Personally, I support these accusations since they are based on a legal basis and also because they impose a tracking and monitoring policy on Binance, which has begun to form a kind of monopol based mainly on the fact that it is not being tracked and no one knows about its internal kitchen. What is happening with Binance has affected the rest of the platforms, which have begun to take measures commensurate with the laws and procedures on which sec is based to activate procedural traces.
Yeah its good to support what Sec actions done to binance since for sure they and other new crypto businesses will be watchful to the requirements or other things they need to do to comply on legalities on said country and so they can operate without violating the law in US. If we can see the brighter side of the regulation they did this will benefits us since we can assure that we are now dealing with good crypto services by the help of the government tightening its rules to those crypto platforms.
Im not making some conclusion but we arent that blind that this isnt something first time that do happen on this space. Government does really like or want to get involvement on crypto based platforms and trying out to throw up some issues and other means which if they do want or like to make some noise here on this space then they would always be targeting out on what are those places which most of crypto community been using. Just like on Binance on which this had been the most popular and known or reputable crypto exchange then its not shocking on why they have put up that focus into it.
Supporting? I dont love on supporting anyone, if there's someone needs to answer up some issues and there should be needing those possible sanctions or whatsoever then i dont really care
but this one really make out that impact on this space which it isnt something new.