LOL, that guy has been butt hurt lately, and looking for people to face off with. He's very serious with claiming the title of Satoshi Nakamoto, while he hasn't been able to prove he's even the one. He's just messing around and nobody believes that nonsense he's been saying, people are still looking for the real Satoshi Nakamoto.
Oh, and that reminds me that there have been a site that people believes is Satoshi website and when you visit the site you just see a countdown, seems like the real Satoshi Nakamoto plans to reveal him, her, themselves anytime soon. For now, Craig can continue to claim he is Satoshi, but I don't believe that. We will all see if he is at the end of all this.
Topic: Craig Wright sues a podcaster for saying Craight Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto (Read 595 times)
May 08, 2019, 03:29:25 AM
May 07, 2019, 12:37:42 PM
I think in a court of law even if he is satoshi nakomoto the fact is that he has not proved that in any way at all aside from saying he "is" satoshi nakomoto shows clearly that it can't be defamation of character in any way or sense.
I would like to go back to that defamation of character later on but first lets see it from point of view of the judge, there is one person who has claimed to be satoshi nakomoto and have not proved that he in fact is satoshi nakomoto and we have someone who said he is not, how could you say that is true or not, there is no proof which means even if he is satoshi it doesn't mean someone can't say he is not, telling someone he is not someone else can't be sued at all.
Moreover, coming back to defamation of character, telling someone they are not satoshi nakomoto is not that, "you are a liar and scammer and you steal money and kill people" or whatever could be but saying "you are not satoshi" is not.
I would like to go back to that defamation of character later on but first lets see it from point of view of the judge, there is one person who has claimed to be satoshi nakomoto and have not proved that he in fact is satoshi nakomoto and we have someone who said he is not, how could you say that is true or not, there is no proof which means even if he is satoshi it doesn't mean someone can't say he is not, telling someone he is not someone else can't be sued at all.
Moreover, coming back to defamation of character, telling someone they are not satoshi nakomoto is not that, "you are a liar and scammer and you steal money and kill people" or whatever could be but saying "you are not satoshi" is not.
May 07, 2019, 03:25:01 AM
Binance CEO Changpeng Zhao said that Craig Wright is not Satoshi Nakamoto and threatened that Bitcoin SV could be delisted from the cryptocurrency exchange.
https://www.unblock.news/popular/zhao-craig-wright-is-not-satoshi-could-delist-bsv-from-binance
https://www.unblock.news/popular/zhao-craig-wright-is-not-satoshi-could-delist-bsv-from-binance
May 06, 2019, 06:14:11 AM
Here we have Craig Wright suing Peter McCormack for "defamation" as McCormack said Craig Wright isn't Satoshi on a pocast. In addition Craig Wright is attempting to file a gag order (see: injunction) against McCormack to prevent him from discussing this topic in the future. Gag orders and injunctions are extremely common in europe where they're utilized to essentially strip freedom of speech from citizens.
How Craig is going to accomplish that is still a mystery, if he could prove anything he could have done that earlier instead of these drama and since he flaunts his attitude and still claim to be Satoshi does not mean anything and this is yet another gimmick from him to get news headlines and nothing else, he produced fake documents in court from what i understand and how he is going to deal with all those is a drama in itself. 
May 06, 2019, 04:40:13 AM
How can Craigh Wright claim 'defamation of character" when he has not proven beyond doubt that he is who he claims to be.His 'evidence' to be Satoshi Nakamoto has more holes in it than the holes in a doughnut shop.I am glad at the response of the entire cryptocommunity, several exchanges delisted BSV in protest- Binance.Coinhe..
Anyone can file a defamation case to anyone, That's why there will be a court hearing to hear both sides of the story and craig still needs to prove that person he is accusing really dafame him,. its gonna be a long bloody battle and waste of both money and time. Only lawyers will are happy with this fight
The angle where I am looking at it that the court may not grant much audience to Craig is because, the subject matter has not legal backing, satoshi is a name and legally, he has not been approved to carry such name, and secondly, court still does not recognize any case that has to do with cryptocurrency for now, so those are the areas I feel Craig might lost the battle.
May 04, 2019, 03:04:10 AM
How can Craigh Wright claim 'defamation of character" when he has not proven beyond doubt that he is who he claims to be.His 'evidence' to be Satoshi Nakamoto has more holes in it than the holes in a doughnut shop.I am glad at the response of the entire cryptocommunity, several exchanges delisted BSV in protest- Binance.Coinhe
CW is going deeper and deeper into the hole
And it looks like that he cannot be stopped (not saying there is a need to, though). I'm curious if he himself understands that this is unlikely to pan out for him personally. But it is not just about him obviously as it is also about people who believed in him (at least for some time) and invested in BSV. Well, I don't really know if there are any such people but he definitely doesn't give a fuck about them. How did he ever come to make a name in the cryptoverse in the first place with such attitudes?
May 03, 2019, 11:07:03 PM
How can Craigh Wright claim 'defamation of character" when he has not proven beyond doubt that he is who he claims to be.His 'evidence' to be Satoshi Nakamoto has more holes in it than the holes in a doughnut shop.I am glad at the response of the entire cryptocommunity, several exchanges delisted BSV in protest- Binance.Coinhe..
Anyone can file a defamation case to anyone, That's why there will be a court hearing to hear both sides of the story and craig still needs to prove that person he is accusing really dafame him,. its gonna be a long bloody battle and waste of both money and time. Only lawyers will are happy with this fight
May 03, 2019, 01:59:38 PM
I always on my mind, imagine all people around the world saying to him. CSW Its FAKETOSHI, How much money he will use to sues all people just because saying he is not Satoshi Nakamoto. He already has a chance to proof him Satoshi Nakamoto, but he can't provide that and making a fake document just to want to be Satoshi.
May 03, 2019, 11:28:26 AM
How can Craigh Wright claim 'defamation of character" when he has not proven beyond doubt that he is who he claims to be.His 'evidence' to be Satoshi Nakamoto has more holes in it than the holes in a doughnut shop.I am glad at the response of the entire cryptocommunity, several exchanges delisted BSV in protest- Binance.Coinhe..
May 03, 2019, 11:21:41 AM
I thought Wright has taken lessons from the backlash he got from exchanges for been an imposter and trying to fight the truth. It seems the government and the banks are the one backing Craig Wright otherwise he knows fully well that he is not Satoshi. If he was, he would have been very honorable in his character and speak less.
They never try to learn from there, they always try to create more and more FUD. The government and banks don't have any relationship with him. he is only a greedy person. Just a simple task to verify if he is a real one or not. Remember satoshi was giving an answer to someone that was talking to him a few months ago and if he is true satoshi and he can use that account. The characteristic of satoshi was talk less do more.
May 03, 2019, 03:32:55 AM
I thought Wright has taken lessons from the backlash he got from exchanges for been an imposter and trying to fight the truth. It seems the government and the banks are the one backing Craig Wright otherwise he knows fully well that he is not Satoshi. If he was, he would have been very honorable in his character and speak less.
I don’t think he has got any lesson from what happened to him last, the whole furore end up making him more courageous, have you seen BSV lately, even the almighty Binance could not keep the guy’s mouth shut, does a fool knows that he is a fool? Since he chose to be a fool. Let him continue in his foolishness.People who are in the crypto space are not dullards for them to toss around as they wish, so the best would just be to see whatever they say or do, ignore it and let it go. I am sure whatever case he is dragging with the podcaster; the court will dismiss it if they have not even dismissed it by now.
May 02, 2019, 01:08:53 PM
Well then the podcaster should sue them, and ask him to sign a message from first bitcoin address where is mined 50 bitcoin at first time and if he can't then pay the podcaster over 1 billions $ for lies and false accusation.
May 02, 2019, 07:07:59 AM
I thought Wright has taken lessons from the backlash he got from exchanges for been an imposter and trying to fight the truth. It seems the government and the banks are the one backing Craig Wright otherwise he knows fully well that he is not Satoshi. If he was, he would have been very honorable in his character and speak less.
May 02, 2019, 05:51:36 AM
Craig Wright is a man who always love publicity and has this grand assumption that he is a very important man in this side of the universe. Maybe this suit can be the best way for him to prove of his claim to be the real Satoshi Nakamoto so that the podcaster can be wrong. Anyway, we should be glad that Craig Wright is actually contributing something for the advancement of the blockchain and cryptocurrency movement and that is being a comical relief. Good job, sir Wright...way to go, man!
May 02, 2019, 05:28:22 AM
The scary part is no judge is smart enough to know what/who Satoshi Nakomoto is and why we can or can't call Craig he is not Satoshi, so the result could be anything and this baboon of a man will come out and say that he is Satoshi and this is the proof if some idiot judge just doesn't care and says "yeah fine he is or what not" and not even really do their research
In fact I see this case as no more than a publicity stunt
While Craig Wright as an attention whore and drama queen (or should I say king?). But we already know that. So whoever will be the judge in this case, he doesn't actually need to know who Satoshi is as all he has to do is see the legally binding documents that Craig Wright is Satoshi Nakamoto (like passport). Anyway, the burden of proof is on the claimant. Personally, I expect the claim thrown out of court for the lack of any real evidence
Dudes personal defense is he paid the website with his credit card and that should be proof enough that he is in fact Satoshi Nakomoto because he paid one domain with one credit card. That can't be enough reason to actually call him Satoshi but in courts perspective that could be potentially enough. I hope the reverse happens and court says he is not, that way at least he will shut up for a little while
I'm not sure this is the way how the court is going to check Craig Wright's identity
May 02, 2019, 03:31:32 AM
The scary part is no judge is smart enough to know what/who Satoshi Nakomoto is and why we can or can't call Craig he is not Satoshi, so the result could be anything and this baboon of a man will come out and say that he is Satoshi and this is the proof if some idiot judge just doesn't care and says "yeah fine he is or what not" and not even really do their research.
Dudes personal defense is he paid the website with his credit card and that should be proof enough that he is in fact Satoshi Nakomoto because he paid one domain with one credit card. That can't be enough reason to actually call him Satoshi but in courts perspective that could be potentially enough. I hope the reverse happens and court says he is not, that way at least he will shut up for a little while.
Dudes personal defense is he paid the website with his credit card and that should be proof enough that he is in fact Satoshi Nakomoto because he paid one domain with one credit card. That can't be enough reason to actually call him Satoshi but in courts perspective that could be potentially enough. I hope the reverse happens and court says he is not, that way at least he will shut up for a little while.
This case will never materialized in any court of law, This is nothing but a publicity stunt to make BSV relevant in the cryptocurrency market,. This story will soon be forgotten and life goes on with both parties involve.
The only part I don’t like is him playing with law, he should have limited his game to the crypto environment and having to use legal means is way beyond his capacity and I don’t think too that any judicial system will listen to him. The court he is even going to, will they even be able to understand what the whole satoshi thing is all about. He is just looking for a way to shut the podcater’s mouth up.
May 01, 2019, 12:44:41 PM
Personally, i think this CSW issue is getting unnecessary attention in the space and it's preventing us from seeing the other bright side of the space.
Honestly speaking if Craig was to be the real satoshi, he wouldn't have planned to kill BTC in the first place. Even if it is his, we all together have taken it over from him. We gotta move on. He can't force us to adopt BSV. Crypto is about freedom lol
Yeah, Craig Wright is crazy and his claims are just baseless. It would be an easy thing for the real Satoshi to sign a message from a few of his old wallets he used in the early days and he can login on his Bitcointalk account in addition. That shows Wrights claims have absolutely zero legitimacy... Honestly speaking if Craig was to be the real satoshi, he wouldn't have planned to kill BTC in the first place. Even if it is his, we all together have taken it over from him. We gotta move on. He can't force us to adopt BSV. Crypto is about freedom lol
May 01, 2019, 12:00:36 PM
Personally, i think this CSW issue is getting unnecessary attention in the space and it's preventing us from seeing the other bright side of the space.
Honestly speaking if Craig was to be the real satoshi, he wouldn't have planned to kill BTC in the first place. Even if it is his, we all together have taken it over from him. We gotta move on. He can't force us to adopt BSV. Crypto is about freedom lol
Honestly speaking if Craig was to be the real satoshi, he wouldn't have planned to kill BTC in the first place. Even if it is his, we all together have taken it over from him. We gotta move on. He can't force us to adopt BSV. Crypto is about freedom lol
May 01, 2019, 10:04:43 AM
Witnesses are now testifying against him:
https://www.ccn.com/satoshi-nakamoto-expert-witness-testifies-craig-wright
https://www.ccn.com/satoshi-nakamoto-expert-witness-testifies-craig-wright
Quote
An expert witness has filed an affidavit in the Kleiman v. Wright case, which alleges that Craig Wright stole billions of dollars worth of bitcoins from Dave Kleiman either before or after he passed away. The Kleiman estate is seeking damages in the neighborhood of $10 billion. Wright is defending the case with tenacity and recently submitted a provably fake e-mail as evidence.
One thing for sure: The e-mail was fake
In response to this e-mail’s filing and Wright’s subsequent motion that it be stricken from evidence, an expert witness has filed an affidavit on behalf of the plaintiffs.
Dr. Matthew J. Edman, a cybersecurity researcher who previously helped the FBI acquire Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht’s Bitcoin stash, testifies that the e-mail was certifiably fake.
"Counsel for Plaintiff also provided me with the file DEF_00030487.mht, which appears to be a copy of an email sent from the Defendant to himself and that I understand was produced by the Defendant in discovery. The content of the email is identical to the content of ECF No. [144-1], including the PGP signature. The email was sent on April 16, 2014 at 10:22 PM UTC6 according to the date in the email’s header. If this time is adjusted to UTC+10, it shows that the Defendant sent this email to himself on April 17, 2014, at approximately 8:22 AM, i.e., about two minutes before ECF No. [144-1] was created and six minutes before it was last modified."
One thing for sure: The e-mail was fake
In response to this e-mail’s filing and Wright’s subsequent motion that it be stricken from evidence, an expert witness has filed an affidavit on behalf of the plaintiffs.
Dr. Matthew J. Edman, a cybersecurity researcher who previously helped the FBI acquire Silk Road founder Ross Ulbricht’s Bitcoin stash, testifies that the e-mail was certifiably fake.
"Counsel for Plaintiff also provided me with the file DEF_00030487.mht, which appears to be a copy of an email sent from the Defendant to himself and that I understand was produced by the Defendant in discovery. The content of the email is identical to the content of ECF No. [144-1], including the PGP signature. The email was sent on April 16, 2014 at 10:22 PM UTC6 according to the date in the email’s header. If this time is adjusted to UTC+10, it shows that the Defendant sent this email to himself on April 17, 2014, at approximately 8:22 AM, i.e., about two minutes before ECF No. [144-1] was created and six minutes before it was last modified."
May 01, 2019, 09:51:47 AM
Craig Wright is defame by a podcaster and sued him? Then how the heck he can't sue John McAfee saying the same to him, man he's got no balls. Ambitious Craig S.W is a bully and needs to be disciplined at all cost.
I agree. Craig S Wright needs to be taught a hard lesson, that he is not going to forget anytime soon. But at the same time, I have a feeling that we should leave BSV out of this discussion. A lot of crypto-users have invested in that coin and almost none of them have anything to do with CSW. Let's keep the hatred directed at CSW and not towards BSV.
Jump to: