I'll give a rating from 0 to 5 (5 = most important) for each of the items you mention:
1. Technology:
3/5. An interesting technology is mostly important for the launch phase, when it can help to create momentum. But most interesting tech developments can be used by other cryptocurrencies as well. However, I think this item is important for special-purpose blockchains, like privacy coins (Monero, Grin ...).
Small comment:
Cardano (ADA) and Polkadot (DOT) have gained attention for their advanced blockchain technology.
Probably because people don't know they're based on the PBFT model from 1999.
2. Tokenomics
1/5. If the cryptocurrency is meant to work mainly as a token platform, at least it should provide the necessary features to enable "sound" tokenomics. But why should it not?
3. Market capitalization:
4/5. Agree mostly, but this is a quite trivial item.
4. Utility and Application
5/5, at least if you mean the real-world adoption of applications. This is indeed crucial, and for example the factor separating BTC from LTC (because BTC is used/accepted in much more contexts) or ETH from chains like AVAX (because ETH continues to be the "main" token/NFT/DeFi platform). If instead you refer to "features" of the blockchain platform, then it overlaps with item 1.
5. DevelopmentTeam
4/5. What's important is that there are developers interested in maintaining and updating the coin.
6. Collaboration and Partnerships
3/5. Bitcoin benefitted for example when it was accepted by Wikipedia and Wikileaks. But the importance to have a long list of "partner" companies is rather limited. Quality beats quantity here.
7. Industry Competition and Position
3/5. First mover advantage and dominance can be important, as in the case of Bitcoin. But a good position at a specific time may not mean it's a good long-term investment. Take examples like NXT, Dash, or NEM. And not all cryptocurrencies see themselves as part of an "industry". Those that are part of an "industry" can barely be called cryptocurrencies
8. Socialization and User Community
4/5. Of course community is important. But you're describing here more something like an army of shills.
Most of the items are clearly written from the point of view of a supporter of centralized cryptocurrencies. Apart from that I agree with most of them.