Topic: Craig Wright's lawsuit against Kraken - page 2. (Read 534 times)

UK civil cases are heard by a judge. (I think always?).

Is a jury going to assess evidence? That's the worrying part of the lawsuit, judges can award damages incompetently.

Seems like he’s seeing some of his funding start to dry up and is now throwing Hail Mary lawsuits at people hoping to be able to get something. His claim is utterly ridiculous and I think it won’t go anywhere but you never know when it comes to the legal system. I’ve seen dumber things be allowed to progress as lawsuits. Hopefully this one is over quickly.

I don't really understand this man's actions. If Wright was the real Satoshi, why did he hide his identity in the beginning and then try in every way to prove that he is Satoshi? This behavior can only be explained as a liar.
If he was the "Satoshi" himself in the truth, why did he hide himself in the beginning and then go through all this trouble, courts and cases to prove the truth that he hid as he claims? This behavior leaves us with two possibilities: either he is a very stupid person (Satoshi certainly can't be stupid) or a liar looking for fame and money.

this is just proof that Craig Wright is only on a hot persuit on money. He has tried for several ways to get a share of Bitcoin wealth by adopting absurd attitudes.
Nowadays he is nothing but a joke who is making lawyers rich wheras himself is nothing but the joke of the crypto industry.

He's gonna wish that he didn't walk into this one. This is not some random tweeter he's suing. This is an exchange with billions of dollars of liquid assets (not some illiquid, hard to sell coin like BSV which most exchanges delisted) and who can easily obtain several millions of dollars in loans to shut his lawsuit down.

"Don't pick on someone your own size"

I think that Faketoshi and his team of lawyers don't have much sense for anything, not even for timing. It may seem to some that this is a good time for such a lawsuit to cause even more panic, but Faketoshi announced these lawsuits even before the trial in Norway started in which he sued (and lost) @hodlonaut. Then @hodlonaut publicly asked for help from both companies, but as far as I remember, there was no response.

---

Such powerful companies can lose a case like this only if two things coincide - and that is that they have incompetent lawyers or that the judge is bribed or a total idiot. Faketoshi simply cannot prove anything, except that he has piled up a bunch of fake evidence with which he can do something only in countries like Colombia where they recognized him as Satoshi.

He is just playing the legal system and by abusing the flaws in it he is trying to get his way. The simplest example of it is the case against Cobra, he simply didn't show up to court so CSW won the case against him easily! It still would have worked even if the judge were the most tech-expert on the planet.

P.S. Interesting timing about this new shenanigan. A cryptocurrency exchange (FTX) goes down causing bitcoin price drop, now The Scammer is going after a major bitcoin exchange...

Duh,
Have all cases with the same complaint moved to a single trial.
Also counter sue anyone dumb enough to file a false lawsuit for legal fees.

FYI:  https://fhnylaw.com/can-i-sue-em-for-my-legal-fees/


I suggest you might want to start your meds again.  

CSW is the bain of many lives and it seems as proven by moses that CSW is now making more newbies want to follow in CSW path
scammers recruiting scammers..

moses knows nothing of bitcoin, asks the most basic newbie questions but pretend he created it.. sometimes i thought it was just comedy lost in translation but it appears he seriously wants to be CSW2.0
or in his most recent view CSW's daddy

.. back to the topic..
CSW claims have no bases. and lots of the descriptors can easily be debunked in a couple days of "teaching" bitcoin the proper way. about forking and if BSV was the ticker of "bitcoin" 2010+ or BTC was the ticker of bitcoin according to the real satoshi (forum posts used as proof)

BSV was created in 2018 and wrights other company WII was not created in 2009+ but years later. thus the only development and commercial stuff the WII company was involved in was the support towards making BSV

by defining BCH as the 2017 airdrop(fork creating new free coins to sell)
thus also defining BSV as an airdrop(fork creating new free coins to sell)

he is admitting BSV is not "bitcoin"

The return of the half-wit. This guy is still at it even though he's lost a lot of money and time on lawsuits and other legal protest against other entities just because they use the word bitcoin. It's a shame that the legal system allows this person to continuously file lawsuits that are meaningless, but yeah, the court gains profits and I guess that's what matters the most.

Just another day in the office for bitcoin's biggest troll. Nothing to see here.

yep
CSW gets paid to turn up as claimant in court he enjoys turning up as a claimant in court. win or lose. he got paid to be there.

the losses are not losses to him the losses are between the lawyers and the backer investor, not CSW

his backer investors see that paying $xm is cheap. its cheaper then paying TV.media $xm for advertising if the court details get into press, its cheap advertising to them. so they happily buy into CSW schemes

he doesnt/they dont care about how long the case draws out
he doesnt care if it loses. he already bagged his backers investment on day one.

its the same as the conference speaker tours

he doesnt care about the speach or the material of topics to speak about he already got paid to just turn up. so as long as he can keep adding event fates into his schedule he gets paid. no matter what the event is.

the backer might not see instant ROI on the investment when cases lose in court, but they hope the advertisement nets them more users on the BSV network to syphon ROI from. though they probably do wish they could one time actually get a win worthy of more then a lollypop($1) amount, because their advert hopes are not causing a mass user adoption to syphon from either




part of my opinion about why his claims smell rancid and have soo many inconsistencies and lies and obvious flaws in them is, that i believe he puts errors into claims and easily debunks crap. to make the defendant prolong the case having to re-debunk each and every error. thus letting CSW get paid the longer the case flows on

Wright has a couple of wealthy people who are funding him.  Their understanding of Bitcoin is extremely limited and mostly comes via Wright.  They believe these lawsuits have a chance of success, they're paying wright millions of UKP a year and covering his costs because they hope to get a windfall at the end.

So Wright just needs to keep the show going and he'll get paid as long as he does.

Don't underestimate the power of conmen.

I might be a bit thick here, but.....Kraken is not small it's not like going after 1 person who either had to choose to remain anonymous OR had to have a massive fundraising campaign to help out.
This is not a business that is going to roll over and take it. Not to mention they will probably get both legal and financial support from other exchanges.

Eliminating everything else, the tech, the BS, everything. Am I missing something in why he picked this fight?

-Dave

This guy really has no shame, he really is a lowlife. I’m unsure what he’s actually trying to achieve here because he’s never going to win any type of court case like this. The only time he had any success (hollow) was because Cobra wouldn’t remove his anonymity to defend himself so that was won by default.

No judge is going to award him a court victory against Kraken. I don’t know what he’s trying to achieve, it doesn’t make any sense.

And it definitely should not be that way, considering cryptographic signatures have legal significance in countries like the United States of America, Canada, Mexico and even within the European Union.

This guy and his lawyers have reached a point of blatant attention seeking at this point while looking to deceive anyone with his nonsense.

He's just so atrocious that I'm convinced that CSW, Ayre, and friends are just betting that the judges are idiots(if I were to guess, most are tech-illiterate).

the real sotisho created bitcon and used the term BTC

it did begin in 2009
but CSW main claim is that thet kraken is using another network called bitcoin but its not "the bitcoin"


everything in the quote is true. the bitcoin network(btc) was invented then. and is used now..

CSW's BSV network was invented 2018
it was a fork of a fork
BSV is not the main inheritor of "bitcoin"

and isnt really used at all by any substantially known exchanges

its like royalty lineage
the straight line of descendant is the winner. first child wins
the offspring that come later are not first inline to the thrown

                     / anne                      /harry
k.george - Q. elizabeth - .K charles- william
                                      \ andrew
      
btc - btc - btc
      \ bch - bch (minority economic(exchange) acceptance)
               \ bsv (minority pf minority economic(exchange) acceptance)

thus BSV is not in the lineage inheritance of "bitcoin"

Wright hasn't proved he's Satoshi. He'll never be able to do it because he isn't Satoshi so what's he after by going after Kraken?

Attention seeking behaviour at its finest from CSW. Using a sensational amount in the suit might just be a way to show that there still might be profit at the end of his sham campaign and attract investments.

When does it all end?