire and trying to make himself recognized as satoshi.
If one thing is for sure, from what we have read and from what we know, satoshi was not such a crazy lunatic.
If one thing is for sure, from what we have read and from what we know, satoshi was not such a crazy lunatic.
Craig Wright is clearly not Satoshi, and it's pretty easy to see this. I asked Craig about bitcoin and smart contracts once and he told me that he built smart contracts in to bitcoin from day one. Pretty easy to fact check this one, and the answer is that smart contracts were not built in to bitcoin from day one. If Craig was satoshi then he should also be able to prove his website registrations which were done through companies who hold that private. What's stopping from him releasing that info? ( I am legitimately asking this question )
We've talked about this a hundred times, the answer is NO.
nobody in the thread nor the OP saying that he is. the title is clickbait. if you read the Thread topic you'll see that the reason why CSW won the lawsuit is that cobra doesn't want to reveal his Identity thus he is unable to defend his case and CSW won by default. 
Apart from taking down the flagship cryptocurrency’s founding document, Cobra will also have to pay £35,000 ($48,655) in legal fees.
Imagine Cøbra doing the following thing, then it's safe to say that CSW is never going to get his filthy hands on those funds @CobraBitcoin
Happy to pay Craig his costs for the Bitcoin whitepaper case.
How does a BTC payment to the address associated with block #9 sound?
Happy to pay Craig his costs for the Bitcoin whitepaper case.
How does a BTC payment to the address associated with block #9 sound?
I may not agree with some of Cøbra's previous actions, but I do agree with the following tweet...
@CobraBitcoin
The whole thing is such an abuse. Being able to sue “persons unknown” *outside* of the jurisdiction is stupid. So is granting default to someone who shows no proof of their claims (his only proof is swearing to be Satoshi). And then ISPs nuking sites based on that. Like WTF!
The whole thing is such an abuse. Being able to sue “persons unknown” *outside* of the jurisdiction is stupid. So is granting default to someone who shows no proof of their claims (his only proof is swearing to be Satoshi). And then ISPs nuking sites based on that. Like WTF!
There's no way, he wanted to take down the whitepaper, it's just recent remember that? And satoshi isn't the type to go back on his words and make some hypocritical shit. Craig just wants to promote his scams, that's why he is doing this stupid claims.
This man should get a long trip to jail and stay there for good. He's causing other people trouble by using legal loopholes to his advantage while constantly dodging and avoiding a very easy way of proving himself as Satoshi. I wonder why the courts still cater to this man's cases and requests when in fact he's still at large in his home country.
Winning a case by default against someone who doesn't want their identity revealed doesn't mean that he's Satoshi or anything. A pathetic piece of human scum CSW is for trying to ruin everyone's life just because he wants to call something he didn't craft as his own.
The man just keeps getting more and more attention. I feel he's the equivalent of Trump but in this case int eh world of crypto. I agree, the court ruling in his favour this one time about the ownership of the whitepaper doesn't mean anything. If Craig was the real deal he could have proved it times and times again but yet he doesn't, putting him on the lowest of the lows. Winning a case by default against someone who doesn't want their identity revealed doesn't mean that he's Satoshi or anything. A pathetic piece of human scum CSW is for trying to ruin everyone's life just because he wants to call something he didn't craft as his own.
This man should get a long trip to jail and stay there for good. He's causing other people trouble by using legal loopholes to his advantage while constantly dodging and avoiding a very easy way of proving himself as Satoshi. I wonder why the courts still cater to this man's cases and requests when in fact he's still at large in his home country.
Winning a case by default against someone who doesn't want their identity revealed doesn't mean that he's Satoshi or anything. A pathetic piece of human scum CSW is for trying to ruin everyone's life just because he wants to call something he didn't craft as his own.
Winning a case by default against someone who doesn't want their identity revealed doesn't mean that he's Satoshi or anything. A pathetic piece of human scum CSW is for trying to ruin everyone's life just because he wants to call something he didn't craft as his own.
If this thing is true, then it proves that bsv is the real Bitcoin
It proves nothing. Let's not bring BSV shit in here. CSW is not satoshi.. full stop . end of story move on
I wish these CSW shillers will ever stop.
In the world of crypto filled with echo chambers, it'd be funny right now to go to any of the places where the BSV idiots congregate. They'll be busy pumping the shit citing the court win because there was nobody to fight against.
Typical of scammers, these people will probably pump their shitcoin for sometime before the lawsuit from COPA comes knocking to put them into their place. This is just so stupid that those with money can manipulate courts so easily. Just shows that how easy it is to game the legal system if you have money to fund.
The best day would be when these people still buying BSV on shit exchanges (coz most with an understanding of their interests have delisted it) will have it dumped on them by the scam artist.
Typical of scammers, these people will probably pump their shitcoin for sometime before the lawsuit from COPA comes knocking to put them into their place. This is just so stupid that those with money can manipulate courts so easily. Just shows that how easy it is to game the legal system if you have money to fund.
The best day would be when these people still buying BSV on shit exchanges (coz most with an understanding of their interests have delisted it) will have it dumped on them by the scam artist.
Funny how this shameful man is still getting the attention he does not deserve. Yes, he can have the whole copyright to the Bitcoin Whitepaper, and it will not matter at all. He can use the court to order all publications of the whitepaper be stopped or deleted...and yet it does not matter at all. Just owning the copyright to the whitepaper will not have any bearing as to who is the real Satoshi Nakamoto and certainly will not mean that Craig Wrong will have any influence on Bitcoin. He already got his own BSV so why not focus on his energy in there?
Sorry, I just learned about this.In this case, using Satoshi Nakamoto wallet becomes the only way to prove his/her identity
in short yes.
CSW is not satoshi.. full stop . end of story move on
the real bitcoin inventor(satoshi) does not need to return or make an appearance or prove anything.
for instance
i have coins on the blockchain. but i dont need to annouce to the world my human id to use my coins.
i dont need to make any public appearances or show any driving licence to spend my coins.
bitcoin does not need satoshi's human ID presence to function.
the human behind the first mined coins can spend them and change it into fiat to buy an island without having to announce his human identity.
the human behind the first mined coins can without having to spend or announce or publicise himself. just create a new persona /username and interact with people on this forum without them having to know who he is
but for anyone wanting to say they are satoshi... they better prove it.
theymos ensured satoshis forum account cant be hacked. by putting it into a perma-ban status for security
so no one not even the original user of the account can ever use it again
signing a transaction from a known utxo spend of satoshi (EG the one he sent to hal and got change back) would be true proof.
but we all know CSW never was satoshi. so no point even asking or waiting for such
best to move on and forget CSW existence. just talking about him is more fame than he deserves.
Sorry, I just learned about this.In this case, using Satoshi Nakamoto wallet becomes the only way to prove his/her identity so no one not even the original user of the account can ever use it again
signing a transaction from a known utxo spend of satoshi (EG the one he sent to hal and got change back) would be true proof.
but we all know CSW never was satoshi. so no point even asking or waiting for such
best to move on and forget CSW existence. just talking about him is more fame than he deserves.
theymos ensured satoshis forum account cant be hacked. by putting it into a perma-ban status for security
so no one not even the original user of the account can ever use it again
signing a transaction from a known utxo spend of satoshi (EG the one he sent to hal and got change back) would be true proof.
but we all know CSW never was satoshi. so no point even asking or waiting for such
best to move on and forget CSW existence. just talking about him is more fame than he deserves.
so no one not even the original user of the account can ever use it again
signing a transaction from a known utxo spend of satoshi (EG the one he sent to hal and got change back) would be true proof.
but we all know CSW never was satoshi. so no point even asking or waiting for such
best to move on and forget CSW existence. just talking about him is more fame than he deserves.
Jump to: