Topic: Craig Wright just nuked Gavins and Matonis credibility in just 2 days - wow! - page 2. (Read 2137 times)
May 06, 2016, 02:11:29 AM
So bay for him.
May 06, 2016, 01:13:43 AM
I guess Gavins and Matonis regret publicly endorse Craig Wright now. This is by product, few people care about G and J now.
May 05, 2016, 03:42:03 PM
Good find. Very interesting.
And this is supposed to be the egocentric scammer sociopath ?
LOL
Blockchain (bitcoin) represents "a means of tracking and registering anything that can exist".
I don't think I've yet got my head around how big this thing is going to be.
I hope Craig isn't looking here like Oppenheimer before the bomb was dropped.
May 05, 2016, 03:27:13 PM
Odd,thought this would be about so much more than wrecking two individuals credibility!
Thought at least it was some work being set to take bitcoin down a notch,maybe it achieved this with the business world in some sense making bitcoin a little more unpredictable. Its very odd that the news gravitated to this story so quickly and did no due diligence.
Thought at least it was some work being set to take bitcoin down a notch,maybe it achieved this with the business world in some sense making bitcoin a little more unpredictable. Its very odd that the news gravitated to this story so quickly and did no due diligence.
May 05, 2016, 03:19:56 PM
May 05, 2016, 02:40:03 PM
Interesting Craig Wright interview I'm watching right now:
https://vimeo.com/149035662
https://vimeo.com/149035662
May 05, 2016, 02:35:08 PM
Gavin, don't worry about this... I have a bigger scoop for you, when you are ready to talk...
Satoshi has a Naughty and Nice Faucet ?
May 05, 2016, 01:25:48 PM
Gavin, don't worry about this... I have a bigger scoop for you, when you are ready to talk...
May 05, 2016, 12:47:01 PM
As much as I am convinced CW is not Satoshi I do not know this for a fact. Failing to provide the proof he claimed was coming is a huge red flag, but not really proof he isn't. [/devil's advocate]
Reasonable and correct. But that shouldn't deter all necessary trolling and ridicule of Craig and co at this point - they've earned it.
May 05, 2016, 12:46:51 PM
i guess Gavin and John are pretty pissed right now. 
The Core works in mysterious ways...
I assume he had some type of intention. I'd love to know what it is.
A bag full of silver from Blockstream, no doubt
it is a plot from Blockstream to kill Gavins reputation
? hrhr, interesting but i dont think so. May 05, 2016, 12:33:28 PM
i guess Gavin and John are pretty pissed right now.
The Core works in mysterious ways...
I assume he had some type of intention. I'd love to know what it is.
A bag full of silver from Blockstream, no doubt
May 05, 2016, 12:31:50 PM
What was in it for him? All of these shenanigans have just made him out to look like a silly sausage. I assume he had some type of intention. I'd love to know what it is.
May 05, 2016, 12:24:44 PM
As much as I am convinced CW is not Satoshi I do not know this for a fact. Failing to provide the proof he claimed was coming is a huge red flag, but not really proof he isn't. [/devil's advocate]
You're not being the Devil's advocate here, there is legitimately very little evidence he is providing and him backing out when asked to verify his identity solidifies the educated guess that he is not Satoshi.We don't know for sure that he isn't Satoshi, but he wouldn't be whining like this if he was and he would have documents ready, instead of saying "I'll leak them once I create them or find them".
May 05, 2016, 12:21:44 PM
As much as I am convinced CW is not Satoshi I do not know this for a fact. Failing to provide the proof he claimed was coming is a huge red flag, but not really proof he isn't. [/devil's advocate]
May 05, 2016, 12:20:19 PM
i guess Gavin and John are pretty pissed right now.
Does this mean Jon is not going to answer my questions? (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/questions-for-jon-matonis-regarding-craig-wright-1461175)
good questions. i guess that depends on the NDA. is it still valid? a lawyer should know this
May 05, 2016, 12:12:48 PM
i guess Gavin and John are pretty pissed right now.
Does this mean Jon is not going to answer my questions? (https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/questions-for-jon-matonis-regarding-craig-wright-1461175) May 05, 2016, 12:11:26 PM
i guess Gavin and John are pretty pissed right now.
May 05, 2016, 12:09:10 PM
http://in.reuters.com/article/us-australia-bitcoin-idINKCN0XW1BT
""But, as the events of this week unfolded and I prepared to publish the proof of access to the earliest keys, I broke. I do not have the courage. I cannot."
After coming under pressure to provide more credible evidence that he was bitcoin's creator, Wright had published a post on Monday that said he would post "independently verifiable documents and evidence" that would back up his claims. The post could no longer be found on the blog site. "
--------------------------------------------
I don't know who Satoshi Nakamoto is but I don't not believe it is Dr. Wright. Two pieces of proof I will accept, Contact Thermos and unlock your account on BitcoinTalk or move 0.00000001BTC from the blocks we know only Satoshi mined and publish the results. Without either of those, the burden of proof has not been met in my opinion.
""But, as the events of this week unfolded and I prepared to publish the proof of access to the earliest keys, I broke. I do not have the courage. I cannot."
After coming under pressure to provide more credible evidence that he was bitcoin's creator, Wright had published a post on Monday that said he would post "independently verifiable documents and evidence" that would back up his claims. The post could no longer be found on the blog site. "
--------------------------------------------
I don't know who Satoshi Nakamoto is but I don't not believe it is Dr. Wright. Two pieces of proof I will accept, Contact Thermos and unlock your account on BitcoinTalk or move 0.00000001BTC from the blocks we know only Satoshi mined and publish the results. Without either of those, the burden of proof has not been met in my opinion.
May 05, 2016, 12:03:15 PM
Maybe they should sue this guy?
Jump to: