Topic: Dank Bank Deposits - dank's soul is claimed! - New music Nov 30th - page 88. (Read 128895 times)

If you are short on money it would be my advice that you focus on your strengths, your banking business and your music career, and make sure to put any money available towards a Mac before purchasing an inventory of illegal drug paraphernalia for resale.  You will also find more success if you entirely cease taking any mind altering substances and strive for clarity.

Was planning on it when I have spare cash for such a thing.  And after I rebuild my PC.

You should get a Mac, much better for this sort of thing.

Can anybody suggest a microphone recorder that doesn't suck?  Windows sound recorder isn't picking up my guitar anymore.

I asked the mods to take the drug conversation to a different thread. I suggest everyone does that too 

Once again for the inebriated who have lost their short term memories.  Dank introduced his illegal drug paraphernalia business into this thread, not I.   This forum believes in free speech, he introduced an idea in his own thread and I am criticizing it.


Please attempt to sober up if you are planning to continue at this time.  It takes practice to spot someone under the influence online, not so much in person.


I have no desire to ignore you.  You are experiencing confusion as a result of your inebriation and your clear incapacitation is presenting a very clear example of how dangerous drugs and alcohol can be for the mind.

An 8 hour+ drug/alcohol session is a sign of binging which is a serious warning sign for alcoholism.  I encourage you to go get help before it is too late.

*sigh* Hello again.  Yes, marijuana is still dangerous, childish sarcasm does not erase the scientific facts.


http://www.drugs.health.gov.au/internet/drugs/publishing.nsf/content/marijuana

Ok Rarity, you're right, I don't know how I could have been so naive to think that.  I feel like a fool poisoning my body all this time.  I guess my DARE officers were right after all.

This is the same, "NUH-UH!  THE SCIENTISTS AND DOCTORS ARE DUMMYS!" you have posted every time evidence has been pointed out to you.  The experts have looked at ALL the studies and all over the world have come to the same conclusion, the drug is dangerous and it should be legally restricted.  This is not conjecture, it is a result of an unbiased look at all the data.


What kind of bizarre druggy logic is that?  Nobody was saying cannabis and chemo are the same thing. The point is they both have dangers and they both have medical benefits.  You have attempted to point out medical benefits as if that erases the dangers.  Not so.


Yes, you have a civil right not to be sold addictive poison that ruins your body and the clarity of your mind.


What is this, the third time you have claimed you were done?  I really hope you do just accept the truth this time and not attempt to re-post the same lies as you have been doing.

Dank is the one who brought his drug paraphernalia business into this thread.


That is a ridiculous comparison.  Erowid is encouraging the use of deadly and dangerous chemicals and are a danger to anyone who uses their information.  Narconon is a well respected treatment agency with a 75% success rate at keeping people off drugs.  They are the best in the business.  

You did that all on your own.  And if you can use Narconon as a source, he can sure as shit use erowid.  At least erowid isn't trying to get people to sign up for dangerous, expensive "treatments" which are not evidence based.

Rarity, does it hurt?

You are a very, very slow individual.  Radiation also inhibits the growth of cancer.  Chemotherapy inhibits cancer.  Yet these things are both dangerous as hell.  There are often such tradeoffs in medical treatment.  Recreational use is not medical treatment.

Since your short term memory loss is inhibiting your ability to remember what has gone on earlier in the conversation, here are the tradeoffs we are talking about:


http://www.narconon.org/drug-information/dangers-of-marijuana.html


http://www.acde.org/common/Marijana.htm


http://smoking.ygoy.com/dangers-of-smoking-marijuana/

Once again, finding some cases where certain chemicals found in the plant may have some medical use (Read:  Not all of them and not smoked into the lungs) does not erase the dangers that are present in use of this addictive drug.


It is offensive to compare your selfish desire to abuse your body with drugs and to sell drug tools to children to a struggle for civil rights.  Regardless, I have not detected your inebriation just because you argue in favor of deadly drugs.  It is the total lack of understanding and logic which you bring to the subject and your reliance on druggie websites that makes that clear.

You don't get it, you can't just say "That information is invalid because " you have to find evidence of why it would be invalid, which means you have to read it.  I'll just leave these here instead.

-9 Tetrahydrocannabinol inhibits growth and metastasis of lung cancer..
BIDMC, Harvard University, Boston, MA
http://www.aacrmeetingabstracts.org/cgi/content/meeting_abstract/2007/1_Annual_Meeting/4749?maxtoshow=&hits=80&RESULTFORMAT=&fulltext=cannabinoid&searchid=1&FIRSTINDEX=1760&resourcetype=HWCIT

Cannabinoids promote brain cell growth
University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
http://www.jci.org/articles/view/25509

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tmviQBB5DHs

There, three links that prove cannabis's medicinal and non destructive properties.  I'm done unless you can prove these wrong (with logic).

So by your logic, if I debate in favor of gay rights, I'm gay?

It is inevitable when discussing drug issues online that the people arguing in favor of drugs will often be inebriated in one or more ways.  The denial of the dangers is a common symptom of the addictions so they are drawn to such debates.  It has taken some practice for me to be able to detect the signs of inebriation in this manner as I have done with you.  In the public square those who show up to a debate drunk or high on drugs are more easily spotted and more easily ignored for the compromised thinkers that they are, but we have no such luxury in online forums that allow them to contribute. 

They do not, under federal law which is always supreme to state law.  But you also said you were only selling tobacco products, so what does marijuana paraphernalia have to do with your business?  I'm confused.


You linked to a drug forum with a long and rambling list of random topics and sources including other sites like "erowid", another druggie website, none of which disproves the scientific consensus that marijuana is dangerous.  There are medical uses for radiation, it's the focus of a prominent medical specialty called Radiology.  However, that does not make it safe to zap children with radiation willy-nilly for no medical reason.

The medical consensus is that Marijuana is a dangerous substance, regardless of how many druggie sites try to tell you it is not.


No, I said marijuana is legally restricted worldwide.

Your drug induced amnesia has obviously struck again.  You claimed:


and also claimed:


So what are you selling?  Drug paraphernalia for illegal marijuana patients or tobacco pipes?  And how will you determine you are only selling to patients when you are doing no identity verification.


Please do not try and derail this discussion off topic from Dank's businesses.  However, I certainly maintain that Zimmerman was only acting in self defense because the drugs made Trayvon make a horrible decision.  Another victim of marijuana.

The legal case against Zimmerman will fall apart, he did nothing wrong aside from not carrying a non-lethal weapon instead of a gun.  The case against him has looked worse than it is because the judge was biased.  He has since been thrown off the case.

dank, stop biting.  Rarity maintains that George Zimmerman is a fine, upstanding citizen, ffs. 

Medical marijuana is legal in over 15 states, licensed patients have the right to buy tools needed to administer their medicine.  I already said this.

Go back to the list of hundreds of studies I posted, you can't discredit it because of the website it's on.  Look at the studies and you'll see many are conducted by very reputable medical institutions.

You serious?  I didn't say that, don't change my words around, and you were the one claiming it was globally illegal.

Only in your world is there something wrong with sharing love and medicine.  If you care about kids so much using drugs, you would A) want drugs to be legal and regulated as to keep them off the streets and away from children B) want to educate parents about how to better (truthfully) educate their children on such a matter, including harm reduction.  You can't blame the movie theater because your child snuck into a rated R movie.

You answered nothing ("NUH-UH! THE SCIENTISTS ARE DUMMYS!" is not an answer) and dodged everything.  I shall repeat again, why were you talking about patients and "legal in some jurisdictions" when you separately claim you are only selling tobacco products?  Why are you refusing to use any of the many well respected age verification services that can include things like checking ID at delivery?

Insulting me more isn't going to hide the fact that you have been unable to formulate any answers to the moral and legal violations your plan involves.  I can't understand why someone who is running such a sound, trustworthy, profitable, and ethical banking business would want to throw it all away for a life of crime.