all i want to know chessnut is when moon landing?
Topic: Critical Levels - EW analysis - page 3. (Read 355104 times)
Nice EW analysis chessnut!
He’s often there or thereabouts with his predictions, nobody is right all the time though so never trade based on what people here say no matter what their track record is.
Buy & HODL.
Nice EW analysis chessnut!
He’s often there or thereabouts with his predictions, nobody is right all the time though so never trade based on what people here say no matter what their track record is.
Buy & HODL.
Whichever way you look at it, this abc seems like it will correct at least 62% upwards.
Amazing how accurate this prediction was.
62% on 3794 US$ (from the chart) is 6146 US$, almost exactly where the price went.
Well, he meant 62% of the drop from 5k, like a B wave before dropping in a C. It was more of an "if the correction is not complete, we'll see 62% retrace, but if it is complete, it'll go higher than that." so that's where the "at least 62%" comes from. Not 37xx + 62% of 37xx. Still, weird how fibo levels work like that though. People's brains have a funny way of determining when price moves too far too fast and decide to wait on that next purchase/sell.
Nice EW analysis chessnut!
Whichever way you look at it, this abc seems like it will correct at least 62% upwards.
Amazing how accurate this prediction was.
62% on 3794 US$ (from the chart) is 6146 US$, almost exactly where the price went.
You havent posted anything in ages
This is a dangerous place for a five wave count to seem complete. A 50% correction or 62% correction is rational. iv wave territory is between 3000 and 2000.
In the middle of IV territory places us at $2500, or log, $2200.
Whichever way you look at it, this abc seems like it will correct at least 62% upwards.
This is a dangerous place for a five wave count to seem complete. A 50% correction or 62% correction is rational. iv wave territory is between 3000 and 2000.
In the middle of IV territory places us at $2500, or log, $2200.
The presence of this Ending Diagonal is a sign of weakness. This is probably an impulse down at 2 levels. 
This is a dangerous place for a five wave count to seem complete. A 50% correction or 62% correction is rational. iv wave territory is between 3000 and 2000.
Yeah, looks like 5300-5500 or 3400-3600 zone intermediate.
This is a dangerous place for a five wave count to seem complete. A 50% correction or 62% correction is rational. iv wave territory is between 3000 and 2000.
what kind of correction do you see after wave 5 completes.
Imo depends upon LN, schnorr and CT. Im going to meet poelstra very soon and get an idea on how far along schnorr is because it didnt work for multisig. If its ready id say small dip then 100koh...100k? please keep us updated.
what kind of correction do you see after wave 5 completes.
Imo depends upon LN, schnorr and CT. Im going to meet poelstra very soon and get an idea on how far along schnorr is because it didnt work for multisig. If its ready id say small dip then 100koh...100k? please keep us updated.
what kind of correction do you see after wave 5 completes.
Imo depends upon LN, schnorr and CT. Im going to meet poelstra very soon and get an idea on how far along schnorr is because it didnt work for multisig. If its ready id say small dip then 100k
what kind of correction do you see after wave 5 completes.
Looks like and ED consistent with a running flat iv. weakness suggests a powerfully extended wave v.
This could be the intermediate term action.
as wave 1 is about equal to wave 3, wave V should be extended, it could go to 5800.
This could be the intermediate term action.
The impulse had many primary wave extensions which is why it seems it has bottomed on just one sharp fell swoop. Having gone too far none the less I think the bottom very probably in.
We know theres a bottom here because of the triangle. We know abc's retrace at least 62% as a strong guideline. Not to mention that the abc could have been a wave ii of sorts.
We know theres a bottom here because of the triangle. We know abc's retrace at least 62% as a strong guideline. Not to mention that the abc could have been a wave ii of sorts.
Now that this abc is behind us in clarity we can play with the idea that this could be a grand wave iii following a wave ii. Not necessarily but I dont see why this is a lesser count given what is behind us.
This is cool
Jump to: