Topic: CRYPTSY stopping withdraw locking accounts without notifying users! Class Action - page 328. (Read 1006940 times)

These are the approximate figures taken:
Bitcoin:  13,000 BTC
Litecoin:  300,000 LTC

This of course was a critical event for Cryptsy, however at the time the website was earning more than it was spending and we still have some reserves of those cryptocurrencies on hand.   The decision was made to pull from our profits to fill these wallets back up over time, thus attempting to avert complete closure of the website at that time.   This worked fine for awhile, as profits decreased due to low volume and low Bitcoin prices, we would adjust our spending accordingly.  It wasn’t until an article from Coinfire came out that contained many false accusations that things began to crumble.   The article basically caused a bank-run, and since we only had so much in reserves for those currencies problems began.  

Our current customer liabilities for BTC is around 10,000 BTC, so as you can see we would like to see the Bitcoins returned for both our users and for ourselves.

Here are the transaction details from the Bitcoin wallet:

https://www.walletexplorer.com/wallet/0c07e0bec1002bd2

As you can see,  2014-07-29 13:17:36 is when the event occurred.   A very interesting fact here, however, is that those Bitcoins have not moved once since this happened.    This gives rise to the possibility they can be recovered.   In fact, I’m offering a bounty of 1000 BTC for information which leads to the recovery of the stolen coins.
recovered.   In fact, I’m offering a bounty of 1000 BTC for information which leads to the recovery of the stolen coins.

Well, its proven that factom addy is directly linked to the bunch of addresses associated with july hack.

We even had people https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/djohnston-76620 confirming the use of the same factom addy for sending dust to different accounts so as to affiliate them with 'early adopters' or 'supporters of emerging crypto technologies' https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10945892.

This means that addresses that ever received dust from factom addy https://blockchain.info/address/1FactomGnNFTsTVx8jiGjcLKDpyL65GDsH are marked as early adopters.

Here is one of the hackers addresses: https://blockchain.info/address/1DqCNwUffFTxULH8crehynw53TwrHnrv1c and a transaction that links factom vanity address and recipient's addy
https://blockchain.info/tx/b6e2d9e639b1bb70bda4de160531d7f0cacca8f842edcedab9f945b76faf0d56 on april, 2.

This would imply factom faggots and this fellow https://www.linkedin.com/in/davidajohnston would be involved in cooperation with ppl linked to hacker`s addresses.

Whoever controls these addresses https://blockchain.info/tx/c7b46a79fd8887038bd3a8e884b04820038415a60e0b9d2c2f5bcff68a2687bf they're recognized as early adopters or supporters of factom foundation and could even be among backers of their ico. Or they themselves could work at factom.