They seems to have relaunced the scam, now they claim to have been paying dividend for the past 3 months:
"Payout Statistics
January - 11.09% Return
February - 12.53% Return
March - 11.31% Return
April - Not Yet Counted"
Even thou they just started up there new scam the 2 April and also paid there first dividend then and was not llisted on Cryptostocks before the 17 feb, so an obvious scam, stay away from this one.
Topic: [Cryptostocks]COIN Coinex.io they just removed all traces about there offer @ CS (Read 2986 times)
April 03, 2014, 04:46:53 PM
February 26, 2014, 11:51:09 AM
Wow, stop wasting time in a forum and go get a grade school education. Seriously, it'll change your life or something.
I've met some very well educated people who couldn't write at all. The way a person writes is too often misapplied to their ability to perform in other areas - especially on forums. That guy could well make more in a year than any of us make in a lifetime - but the way he writes would not be an indicator of that. Likewise, neither would his complaints here.
Usually, the people we trust the most are those the least deserving of that trust. For example, a writer like me can polish himself up, look good, research what to say and when to say it, bring my exceptionally well educated trophy wife along, and then go scam people into putting money in me - because I make it look good.
Meanwhile, the guy who really should be managing that sort of thing is a little overweight, rarely gets laid, and likely doesn't speak well in person. However, he's brilliant where it counts - most people just don't see that.
This is because the guy with nothing to lose can totally win your heart - while the guy who knows what he has to offer usually sucks at selling himself - because he knows in comparison to everything else right where he sits, and isn't going to lie to you about it.
Anyway
Not my fight. When either of you want to put your VC in a writer, look me up. 
I've also got a few projects in the Caucasus Mountains - but who wants to invest there, right?This is mostly naive gibberish unfortunately. What you are describing is an exception to prove a rule. Inability to communicate and discern effectively, is indicative of other shortcomings (it also makes one a target to scammers).
What's even worse about your comment, and even worse than thy's, is your focus on exceptions and naivety as positive indicators. It's absurd. Yes, an untainted mind is free to consider things that an experienced one may disregard, but experience is a tempered value.
By your measures we should all act like children and throw worry to the wind if we want success. These are values uplifted by bandits, not brethren.
If the people you trust the most, as you say, are typically not worthy of that trust, it is YOU that must reevaluate your process for bestowing trust. By your comments, you obviously have misplaced values, and thus inability to properly assign trust in the first place. You are not someone experienced enough to take advice from.
Scammers can scam people by making things look good, not because they are educated and experienced, they can do it because you are not.
Consider that. Then consider it again without being a stubborn child.
I say this not because I'm "mean", but because children running with scissors don't know any better.
What a lovely response. I shall do my best to refrain from being childish, or running with scissors, and hope that we part ways with you laughing at least as much as your response left me laughing. Here goes.
It's a pity that your professed erudite wisdom is followed by warnings that those who fail to consider it are little more than stubborn children. Worse, you then martyr yourself to the cause of helping poor and ignorant children who don't know better than to run with scissors. I'd add more commentary to your remarks, but it would be wasted. Your default response to anyone you disagree with or can't understand is to call them children - and what one calls others is usually a pretty firm indication of what they themselves are.
In the process of calling us all children, you never fail to point out how intellectually superior you are, not because you're mean or unkind, but because you're kind and benevolent. Those of us who are less than you are of course quite thankful to be afforded the opportunity of basking in the glow of your vast and limitless wisdom. No doubt you've saved us all from hurting ourselves on the sharp edges of experience and the knowledge gained - or scissors, for those of us who like to run.
Overall, your remarks here and elsewhere, while perhaps indicative of an intelligent person, absolutely establish the complete absence of those redeeming traits you seem to believe are exuded by your presence. Obviously you've a lot to learn, but it's not for me to provide that education. Of course, like me, you will probably not remember your comments much past my next healthy bowel movement - the two having a surprising degree of commonality. Thus, anything positive you'd have taken away from the constructive comments I could provide would be wasted.
With that said. Good day, and good luck to you. My wishes are for godspeed and good journeys - and of course, much laughter, for it is the wisest among us who laugh the most.
May you never fall, in your kingdom of children running with scissors.
May there be no limits to your success, or the unwashed masses required to sustain them.
Most of all, may your vast ass never be chapped by the throne of responsibility on which you sit, enabling it to ever keep the rest of us safe from the naivety and stupidity that defines us.
Amen (oh, wait - that's another god, my bad).
So, hopefully you enjoyed the laugh. If you'd like to communicate further, as no doubt you're following this thread, please feel free to PM me, or contact me through any of the mediums listed from my linked website. Otherwise, it's been fun. In my childish world, this is me having the last word, and running off with your scissors.
So you're done defending naivety? Done calling educated/experienced people untrustworthy?
You seem so offended upon first consideration of my words, that's the first "Consider that" part I mentioned.
We've made now made it to the "consider it again" part.
This is where you put aside how I made you feel, strip away any emotion that controlled your typing, and actually consider the meaning and of the words I said. Consider them as if they just might be correct. Your blood cools, your heart relaxes. You digest the conversation as if it were a sour fruit you hated as a child, but can now appreciate as an adult.
You realize that how you feel, and how you feel about me, are merely distractions. I'm just some guy with some experience who happened to share whilst stumbling by...No agenda other than delusions of being another butterfly contributing to some future tsunami. Come fly with us!
Have a cookie, you're doing great!
February 26, 2014, 10:11:49 AM
Wow, stop wasting time in a forum and go get a grade school education. Seriously, it'll change your life or something.
I've met some very well educated people who couldn't write at all. The way a person writes is too often misapplied to their ability to perform in other areas - especially on forums. That guy could well make more in a year than any of us make in a lifetime - but the way he writes would not be an indicator of that. Likewise, neither would his complaints here.
Usually, the people we trust the most are those the least deserving of that trust. For example, a writer like me can polish himself up, look good, research what to say and when to say it, bring my exceptionally well educated trophy wife along, and then go scam people into putting money in me - because I make it look good.
Meanwhile, the guy who really should be managing that sort of thing is a little overweight, rarely gets laid, and likely doesn't speak well in person. However, he's brilliant where it counts - most people just don't see that.
This is because the guy with nothing to lose can totally win your heart - while the guy who knows what he has to offer usually sucks at selling himself - because he knows in comparison to everything else right where he sits, and isn't going to lie to you about it.
Anyway
Not my fight. When either of you want to put your VC in a writer, look me up. I've also got a few projects in the Caucasus Mountains - but who wants to invest there, right?This is mostly naive gibberish unfortunately. What you are describing is an exception to prove a rule. Inability to communicate and discern effectively, is indicative of other shortcomings (it also makes one a target to scammers).
What's even worse about your comment, and even worse than thy's, is your focus on exceptions and naivety as positive indicators. It's absurd. Yes, an untainted mind is free to consider things that an experienced one may disregard, but experience is a tempered value.
By your measures we should all act like children and throw worry to the wind if we want success. These are values uplifted by bandits, not brethren.
If the people you trust the most, as you say, are typically not worthy of that trust, it is YOU that must reevaluate your process for bestowing trust. By your comments, you obviously have misplaced values, and thus inability to properly assign trust in the first place. You are not someone experienced enough to take advice from.
Scammers can scam people by making things look good, not because they are educated and experienced, they can do it because you are not.
Consider that. Then consider it again without being a stubborn child.
I say this not because I'm "mean", but because children running with scissors don't know any better.
What a lovely response. I shall do my best to refrain from being childish, or running with scissors, and hope that we part ways with you laughing at least as much as your response left me laughing. Here goes.
It's a pity that your professed erudite wisdom is followed by warnings that those who fail to consider it are little more than stubborn children. Worse, you then martyr yourself to the cause of helping poor and ignorant children who don't know better than to run with scissors. I'd add more commentary to your remarks, but it would be wasted. Your default response to anyone you disagree with or can't understand is to call them children - and what one calls others is usually a pretty firm indication of what they themselves are.
In the process of calling us all children, you never fail to point out how intellectually superior you are, not because you're mean or unkind, but because you're kind and benevolent. Those of us who are less than you are of course quite thankful to be afforded the opportunity of basking in the glow of your vast and limitless wisdom. No doubt you've saved us all from hurting ourselves on the sharp edges of experience and the knowledge gained - or scissors, for those of us who like to run.
Overall, your remarks here and elsewhere, while perhaps indicative of an intelligent person, absolutely establish the complete absence of those redeeming traits you seem to believe are exuded by your presence. Obviously you've a lot to learn, but it's not for me to provide that education. Of course, like me, you will probably not remember your comments much past my next healthy bowel movement - the two having a surprising degree of commonality. Thus, anything positive you'd have taken away from the constructive comments I could provide would be wasted.
With that said. Good day, and good luck to you. My wishes are for godspeed and good journeys - and of course, much laughter, for it is the wisest among us who laugh the most.
May you never fall, in your kingdom of children running with scissors.
May there be no limits to your success, or the unwashed masses required to sustain them.
Most of all, may your vast ass never be chapped by the throne of responsibility on which you sit, enabling it to ever keep the rest of us safe from the naivety and stupidity that defines us.
Amen (oh, wait - that's another god, my bad).
So, hopefully you enjoyed the laugh. If you'd like to communicate further, as no doubt you're following this thread, please feel free to PM me, or contact me through any of the mediums listed from my linked website. Otherwise, it's been fun. In my childish world, this is me having the last word, and running off with your scissors.
February 24, 2014, 10:58:19 AM
English isen't everyone's first language you know, but there's nothing wrong with my education you can't get much higher actually, but that really has nothing to do with the fact that some of us actually like to prevent newcummers from making huge misstakes in the btcworld.
You seem to live under the spell of the notion that English being one's first language somehow magically bestows upon them linguistic competence. This is utterly false: even kids born in England have to go to grammar school.
Cryptostocks is a joke.
Any other, better suggestion?
Cryptostocks have around 70 stocks but there is many scams and halfscams among them so you really have to be very carefull with what you buy there and CS is hardly doing anything to stop scams from listing there, they only seems interested in getting the 1 btc fee(and getting fees on trades) for listing stocks and probably does zero checkup on the listings.
Havelock have 21 stocks and people say there better quality in general on the listings there and from the little i looked at them it may be correct but it also seems like there way worse than what btc-tc/ltcglobal & Bitfunder was before.
Crypto-Trade have 4 of there own stocks and some lemon/avocado farmer and AMC, AMC illeagally sold off/dumped "ukyo/ukyo loan investors/weexchange balanceholders" shares without ukyo's permission and then tradestopped the share so the fact that they allowed that hardly makes CT look any better than CS,
Then you have Mpex where you can buy 4 of there own stocks if you first pay them 30 btc to be allowed to trade there,
Mcxnow have there own share at there exchange,
Picostocs have a few stocks but they look even worse than cryptostocks, only 4 out of 39+ listings is till there.
February 24, 2014, 10:22:08 AM
English isen't everyone's first language you know, but there's nothing wrong with my education you can't get much higher actually, but that really has nothing to do with the fact that some of us actually like to prevent newcummers from making huge misstakes in the btcworld.
You seem to live under the spell of the notion that English being one's first language somehow magically bestows upon them linguistic competence. This is utterly false: even kids born in England have to go to grammar school.
February 24, 2014, 09:26:00 AM
Then you have Mpex where you can buy 4 of there own stocks if you first pay them 30 btc to be allowed to trade there,
This fundamental misunderstanding of yours was passed off as momentary idiocy the first time, but now I see you're bent on preaching it whenever possible.
Failing to understand the marketplace, or the difference between bitcoin's actual stock exchange and the various failed excuses for such passed off by people not at all capable of running such an operation, along with preferring an immediate emotional response to new things over actually reading and learning are all exceptionally shitty ways to go about things.
That you've noticed cryptostocks' well-documented failures is fine. That you're demonstrably making an effort to elaborate on the topic is potentially useful. That you stop short of understanding bitcoin finance is your loss, but it doesn't particularly matter. Don't for an instant imagine, however, that your failure qualifies you to present a few soggy scraps as anything other than that.
Most likely any btcstockexchange(whether or not you like to call them that MPOE-PR) anywhere in the world is working on the borderline on what's allowed or unregulated territory including the one located in Rumania so there's nothing special about mpex in that matter.
If you claim that for some reason that it would be better for people to invest in stocks or something else on mpex then doing carefully selection on what investments and where on other plattfors or avoid investing in anything at all if they don't have the correct knoledge. Then you may kindly explain why and how it would be better for the avg investors as im pretty sure most of them wouldent even have 30 btc so how do you even think they would even be in the target group for your stockexchange, is just redicules.
The fact that you claim i don't understand bitcoin finace is just redicules, what do you know about that ?
Im pretty sure i make more in 1 year than you will make in a lifetime. But go ahead and keep posting noncence if you like, im sure most people will take it for just that.
Wow, stop wasting time in a forum and go get a grade school education. Seriously, it'll change your life or something.
Paying 30 btc to get access to trading on mpex would be a huge misstake for 99.99% of all people, especially as some got access to that for free in the beginning.
February 24, 2014, 09:10:47 AM
@TAT: Just a heads-up -- Active Miners are talking about listing their sharez on Havelock. That will, undoubtedly, destroy Havelock -- just like the last three exchanges they traded on.
Coincidence, you say? Every exchange the shares are traded on goes down under mysterious circumstances?
I say not! Hax0rs and saboteurs, those Active Miners.
If not worse...
Coincidence, you say? Every exchange the shares are traded on goes down under mysterious circumstances?
I say not! Hax0rs and saboteurs, those Active Miners.
If not worse...
February 24, 2014, 09:03:18 AM
Wow, stop wasting time in a forum and go get a grade school education. Seriously, it'll change your life or something.
I've met some very well educated people who couldn't write at all. The way a person writes is too often misapplied to their ability to perform in other areas - especially on forums. That guy could well make more in a year than any of us make in a lifetime - but the way he writes would not be an indicator of that. Likewise, neither would his complaints here.
Usually, the people we trust the most are those the least deserving of that trust. For example, a writer like me can polish himself up, look good, research what to say and when to say it, bring my exceptionally well educated trophy wife along, and then go scam people into putting money in me - because I make it look good.
Meanwhile, the guy who really should be managing that sort of thing is a little overweight, rarely gets laid, and likely doesn't speak well in person. However, he's brilliant where it counts - most people just don't see that.
This is because the guy with nothing to lose can totally win your heart - while the guy who knows what he has to offer usually sucks at selling himself - because he knows in comparison to everything else right where he sits, and isn't going to lie to you about it.
Anyway
Not my fight. When either of you want to put your VC in a writer, look me up. I've also got a few projects in the Caucasus Mountains - but who wants to invest there, right?This is mostly naive gibberish unfortunately. What you are describing is an exception to prove a rule. Inability to communicate and discern effectively, is indicative of other shortcomings (it also makes one a target to scammers).
What's even worse about your comment, and even worse than thy's, is your focus on exceptions and naivety as positive indicators. It's absurd. Yes, an untainted mind is free to consider things that an experienced one may disregard, but experience is a tempered value.
By your measures we should all act like children and throw worry to the wind if we want success. These are values uplifted by bandits, not brethren.
If the people you trust the most, as you say, are typically not worthy of that trust, it is YOU that must reevaluate your process for bestowing trust. By your comments, you obviously have misplaced values, and thus inability to properly assign trust in the first place. You are not someone experienced enough to take advice from.
Scammers can scam people by making things look good, not because they are educated and experienced, they can do it because you are not.
Consider that. Then consider it again without being a stubborn child.
I say this not because I'm "mean", but because children running with scissors don't know any better.
February 24, 2014, 08:37:49 AM
Wow, stop wasting time in a forum and go get a grade school education. Seriously, it'll change your life or something.
I've met some very well educated people who couldn't write at all. The way a person writes is too often misapplied to their ability to perform in other areas - especially on forums. That guy could well make more in a year than any of us make in a lifetime - but the way he writes would not be an indicator of that. Likewise, neither would his complaints here.
Usually, the people we trust the most are those the least deserving of that trust. For example, a writer like me can polish himself up, look good, research what to say and when to say it, bring my exceptionally well educated trophy wife along, and then go scam people into putting money in me - because I make it look good.
Meanwhile, the guy who really should be managing that sort of thing is a little overweight, rarely gets laid, and likely doesn't speak well in person. However, he's brilliant where it counts - most people just don't see that.
This is because the guy with nothing to lose can totally win your heart - while the guy who knows what he has to offer usually sucks at selling himself - because he knows in comparison to everything else right where he sits, and isn't going to lie to you about it.
Anyway
Not my fight. When either of you want to put your VC in a writer, look me up. I've also got a few projects in the Caucasus Mountains - but who wants to invest there, right? February 24, 2014, 08:30:52 AM
From where I sit, you're just buying into Venture Capital that's been cloaked as an investment. You have nothing tangible, and no recourse other than complaining when there are top down changes.
Much better you invested your funds into something real and tangible if you're going to go at VC.
I'll be looking at some people in the near future to partner with me for writing. If you're interested, PM me. If not - well... good luck man. You'd do better in penny stocks.
Much better you invested your funds into something real and tangible if you're going to go at VC.
I'll be looking at some people in the near future to partner with me for writing. If you're interested, PM me. If not - well... good luck man. You'd do better in penny stocks.
February 24, 2014, 08:12:04 AM
Then you have Mpex where you can buy 4 of there own stocks if you first pay them 30 btc to be allowed to trade there,
This fundamental misunderstanding of yours was passed off as momentary idiocy the first time, but now I see you're bent on preaching it whenever possible.
Failing to understand the marketplace, or the difference between bitcoin's actual stock exchange and the various failed excuses for such passed off by people not at all capable of running such an operation, along with preferring an immediate emotional response to new things over actually reading and learning are all exceptionally shitty ways to go about things.
That you've noticed cryptostocks' well-documented failures is fine. That you're demonstrably making an effort to elaborate on the topic is potentially useful. That you stop short of understanding bitcoin finance is your loss, but it doesn't particularly matter. Don't for an instant imagine, however, that your failure qualifies you to present a few soggy scraps as anything other than that.
Most likely any btcstockexchange(whether or not you like to call them that MPOE-PR) anywhere in the world is working on the borderline on what's allowed or unregulated territory including the one located in Rumania so there's nothing special about mpex in that matter.
If you claim that for some reason that it would be better for people to invest in stocks or something else on mpex then doing carefully selection on what investments and where on other plattfors or avoid investing in anything at all if they don't have the correct knoledge. Then you may kindly explain why and how it would be better for the avg investors as im pretty sure most of them wouldent even have 30 btc so how do you even think they would even be in the target group for your stockexchange, is just redicules.
The fact that you claim i don't understand bitcoin finace is just redicules, what do you know about that ?
Im pretty sure i make more in 1 year than you will make in a lifetime. But go ahead and keep posting noncence if you like, im sure most people will take it for just that.
Wow, stop wasting time in a forum and go get a grade school education. Seriously, it'll change your life or something.
February 24, 2014, 07:55:36 AM
Then you have Mpex where you can buy 4 of there own stocks if you first pay them 30 btc to be allowed to trade there,
This fundamental misunderstanding of yours was passed off as momentary idiocy the first time, but now I see you're bent on preaching it whenever possible.
Failing to understand the marketplace, or the difference between bitcoin's actual stock exchange and the various failed excuses for such passed off by people not at all capable of running such an operation, along with preferring an immediate emotional response to new things over actually reading and learning are all exceptionally shitty ways to go about things.
That you've noticed cryptostocks' well-documented failures is fine. That you're demonstrably making an effort to elaborate on the topic is potentially useful. That you stop short of understanding bitcoin finance is your loss, but it doesn't particularly matter. Don't for an instant imagine, however, that your failure qualifies you to present a few soggy scraps as anything other than that.
Most likely any btcstockexchange(whether or not you like to call them that MPOE-PR) anywhere in the world is working on the borderline on what's allowed or unregulated territory including the one located in Rumania so there's nothing special about mpex in that matter.
If you claim that for some reason that it would be better for people to invest in stocks or something else on mpex then doing carefully selection on what investments and where on other plattfors or avoid investing in anything at all if they don't have the correct knoledge. Then you may kindly explain why and how it would be better for the avg investors as im pretty sure most of them wouldent even have 30 btc so how do you even think they would even be in the target group for your stockexchange, is just redicules.
The fact that you claim i don't understand bitcoin finace is just redicules, what do you know about that ?
Im pretty sure i make more in 1 year than you will make in a lifetime. But go ahead and keep posting noncence if you like, im sure most people will take it for just that.
February 24, 2014, 07:37:53 AM
Then you have Mpex where you can buy 4 of there own stocks if you first pay them 30 btc to be allowed to trade there,
Failing to understand the marketplace,Bernie Madoff is your idol isnt he? That is the line he used on people for years while he was ripping them off.
February 24, 2014, 07:19:38 AM
Then you have Mpex where you can buy 4 of there own stocks if you first pay them 30 btc to be allowed to trade there,
This fundamental misunderstanding of yours was passed off as momentary idiocy the first time, but now I see you're bent on preaching it whenever possible.
Failing to understand the marketplace, or the difference between bitcoin's actual stock exchange and the various failed excuses for such passed off by people not at all capable of running such an operation, along with preferring an immediate emotional response to new things over actually reading and learning are all exceptionally shitty ways to go about things.
That you've noticed cryptostocks' well-documented failures is fine. That you're demonstrably making an effort to elaborate on the topic is potentially useful. That you stop short of understanding bitcoin finance is your loss, but it doesn't particularly matter. Don't for an instant imagine, however, that your failure qualifies you to present a few soggy scraps as anything other than that.
February 23, 2014, 06:48:10 PM
To anyone that wants to read.
I put an Open Letter on Cryptostocks
https://cryptostocks.com/announcements/884
I put an Open Letter on Cryptostocks
https://cryptostocks.com/announcements/884
February 23, 2014, 02:26:54 PM
Cryptostocks is a joke.
Any other, better suggestion?
Cryptostocks have around 70 stocks but there is many scams and halfscams among them so you really have to be very carefull with what you buy there and CS is hardly doing anything to stop scams from listing there, they only seems interested in getting the 1 btc fee(and getting fees on trades) for listing stocks and probably does zero checkup on the listings.
Havelock have 21 stocks and people say there better quality in general on the listings there and from the little i looked at them it may be correct but it also seems like there way worse than what btc-tc/ltcglobal & Bitfunder was before.
Crypto-Trade have 4 of there own stocks and some lemon/avocado farmer and AMC, AMC illeagally sold off/dumped "ukyo/ukyo loan investors/weexchange balanceholders" shares without ukyo's permission and then tradestopped the share so the fact that they allowed that hardly makes CT look any better than CS,
Then you have Mpex where you can buy 4 of there own stocks if you first pay them 30 btc to be allowed to trade there,
Mcxnow have there own share at there exchange,
Picostocs have a few stocks but they look even worse than cryptostocks, only 4 out of 39+ listings is till there.
February 23, 2014, 01:36:30 PM
Cryptostocks is a joke.
Any other, better suggestion?
February 23, 2014, 12:19:21 PM
Cryptostocks is a joke.
This is the truth - if it wasn't for Cryptsy and Cannabit, I'd tell people to swear it off completely.
February 23, 2014, 10:07:30 AM
Cryptostocks is a joke.
February 23, 2014, 08:11:07 AM
perhaps people should stop throwing money at strangers ?
Jump to: