Topic: Cryptopia.co.nz delists WAVES and her assets. Opinions? - page 2. (Read 1187 times)
There is some kind of fork in waves and not mandatory but Cryptopia delist.What now happend with dotcom?
I see alot of FUD about Waves but honestly this thing will change crypto.
Not trying to fud, just discussing here.
Waves just posted a response to cryptopia with proof they informed them of the update
Could you post a link to this announcement please?
If cryptopia really wasn't informed or had to go fish for information then yes I think they have every right to kick them off, they are busy.
It was not Waves fault...Cryptopia is a shitty exchange. Waves responded to this news and even I remember they have informed everyone of new update.
I see alot of FUD about Waves but honestly this thing will change crypto.
I see alot of FUD about Waves but honestly this thing will change crypto.
Good job to cryptopia for being proactive and being firm with decision making. Poorly managed coins (which result in lost value for investors) dont deserve to be listed in exchanges if you ask me.
Are they proactive when they prefer to be informed about updates, rather than informing themselves?
The volume was so low it will not affect anything.
But, Is it necessary to delist the assets as well?
I will say Yes, why? Imagine, if the network fork and coins gone missing on the exchange, who will be taking the responsible? Trust me, not all the user of a particular product are rational, i seen before cases where the user just blindly hook and blast on the exchange even it's not the exchange fault
My 2 cent tho, we don't know the full thing behind
In no way is it my intention to burn down this decision or the exchange that took it.
Just discussing here and maybe get a better understanding of the whole situation.
You're two cents helped with that, so thanks!
Good job to cryptopia for being proactive and being firm with decision making. Poorly managed coins (which result in lost value for investors) dont deserve to be listed in exchanges if you ask me.
Watching the IOU market on Cryptopia this morning I was suddenly surprised with this announcement:
After reading it twice, these questions came to mind:
Is it reasonable for an exchange to take a passive stance towards updates from a platform like Waves?
Is it necessary to delist the assets as well?
I'd like to know your opinion on this.
After reading it twice, these questions came to mind:
Is it reasonable for an exchange to take a passive stance towards updates from a platform like Waves?
Is it necessary to delist the assets as well?
I'd like to know your opinion on this.
IMO, as stated by cryptocopia waves team fail to notify them for the two recent updates, they even approach towards waves but they neglected. Not sure if Waves didn't see the message or so
But, Is it necessary to delist the assets as well?
I will say Yes, why? Imagine, if the network fork and coins gone missing on the exchange, who will be taking the responsible? Trust me, not all the user of a particular product are rational, i seen before cases where the user just blindly hook and blast on the exchange even it's not the exchange fault
My 2 cent tho, we don't know the full thing behind
Watching the IOU market on Cryptopia this morning I was suddenly surprised with this announcement:
After reading it twice, these questions came to mind:
Is it reasonable for an exchange to take a passive stance towards updates from a platform like Waves?
Is it necessary to delist the assets as well?
I'd like to know your opinion on this.
After reading it twice, these questions came to mind:
Is it reasonable for an exchange to take a passive stance towards updates from a platform like Waves?
Is it necessary to delist the assets as well?
I'd like to know your opinion on this.
Jump to: