Topic: CSW Nonsense AGAIN (Read 610 times)
Suing every devs until they’re broken and wreck havoc their life? This guy has a bdsm tendency, I think he could really enjoy pleasure in hell. Btw it is what we called go full retard.
This is an excellent tweet/thought by Cobra. All the best for him, and let’s hope he doesn’t become a victim of Craig Wright’s troll-lawsuits, that make the defendants spend without actual benefit for anyone.
https://twitter.com/cobrabitcoin/status/1352967587232182273
Satoshi himself uploaded the Bitcoin whitepaper to http://bitcoin.org. It's linked too from millions of pages, and cited by thousands of academic papers . Us removing it would be a betrayal to his legacy. It will never happen.
https://twitter.com/cobrabitcoin/status/1352967587232182273
Quote
Satoshi himself uploaded the Bitcoin whitepaper to http://bitcoin.org. It's linked too from millions of pages, and cited by thousands of academic papers . Us removing it would be a betrayal to his legacy. It will never happen.
The messiah is real global compliant use of the public ledger - any crap (ano!) use incl pure speculation is biggest risk to any crypto in the global adoption run
No financial e-trx system gets altered into the dark and has a bright future
No financial e-trx system gets altered into the dark and has a bright future
That's genuinely amusing. A few points:
a) None of your paltry number of SV devs are talented enough to create true regulatory compliance within your forkcoin's codebase. Pretty much all they do is copy code from Bitcoin and fiddle with it a bit.
b) Even if they were gifted coders, you still can't force regulatory compliance upon those who don't want it. Anyone who doesn't wish to adhere to compliance will simply run different code.
c) Regulatory compliance defeats the purpose of having a censorship-resistant distributed ledger. If you want to have a system where someone in charge can block your payments, just use a bank, stupid.
d) You didn't answer the question. What does any of your ideological authoritarianism and shortsightedness have to do with faketoshi and his mindless lawsuits attempting to prevent distribution of a document that is clearly intended to be freely shared?
Hahaha. Under-appreciated post. I just clicked the link, I thought it would be another useless BSV shill’s Reddit post.
Bitcoiners, something in the link will your only chance to see gmaxwell do actual yard work/man duties. 99.9% of his time is spent in front of a computer.
Another proof that Craig is a clown. I mean why would the creator of Bitcoin who wanted to remain private sue somebody for using terms from the "Bitcoin whitepaper" when the cryptocurrency is meant to offer freedom back to the people? It is indeed nonsense. 
If I remember correctly, his argument was like something something that Bitcoin isn't going the way that he planned or some BS. So much for being "decentralized" if he just wanted things to go the way he wanted lmao. 🤡
Keep Bitcoin work at scale, clean and max compliant to get max users on board incl govs and give no reason to shut down rather banks to accept?
Can't help but notice you're totally avoiding the issue where your messiah is taking legal action against the distribution of MIT licensed documentation. Are you simply too embarrassed by his actions to comment on that? Do you worry it will reflect badly on you? I'd say that's probably a legitimate concern. Given that you're an unabashed faketoshi mouthpiece, I hold you equally culpable in perpetuating this farce. You're as much a lowly piece of filth as Wright.
The messiah is real global compliant use of the public ledger - any crap (ano!) use incl pure speculation is biggest risk to any crypto in the global adoption run
No financial e-trx system gets altered into the dark and has a bright future
Keep Bitcoin work at scale, clean and max compliant to get max users on board incl govs and give no reason to shut down rather banks to accept?
Can't help but notice you're totally avoiding the issue where your messiah is taking legal action against the distribution of MIT licensed documentation.
A license that, “He Satoshi” himself, declared it under. Hahaha.
Plus the Bitcoin white paper is a historical document. By trying to stop anyone from hosting it through copyright infringement “cases”, would be the first steps in trying to control the brand, then the narrative.
It appears CSW is up to his usual nonsense again.
this guy has been crazy for years, just seeing things he does, he just wants attention, he wants to be famous ... sometimes I wonder if one day the real satoshi would appear if this faketoshi wouldn’t chase to take the life of the real satoshi . because faketoshi is crazy and his obsession with bitcoin is starting to be scary, he doesn't realize that he is embarrassed and is taking his family along this shameful path.
Keep Bitcoin work at scale, clean and max compliant to get max users on board incl govs and give no reason to shut down rather banks to accept?
Can't help but notice you're totally avoiding the issue where your messiah is taking legal action against the distribution of MIT licensed documentation. Are you simply too embarrassed by his actions to comment on that? Do you worry it will reflect badly on you? I'd say that's probably a legitimate concern. Given that you're an unabashed faketoshi mouthpiece, I hold you equally culpable in perpetuating this farce. You're as much a lowly piece of filth as Wright.
...snip...
You are an OG Bitcoiner. What do you think is Craig Wright’s main motive for doing this? I believe it’s more than money, anything material, or notoriety. It’s something else with him. I believe he simply wants to see something good burn, and destroyed.
You are an OG Bitcoiner. What do you think is Craig Wright’s main motive for doing this? I believe it’s more than money, anything material, or notoriety. It’s something else with him. I believe he simply wants to see something good burn, and destroyed.
Indeed.
It would appear that he has narcissistic tendencies and delusions of grandeur. I feel he really needs some professional help!
He has commenced on a path to 'hijack' Bitcoin and he is failing.
It is truly "do or die" for him now and by that I mean he succeeds (in some way) or (more likely) goes to jail for perjury and/or other crimes.
...
"Like I said, the Jonestown phase of Craig #Faketoshi Wright has begun.
He will go down in flames, and take everyone around him with him."
- https://twitter.com/MyLegacyKit/status/1352960746154557441
...
...
Generally, folks who advocate violent extremism against others, don't succeed.
Keep Bitcoin work at scale, clean and max compliant to get max users on board incl govs and give no reason to shut down rather banks to accept?
Not hard to see
Not hard to see
...snip...
OK, then he, Craig Wright who is “Satoshi Nakamoto”, created Bitcoin and everything with it, including the white-paper, under an MIT license, and also he “Satoshi Nakamoto”, is claiming he didn’t place it under an MIT license? Call me confused.
OK, then he, Craig Wright who is “Satoshi Nakamoto”, created Bitcoin and everything with it, including the white-paper, under an MIT license, and also he “Satoshi Nakamoto”, is claiming he didn’t place it under an MIT license? Call me confused.
Indeed. CSW is often providing historically inaccurate and/or conflicting information, mixed up with some facts for good measure.
Perhaps the only person he really needs to be suing is himself.
...
I've updated the post I re-posted in this thread relating to the known Satoshi PGP Key;
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56151514
These clowns are unbelievable!
I'm not sure all of this is ever really worth my time and effort, but I won't stand for this BS any longer.
You are an OG Bitcoiner. What do you think is Craig Wright’s main motive for doing this? I believe it’s more than money, anything material, or notoriety. It’s something else with him. I believe he simply wants to see something good burn, and destroyed.
This guy is the most annoying person there is in the planet I swear. He always does this when bitcoin is in a good spot and is nowhere to be found when bitcoin is in a tough spot. I honestly don't even know what he's gonna gain after claiming that he's Satoshi. He's just wasting his time, his money, his lawyer's efforts, and everybody's time doing all of his antics. It's sickening.
Is there any way to stop this BS of Craig Wright being Satoshi Nakamoto? Any good investigative work that can be done to find out who Satoshi Nakamoto is?
If I remember correctly, the white paper was first published on bitcoin.org. While the domain registration info might have been private, the registering company should have the info on who purchased the domain name. Same thing with the company that used to host that website. Someone must have paid using a credit card, and the credit card has a name.
Unfortunately Satoshi literally made himself anonymous in order to maintain his privacy. Even the Pseudonym he used which is Satoshi Nakamoto is the Japanese equivalent of someone being named Michael Smith in the US, it's common and just plain unassuming. So I'm already accepting of the fact that as long as bitcoin is there, CSW will continue to heckle around. If I remember correctly, the white paper was first published on bitcoin.org. While the domain registration info might have been private, the registering company should have the info on who purchased the domain name. Same thing with the company that used to host that website. Someone must have paid using a credit card, and the credit card has a name.
Is there any way to stop this BS of Craig Wright being Satoshi Nakamoto? Any good investigative work that can be done to find out who Satoshi Nakamoto is?
If I remember correctly, the white paper was first published on bitcoin.org. While the domain registration info might have been private, the registering company should have the info on who purchased the domain name. Same thing with the company that used to host that website. Someone must have paid using a credit card, and the credit card has a name.
If I remember correctly, the white paper was first published on bitcoin.org. While the domain registration info might have been private, the registering company should have the info on who purchased the domain name. Same thing with the company that used to host that website. Someone must have paid using a credit card, and the credit card has a name.
...snip...
OK, then he, Craig Wright who is “Satoshi Nakamoto”, created Bitcoin and everything with it, including the white-paper, under an MIT license, and also he “Satoshi Nakamoto”, is claiming he didn’t place it under an MIT license? Call me confused.
OK, then he, Craig Wright who is “Satoshi Nakamoto”, created Bitcoin and everything with it, including the white-paper, under an MIT license, and also he “Satoshi Nakamoto”, is claiming he didn’t place it under an MIT license? Call me confused.
Indeed. CSW is often providing historically inaccurate and/or conflicting information, mixed up with some facts for good measure.
Perhaps the only person he really needs to be suing is himself.
...
I've updated the post I re-posted in this thread relating to the known Satoshi PGP Key;
- https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.56151514
These clowns are unbelievable!
I'm not sure all of this is ever really worth my time and effort, but I won't stand for this BS any longer.
Another proof that Craig is a clown. I mean why would the creator of Bitcoin who wanted to remain private sue somebody for using terms from the "Bitcoin whitepaper" when the cryptocurrency is meant to offer freedom back to the people? It is indeed nonsense.
I think Satoshi’s whitepaper has to be placed on IPFS network to shield it from shady personalities like CSW and such. It would prevent this precious paper from sudden "dissolution". Anyone knows if it there? I have tried to find it among IPFS stuff using search engine but didn't managed to get any link.
No need. The paper is already hosted all over the internet and by a lot of different individuals. Most importantly it can also be found on bitcoin blockchain, the immutable ledger that can not be erased. Someone put it there a long time ago. Besides the Scammer Craig is not targeting the bitcoin paper, he is targeting individuals and wants to cause them harm (eg. wasting their time and money in court). 
gmaxwell has put a superb thread up - have a read 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/so-you-want-to-get-sued-by-a-scammer-5311388
Hopefully the drama caused by CSW a will have some positives -
- more people will read the whitepaper
- more people will realise what a fraud he is !
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/so-you-want-to-get-sued-by-a-scammer-5311388
Hopefully the drama caused by CSW a will have some positives -
- more people will read the whitepaper
- more people will realise what a fraud he is !
Some proof that Bitcoin.pdf is MIT licensed.
In March 2009, nakamoto2 added the bitcoin.pdf file with License: MIT License to Sourceforge.
https://web.archive.org/web/20090106201347/https://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/
Please archive this website on alternative mirrors before the history gets erased by FUDders.
OK, then he, Craig Wright who is “Satoshi Nakamoto”, created Bitcoin and everything with it, including the white-paper, under an MIT license, and also he “Satoshi Nakamoto”, is claiming he didn’t place it under an MIT license? Call me confused.
Jump to: