Pages:
Author

Topic: 🔥�� [MAINNET] [UPX] uPlexa ⚡� Anonymity and eCommerce via IoT - page 29. (Read 51057 times)

jr. member
Activity: 313
Merit: 8
i like uplexa project. im mining now for 2 weeks and  hash still low really grate time to get involved. Keep up the good work

You are right! Only 5MH right now, which is around 2500 upx per day with a regular cpu https://www.uplexamining.com/hw-benchmarks/
Have you had a go at mining on your mobile phone yet? I have tried several models and made 500 UPX already Cheesy you should try

yeah, just imagine your UPX going up to 1 doolar? Smiley) (which is not irrealistic, and don't even give me any "max supply", it doesn't mean anything here... or if you want to think that way, check the "max supply" of fiat coins and bank notes...)
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
An official telegram group has also been launched!
Please note: the official discord is still the best place to go, but if you are not a Discord user, feel free to pop over; https://t.me/uplexaOfficial
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
235H/s on my S7  Grin
Been running my P20 Pro for nearly a week (every night) now, so far so good!

Can see great jump in volume and interest since CMC listing. Are there any plans for more exchanges?

Nice! How many coins has your S7 mined?

I don't think a new exchange is immediately coming, but it will come eventually. There are more pressing tasks being performed right now (lots of cool stuff on its way!).
jr. member
Activity: 226
Merit: 2
I feel having an anti-ASIC fork ready at hand is a great idea.

Who would want to take the time and expense to develop an ASIC for UPX, knowing the mining might only last a day?
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1166
Is this supposed to be an anonymous blockchain powered by IoT or is it the other way around and it is IoT powered by a blockchain?

It's an anonymous blockchain that has an IoT viable algorithm (allowing for the release of things like today's miner) Smiley

IoT viable algorithm, I have to think about and study that term as I can't come up easily with the opposite. Which algorithm for example is not viable for IoT?

It's viability mainly comes from the ASIC-resistant nature of the project, and the steps the team have taken to ensure small miners stay relevant.

For example, the uPlexa team already have an emergency fork ready, should anyone develop a compatible ASIC - one which they can deploy in hours, rather than months.

On top of that (and I'm not a developer, so they may chime in here), I believe the algo used is 'kinder' on low powered devices (half iterations from the original Cryptonight iirc).

The main note from the project thus far, is that we're actually seeing delivery of these promises, and when we're surrounded by projects that simply don't deliver, I think that has to be a reason to show an interest Smiley




Is it always possible to detect active ASIC miners? If I was an ASIC developer, I would slowly deploy machines over time so that it is not easily detected.

Yes, but that hasn't been the case with any other coin. Look at Monero recently.
These people want a sharp ROI.

The point here is that the next hardfork is ready to go, immediately. There's no 6 month etc period where ASIC's can exploit the network.

Perfection in this scenario is impossible, but this greatly reduces their influence. Yes, given your scenario, a single ASIC dev could avoid detection for a period of time.

I don't want to get too bogged down with just this, either. This is just one feature of this project. The dev team have 2 straight weeks of product releases coming soon (they're literally releasing something new every day for two weeks). Not sure if that's ever been done before, but it's pretty rapid development and desire, and I'm pretty excited about it! Smiley

Ok, it is good to have an emergency plan if ASICS would take over the network, I get that! Wink
legendary
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1387
Ukrainians will resist
Markscheider Mining Pool

Welcome to your pool Uplexa http://upx.ms-pool.net.ua/#

Commission: 0.1% (in the first month)
Min. Payment: 50 UPX
Algorithm: Cryptonight UPX
Payment interval: 3 minutes
DENOMINATION UNIT: 0.01
A wide range of mining ports
The possibility of separation by workers
Customizable payout threshold
The ability to mine immediately to the exchange
You can set a constant DIFFICULTY.

Node for remote connection:
Code:
upx.ms-pool.net.ua:21061

Happy mining!BTC
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
Is this supposed to be an anonymous blockchain powered by IoT or is it the other way around and it is IoT powered by a blockchain?

It's an anonymous blockchain that has an IoT viable algorithm (allowing for the release of things like today's miner) Smiley

IoT viable algorithm, I have to think about and study that term as I can't come up easily with the opposite. Which algorithm for example is not viable for IoT?

It's viability mainly comes from the ASIC-resistant nature of the project, and the steps the team have taken to ensure small miners stay relevant.

For example, the uPlexa team already have an emergency fork ready, should anyone develop a compatible ASIC - one which they can deploy in hours, rather than months.

On top of that (and I'm not a developer, so they may chime in here), I believe the algo used is 'kinder' on low powered devices (half iterations from the original Cryptonight iirc).

The main note from the project thus far, is that we're actually seeing delivery of these promises, and when we're surrounded by projects that simply don't deliver, I think that has to be a reason to show an interest Smiley




Is it always possible to detect active ASIC miners? If I was an ASIC developer, I would slowly deploy machines over time so that it is not easily detected.

Yes, but that hasn't been the case with any other coin. Look at Monero recently.
These people want a sharp ROI.

The point here is that the next hardfork is ready to go, immediately. There's no 6 month etc period where ASIC's can exploit the network.

Perfection in this scenario is impossible, but this greatly reduces their influence. Yes, given your scenario, a single ASIC dev could avoid detection for a period of time.

I don't want to get too bogged down with just this, either. This is just one feature of this project. The dev team have 2 straight weeks of product releases coming soon (they're literally releasing something new every day for two weeks). Not sure if that's ever been done before, but it's pretty rapid development and desire, and I'm pretty excited about it! Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1166
Is this supposed to be an anonymous blockchain powered by IoT or is it the other way around and it is IoT powered by a blockchain?

It's an anonymous blockchain that has an IoT viable algorithm (allowing for the release of things like today's miner) Smiley

IoT viable algorithm, I have to think about and study that term as I can't come up easily with the opposite. Which algorithm for example is not viable for IoT?

It's viability mainly comes from the ASIC-resistant nature of the project, and the steps the team have taken to ensure small miners stay relevant.

For example, the uPlexa team already have an emergency fork ready, should anyone develop a compatible ASIC - one which they can deploy in hours, rather than months.

On top of that (and I'm not a developer, so they may chime in here), I believe the algo used is 'kinder' on low powered devices (half iterations from the original Cryptonight iirc).

The main note from the project thus far, is that we're actually seeing delivery of these promises, and when we're surrounded by projects that simply don't deliver, I think that has to be a reason to show an interest Smiley




Is it always possible to detect active ASIC miners? If I was an ASIC developer, I would slowly deploy machines over time so that it is not easily detected.
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0

It is perfectly. Not planning to add a market maker to trade? Or additional exchanges?
Your project seems to me in need of this.

Yeah, they've definitely mentioned more exchanges in the pipeline, but I know in the immediate future they're concentrating on the MPS and sticking to the original roadmap (there's some pretty exciting products coming out soon).

But in parallel I am certain will we see more listings in the near future!
sr. member
Activity: 854
Merit: 252

It is perfectly. Not planning to add a market maker to trade? Or additional exchanges?
Your project seems to me in need of this.
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0

Well done, guys! I can see it's had an immediate impact on price and hash rate....let the fun begin!
Any idea when the m.cap will show up? I can see that none of the new coins have it, so it must be pretty standard.

Yeah, it'll update within a week. I know they're documentation states that they sometimes require 3 exchanges, but I've seen this with pretty much every new listing.
copper member
Activity: 143
Merit: 3
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
Such an underrated project. Is there any plans for hiveOS support?

There's no hiveOS yet, although uPlexa is included within the latest versions of XMRig-CC (which allows easy control over many miners, live hiveOS).
A few of us will look at it over the next week! Smiley
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
For reference I mined 94 uplexa after 24 hours, using my P20 Pro Cheesy Pretty good!


Noice! I have the same phone, but have not had it running for 24 hours yet. I've got a load of old handsets that I'm going to fire up next week.
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
Is this supposed to be an anonymous blockchain powered by IoT or is it the other way around and it is IoT powered by a blockchain?

It's an anonymous blockchain that has an IoT viable algorithm (allowing for the release of things like today's miner) Smiley

IoT viable algorithm, I have to think about and study that term as I can't come up easily with the opposite. Which algorithm for example is not viable for IoT?

It's viability mainly comes from the ASIC-resistant nature of the project, and the steps the team have taken to ensure small miners stay relevant.

For example, the uPlexa team already have an emergency fork ready, should anyone develop a compatible ASIC - one which they can deploy in hours, rather than months.

On top of that (and I'm not a developer, so they may chime in here), I believe the algo used is 'kinder' on low powered devices (half iterations from the original Cryptonight iirc).

The main note from the project thus far, is that we're actually seeing delivery of these promises, and when we're surrounded by projects that simply don't deliver, I think that has to be a reason to show an interest Smiley


legendary
Activity: 2058
Merit: 1166
Is this supposed to be an anonymous blockchain powered by IoT or is it the other way around and it is IoT powered by a blockchain?

It's an anonymous blockchain that has an IoT viable algorithm (allowing for the release of things like today's miner) Smiley

IoT viable algorithm, I have to think about and study that term as I can't come up easily with the opposite. Which algorithm for example is not viable for IoT?
newbie
Activity: 85
Merit: 0
Are there any plans to allow the pool to be changed on the android miner?

Right now you'll be mining on PoolBux with Fruitypool as a backup. I believe the plan to to load balance miners across all the uPlexa pools, once there is enough mobile mining traffic.
newbie
Activity: 33
Merit: 0
Can you believe that from now on, every Mining Calculator will have boxes not only for CPU / GPU / ASIC but also for MOBILE DEVICES ?
I wouldn't have imagined that this could ever be possible... And still I can't imagine how many paths will be opened only because this was invented.

Also imagine mining on your car navi / tv / refrigerator /...
Sky is really the limit from now on !


Pages:
Jump to: