Topic: Dan Metcalf Please Respond To The Allegations - Q&A Of Xcurrency XC - page 4. (Read 5839 times)

I can confirm there is manipulation going on, some users are actively creating new accounts in the attempt to deceive the holders into selling at lower prices with negative press.

Also, non-moderated threads are by far the worst. Darkcoin's thread is the perfect example. 80% of all posts on that thread are Negative/Deceptive/Lies/FUD. There again were users deceiving others with lies into selling Darkcoin(Before the historic pump). Same goes for Bitcoindark's previous Supernet to which users also started FUD to get in at cheap prices.

Lesson is: Don't believe anyone telling you to "sell", especially with a solid development plan.

Sorry folks, but in no way does engaging with this thread legitimise XC.

And we will not legitimise your expectations by engaging.

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9395895

Bye.

u want to know what is hilarious. As soon as new fud was released last night a mysterious 40 BTC entered the buy order book. Take whatever you want from it, you're free to believe what you choose to, but there is clear manipulation happening here regardless of whether some of the statements have even the slightest bit of authenticity

Veried!!!
Diden't know that "to fake" means "to dig"

This is hilarious.  

Notice that those who don't have totalitarian rules in their moderated threads don't get as much negative press?  Try to control free speech and people start digging.

He doesn't need to answer. This is a bunch of childish crap. They should ban you from the forums.  Grow up, this is what I was talking about and why your coin is in the trash.

It looks bad that they shut down the thread, however, if you were part of the team and every other post was someone bringing up one of the FIVE FUD topics from the mainboard, and ontop of that the majority of them being trolls who keep returning when XC is in turmoil, then yes I would have done the same thing. It can be reopened at any time, but as of this moment, the team cannot control the thread well enough under BTC talk forums. Thread bans still didnt mean anything as trolls would still come back and FUD. if you want to promote positive discussion and dont come off as a jackass whose intent is to FUD, then you will have all your questions answered at

http://xctalk.com/index.php?/topic/227-regarding-all-the-fud/

I hope if he answers these questions to everyones satisfaction we can stop cluttering the entire board with this stuff.

If there is a scam let's have some concrete proof presented now so i can dump my xc and block. If not then let's move forward. I bought a few k of block and held xc throught this crash so i'm hoping this is nothing more than fud.

However if proven not to be fud and there is evidence to show real scamming or shady tactics then those projects are in serious trouble.

Looks bad them shutting down the xc thread.

XC team just answer legit questions and delete the rest but do not close the thread, that just looks bad.

I see no real proof of wrong doing so far. Although i do think dan should have stuck with the xc road map. I would have supported a hardfork superblock for funds if the premine had of had a full ledger with expenses. I understand that is depleted now sadly, but since there is no real ledger of course questions will be asked about that.

Anytime a premine is spent there should be a full ledger. I accept devs need payment but it needs to be fully transparent along with all other costs.

Blocknet is a bit of a short term slap in the face for xc holders. I am hoping there will be a full ledger for the alts and BTC raised on the blocknet sale.

For now i remain positive about xc and blocknet but not as positive as i was about xc before this all came about. Blocknet could be great. Perhaps the funds raised should have only been gradually released as work was completed.

I'm forced to ask here because of being censored in the XC thread which is now locked and my questions deleted/redacted
Failing to answer these questions is highly suspicious and i would think it wise to just put an end to all of this and answer them once and for all

1: Did you develop hal in any way shape or form (answer clearly and explain what if at all you worked on for hal!)

2: Do you develop for util (again a straight forward answer yes or no and with an explanation of what you worked/work on if you did)

3: Can you list all of the people who formulated the blocknet with you and is prom bob fonats or any other known pump group in any way involved in the setup? (if so then detail specifically how and to what extent)

4: Please tell everyone here how you came to decide on these coins and did prom have anything to do with this?

5: Have you worked with prom or bob or fontas any other known pump group to date (yes or no and please detail specifically how and what you did and to what extent)

6: Have you done any code reviews on coins prom has be involved with (we know most of the blocknet coins prom is involved with)

7: Have you done code reviews for prom directly or him as a contact that lead you to do one?

8: has prom ever funded you in any way shape or form (elaborate please telling us what you did for prom if you did anything at all)

9: Are you the sole person doing your (Dan Metcalf) code reviews if not who are you outsourcing them to?

If anyone else has some questions for Dan Metcalf please feel free to ask in this thread so we can all put this to rest and move on.


HERE ARE THE ANSWERS