People are understanding that Coinbase is a custodial service and therefore not a good way to store coins in the long run - it's as simple as that.
Okay, ironic aside
(at the initial stage of development, Coinbase was called Bitbank) Coinbase is still the best storage service since 98% of all actives are stored in cold wallets, and do not forget about their insurance fund,
"Coinbase is one of the only exchanges that offers FDIC insurance on USD (US Dollar) deposits".I do not know why only Coinbase was used for this, why Binance and other first five exchanges were not included? [...]
I apologize for moving away from the topic ... but I think this post is more relevant than ever.
So let's be clear about something ... First, Coinbase and Binance are not competitors to each other, despite the fact that each of these exchanges has 50 million users. Both exchanges have different goals, with Coinbase targeting USA and Europe while Binance is targeting Eurasia and South America, (to simplify, we can say that it is a matter of jurisdiction, and politics).
Second, the appraised values of these exchanges differ significantly. Despite the colossal trading volumes, everyone forgets that before founding, Binance enlisted the support of the Asian Whales in exchange for long-term trading incentives. I will not be too unfounded, but judging only by the numbers, then Coinbase already has 12% of the total crypto market capitalization at its disposal. You can say that BNB is breaking records, and the capitalization of this token is $ 80 billion - but in reality it is just an altcoin, if Binance announced the IDO now, then BNB would not be included in the estimated value of Binance, (correct me if I am wrong).