Topic: Craig Wright To Face Trial - page 2. (Read 420 times)

i don't really care enough for this trial because it is mainly between these two people and isn't going to change anything in the end.
the CSW crimes i (and i think most bitcoiners) care about is the identity fraud and scamming newbies (another form of fraud) and he is not and probably will not ever be on trial for these crimes because there is no private plaintiff (the real Satoshi) which is required to really put him in jail.

He is responsible for his deeds and does purposely as well feel so like coming out and saying he is Satoshi etc and whole world now know that he is nothing more than liar. It’s strange though still he is out but may be soon law will take its action and will be given the spot where he needs to be for the act.

How many trials has he faced till now?

I thought he might be behind bars by now. This guy needs it to rethink his next move and strategy.

Waiting for result of this trial.

To be honest, I don't really expect anything much about this trial since all the previous trials has proven that he can lie and extend this facade for a long time. He will probably find or forge another way to get away from the laws again.


But fortunately enough, he doesn't own any of those coins lol.

FYI, this is not a criminal trial. It's a lawsuit. There is no jail.

Craig Wright claims (without proof) that he is Satoshi, and that he has a million or so bitcoins (including bitcoins that were proven to not be his). Ira Kleiman claims that his deceased brother was partners with Wright and that his brother's estate owns half of those bitcoins.

Here is my prediction of the outcome: CSW will lose and Kleiman will be awarded half of the bitcoins. CSW will never deliver because he doesn't actually have them, but he will claim that he lost the keys in a boating accident. The lawsuits will go on until CSW loses everything.

Why does this person still lurking around? Shouldn't he be jailed already? He's just making the crypto community at risk and making the crypto world on a much riskier situation. Either he claims were all true (which isn't), his money should've saved his ass sooner. Hope this guy would be jailed after I woke up later There should be no trials but rather direct him to prison lol

Saving this pic for references. Don't really expect to come at this thread just prefer reading and saving the memes instead of the actual craig wright issue

This is what he gets by attracting too much attention. Well, be careful what you wish for. He was badly in need of attention. Now, look where he is.

Well, he owns at least $11 Billion in BTC as he claims. He could therefore afford to hire the best lawyers in town to take care of the cases. For him, he could spend his days doing what he loves, stress-free. Or does he own them? Either way, good luck to you, Satoshi.

Why this dude still isn't in jail or in a padded cell in a psychiatric ward is beyond me. Let alone why this dude still actually has followers on Twitter and on their "mEtAnEt" community.

Well, the way to prove that he is the owner of those 1.1M BTC is by signing a transaction, not with a Judgment, because maybe if he wins the case, he would be able to claim he is the owner, but that wouldn't be enough to spend them. Not his keys mean not his coins, that's how it works.

https://www.coindesk.com/craig-wright-must-face-trial-after-appeal-for-summary-judgement-denied

Craig Wright Must Face Trial Over Alleged $11B Bitcoin Fortune as Request for Summary Judgment Denied


The District Court for the Southern District of Florida has denied Craig Wright’s request for summary judgment in a case that involves claims over ownership of about 1.1 million bitcoin (worth over $11 billion).

In an order signed on Monday, Judge Beth Bloom at the Florida court denied Wright’s motion seeking summary judgment that would have prevented the matter from proceeding to a full trial.

The case, first brought in 2018,  involves the plaintiff Ira Kleiman’s argument on behalf of the estate of his late brother David, that half of Wright’s bitcoin worth and intellectual property belongs to Kleiman. The plaintiff has argued that the bitcoin in question was also mined together by Wright and Kleiman.
Wright’s request for summary judgment was comprised of six claims including statute of limitations, the plaintiff’s inability to prove the existence of an oral partnership and the court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
In the past, Wright has claimed that he was the inventor of bitcoin under the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto, an assertion many in the crypto world have disputed due to a lack of corroborating evidence.
According to an order issued by the Florida court on Sept. 4, the trial involving Wright’s bitcoin fortune has now been moved to Jan. 4, 2021.


Stick him in jail & throw away the key.