Crowdfunding: Potential Legal Disaster Waiting To Happen

HBBZ

sr. member

Activity: 570

Merit: 250

Quote from: dentldir on October 28, 2012, 10:57:19 PM

Agreed. I was fairly irritated when I first learned about the opportunities available to accredited investors. I think it's a possible major reason for the growing income gap.

I hope crowdfunding can provide additional opportunities to small investors. Since crowd funded shares are not tradeable, I think it can be very different than pump and dump penny stocks. It will have it's challenges for sure, but nothing we need the government to protect us from.

I absolutely agree with you and appreciate your strong grassroot confidence, which can be rarely seen here in my country, mainland China where the majority of civilians just lean on the back of government like babies Undecided

. That accounts for a thousand-year-long slavery.

Herodes

hero member

Activity: 868

Merit: 1000

Sorry, but I don't see the problem.

1. If you're asking to be funded, make sure you do everything legit, and that you actually deliver a product/service, even if it would be delayed somehow.

2. If you invest, never invest more than you stand to lose, and do your best to check if the project is legitimate or not.

I don't really see the problem at all!

Boussac

legendary

Activity: 1221

Merit: 1025

e-ducat.fr

Quote from: Stephen Gornick on October 25, 2012, 03:23:59 AM

Quote from: rebuilder on October 25, 2012, 02:45:47 AM

I don't understand the comparison of crowdfunding to investment. Investors get a stake in the company they're investing in. Crowdfunders get a hand-written letter or a piece of equipment or other goods, and they know that. There's no expectation of profit.

You are confusing the donation-based (sort-of) crowdfunding that Kickstarter offers and the equity crowdfunding that was signed into law in the U.S. earlier this year.

See:

U.S. CrowdFunding Bill
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/us-crowdfunding-bill-73858

Right, the "donation-based" sort is a work around the huge barriers to entry set up by banks to prevent crowdfunding from becoming too effective too fast.
Bank-managed, regulated IPOs are a great source of profits for lots of middlemen who get insider information well ahead of the individual investors.
Crowdfunding is one of the ways out of crony capitalism.

Rudd-O

newbie

Activity: 56

Merit: 0

The crowdfunding act was written in order to ensure that crowdfunding would be a stillborn enterprise -- to limit access to crowdfunding to a few powerful players, so that the existing mechanisms of wealth transfer from poor to rich (IPOs, stock market, bonds, et cetera) remain unchallenged.

Anyone who understand why government does what it does can see this.

dentldir

sr. member

Activity: 333

Merit: 250

Agreed. I was fairly irritated when I first learned about the opportunities available to accredited investors. I think it's a possible major reason for the growing income gap.

I hope crowdfunding can provide additional opportunities to small investors. Since crowd funded shares are not tradeable, I think it can be very different than pump and dump penny stocks. It will have it's challenges for sure, but nothing we need the government to protect us from.

Stephen Gornick

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1010

Quote from: makomk on October 28, 2012, 01:42:44 PM

crowdfunding investors are inevitably going to make poorer, less well-informed decisions than proper venture capitalists.

Some will, and some will spot opportunity in an idea that a venture capitalist won't.

I mean seriously, what self-respecting venture capitalist would back an idea about renting out an airbed in your spare bedroom?

Not VC superstar Ron Conway, for instance ... "am [too] jammed now" was his response.
- http://www.foundersatwork.com/1/post/2012/10/what-goes-wrong.html

Now with AirBNB valued at more than one billion dollars a few years later shows that while venture capitalists are smart they aren't smarter than everyone else.

And for that reason, I should be allowed to learn of and invest in opportunities as I see fit. Today's regulations are prohibiting me (an "unaccredited" investor) from gaining access to the best information out there for me to make an informed decision.

I look forward to Bitcoin helping to tear these regulations down, whether it be painful or if they crumble under their own weight.

makomk

hero member

Activity: 686

Merit: 564

Quote from: Stephen Gornick on October 22, 2012, 05:38:34 PM

tl;dr: People are too stupid to know what the best use is for their money.

They are much better off letting the professionals on Wall Street manage it for them. If there is no competition for investment, then everyone puts their money into the same pool of equities and thus it is easier for fund managers to make a great profit, even with mediocre choices or worse, from making really risky bets.

It doesn't actually matter how intelligent they are, crowdfunding investors are inevitably going to make poorer, less well-informed decisions than proper venture capitalists. It makes no sense to spend more than the maximum amount you stand to lose on investigating an investment opportunity, so the smaller the individual investments the less investigation the investors do before putting money. Even if some of the crowdfunders are actual venture capitalists they're still going to make worse investments, though they'd probably do better at it than random outsiders with no investment experience.

(I'm pretty sure this is why so many investments are restricted to accredited investors too. Before the Internet, raising money from large numbers of small investors was very expensive, so the only reason to do it was if you wouldn't be able to raise the money from larger investors - for example, because the investment was a scam and you were taking advantage of the fact that smaller investors are less able to sniff this out.)

Stephen Gornick

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1010

Quote from: BlackHeartFund on October 27, 2012, 05:27:39 AM

I can't imagine they aren't right. At the moment it is all fun and games, but once a bunch of househusbands/wives start losing $10k to serial fraudsters, there will be an uproar and a huge opportunity for lawyers.

The market wants equity crowdfunding. The market will get equity crowdfunding.

This will not be for everyone ... and probably not most househusbands/wives, but there is a segment that wants this capability,

From another thread:

Quote from: Stephen Gornick on October 06, 2012, 05:15:20 PM

The Crowdfunding ammendment in the U.S. still won't allow trading of shares purchased for one year after buying them. The genie is aleady out of the bottle though. Kickstarter is not an equity platform but gave people a taste of what they want -- the ability to buy and trade equity in startups. So if they can't get that from the U.S., they'll buy bitcoins and send them to wherever this service (equity crowdfunding) is offered.

[Edit: And, of course, it would be beneficial if that capital were to remain within the country. Thus there will be a push to relax the regulation (to allow secondary markets, to allow foreign ownership of U.S. crowdfunded equity, etc.) or to apply tiers where micro-companies, under some threshold of equity valuation, can be formed with more leeway than firms above that threshold.]

BlackHeartFund

full member

Activity: 126

Merit: 100

I can't imagine they aren't right. At the moment it is all fun and games, but once a bunch of househusbands/wives start losing $10k to serial fraudsters, there will be an uproar and a huge opportunity for lawyers.

rebuilder

legendary

Activity: 1615

Merit: 1000

Quote from: Stephen Gornick on October 25, 2012, 03:23:59 AM

Quote from: rebuilder on October 25, 2012, 02:45:47 AM

I don't understand the comparison of crowdfunding to investment. Investors get a stake in the company they're investing in. Crowdfunders get a hand-written letter or a piece of equipment or other goods, and they know that. There's no expectation of profit.

You are confusing the donation-based (sort-of) crowdfunding that Kickstarter offers and the equity crowdfunding that was signed into law in the U.S. earlier this year.

See:

U.S. CrowdFunding Bill
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/us-crowdfunding-bill-73858

Ah, I hadn't heard of this.

In that case I tend to agree with the assesment that a shitstorm is a-brewin, even though the writer appears to be a rather stodgy status quo conservative.

dentldir

sr. member

Activity: 333

Merit: 250

Quote from: Stephen Gornick on October 25, 2012, 03:23:59 AM

You are confusing the donation-based (sort-of) crowdfunding that Kickstarter offers and the equity crowdfunding that was signed into law in the U.S. earlier this year.

See:

U.S. CrowdFunding Bill
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/us-crowdfunding-bill-73858

This. Unfortunately, the SEC is dragging their feet on getting all of its provisions formalized.

Right now the "advertise investments to the unaccredited general public rule" has yet to be ruled on. The accredited investor ruling came out a couple of months ago I believe.

Stephen Gornick

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1010

Quote from: rebuilder on October 25, 2012, 02:45:47 AM

I don't understand the comparison of crowdfunding to investment. Investors get a stake in the company they're investing in. Crowdfunders get a hand-written letter or a piece of equipment or other goods, and they know that. There's no expectation of profit.

You are confusing the donation-based (sort-of) crowdfunding that Kickstarter offers and the equity crowdfunding that was signed into law in the U.S. earlier this year.

See:

U.S. CrowdFunding Bill
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/us-crowdfunding-bill-73858

rebuilder

legendary

Activity: 1615

Merit: 1000

I don't understand the comparison of crowdfunding to investment. Investors get a stake in the company they're investing in. Crowdfunders get a hand-written letter or a piece of equipment or other goods, and they know that. There's no expectation of profit.

dentldir

sr. member

Activity: 333

Merit: 250

Quote from: JDBound on October 22, 2012, 05:36:55 PM

2. How does this bear even a tertiary relationship to Bitcoin?

Bitcoin would be an incredible method for crowdsourcing investments. And the JOBS Act has been mentioned many times in the context of the legality of securities.

Of course, all crowdfunding under the JOBS Act has to go through SEC approved channels, so Bitcoin wont get the spotlight when Title III is resolved. (Advertise to general public ruling).

JDBound

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 108

Quote from: galambo on October 22, 2012, 06:46:59 PM

Most people are too stupid to know what to do with their money.

Oh. Well now that that's settled, I have to go back to the law library to invest in a few promising "fake kickstarter style startups".

Quote from: Stephen Gornick on October 22, 2012, 07:04:28 PM

I see. You are likely one of those kind of people who think my life will be better without sugary sodas sold in sizes larger than 16 fluid ounces and that, in looking out for my welfare, that practice should be banned?

+1

Stephen Gornick

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1010

Quote from: galambo on October 22, 2012, 06:46:59 PM

Most people are too stupid to know what to do with their money.

Most people would be better off with a pension plan than a self-managed 401k.

I'd rather own shares of companies you named, than a kickstarter style startup where 100% losses are all but guaranteed, like "wikispeed."

I see. You are likely one of those kind of people who think my life will be better without sugary sodas sold in sizes larger than 16 fluid ounces and that, in looking out for my welfare, that practice should be banned?

galambo

sr. member

Activity: 966

Merit: 311

Quote from: Stephen Gornick on October 22, 2012, 05:38:34 PM

Quote from: galambo on October 22, 2012, 04:55:56 PM

Typical crowdfunding investors, even with basic disclosure requirements for participation, won’t have the investment savvy to determine whether an investment is real or a fraud.

tl;dr: People are too stupid to know what the best use for their money is.

They are much better off letting the professionals on Wall Street manage it for them. If there is no competition for investment, then everyone puts their money into the same pool of equities and thus it is easier for fund managers to make a great profit, even with mediocre choices or worse, from making really risky bets.

The people should be thankful there are regulators stopping such stupidity like dumping $120/year on some stupid idea like this and thinking they will have any equity worth a dime further down the road:
- http://www.wikispeed.com/WhatWeNeed

Instead they should be investing in only listed securities where because the listed companies file reports you can trust there is no fraud and that you won't lose money:
- http://finance.yahoo.com/quotes/HPQ,INTC,CAT,MCD/view/dv;_ylt=AtzVn5O1xTuk6.Mfsa8sAPcLv7gF

Most people are too stupid to know what to do with their money.

Most people would be better off with a pension plan than a self-managed 401k.

I'd rather own shares of companies you named, than a kickstarter style startup where 100% losses are all but guaranteed, like "wikispeed."

galambo

sr. member

Activity: 966

Merit: 311

Quote from: JDBound on October 22, 2012, 05:36:55 PM

Hard to read past all the FUD here. It's really shocking that two attorneys are clamoring for more litigation on this issue.

1. Why post the entire text of the article?

2. How does this bear even a tertiary relationship to Bitcoin?

edit: finally 100th post!

1) I have reduced it to a shorter quote.

2) Its particularly unsettling to read that you've been in a coma for the last month. I hope the damage is not permanent.

Stephen Gornick

legendary

Activity: 2506

Merit: 1010

Quote from: galambo on October 22, 2012, 04:55:56 PM

Typical crowdfunding investors, even with basic disclosure requirements for participation, won’t have the investment savvy to determine whether an investment is real or a fraud.

tl;dr: People are too stupid to know what the best use is for their money.

They are much better off letting the professionals on Wall Street manage it for them. If there is no competition for investment, then everyone puts their money into the same pool of equities and thus it is easier for fund managers to make a great profit, even with mediocre choices or worse, from making really risky bets.

The people should be thankful there are regulators stopping such stupidity like dumping $120/year on some stupid idea like this and thinking they will have any equity worth a dime further down the road:
- http://www.wikispeed.com/WhatWeNeed

Instead they should be investing in only listed securities where because the listed companies file reports you can trust there is no fraud and that you won't lose money:
- http://finance.yahoo.com/quotes/HPQ,INTC,CAT,MCD/view/dv;_ylt=AtzVn5O1xTuk6.Mfsa8sAPcLv7gF

JDBound

full member

Activity: 150

Merit: 108

Hard to read past all the FUD here. It's really shocking that two attorneys are clamoring for more litigation on this issue.

1. Why post the entire text of the article?

2. How does this bear even a tertiary relationship to Bitcoin?

edit: finally 100th post!

Topic: Crowdfunding: Potential Legal Disaster Waiting To Happen (Read 4772 times)