Topic: DA DICE Signature Campaign | [REPLACED by 2.0] - page 40. (Read 82244 times)

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:25:14 PM

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

Quote from: marcotheminer on April 08, 2015, 02:46:44 PM

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

The statement was in rection to marcotheminer saying that you can only institute a local rule when you create the thread after a local rule was added saying that marcotheminer cannot post in this thread. The plan was to create a new thread with a local rule of no marcotheminer to prevent him from posting/trolling here.

IMO I think the local rule should be enforced here especially if he is made aware of it ahead of time.

Yes I thought that was the reason. I merely stated that anyone may switch campaigns because I believe this was the root for implementing the local rule in the first place. Im not sure if mods would enforce the local rule or if its even needed. My argument is that marco will not be the last person thats uncomfortable or trolling here and keeping a growing list of those people seems like the wrong solution to me.

Well it is not so much that he is trolling, it is that he is spamming his signature campaign in this thread by telling everyone in the campaign that he will try to work out a "special deal" with them if they are a ~~good poster~~ on default trust and willing to give positive trust.

You got the wrong idea, quickseller, but I won't try to argue. I worked out a deal with Q7 and cyclops to name a few not with any default trust standings and am in the talks with a few other 'ordinarily exceptional' members actually.

As of now, you have already roped in two of our participants with the same method you accused Carra23 of.

He did it in a completely different way, there was no complaints, no bans. I respect him all the same like any other campaign manager. You have no right to accuse him while you are employing a more tactical version of the same.

They actually contacted me regarding me paying a higher rate.

ndnh

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1005

New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:38:12 PM

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:25:14 PM

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

Quote from: marcotheminer on January 04, 2015, 08:07:38 AM

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

The statement was in rection to marcotheminer saying that you can only institute a local rule when you create the thread after a local rule was added saying that marcotheminer cannot post in this thread. The plan was to create a new thread with a local rule of no marcotheminer to prevent him from posting/trolling here.

IMO I think the local rule should be enforced here especially if he is made aware of it ahead of time.

Yes I thought that was the reason. I merely stated that anyone may switch campaigns because I believe this was the root for implementing the local rule in the first place. Im not sure if mods would enforce the local rule or if its even needed. My argument is that marco will not be the last person thats uncomfortable or trolling here and keeping a growing list of those people seems like the wrong solution to me.

Well it is not so much that he is trolling, it is that he is spamming his signature campaign in this thread by telling everyone in the campaign that he will try to work out a "special deal" with them if they are a ~~good poster~~ on default trust and willing to give positive trust.

You got the wrong idea, quickseller, but I won't try to argue. I worked out a deal with Q7 and cyclops to name a few not with any default trust standings and am in the talks with a few other 'ordinarily exceptional' members actually.

As of now, you have already roped in two of our participants with the same method you accused Carra23 of.

He did it in a completely different way, there was no complaints, no bans. I respect him all the same like any other campaign manager. You have no right to accuse him while you are employing a more tactical, monopolistic version of the same.

The campaign manager of cryptomine.io, Carra23, is specifically inviting and paying higher rates for some (not all) very trusted members (with significant green, often bolded, trust) into the cryptomine.io signature campaign.

Quotes confirming he PMs high trusted users to join the campaign (all below users have publicly visible green trust):

Quote from: ?? on ??

Enrolling as per invitation via PM..

Quote from: MoreBloodWine on January 04, 2015, 08:08:49 AM

I was PM'd about it

Quote from: Wardrick on January 03, 2015, 07:29:46 PM

Yeah she did.

Quote from: goose20 on January 03, 2015, 11:08:13 PM

Yes they did.

Quote

Quote from: marcotheminer
Did carra23 contact you to join a campaign?

Quote from: bigtimespaghetti (green trusted user)
Hi marco, yes carra23 got in touch to join.

The above issue(s) aren't too big of a deal, although it does make him sound a bit shady but as long as members don't find the PMs to be spammy, it can slide.

Full disclosure, I run am running a signature campaign on behalf of BIT-X.com.

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:38:12 PM

-snip-
Well it is not so much that he is trolling, it is that he is spamming his signature campaign in this thread by telling everyone in the campaign that he will try to work out a "special deal" with them if they are a ~~good poster~~ on default trust and willing to give positive trust.

I haven't got a special offer, probably because marco knows my answer. Banning him from this thread does not change anything. Besides that its common that the top signature campaigns battle for participants. In the past it was more about who has the higher rates, now its more about certain posters. I think thats an improvement. Marco will probably continue to ask via PM, he specifically checked whether this would be banworthy in meta. I dont think this is a problem. We choose to run for dadice and we can choose to change.

My point still stands: learn to handle the heat, there will be others and it matters how you (obviously not you personally) handle them. This argument is not about marco specifically but more general. If you have people leaving its bad style to blame the person paying higher rates. I dont see a reason for ndnhc et al. to lower themself on marcos niveau.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:38:12 PM

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:25:14 PM

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

The statement was in rection to marcotheminer saying that you can only institute a local rule when you create the thread after a local rule was added saying that marcotheminer cannot post in this thread. The plan was to create a new thread with a local rule of no marcotheminer to prevent him from posting/trolling here.

IMO I think the local rule should be enforced here especially if he is made aware of it ahead of time.

Yes I thought that was the reason. I merely stated that anyone may switch campaigns because I believe this was the root for implementing the local rule in the first place. Im not sure if mods would enforce the local rule or if its even needed. My argument is that marco will not be the last person thats uncomfortable or trolling here and keeping a growing list of those people seems like the wrong solution to me.

Well it is not so much that he is trolling, it is that he is spamming his signature campaign in this thread by telling everyone in the campaign that he will try to work out a "special deal" with them if they are a ~~good poster~~ on default trust and willing to give positive trust.

You got the wrong idea, quickseller, but I won't try to argue. I worked out a deal with Q7 and cyclops to name a few not with any default trust standings and am in the talks with a few other 'ordinarily exceptional' members actually.

ACCTseller

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

no longer selling accounts

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:25:14 PM

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:25:14 PM

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

The statement was in rection to marcotheminer saying that you can only institute a local rule when you create the thread after a local rule was added saying that marcotheminer cannot post in this thread. The plan was to create a new thread with a local rule of no marcotheminer to prevent him from posting/trolling here.

IMO I think the local rule should be enforced here especially if he is made aware of it ahead of time.

Yes I thought that was the reason. I merely stated that anyone may switch campaigns because I believe this was the root for implementing the local rule in the first place. Im not sure if mods would enforce the local rule or if its even needed. My argument is that marco will not be the last person thats uncomfortable or trolling here and keeping a growing list of those people seems like the wrong solution to me.

Well it is not so much that he is trolling, it is that he is spamming his signature campaign in this thread by telling everyone in the campaign that he will try to work out a "special deal" with them if they are a ~~good poster~~ on default trust and willing to give positive trust.

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

Quote from: ACCTseller on April 08, 2015, 02:25:14 PM

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

The statement was in rection to marcotheminer saying that you can only institute a local rule when you create the thread after a local rule was added saying that marcotheminer cannot post in this thread. The plan was to create a new thread with a local rule of no marcotheminer to prevent him from posting/trolling here.

IMO I think the local rule should be enforced here especially if he is made aware of it ahead of time.

Yes I thought that was the reason. I merely stated that anyone may switch campaigns because I believe this was the root for implementing the local rule in the first place. Im not sure if mods would enforce the local rule or if its even needed. My argument is that marco will not be the last person thats uncomfortable or trolling here and keeping a growing list of those people seems like the wrong solution to me.

marcotheminer

legendary

Activity: 2072

Merit: 1049

┴puoʎǝq ʞool┴

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

The statement was in rection to marcotheminer saying that you can only institute a local rule when you create the thread after a local rule was added saying that marcotheminer cannot post in this thread. The plan was to create a new thread with a local rule of no marcotheminer to prevent him from posting/trolling here.

IMO I think the local rule should be enforced here especially if he is made aware of it ahead of time.

I'm not trolling..

ACCTseller

hero member

Activity: 532

Merit: 500

no longer selling accounts

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

Quote from: boopy265420 on April 08, 2015, 02:00:24 PM

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

The statement was in rection to marcotheminer saying that you can only institute a local rule when you create the thread after a local rule was added saying that marcotheminer cannot post in this thread. The plan was to create a new thread with a local rule of no marcotheminer to prevent him from posting/trolling here.

IMO I think the local rule should be enforced here especially if he is made aware of it ahead of time.

shorena

copper member

Activity: 1498

Merit: 1528

No I dont escrow anymore.

I would suggest we should start a new thread then and inform all our participants about the new thread URL, if that is the only way to get rid of people who are not welcome here.

Thanks got payment . Yeah if you think that way new thread can be handled more easily go ahead , make new thread and make here announcement for participants.

I think thats an overreaction. In the end everyone is free to join another campaign if they want to. You will always have people trying to troll you or who are uncomfortable. Opening a self moderated thread for convenience will set a wrong signal as this is the same method shady traders and services handle the heat.

boopy265420

legendary

Activity: 1876

Merit: 1005