From Bitcoin's very inception there's been gross misinformation even from supposedly
reputable news sources. I have caught, and observed the BBC promoting misinformation or even scare mongering from using Bitcoin, based on loosely based accusations, without any substance. I found that instead of taking the responsibility themselves they were quoting other articles from tabloid's in the British Media, without actually verifying their claims. Instead, they were using words such as supposedly, or claimed probably to cover their arse if someone actually challenged their points. Though, by simply sharing or reiterating the point of their media, they were convincing their readers to stay away from Bitcoin, as they should know that the general public consumption is based on the title, and potentially a few sentences in the first paragraph of the article, and even when their readers do read the entire article they usually aren't actively approaching it with a conscious mind, and won't identify the type of language they are using, like the ones I outlined above; claimed, and supposedly.
Point being; Bitcoin has always struggled with misinformation, and I find this is the biggest roadblock when I have discussions about Bitcoin with others; they always seem to bring up past articles that the BBC, and various other news sources had written up, usually trying to paint Bitcoin in a negative light, and when that's already embedded in their minds, it's hard to convince them otherwise.
My question with misinformation, is whether it can encourage people to develop critical thinking skills and a knowledge base which makes it harder for them to be deceived.
Potentially, I would argue that more, and more people every day are becoming aware of how the news, and other sources of information are pushing some sort of agenda. Plus, we have a plethora of archive websites, and fact checking websites. I'd like to think, and I do believe it's the case that people are becoming wise to it.
I haven't heard of many nigerian prince schemes in crypto. Those scams mainly target the elderly, while crypto's average userbase is composed mostly of young people. Part of the reason the elderly are targeted for scams, could involve them growing up in a world without misinformation or the scams we have today. Which led to them not developing defenses against it.
They probably do exist to some extent, although the rich prime scam is a pretty commonly talked about scam, and probably isn't even that effective when it's involving fiat currencies these days. Though, there are definitely more sophisticated scams circulating about both in cryptocurrencies, and fiat. Bitcoin years ago tended to appeal to a certain crowd, and while it's stereotyping to a degree, I believe it was somewhat true that in the early days Bitcoin appealed to those that were interested in computers, and cryptography, and therefore they were at least a little more resistant to the more obvious scams. However, as Bitcoin becomes more of a mainstream interest, then the potential for scamming increases.