I think our fellow BTT Saint-loup just wrote here a list of well-known gambling sites that everyone who reads the Gambling section knows.
For almost every casino from the list, there is a long and long topic, in which there are both positive and negative reviews. And if the project has been working for a long time, then naturally there will be disgruntled users who will write a negative review. It's pretty easy to look at the last hundred posts in such a topic and you will understand what problems can arise with this site.
But besides, no one knows the inside information of the casino and even the most famous casino can suddenly become a problem for the players.
But for those on the list, this is very unlikely.
Yes you are right testimonials on ANN thread from trustful members and even from anonymous users when they are detailed are a good way to evaluate gambling sites. But this has nothing to do with signature campaigns, contrariwise bounty participants could be biased when they leave comments on those threads
. So I don't think bounties are a good indicator to judge a platform.
In a general sense there are many sites under which they are excellent, both for betting and casino games, including the more traditional ones such as roulette, black jack and poker, I usually play daily and I could make a good list, but the most reliable whose reputation is prominent be it for their exploits, marketing including signature campaigns are:
1.-Stake.com
2.-bitcasino.io
3.-Sportsbet.io
4.-Roobet
5.-Duelbits
6.-Betfury
7.-Wolfbet
These casinos have a lot of good reviews on the forum and have a lot of acceptance within the forum, and there are many on their way to becoming one of the best, they usually start with signature campaigns and this gets them off the ground.
Please don't spread bull shit bro, you can get scammed many people by telling that. Signature campaigns have nothing to do with reliability and trustfulness, anybody can launch a signature campaign to scam people and many already did it. You seem to like them very much
, so I guess you must be a big bounty hunter, then I highly doubt you have enough time in your days to gamble "daily" in all those casinos as you claim.
Actually all the mentioned sites are safe places for people to play with their money but I have to agree that signature campaign should not be a thing to consider a site is good or not.
Frankly speaking I'm not so surprised to read it, as he is one of users who always try to suggest any new sites to run signature campaign.
LOL
Hi guys, Saint-loup at no time have I said my opinion to spread stupid or shit, that selection of casinos that I placed is because I trust them and obviously I like them, it goes without saying if I have enough time to play or not, yes , I´m a bounty hunter or not, not your problem, I´m against scammers, I would never encourage scam sites.
When there are new sites of course I suggest you run a signature campaign, I think it is a good way to start on the right foot, advertising is good, as there are sites that turn out to be scams with a signature campaign. There are many who have not launched a signature campaign and it turns out to be a scam, whether they are casinos, exchanges, among others.
The sites that I have suggested signature campaigns have been managed by great campaign managers, if you can see many business models, they are based on good publicity and more in this area of casinos that there is strong competition.
