@crairezx20 (banned account ) alt of @BitMaxz chipmixer

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1288

Quote from: nutildah on March 29, 2021, 04:30:56 PM

Don't understand why you're bumping this thread. The initiative is on you to follow through with what you said you were going to do. Did you lose money to this person or why are you trying to mess with their reputation? You've got to provide more convincing research if you want DT to do anything.

I don't want DT Members to do anything other than someone who has had better experience tracking linked accounts to help me.
As for the reason, I scammed used one of addresses linked to @crairezx20 and I believe @BitMaxz is the same person that use @crairezx20. if the the community accepts this claim I can ask the campaign manager to transfer the amount to me after proving that these accounts are linked.

I can open scam against @crairezx20 but the account is banned.
Attempting to link more accounts would reinforce this hypothesis.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: Husires on March 09, 2021, 04:05:48 AM

Quote from: nutildah on March 07, 2021, 04:28:47 PM

Quote from: Husires on February 13, 2021, 01:38:45 AM

@BitMaxz used this address asking for loan 3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91 source https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15928381

this address used by @ebookscreator asking for another loan.

I looked into it and I couldn't confirm this. Where did you get that ebookscreator used that address? If your final goal is to get BitMaxz tagged for being an alt of a banned account, that's not what trust is supposed to be used for. If your goal is to get BitMaxz banned for ban evasion, you'll need to provide more substantial evidence.

I think I can find more. it seems that buying and selling accounts was common from 2014 to 2016 and you will find more connected accounts more than one of them are banned.

Don't understand why you're bumping this thread. The initiative is on you to follow through with what you said you were going to do. Did you lose money to this person or why are you trying to mess with their reputation? You've got to provide more convincing research if you want DT to do anything.

electronicash

legendary

Activity: 3178

Merit: 1054

Quote from: ?? on ??

bump

how about this information https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.12645815 (https://archive.vn/M5doQ) i hope that helps.

now we still don't know if that name still is his real name there but probably. what do you want to achieve if you learn more about him? i don't know how you can make him pay his loan. maybe that name will help you find more info about him.

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1288

Quote from: nutildah on March 07, 2021, 04:28:47 PM

Quote from: Husires on February 13, 2021, 01:38:45 AM

@BitMaxz used this address asking for loan 3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91 source https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15928381

this address used by @ebookscreator asking for another loan.

I looked into it and I couldn't confirm this. Where did you get that ebookscreator used that address? If your final goal is to get BitMaxz tagged for being an alt of a banned account, that's not what trust is supposed to be used for. If your goal is to get BitMaxz banned for ban evasion, you'll need to provide more substantial evidence.

I think I can find more. it seems that buying and selling accounts was common from 2014 to 2016 and you will find more connected accounts more than one of them are banned.

TryNinja

legendary

Activity: 2758

Merit: 6830

Quote from: nutildah on March 07, 2021, 04:28:47 PM

I looked into it and I couldn't confirm this. Where did you get that ebookscreator used that address?

The ninjastic.space search found:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14738166 (archive)

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: Husires on February 13, 2021, 01:38:45 AM

@BitMaxz used this address asking for loan 3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91 source https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15928381

this address used by @ebookscreator asking for another loan.

I looked into it and I couldn't confirm this. Where did you get that ebookscreator used that address? If your final goal is to get BitMaxz tagged for being an alt of a banned account, that's not what trust is supposed to be used for. If your goal is to get BitMaxz banned for ban evasion, you'll need to provide more substantial evidence.

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1288

bump

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1288

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on February 13, 2021, 02:54:28 AM

That doesn't explain why @BitMaxz includes @bitcoinboy12 into his trust list until 2019 if he sold it in 2016.

I couldn't find an explanation for that, Undecided

what evidence can be provided. Huh

above is sufficient to link between @crairezx20 and @BitMaxz.
If there are any more links between @crairezx20 addresses. please update it here

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: Husires on February 13, 2021, 01:38:45 AM

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on February 13, 2021, 12:13:35 AM

Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past.

I believe that @BitMaxz created this account @bitcoinboy12 and then sold it in 2016.

That doesn't explain why @BitMaxz includes @bitcoinboy12 into his trust list until 2019 if he sold it in 2016.

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1288

Quote from: hacker1001101001 on February 13, 2021, 12:13:35 AM

Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past.

I believe that @BitMaxz created this account @bitcoinboy12 and then sold it in 2016.
they used the same facebook account and Bitcointalk address linked to @crairezx20
@bitcoinboy12 used facebook name : Cristine Princess Bautista
@BitMaxz used same facebook name: Cristine Princess Bautista

i was tracking old scam address linked to 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa which is owned by @BitMaxz/@crairezx20 and the same user still have that account.
If any mod give a reason why @crairezx20 was banned, the story would make more sense.

hahaha i found more accounts. Defaulted on loan.

@BitMaxz used this address asking for loan 3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91 source https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15928381

this address used by @ebookscreator asking for another loan. @ebookscreator/@BitMaxz failed to repayment that loan, so the account transferred @Jeremycoin's ownership.

Quote

So, it's official that the ebookscreator account is now mine

if i have more time will search for more.

hacker1001101001

sr. member

Activity: 1288

Merit: 415

Quote from: DarkStar_ on February 12, 2021, 10:36:22 PM

My understanding was that the connected accounts (or the BitMaxz account) were sold a long time ago, so those connections might not be accurate. I don't think it's right to remove someone simply for being a bought account back when account selling/buying was common and not really frowned upon. I think at one point I even sold accounts myself obtained from defaulted loans.

Definitely could be wrong; someone please correct me if so.

Maybe only BitMaxz can confirm what's the correct story here or if he sold or bought those auto banned accounts in the past.

Also, if nobody noticed here @BitMaxz had both crairezx20 and bitcoinboy12 in his trust list until 2019-02-16. That somehow points to some connection until then at least.

https://loyce.club/trust/2019-02-16_Sat_13.06h/525056.html

Note: I just hope BitMaxz has a better explanation to it.

DarkStar_

legendary

Activity: 2772

Merit: 3282

Quote from: suchmoon on February 11, 2021, 10:06:10 AM

I'm a bit suprised that BitMaxz is still in the the CM campaign despite these links to banned/scammy/sold accounts.

My understanding was that the connected accounts (or the BitMaxz account) were sold a long time ago, so those connections might not be accurate. I don't think it's right to remove someone simply for being a bought account back when account selling/buying was common and not really frowned upon. I think at one point I even sold accounts myself obtained from defaulted loans.

Definitely could be wrong; someone please correct me if so.

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1288

Quote from: suchmoon on February 11, 2021, 02:56:09 PM

I mean Blitzboy was allegedly hacked or sold. Not sure about BitMaxz.

It is suspicious. I created this topic to know what happened in the previous topic https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53622116

Quote from: Findingnemo on February 12, 2021, 01:23:57 AM

I don't see any thread on META regarding this case but talking about the thread, it is better to have one. ST was inactive who was the one created it but if the community think it needs proper maintenance then someone can open a new thread for such purpose and can maintain them. I feel it is mandatory because moderators are not like DT in numbers so helping them to reduce their workload by giving dedicated threads can help to keep the place clean with ease.

Quote from: notblox1 on February 11, 2021, 08:05:26 PM

Are we going to see one more chipmixer campaign purge?

Maybe other forum detectives are already working on this case behind the scenes because I am not fully convinced with evidence presented in this topic, and I would like to here what accused BitMaxz has to say.

I don't think we need to create more topics, lets see BitMaxz response or other forum detectives

I believe there were accounts that were sold, maybe it was legal in the past

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 793

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Quote from: The Cryptovator on February 11, 2021, 12:48:18 PM

Was this case raised there? I can't find the report of this case there even using the search button. Am I missing something? I am talking about this case specifically, not all over ban evasion. I have seen occasionally users creating unique threads for each ban evasion. In the thread you have mentioned, OP is inactive of that thread, so there is a lack of maintenance. Anyways, a single thread would appropriate for this case, it's quite a serious case IMO.

I don't see any thread on META regarding this case but talking about the thread, it is better to have one. ST was inactive who was the one created it but if the community think it needs proper maintenance then someone can open a new thread for such purpose and can maintain them. I feel it is mandatory because moderators are not like DT in numbers so helping them to reduce their workload by giving dedicated threads can help to keep the place clean with ease.

notblox1

legendary

Activity: 2086

Merit: 1282

Logo Designer ⛨ BSFL Division1

Are we going to see one more chipmixer campaign purge?

Maybe other forum detectives are already working on this case behind the scenes because I am not fully convinced with evidence presented in this topic, and I would like to here what accused BitMaxz has to say.

suchmoon

legendary

Activity: 3654

Merit: 8909

https://bpip.org

Quote from: Husires on February 11, 2021, 02:08:58 PM

Quote from: suchmoon on February 11, 2021, 10:06:10 AM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on February 11, 2021, 09:45:15 AM

Now this is interesting: crairezx20 was attempting to discredit Blitzboy, which was connected to BitMaxz. If all of these accounts are connected, why would he try to discredit his own alt?

Apparently it was hacked or sold: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53633015

For how long does BPIP Security/Moderator Log show account changes?@BitMaxz account did not changed password

I mean Blitzboy was allegedly hacked or sold. Not sure about BitMaxz.

BPIP has mod/sec log data starting sometime in 2018. It wouldn't show changes that happened in 2016.

Husires

legendary

Activity: 1596

Merit: 1288

Quote from: suchmoon on February 11, 2021, 10:06:10 AM

Quote from: DireWolfM14 on February 11, 2021, 09:45:15 AM

Now this is interesting: crairezx20 was attempting to discredit Blitzboy, which was connected to BitMaxz. If all of these accounts are connected, why would he try to discredit his own alt?

Apparently it was hacked or sold: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.53633015

For how long does BPIP Security/Moderator Log show account changes?@BitMaxz account did not changed password

Let's go deeper

@BitMaxz used 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa on 11/15/2016 this address is alt of @airezx20 which is alt of @crairezx20 (Banned account)

https://archive.is/8Vj9u

Quote

Old address: 1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa
Message: This is BitMaxz asking for loan of 0.02 today is 11/15/2016
Signature: IGspXw9MTXynjZLO3zbr5ENhaGrlVjoI2AmRsPyTq6qRo7vctxJVq2tKIHSL9fBxravpyj1enEHr9e1 6MCY3wIk=

@BitMaxz used 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX on 12/15/2016

Quote

sign: This is bitmaxz i am asking for loan for 2 weeks. today is 12/15/2016
address: 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX
signature: H1jL4U6WCnzy0fma3kKF0Ja32KYIkpT8xt7UCUbv1INqLGFdSIFDWuMvvSlypIBba4Ul2ltYqDBT2FT PCtrxZsk=

on November 24, 2016, 10:55:52 AM @BitMaxz used the same address 1Fh2GwdSfSDpfB5PpYjscB9u2inCoTmumX
https://web.archive.org/web/20161124105551/https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=525056;

According to this if @BitMaxz hacked it must be between 11/15/2016 to 11/24/2016.

edit both addresses found here.

Quote

Thanks for giving me loan for small amount here is my sign message

- -----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
This is BitMaxz borrowing 0.015 without collateral from Atomicat and giving me 2 weeks deadline Today is 8/15/2016
- -----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
1Py7dZRgKNYMycvzgzYWnxdjhZMTuY85Pa
IKf8LGlbeokVpAmL/JEK8fy7oQOjfLE8ndIXVduZfrZMiYSuXPOy+iiT6nu1lvTR7PUn9iKv2n4BYdkW8GPiCeM=
- -----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----

Here is the address where you send the loan thanks
3QatDfn9nx6CgNKTEJLWd8NyKKaTMstz91
Loan funded without interest.

Please repay 0.015 BTC to 1BL3FPtvsQhWMAinVokoR5yEZoMXRu1CF1
Repayment done
Sorry for delay i was looking in this thread to find the repayment address thanks to let me know..
Sorry also for delay and i am happy that you give me a chance to loan without interest and no collateral thanks

Here is the TXId
https://blockchain.info/tx/70b57e86655319cef5eaf889df142a4d57d28b1264266f43d3e5582f2c79bce7

Thanks again Wink

The Cryptovator

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 2196

Signature space for rent

Quote from: Findingnemo on February 11, 2021, 12:18:02 PM

Quote from: The Cryptovator on February 11, 2021, 12:04:40 PM

Don't know why still all accounts exist without a ban. I think a van evasion thread should open on meta with proper explanations and evidence that should be easier to understand for moderators.

It exists already, : [Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]

Was this case raised there? I can't find the report of this case there even using the search button. Am I missing something? I am talking about this case specifically, not all over ban evasion. I have seen occasionally users creating unique threads for each ban evasion. In the thread you have mentioned, OP is inactive of that thread, so there is a lack of maintenance. Anyways, a single thread would appropriate for this case, it's quite a serious case IMO.

Findingnemo

hero member

Activity: 2366

Merit: 793

Bitcoin = Financial freedom

Quote from: The Cryptovator on February 11, 2021, 12:04:40 PM

Don't know why still all accounts exist without a ban. I think a van evasion thread should open on meta with proper explanations and evidence that should be easier to understand for moderators.

It exists already, : [Report] Ban Evasion [Requesting Admin/mod to check those and ban]

But it didn't got enough attention since reporter(s) simply using Known Alts of any-one - A User Generated List Mk III (2021 Q1) to report such cases.

The Cryptovator

legendary

Activity: 2282

Merit: 2196

Signature space for rent

It's pretty clear these three account. According to forum rules, all connected accounts are supposed to be banned since one account is already banned. Don't know why still all accounts exist without a ban. Most likely moderators didn't notice the thread. I think a van evasion thread should open on meta with proper explanations and evidence that should be easier to understand for moderators.

Quote from: suchmoon on February 11, 2021, 10:06:10 AM

I'm a bit suprised that BitMaxz is still in the the CM campaign despite these links to banned/scammy/sold accounts.

Perhaps DS unaware or missed the case.

Topic: @crairezx20 (banned account ) alt of @BitMaxz chipmixer (Read 740 times)