In an other forum (not bitcoin) there was a thread about funding an own porn. They raise money to rent a acter and a (the guy obv) free candidate.
But i think it never comes to finish.
This would be an idea for bitcoin.
Topic: Crowdfunding for nude photos/videos - page 2. (Read 4279 times)
Maybe, but if the photos used for the request are public, it shouldn't be a problem 
for the offer from the girl to cover the demand.
A stalking accuse risk.
@pooya87
My idea works differently, likely the opposite.
On gonewild the girl come first with their offer, and then waiting for the demand.
On my idea anonymous users come first with the demand, and then they wait for the offer from the girl to cover the demand.
My idea works differently, likely the opposite.
On gonewild the girl come first with their offer, and then waiting for the demand.
On my idea anonymous users come first with the demand, and then they wait for the offer from the girl to cover the demand.
you know there is this site that nobody knows about and it is totally not number 7 on alexa rank. it is called reddit.com!
there totally isn't a sub called /r/gonewild and there is nothing called gonewildrequests and no sub called /r/gonewildvideos and also there is no sticky on the sidebar of /r/bitcoin called /r/girlsgonebitcoin
there totally isn't a sub called /r/gonewild and there is nothing called gonewildrequests and no sub called /r/gonewildvideos and also there is no sticky on the sidebar of /r/bitcoin called /r/girlsgonebitcoin
Quote
.....and yeah titsforbits.com or nakedbitcoins.com domains are awesome 
Thanks! I agree
how much she could accept to give us their nude photos
Hi, the usual price is about from 1 to 15 euro for any picture.
There are many who will accept such requests.
Quote
then people might not "donate" again.
They will get they money back without any fee.They can just put again the photo of the woman on the website and request her nude photo again
Quote
How are you going to regulate underage participation?
If the girl is underage, the website will give back the money to the investors but with a huge fee less, like 10% or more. (maybe all the money)The girl/woman/man should give a photo of her document that show her age to get the money, also to confirm her identity.
Oh, I misunderstood your idea then... I thought the "stripper" willingly offer his clothed pictures on their site and then people pay to see if they
can get the person to take off their clothes. { Your idea seems to be different - The "customer" place a clothed photo on the sites and then dare
the person in that picture to strip for donations? } Do I get it now?
Underage photos should not even reach the point you are saying. { being "published" on your site } .... You should screen these pictures, before
they are "published" on the site and only then post them online. The ToS should state that no underage photos would be allowed and that proof
of age will be requested, if those photos failed the screening process.
once the nude photos are sent, why another person should pay to see that again? once a person gets it he may publish it for free right? secondly is it that easy to get women onboard to upload nude pics?
Quote
then people might not "donate" again.
They will get they money back without any fee.They can just put again the photo of the woman on the website and request her nude photo again
Quote
How are you going to regulate underage participation?
If the girl is underage, the website will give back the money to the investors but with a huge fee less, like 10% or more. (maybe all the money)The girl/woman/man should give a photo of her document that show her age to get the money, also to confirm her identity.
Oh, I misunderstood your idea then... I thought the "stripper" willingly offer his clothed pictures on their site and then people pay to see if they
can get the person to take off their clothes. { Your idea seems to be different - The "customer" place a clothed photo on the sites and then dare
the person in that picture to strip for donations? } Do I get it now?
Underage photos should not even reach the point you are saying. { being "published" on your site } .... You should screen these pictures, before
they are "published" on the site and only then post them online. The ToS should state that no underage photos would be allowed and that proof
of age will be requested, if those photos failed the screening process.
Why people will pay for pictures ? There are billion of free porn pictures and videos available on the net already
do you know that "amateur" section draws 3-4 times more viewers than the regular pro porn actors/actresses from the established studios?
erm....not that I know too much about it
but there is more appeal to see "the girl next door"
Why people will pay for pictures ? There are billion of free porn pictures and videos available on the net already
Simply, because you are offered something that are not free. Imagine walking down the street and imagining how this or that person will look naked? I usually do this as entertainment in a Mall, while I wait for my family. In my case, it is not done for some erotic fantasy, but rather as a fun way to spend the time. < some people will actually make you laugh, if you think about it >
Other people will do this for erotic reasons or just to satisfy their curiosity. If something is given to you on a platter, you will not appreciate it, but if you have to work for it, you might appreciate it. ^smile^
This might even be someone you know. ^lol^
Because people want to know more about the people that are close to them.
Why people will pay for pictures ? There are billion of free porn pictures and videos available on the net already
how will you check if the pictures are legit?
As the usual KYC that you need to do on exchanges.Video with her and her ID in his hands and maybe the newspaper of the day
limit the number of pictures submitted by one account to prevent mass abuse
While the service is anonymous for the donators, it isn't the same for the women/men that want the prize.They will need to confirm their identity.
Then there is only needed a count down before the woman/man (verified account) can add other pictures.
how will you check if the pictures are legit?
there will be hundreds of photos from internet that cannot be checked and validated to be genuine
also why connect a woman to a photo,especially through social networks?
make it anonymous,accounts connected to a wallet addy only
limit the number of pictures submitted by one account to prevent mass abuse
and yeah titsforbits.com or nakedbitcoins.com domains are awesome
there will be hundreds of photos from internet that cannot be checked and validated to be genuine
also why connect a woman to a photo,especially through social networks?
make it anonymous,accounts connected to a wallet addy only
limit the number of pictures submitted by one account to prevent mass abuse
and yeah titsforbits.com or nakedbitcoins.com domains are awesome
Quote
then people might not "donate" again.
They will get they money back without any fee.They can just put again the photo of the woman on the website and request her nude photo again
Quote
How are you going to regulate underage participation?
If the girl is underage, the website will give back the money to the investors but with a huge fee less, like 10% or more. (maybe all the money)The girl/woman/man should give a photo of her document that show her age to get the money, also to confirm her identity.
@PremiumCodeX @Kprawn
I don't think that it is flawed, because the service simply doesn't care about what the higher donator or donators are going to do after receiving the photos/videos
Maybe this is an incentive for the woman to just give the photo to all the donators, to get all the money, because she knows that after this, it is easy that the photos will go public anyway.
I don't think that it is flawed, because the service simply doesn't care about what the higher donator or donators are going to do after receiving the photos/videos
Maybe this is an incentive for the woman to just give the photo to all the donators, to get all the money, because she knows that after this, it is easy that the photos will go public anyway.
Yes, true.... the service provider are not influenced ...but should they add such an option in the first place? Would it not be better to place the
bounty out there and have people collectively crowd fund for a specific goal... { to get that women or man naked }
... If you exclude the other donators and one donator gets the "prize" ... then people might not "donate" again. { or will other donators not be able to donate, if one
donator pay the full bounty from the start? } ....Still a very interesting idea... How are you going to regulate underage participation? { any
verification of age to prevent that from happening? }
@PremiumCodeX @Kprawn
I don't think that it is flawed, because the service simply doesn't care about what the higher donator or donators are going to do after receiving the photos/videos
Maybe this is an incentive for the woman to just give the photo to all the donators, to get all the money, because she knows that after this, it is easy that the photos will go public anyway.
I don't think that it is flawed, because the service simply doesn't care about what the higher donator or donators are going to do after receiving the photos/videos
Maybe this is an incentive for the woman to just give the photo to all the donators, to get all the money, because she knows that after this, it is easy that the photos will go public anyway.
There will be 3 choices for the woman/man:
- Giving the photos only to the higher donator (private)
- Giving the photos to all the donators (the sum of all their money, but photo will still be "private")
- Giving the photos to the public (the sum of all the money from the donators AND the money donated to push her/him to make public nude photos)
- Giving the photos only to the higher donator (private)
- Giving the photos to all the donators (the sum of all their money, but photo will still be "private")
- Giving the photos to the public (the sum of all the money from the donators AND the money donated to push her/him to make public nude photos)
This part is a bit flawed.... Once those photos are out there.... the "higher donator" can re-publish it to everyone. I would rather suggest that the
photos be displayed to everyone that donated to attract more people. The "stripper" can just pre-configure his or her "Go full Monty" threshold
and once it is reached... he or she has to deliver. The moderators of the site will serve as a escrow to make sure both parties get what they
want.
Omg, you have figured out this project for me hehe!
Now, what I wonder is, what if one of the donators shared the pictures? You and I know that there would be people who do this.
Even in the "highest donator" case. There should be a reputation system to spot malicious donors.
Now, what I wonder is, what if one of the donators shared the pictures? You and I know that there would be people who do this.
Even in the "highest donator" case. There should be a reputation system to spot malicious donors.
Jump to: