Topic: [Daily Auction] 300+ Two Letter .bit Domains (Namecoin) (Read 11138 times)
I gave away d/jr and d/vl
is this auction still going? if so, I am assuming the price is not still 2BTC?
just wondering
just wondering
If you are interested send an offer by pm. Letting me know what you want to do with it might soften my disposition
is this auction still going? if so, I am assuming the price is not still 2BTC?
just wondering
just wondering
Round003 - finished. fv.bit sold to Luceo for 2BTC, congrats! Will pm with details.
Round004 - pending - will start with the first legitimate bid.
Round 3 bid: 2 BTC.
hey! target domain checked in. 
Round 3 bid: 2 BTC.
removed http://nf.bit - I may want to use it as a shortcut to the namecoin forum at http://dot-bit.org/forum
finally it's done and works!
removed http://nf.bit - I may want to use it as a shortcut to the namecoin forum at http://dot-bit.org/forum
edit: it is done.
edit: it is done.
fund info updated
ok, let me know if you change your mind
i got TG already, everything went smooth
i got TG already, everything went smooth
my address MwWjGPDfWh15KqKCWfhzNE1WcNNZp16rai
if you don't mind i would also put 2 BTC bid for sg.bit
if you don't mind i would also put 2 BTC bid for sg.bit
money received, domain transfered. 310c8554193bc673056b46af60b6fcbc7453d83d593db323b9d749291a07db11
thanks. looking forward to seeing something under this domain.
sorry, for now it's only one domain per forum member. I will reserve it and let you know should I reconsider.
Round003 still pending.
my address MwWjGPDfWh15KqKCWfhzNE1WcNNZp16rai
if you don't mind i would also put 2 BTC bid for sg.bit
if you don't mind i would also put 2 BTC bid for sg.bit
Round002 - finished.
tg.bit goes to m4rkiz for 2btc.
I will contact you by pm about the details.
Round003 - pending.
Round003 will start with the first valid bid.
2btc bid for tg
Thanks for your bid!Round002 - running.
2btc bid for tg
will remove nx.bit and bx.bit as I consider using them as shortcut domains...
Round002 still waiting for first bid.
Round002 still waiting for first bid.
For your contemplation:
The names offered for sale were registered Dec 5 2011, long after the launch, in blocks 31913-31919.
The cost was 0.48 NMC per domain to register (not the 4.8 NMC it would have been around block 25100, or the 48 NMC it would have been around block 660). The seller also registered letter + number combinations, so if you want g1.bit, he'd be your guy too. They were registered because they were cheap enough, not because of incredible foresight.
Typical block:
http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31914
The names offered for sale were registered Dec 5 2011, long after the launch, in blocks 31913-31919.
The cost was 0.48 NMC per domain to register (not the 4.8 NMC it would have been around block 25100, or the 48 NMC it would have been around block 660). The seller also registered letter + number combinations, so if you want g1.bit, he'd be your guy too. They were registered because they were cheap enough, not because of incredible foresight.
Typical block:
http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31914
thanks for digging that up. do you also [happen] to know the price of nmc back then? I think it was a short time after the merged mining drop.
edit: thanks for reducing the size of that other post
Here's a trade I made around that time:
12/07/11 19:36:32 Price:0.01111000 BTC
and they were never expensive:
07/24/11 11:47:31 Price:0.02740000
06/27/11 03:45:45 Price:0.02675002
For your contemplation:
The names offered for sale were registered Dec 5 2011, long after the launch, in blocks 31913-31919.
The cost was 0.48 NMC per domain to register (not the 4.8 NMC it would have been around block 25100, or the 48 NMC it would have been around block 660). The seller also registered letter + number combinations, so if you want g1.bit, he'd be your guy too. They were registered because they were cheap enough, not because of incredible foresight.
Typical block:
http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31914
The names offered for sale were registered Dec 5 2011, long after the launch, in blocks 31913-31919.
The cost was 0.48 NMC per domain to register (not the 4.8 NMC it would have been around block 25100, or the 48 NMC it would have been around block 660). The seller also registered letter + number combinations, so if you want g1.bit, he'd be your guy too. They were registered because they were cheap enough, not because of incredible foresight.
Typical block:
http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31914
thanks for digging that up. do you also [happen] to know the price of nmc back then? I think it was a short time after the merged mining drop.
edit: thanks for reducing the size of that other post
edit2: just as you said, they were cheap enough. and yes I also have registered a couple more
the first one ~50nmc
Price was about .035 - .04 BTC/NMC. (edit: added exchange prices below)
I was gonna dump all the transactions here, but BBcode freaks out because of the size and brackets.
Here's the A letters though:
[
{
"name" : "d/ae",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "f557ed50b4c5b6531c747bcc9e020a18641912829100005ccf16855bc4476a74",
"expires_in" : 22932
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/aj",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "a48d1d47a83c300ca96bb33a705b2907a61b98d6d9d580a5773a74f107b31bbd",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/ak",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "b266ed12592a8bf41efcf422c9aa864ceed6f73192242775f0bfde637b9ef17c",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/aq",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "77d769718e039d8a02d2155f01a549a96ad2af854a99a025fb89ce81a0b5a3ea",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/ay",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "0b5b2335338fcd6037f28909dffcdb3c7720757b3e5952f2bd3bfe4b6b231901",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
I was gonna dump all the transactions here, but BBcode freaks out because of the size and brackets.
Here's the A letters though:
[
{
"name" : "d/ae",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "f557ed50b4c5b6531c747bcc9e020a18641912829100005ccf16855bc4476a74",
"expires_in" : 22932
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/aj",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "a48d1d47a83c300ca96bb33a705b2907a61b98d6d9d580a5773a74f107b31bbd",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/ak",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "b266ed12592a8bf41efcf422c9aa864ceed6f73192242775f0bfde637b9ef17c",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/aq",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "77d769718e039d8a02d2155f01a549a96ad2af854a99a025fb89ce81a0b5a3ea",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
[
{
"name" : "d/ay",
"value" : "{\"map\": {\"\": \"10.0.0.1\"}}",
"txid" : "0b5b2335338fcd6037f28909dffcdb3c7720757b3e5952f2bd3bfe4b6b231901",
"expires_in" : 22931
}
]
For your contemplation:
The names offered for sale were registered Dec 5 2011, long after the launch, in blocks 31913-31919.
The cost was 0.48 NMC per domain to register (not the 4.8 NMC it would have been around block 25100, or the 48 NMC it would have been around block 660). The seller also registered letter + number combinations, so if you want g1.bit, he'd be your guy too. They were registered because they were cheap enough, not because of incredible foresight.
Typical block:
http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31914
More info: The .01 NMC op_name_new transactions were done the day before: http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31787
The names offered for sale were registered Dec 5 2011, long after the launch, in blocks 31913-31919.
The cost was 0.48 NMC per domain to register (not the 4.8 NMC it would have been around block 25100, or the 48 NMC it would have been around block 660). The seller also registered letter + number combinations, so if you want g1.bit, he'd be your guy too. They were registered because they were cheap enough, not because of incredible foresight.
Typical block:
http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31914
More info: The .01 NMC op_name_new transactions were done the day before: http://explorer.dot-bit.org/b/31787
Jump to: