Topic: CryptoDredge 0.27.0 — CUDA Miner - page 24. (Read 86186 times)
please hashrate x22i CryptoDredge 0.13.0 and CryptoDredge 0.12.0
I love these guys for the work they've done.
Tell me, do you plan to add support for a new algorithm for your miner!The algorithm x21s
Hi, now testing cryptodredge with my 1060 3Gb. I got a lot of rejected shares. Reason: low difficulty share. So whats wrong, OC settings or something else?
On what algo? All algo's require different clock settings.
My mistake, did not specify an algorithm, rejected shares was on cryptonight v8.
The problem was solved:
Hi, now testing cryptodredge with my 1060 3Gb. I got a lot of rejected shares. Reason: low difficulty share. So whats wrong, OC settings or something else?
I can answer on my own question: the problem of "low difficulty share" was solved by decreasing the memory overclocking, but interesting that the same settings on the dagger-hashimoto were absolutely stable.
This miner is gaining more and more supporters. Previously, the most popular miner was Claymore, but apparently now its author has some problems and with the decrease in the price of Ether and the termination of the benefits of dual mining, other programs come out on top.
CryptoDredge 0.12.0 added to https://www.minermonitoring.com/
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
Join our discord https://discord.gg/aGGaeqq
also, you can check the speed of the miner on different rigs using the benchmark page: https://minermonitoring.com/benchmark
Hi CryptoDredge dev,
Thank you for such great miner.
Please help!
I get 54 Mh/s (Allium algo) on GTX 1070 Ti rigs with CryptoDredge 0.11.0, while only get 47 Mh/s with CryptoDredge 0.12.0 (same cards and same settings with both versions).
Why is v0.12.0 slower than v.0.11.0 for Allium algo?
Thank you for such great miner.
Please help!
I get 54 Mh/s (Allium algo) on GTX 1070 Ti rigs with CryptoDredge 0.11.0, while only get 47 Mh/s with CryptoDredge 0.12.0 (same cards and same settings with both versions).
Why is v0.12.0 slower than v.0.11.0 for Allium algo?
Still no support for X16R algo ?
I'd have to test T-Rex 8.0 but 7.4 x22i was significantly slower than CryptoDredge v10.
Has anyone tested the x22i speed and compared to T-Rex's miner by any chance? Curious to see whether there are any big differences. Not at home this weekend so can't check...
GTX 1080 +150 +500 65%
https://imgur.com/a/gZpPbSK
18, as title says. So average speed is around 10MHs.
Now T-Rex is faster by 10% on x22i, I hope it remains the better miner as it has working API.
x22i some improvement ( 1.3-1.5%)
voltage 0.6375 -600 memory +400 clock (with nvinspector)
Edit : Newest T-Rex is now faster than CryptoDredge
Hi, what result frequencies you got with this settings (core clock)? Power consumtion from the wall? It seems about 1300 on core and 60-65W from card? Code:
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1070 Ti : 7026KH/s (Avr 6999KH/s) : 108,4KH/W : T=55C Fan=30%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU1 GTX 1070 Ti : 6862KH/s (Avr 6789KH/s) : 111,7KH/W : T=54C Fan=28%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1070 Ti : 6900KH/s (Avr 6932KH/s) : 111,0KH/W : T=55C Fan=31%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1070 Ti : 6368KH/s (Avr 6384KH/s) : 108,9KH/W : T=54C Fan=26%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU4 GTX 1070 Ti : 6862KH/s (Avr 6863KH/s) : 111,1KH/W : T=56C Fan=33%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU5 GTX 1070 Ti : 7070KH/s (Avr 7069KH/s) : 110,9KH/W : T=57C Fan=34%
voltage 0.6375 -600 memory +400 clock (with nvinspector)
Edit : Newest T-Rex is now faster than CryptoDredge
Yes that's correct, around 64w averaged and resulting frequency is 1180
Hi, now testing cryptodredge with my 1060 3Gb. I got a lot of rejected shares. Reason: low difficulty share. So whats wrong, OC settings or something else?
On what algo? All algo's require different clock settings.
v. 0.12.0
Add Pipe (UOUcoin) algorithm
Add Dedal (Numus) algorithm
Devs are really active, keep up the good work.
Add Pipe (UOUcoin) algorithm
Add Dedal (Numus) algorithm
Devs are really active, keep up the good work.
Hi, now testing cryptodredge with my 1060 3Gb. I got a lot of rejected shares. Reason: low difficulty share. So whats wrong, OC settings or something else?
I can answer on my own question: the problem of "low difficulty share" was solved by decreasing the memory overclocking, but interesting that the same settings on the dagger-hashimoto were absolutely stable. x22i some improvement ( 1.3-1.5%)
voltage 0.6375 -600 memory +400 clock (with nvinspector)
Edit : Newest T-Rex is now faster than CryptoDredge
Hi, what result frequencies you got with this settings (core clock)? Power consumtion from the wall? It seems about 1300 on core and 60-65W from card? Code:
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU0 GTX 1070 Ti : 7026KH/s (Avr 6999KH/s) : 108,4KH/W : T=55C Fan=30%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU1 GTX 1070 Ti : 6862KH/s (Avr 6789KH/s) : 111,7KH/W : T=54C Fan=28%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU2 GTX 1070 Ti : 6900KH/s (Avr 6932KH/s) : 111,0KH/W : T=55C Fan=31%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU3 GTX 1070 Ti : 6368KH/s (Avr 6384KH/s) : 108,9KH/W : T=54C Fan=26%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU4 GTX 1070 Ti : 6862KH/s (Avr 6863KH/s) : 111,1KH/W : T=56C Fan=33%
[16:55:17] INFO - GPU5 GTX 1070 Ti : 7070KH/s (Avr 7069KH/s) : 110,9KH/W : T=57C Fan=34%
voltage 0.6375 -600 memory +400 clock (with nvinspector)
Edit : Newest T-Rex is now faster than CryptoDredge
I have tested T-rex 080, CryptoDredge 0.11.0 and Z-Enemy 1.24v3 CUDA 9.2 with mixed rig (gtx 1060, 1070 and 1080ti) for BCD, Bitcore and Skunk algo. PL62%.
180/176/163
257/248/244
391/394/383
180/176/163
257/248/244
391/394/383
On what cards?
"gtx 1060, 1070 and 1080ti"
first column - freq's in t-rex on 1060-1070-1080ti
first row - freq's on 1060 in t-rex, CD, z-enemy
right ?
Hi, now testing cryptodredge with my 1060 3Gb. I got a lot of rejected shares. Reason: low difficulty share. So whats wrong, OC settings or something else?
I have tested T-rex 080, CryptoDredge 0.11.0 and Z-Enemy 1.24v3 CUDA 9.2 with mixed rig (gtx 1060, 1070 and 1080ti) for BCD, Bitcore and Skunk algo. PL62%.
180/176/163
257/248/244
391/394/383
180/176/163
257/248/244
391/394/383
On what cards?
"gtx 1060, 1070 and 1080ti"
first column - freq's in t-rex on 1060-1070-1080ti
first row - freq's on 1060 in t-rex, CD, z-enemy
right ?
I have tested T-rex 080, CryptoDredge 0.11.0 and Z-Enemy 1.24v3 CUDA 9.2 with mixed rig (gtx 1060, 1070 and 1080ti) for BCD, Bitcore and Skunk algo. PL62%.
180/176/163
257/248/244
391/394/383
180/176/163
257/248/244
391/394/383
On what cards?
"gtx 1060, 1070 and 1080ti"
Jump to: