Topic: Cryptocurrency association to homosexuality are not acceptable! - page 3. (Read 12303 times)

He's already established that he's a Nazi. So very probably both.

i am i minority, and therefor i sympetise with other minorities. No im not gay, i have a mental disorder called autism. "Weird" people(like me, or homos, or blacks, or jews) were killed in Germany when the Nazis ruled.

Now a short poem in danish by Martin Niemöller from WW2:
and translation to english:

This is why we disagree with you: You are attacking a minority. And we ask the question: "will i be next?"

No sane and intelligent person, would support a system that discriminates minorities, except in self defense(bankrobbers or murders).

Therefor i conclude that you are either very stupid, or insane. Discussion over.

More like the bank manager letting convicts have bank accounts. He was put in charge of the church. That gave him the ability to choose who to do services for.

I'm sorry if your fine "atheist" sensibilities were offended by a pastor giving a service for whomever he felt like, but it's not yours, or the crowd's, decision, it's his. If that got him booted from the church hierarchy, well, then that's the risk he took.

Here in the US, we have churches specifically set up for gays, by gays. And I have no problem with that, nor with gays attending normal church services.

The homosexuals were trying every possibility to intentionally infuriate society. They were expecting violent reaction to advance their political goals. There were no real violence against homosexuals before the gay prides. But they wanted to have public demonstrations, official recognition by state, gay marriage and adoption rights. It is all about what values and order society have, not what each pervert does in his bedroom.

The church was not owned by pastor. His actions caused him to be expelled from christian community. It is like cashier or security guard letting in robbers and convicts into bank vault and do banking operations in there.

Well, there you are then. His church, he can decide who to give a service for. If a little old lady was blocking the entrance to my place of business, she'd get moved out of the way, too. I probably wouldn't use riot police, but like I said, you guys don't quite have the whole "peaceful protest" thing down yet.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Libertarianism

Perfectly typical.

I'm fine with that.

Can I move this thread to Politics & Society now? I don't think the past few pages had anything to do with the forum itself...

The pastor was gay himself. Google for Maris Sants. He is the pidar pastor that got his ass kicked out from christian community. It was long ago and back then I was using VHS system for video. Probably goggling for Riga pride 2005 will bring up some videos from that event.Then all your common sense are totally gone. Not to mention moral values. You perfectly demonstrated this. I got impression that You are capable of thinking different than mainstream media and also a gun enthusiast. It is untypical for such person to be fag supporter.

You failed to answer one vital question: Where was the pastor/priest/etc during all this? What was the church's opinion on the matter? And that VHS tape does me no good. I need something I can look at, not something you can look at and tell me about. Forgive me, but your objectivity is suspect.

Assuming they're not harming anyone, I have no problem with them.

I have unedited VHS video tape from that event. Police using force against non-violent and passive protesters, including older women and teenagers. Jut for the "gay" people to enter church as an act of blasphemy. I'm not christian but I understand that the only reason for church service that day was to provocate and infuriate christians.

And what about "peacefull assembly" of necrophiliacs? (their assembly really must be quiet and peaceful )Different parts of world have different moral and cultural values. Different laws. Good luck forcing decriminalization of alcohol consumption upon Saudi arabian muslims!If homosexuality was "proper" then every people would fuck everyone else. More than 90% prefer opposite sex as sexual partners.

I stopped to believe the concept of god in the same day I learned that Santa Claus and Easter bunny are fake. My parents were atheistic as well. Opposing homosexuality and other deviations is nothing to do with religion at all. I have no religion, don't believe there is anything supernatural in world etc. It just happens so than in USA largest anti-gay protesters are christians. Here christians are protesting too, but main body of protesters are ordinary people.It is not true. The homosexual controlled press and television make people believe this bullcrap about protesters being hidden gay themselves. I liked naked women from age 9 when I started to masturbate. Of course I cannot prove that I have no desires or thoughts of having homosexual affairs.

It is my business if I find something disgusting and unpleasant happening in public. If I'm in cinema with my girlfriend I would not like to see a gay or lesbian couple around. It is like someone eating dog shit instead of popcorn. In both gay and dog shit cases I will kick the sicko out of there.

...while claiming they are atheist.

What?

People are open minded enough to use this revolutionary internet currency but do have issues if some people around them don't follow the 2000 years old Biblical view of "proper" human relationships.

Maybe all of the scared people just are too scared of their own bi- or homosexual thoughts. This is just insane, I couldn't care less if there are some gay couples walking in the streets, it's none of my business.

Why would they want to enter a church? Was the priest/minister/whatever of this church among the crowd preventing their entry? Do you have a news report or other article regarding this event? (Russian is fine, Google does a half-way decent job with the translation)

I have to say I don't approve of use of riot police to remove a counterprotest.

You guys certainly have some difficulty getting that whole "peaceably assemble" bit down.
You're right, I don't believe you. Yours is a dwindling voice.

LOL. Stalin and Beria wrote the wikipedia. OMG this is so funny.


Fact: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proto-Balto-Slavic_language

The simple story of Balts. West Balts got pwned by Germanic tribes, East Balts got pwned by Slavs.. The remnants got kicked all the way to the north and a bunch of them just simply got assimilated.


After centuries getting owned? And how long they lasted. O'way. Jews did a much better job with Israel.

Fact:

Reds pwned Latvians, only after help from Germany AND Poland they got their short lived independence.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Latvia



So you're a latvian?

I assume these guys aren't Latvians? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Holocaust_in_Latvia#Ar.C4.81js_commando_formed

Jewish NKVD? Ahhhh..


Huh? Finns / Ukrainians are fine with Russians. Only small dicks like you bitch a lot.

You are wrong Myrkul. You probably will not believe but my views are not in minority.

Relatively certain he views himself - mistakenly - among the majority.

He may be a hetero Caucasian male, but his view plant him squarely in the minority.

do you consider yourself a minority?

Facts:

Balts were slavicized ages ago. Check the damn language. Duh.
Your nation was pwned for thousands of years. Fact.
During WW2 the idiots thought that killing poles and jews was good for business. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponary_massacre
Now, they're just nothing. Who would remember a lithuanian or a latvian today?

Too bad soviets didnt ship them to Siberia like Chechens.

I apologise for my mistakes.

I've mixed up Lithuania with Latvia. I've corrected my previous message in this thread. To make such a mistake for me is completely unexcusable, I'm well aware of the .lt versus .lv distinction and the distinctive history of both nations.

Equally bad on my part is mixing up Slavs with Balts.

I regret making those mistakes.

What I reconfirm is the information about the cooperation and mutual support of the national-socialistic, neo-fascist, old-falangist and similar totalitarian and human-purity movements in Europe. Unfortunately this phenomenon is so recent that there is very little publicly-available information about this in English. Whatever is available in English tends to use code-words, like 88 for "Heil Hitler".

Edit: It is equally hard to come by a reliable and representative information about the social situation in the Baltic independent states that were former republics of the USSR. But please don't try to make direct comparisons between the LGBT rights in the USA and the LGBT rights in the former Soviet Bloc. You will completely miss the point both in the historical and current social context.

Defensive force is another matter entirely. And here I am going to side with you - a bit. Discrimination (freedom of association means freedom not to associate) is fine. It's when you start throwing bricks at their parades that you cross the line. Initiating force is a no-no.