Signed message:
-----BEGIN BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Date: 28/04/2015, Tuesday. bitkilo from Bitcointalk.org
Please change payout address from 1Js5djRnuFozdu79KAqAoSi2LZHEreAVsV to 1MZakirz92c76pK6BNy1NAEmbWYpDcP7mh.
-----BEGIN SIGNATURE-----
17eDS4zwUvd3whq6ep46NRN4gVegQ8JuFM
Gy3lkchsyX9bxhKA+hghqqZ3Qsdcu0/V3pSkbbtMrNqWPEqAihwChb7xnCrbquHne61Q+PaUoej8BQ/QwvpzO3U=
-----END BITCOIN SIGNED MESSAGE-----
He posted this address here -> https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10946223.
Please change it and thank you!
P.S. Please confirm.
If the payout address gets changed by trusting an address that is not being paid out to, I will lose faith in the best judgement of the handlers of this sig campaign. The address that should have signed is 1Js5djRnuFozdu79KAqAoSi2LZHEreAVsV
*Before posting this, I have already completed my 60 posts for April*
That is a deposit address and you know it can't be used for signing. The address used to sign the message is one of the address bitkilo posted and that post is unedited. It is enough. I forgot to tell that I will only take 0.05BTC and remaining will be send to 1Js5djRnuFozdu79KAqAoSi2LZHEreAVsV.
I guess security isn't essential in this case, since someone would have to make all the posts. When it's at the end of the month like this, I think the people of the campaign should not change the payout address if it can't be verified that it's theirs. If you ever had the real signing address in a communication from the user in question, at the same time as they signed up, then fine. But, in this case, if someone hacks into an account, they should not be able to change the payment address. I certainly don't want to have hackers come along, and just claim an address is an online wallet, and be able to steal my money as well. Maybe you should warn against non-signable address if someone ever wants their address changed. Or someone can verify an online wallet by sending a specific dust amount to you, that you will refund with the payment.