Cryptocurrency idiots donate 30K in bitcoin to Rothschild banks!

stompix

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 6403

Blackjack.fun

Quote from: eternalgloom on April 18, 2019, 11:49:48 AM

Do you have a source on that? Couldn't find anything about it immediately.

Just looking at the following list though, I do see a lot of different leaks from a wide variety of countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_material_published_by_WikiLeaks

Not that much from Russia, except for Spy Files Russia.

Of course,
https://foreignpolicy.com/2017/08/17/wikileaks-turned-down-leaks-on-russian-government-during-u-s-presidential-campaign/
https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/world/europe/russian-documents-leaked-ddosecrets.html

Pretty interesting how WikiLeaks is enjoying writing only about the "decadent'" western world, isn't it?
To focus on the wrong side of the top corrupted countries in the world rankings seems a bit ...interesting to me.

Bagaji

sr. member

Activity: 1330

Merit: 291

Quote from: lyks15 on April 12, 2019, 11:42:45 AM

Be carefull on doing good. You don't know if your donation is truelly came on the right person or beneficiary. Sometimes the term donation use as a scam keyword. It is not bad to give help but be carefull because if not you will give the chance to make a scam and it is like you tolerate bad activity.

These are the main reasons why donating to charity or organizations who are in need don't freak me at all. Haven a clear picture of the donation could be of motivation to me, but in the absence of that; count me out. Donate 30k in bitcoin to Rothschild banks to me looks like a waste of resources and should have be channel to other sources.

Ucy

sr. member

Activity: 2576

Merit: 401

Anything is possible except there is no evidence to back up your your claim..
I was a bit suspicious too in the early days of Wikileaks due to it contributing to some big protests/revolutions back then.

What matters is if Wikileaks revelations are true or not

eternalgloom

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1283

Quote from: stompix on April 18, 2019, 10:14:58 AM

Quote from: eternalgloom on April 18, 2019, 04:50:33 AM

I don't know, my personal opinion is that I know far too little about all of this to correctly form my own opinion Tongue

Although I thought Wikileaks had published leaks both for and against Russia at some points.

Actually no, they even refused to publish information back in 2016 because they could not "verify it".
They claimed that information showing thousand of army reports about Russian operations in Ukraine are "insignificant".

Do you have a source on that? Couldn't find anything about it immediately.

Just looking at the following list though, I do see a lot of different leaks from a wide variety of countries.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_material_published_by_WikiLeaks

Not that much from Russia, except for Spy Files Russia.

buwaytress

legendary

Activity: 2856

Merit: 3548

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on April 16, 2019, 08:17:05 PM

I'm baffled how people unanimously defend Assange on this forum, it's like everyone is living under the rock or in some informational bubble. Today everyone knows that Assange has very close ties to Russia, that he is biased and not a free-speech fighter he claims to be. Even anti-government communities, like reddit's /r/Libertarian know this.

However, this Rothschild conspiracy is just total bullshit, and the person who came up with it is either seriously misguided or attempts to deflect the actualy and well-known conspiracy.

All other things proven and unproven aside, it's really tough I think to give additional sympathy to guys who, already long overstaying their welcome smears faeces on walls. I don't doubt he did that, and I normally think anyone is free to protest, but surely not bite the hand feeding you, the hand you sought for?

It's tough to be anything these days though. Can't please everyone, by definition of taking any stand. You want to be something and you have to be a purist, you aren't allowed to be a little of anything, aren't allowed to change your mind. Tough crowd online especially;)

But oh yeah, Rothschild. Illuminati. The Vatican. They're all behind this.

stompix

legendary

Activity: 2912

Merit: 6403

Blackjack.fun

Quote from: eternalgloom on April 18, 2019, 04:50:33 AM

I don't know, my personal opinion is that I know far too little about all of this to correctly form my own opinion Tongue

Although I thought Wikileaks had published leaks both for and against Russia at some points.

Actually no, they even refused to publish information back in 2016 because they could not "verify it".
They claimed that information showing thousand of army reports about Russian operations in Ukraine are "insignificant".

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on April 16, 2019, 08:17:05 PM

I'm baffled how people unanimously defend Assange on this forum, it's like everyone is living under the rock or in some informational bubble. Today everyone knows that Assange has very close ties to Russia, that he is biased and not a free-speech fighter he claims to be. Even anti-government communities, like reddit's /r/Libertarian know this.

However, this Rothschild conspiracy is just total bullshit, and the person who came up with it is either seriously misguided or attempts to deflect the actualy and well-known conspiracy.

You're going to be amazed by how many people on this forum hate the US and the EU and praise everyone who fights against them just because they've read bad things or saw some clips on yt by some "famous" analyst.
And this is highly ironic especially here, where most of the older members and developers come from the western countries, where the only exchange you can trust are in the western area and to add a cherry on top, the US and the EU are the best countries to spend your coins and best laws for cryptos.

De4ted

member

Activity: 111

Merit: 10

Quote from: pushups44 on April 12, 2019, 09:05:08 AM

Quote from: anticonformist on April 12, 2019, 08:47:59 AM

wikileaks and Assange are part of the Rothschild Family banking dynasty, see here http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-rothschilds-use-wikileaks-wound-rival-bank/

and some fools are still sending them more bitcoin! https://bitcoinist.com/julian-assange-20k-bitcoin-donations-wikileaks/

Oh please! This sounds like Alex Jones. The bankers are not behind everything, contrary to what some people believe. They certainly would not release their own classified dirt and then chase themselves publicly for 7 years.

Logically correct.

eternalgloom

legendary

Activity: 1792

Merit: 1283

Quote from: hatshepsut93 on April 16, 2019, 08:17:05 PM

I'm baffled how people unanimously defend Assange on this forum, it's like everyone is living under the rock or in some informational bubble. Today everyone knows that Assange has very close ties to Russia, that he is biased and not a free-speech fighter he claims to be. Even anti-government communities, like reddit's /r/Libertarian know this.

I think you'll find a whole range of different opinions about Assange on this forum, just as in the real world.
He's just a very polarizing person.

I don't know, my personal opinion is that I know far too little about all of this to correctly form my own opinion Tongue

Although I thought Wikileaks had published leaks both for and against Russia at some points.

maianh09

full member

Activity: 672

Merit: 100

They are not stupid people, they are sharks, and they are creating new opportunities for themselves. In the future banks will accept Cryptocurrency and they may need banks to help with illegal transactions and money laundering.

anticonformist

newbie

Activity: 65

Merit: 0

name one amazing mind blowing world changing thing wikileaks published ever.... there's 0. otherwise put it on this thread.

people who believe wikileaks is the new age gospel of truth representing free speech of the internet couldn't be further form the truth. look ill break it down real simple for the blind deaf and dumb.....

https://www.thestranger.com/slog/archives/2010/07/27/911-truthers-hate-on-wikileaks-founder

who did 911??

https://wikispooks.com/wiki/9-11/Israel_did_it

wikileaks wants to blame and publish ONLY things that make OUR country look bad. people who hold dual citizenship do not feel part of
OUR country would therefore have a reason to leak documents about OUR government but not their own.

Why people cannot see it???

romero121

legendary

Activity: 3206

Merit: 1213

Enterapp Pre-Sale Live

Quote from: niisarearning on April 17, 2019, 05:18:50 AM

Quote from: okala on April 12, 2019, 09:12:59 AM

The bank may be publicly against bitcoin but most of they top management teams are still greatly involves in bitcoin and are taking advantage of the opportunity the bitcoin network brings. Rothschild is a households name in the banking sector but have never publicly spoken against bitcoin lately.

Yes even if they against bitcoin why should they accept payments in bitcoin . As you said most of the bankers may be supporting and taking advantage of this crypto moments most of the wales might belong to these bankers group . These wales always spread wrong propaganda for diversify people mindset then they will take advantage out of that .

Is there any proven statement or evidence that they are against bitcoin. From my understanding there is nothing evident and if the service rendered by them is being overtook by something else, truly they will make plans to stop the growth of the one which has gone competing with them. Here bitcoin is the rival and for that stance they could have opposed it in some way, and for the same we cannot say they are not supposed to get donation in terms of bitcoin. These whales aren't a market manipulative authority anymore, because people have begun to analyze to the core whenever some news is being spread by whales.

niisarearning

sr. member

Activity: 910

Merit: 252

Quote from: okala on April 12, 2019, 09:12:59 AM

The bank may be publicly against bitcoin but most of they top management teams are still greatly involves in bitcoin and are taking advantage of the opportunity the bitcoin network brings. Rothschild is a households name in the banking sector but have never publicly spoken against bitcoin lately.

Yes even if they against bitcoin why should they accept payments in bitcoin . As you said most of the bankers may be supporting and taking advantage of this crypto moments most of the wales might belong to these bankers group . These wales always spread wrong propaganda for diversify people mindset then they will take advantage out of that .

hatshepsut93

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 2148

I'm baffled how people unanimously defend Assange on this forum, it's like everyone is living under the rock or in some informational bubble. Today everyone knows that Assange has very close ties to Russia, that he is biased and not a free-speech fighter he claims to be. Even anti-government communities, like reddit's /r/Libertarian know this.

However, this Rothschild conspiracy is just total bullshit, and the person who came up with it is either seriously misguided or attempts to deflect the actualy and well-known conspiracy.

CaVO32

full member

Activity: 1848

Merit: 158

Quote from: avikz on April 16, 2019, 11:13:30 AM

These may be facts! But considering the contributions of Julian Assange to the world of free information and exposing powerful government personalities, I don't necessarily see him as a threat to the crypto community, even though he may be related to Rothschild!

Julian Assange is probably one of the most important media personalities of our time and we should respect that fact! People are donatinh to show their gratitude, they must not be called idiots!

people have different takes on this matter but i don't think calling idiots to those who are donating him is appropriate. maybe at some point, they are believers of wikileaks or have been benefited by those exposures or been happy that someone got the guts to expose those activities and the least that they can do is contribute to this person via sending btc to him. at least, being anonymous, they won't be the subject of prying eyes.

dunfida

legendary

Activity: 3122

Merit: 1140

Quote from: anticonformist on April 12, 2019, 08:47:59 AM

wikileaks and Assange are part of the Rothschild Family banking dynasty, see here http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-rothschilds-use-wikileaks-wound-rival-bank/

and some fools are still sending them more bitcoin! https://bitcoinist.com/julian-assange-20k-bitcoin-donations-wikileaks/

Those aren't fools but those are people who do support WikiLeaks and making out some donation thru BTC. I don't see anything wrong on it yet those people aren't forced out to sent out those amounts on that given wallet. I don't care if they are attached with Rothschild's yet this is already an another segment.

amposed

newbie

Activity: 104

Merit: 0

Quote from: toleomasd on April 16, 2019, 01:37:20 PM

Quote from: amposed on April 16, 2019, 01:31:26 PM

It seems to me that the project lacks a more active audience, and users would like to have more live communication with the team, and not with the admin in the chat. After all, no one else as a team member can explain how to competently interact with the platform. You did not try to share strategies in Taklimakan?

I agree, I would like to directly interact with the team, not a bot, but what does the named platform have to do with it?

Differently. For example, team members could share expert opinions and directly receive feedback from users. What also benefits the project itself, because the reputation and loyalty of users is earned. Or you can post reports about the project, how it develops, what achievements already exist. This is a social network, not a blog, because the audience is more active and always yearns for new knowledge

toleomasd

member

Activity: 140

Merit: 10

Quote from: amposed on April 16, 2019, 01:31:26 PM

It seems to me that the project lacks a more active audience, and users would like to have more live communication with the team, and not with the admin in the chat. After all, no one else as a team member can explain how to competently interact with the platform. You did not try to share strategies in Taklimakan?

I agree, I would like to directly interact with the team, not a bot, but what does the named platform have to do with it?

jvdp

hero member

Activity: 1148

Merit: 523

CryptoTalk.Org - Get Paid for every Post!

Quote from: anticonformist on April 12, 2019, 08:47:59 AM

wikileaks and Assange are part of the Rothschild Family banking dynasty, see here http://www.alternativenewsnetwork.net/wikileaks-rothschild-operation-rothschilds-use-wikileaks-wound-rival-bank/

and some fools are still sending them more bitcoin! https://bitcoinist.com/julian-assange-20k-bitcoin-donations-wikileaks/

May be this is fake information or the person who sent the money might receive cash equivalent to that bitcoins. I do not believe crypto investors and hodlers are stupid to do such work with Rothschild family.

If you have proof to show the transaction then we can confirm the receiver address is Rothschild's family right? Can I have addresses. We can track the centralized banking giant with the power of blockchain. Lets trash them.

amposed

newbie

Activity: 104

Merit: 0

It seems to me that the project lacks a more active audience, and users would like to have more live communication with the team, and not with the admin in the chat. After all, no one else as a team member can explain how to competently interact with the platform. You did not try to share strategies in Taklimakan?

avikz

legendary

Activity: 3080

Merit: 1500

Quote from: anticonformist on April 12, 2019, 09:40:14 AM

do you not read the article, facts are facts...

1. a sister-in-law and second cousin of the Rothschilds posted bail for Julian Assange

2. The Economist (a Rothschild magazine) gave Assange its New Media Award in 2008

3. Wikileaks used the law firm Fox Rothschild to overturn a judge’s ruling to order a web host to shut down the Wikileaks site

4. The Guardian and The New York Times, two of Assange’s media partners, are linked to the Rothschilds

5. The owner of the mansion where Assange was eventually put under house arrest has links to Rothschilds

6. Assange’s lawyer is also Rothschilds’ lawyer

7. US Senator Joe Lieberman who was ultimately responsible for making Assange the largest media personality of the decade, is a member of the Council On Foreign Relations (a Rothschild organization)

These may be facts! But considering the contributions of Julian Assange to the world of free information and exposing powerful government personalities, I don't necessarily see him as a threat to the crypto community, even though he may be related to Rothschild!

Julian Assange is probably one of the most important media personalities of our time and we should respect that fact! People are donatinh to show their gratitude, they must not be called idiots!

Topic: Cryptocurrency idiots donate 30K in bitcoin to Rothschild banks! (Read 371 times)