If we are playing arm chair litigator, how about a class action suit for misleading investors with the claims of "no premine" and the false promises of the infamous "masternode ROI" info graphic? But I'm sure Evan's lawyers already told him to lose those and the weak explanations that followed in regard to the instamine being "a great accident" are Evan's desperate attempt to steer the ship away from the rocks.
Do you know how I know Dash isn't quite done yet? The rats haven't left yet.
But when they figure it out, and enough of their ill gotten gains are safe on other shores, then we'll see the dash ship where it belongs--at the bottom of the scammy seas.
Topic: Darkcoin aka DASH - The biggest ongoing SCAM in crypto - page 5. (Read 48692 times)
Does that imply that the suing party owns all dash in existence that was sold in the recent past (causing the decline in market cap)?
No, but as I said, it would be a start. And the Foundation would represent all the stake holders, so it's not unreasonable.
And it's not always about winning a case straight up, sometimes it's about dragging it long enough to bankrupt the other party.
Good luck getting everyone who sold dash to be on that side. If Adam then sold 1 dash wouldn't he be on the plaintiff's side?
lol
Look, I don't have to have all the details and answers for you. That's the job for the army of attorneys both parties would have to hire anyway (if they can afford it that is). Pointless to debate the details here. And I'm not really saying they should actually do it. Simply entertaining the thought of it. Crazier things have happened.
Does that imply that the suing party owns all dash in existence that was sold in the recent past (causing the decline in market cap)?
No, but as I said, it would be a start. And the Foundation would represent all the stake holders, so it's not unreasonable.
And it's not always about winning a case straight up, sometimes it's about dragging it long enough to bankrupt the other party.
Good luck getting everyone who sold dash to be on that side. If Adam then sold 1 dash wouldn't he be on the plaintiff's side?
lol
And it's not always about winning a case straight up, sometimes it's about dragging it long enough to bankrupt the other party.
Ah I see. So it's not about winning the argument, it's about bankrupting the competition.
Classy. How very Dash.
Yup. Almost as classy as AdamWhite's defamation campaign. How very Monero.
And it's not always about winning a case straight up, sometimes it's about dragging it long enough to bankrupt the other party.
Ah I see. So it's not about winning the argument, it's about bankrupting the competition.
Classy. How very Dash.
Does that imply that the suing party owns all dash in existence that was sold in the recent past (causing the decline in market cap)?
No, but as I said, it would be a start. And the Foundation would represent all the stake holders, so it's not unreasonable.
And it's not always about winning a case straight up, sometimes it's about dragging it long enough to bankrupt the other party.
A good start for the damages his defamation and accusations without proof have caused could be easily calculated - the difference in market cap before AdamWhite had started his defamation mission and now.
This is the stupidest thing I've read all day.
Why? Are you AdamWhite?
To be honest, I don't even know who AdamWhite is. But the idea you could go to a judge and try to claim a market cap difference is just laughable, irrespective of the circumstances. It's not worth even responding in detail.
A good start for the damages his defamation and accusations without proof have caused could be easily calculated - the difference in market cap before AdamWhite had started his defamation mission and now.
This is the stupidest thing I've read all day.
LOL they are reaching now....
now that would be a stretch...sue for the difference in market cap lol.
Does that imply that the suing party owns all dash in existence that was sold in the recent past (causing the decline in market cap)?
lol
A good start for the damages his defamation and accusations without proof have caused could be easily calculated - the difference in market cap before AdamWhite had started his defamation mission and now.
This is the stupidest thing I've read all day.
Why? Are you AdamWhite?
A good start for the damages his defamation and accusations without proof have caused could be easily calculated - the difference in market cap before AdamWhite had started his defamation mission and now.
This is the stupidest thing I've read all day.
Or Darkcoin Foundation should sue AdamWhite. A good start for the damages his defamation and accusations without proof have caused could be easily calculated
Of all the hundreds of bluff allegations and litigation threats that float around these forums, thats the one realistic one.
Actually every single thing on the OP is a fact, not opinion whatsoever. All of those things happened and you won't find them mentioned let alone explained anywhere on the Dash website or their BCT Ann.
The OP concludes with research so feel free to do so and make up your own mind
IHMO writing your OP does not make your claims facts - you are not providing any proof.The OP concludes with research so feel free to do so and make up your own mind
Like I wrote: file your accusations as a lawsuit against Darkcoin Foundation if you were scammed. Otherwise your actions are just a form of cyberharassment which is illegal in many countries.
Or Darkcoin Foundation should sue AdamWhite. A good start for the damages his defamation and accusations without proof have caused could be easily calculated - the difference in market cap before AdamWhite had started his defamation mission and now.
This thread is to spread the word.
2+ million Darkcoin/DASH were instamined in the first48 hours30 hours of launch. (1.5 million in the first 8 hours) Dev tries to make everyone believe it was an accident.
After the initial 2+ million coin instamine, they start using private GPU miners while convincing everyone else it's still a CPU only coin.
In addition, they:
- Lower the block emission 100x (500 coins per block to 5 coins per block)
- Lower the total coin supply that can ever exist from 80 million to 20 million
- Try and fail to bury the instamine by not mentioning it on the OP or the website
- Try to distance themselves from these facts by going through two rebrandings
They instamined at 100x emission and then drastically reduced the supply and emission rate once they had their fill. What a scam!
Spread the word, research.
2+ million Darkcoin/DASH were instamined in the first
After the initial 2+ million coin instamine, they start using private GPU miners while convincing everyone else it's still a CPU only coin.
In addition, they:
- Lower the block emission 100x (500 coins per block to 5 coins per block)
- Lower the total coin supply that can ever exist from 80 million to 20 million
- Try and fail to bury the instamine by not mentioning it on the OP or the website
- Try to distance themselves from these facts by going through two rebrandings
They instamined at 100x emission and then drastically reduced the supply and emission rate once they had their fill. What a scam!
Spread the word, research.
To be convincing you should at least try to find some evidence before starting to accuse. Can you at least post some proof of what you are saying is true?
It seems that the OP is very convinced that he has proof that Evan Duffield is a scammer.
If his proofs are that good he should sue him and the Darkcoin Foundation. All information necessary is on their website: https://www.darkcoinfoundation.org/about/team/
If his proofs are made up he should think about stopping his accusations.
Just because I "know" someone is a scammer does not mean I get to sue him.
I didnt lose anything with Mark K and the EMPTYGOX fiasco but he is a scammer and I have no right to sue him given I lost nothing.
Check facts at least, scambags 
You shouldn't let facts get in the way of good trollin'.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/darkcoin-aka-dash-the-biggest-ongoing-scam-in-crypto-995710
The XCOIN block 0 timestamp is from the relaunched blockchain. The first public launch was before ChainCoin's block 0.
But then again, facts shouldn't get in the way of good trollin' so please carry on.
Actually every single thing on the OP is a fact, not opinion whatsoever. All of those things happened and you won't find them mentioned let alone explained anywhere on the Dash website or their BCT Ann.
The OP concludes with research so feel free to do so and make up your own mind
IHMO writing your OP does not make your claims facts - you are not providing any proof.The OP concludes with research so feel free to do so and make up your own mind
Like I wrote: file your accusations as a lawsuit against Darkcoin Foundation if you were scammed. Otherwise your actions are just a form of cyberharassment which is illegal in many countries.
This thread is to spread the word.
2+ million Darkcoin/DASH were instamined in the first48 hours30 hours of launch. (1.5 million in the first 8 hours) Dev tries to make everyone believe it was an accident.
After the initial 2+ million coin instamine, they start using private GPU miners while convincing everyone else it's still a CPU only coin.
In addition, they:
- Lower the block emission 100x (500 coins per block to 5 coins per block)
- Lower the total coin supply that can ever exist from 80 million to 20 million
- Try and fail to bury the instamine by not mentioning it on the OP or the website
- Try to distance themselves from these facts by going through two rebrandings
They instamined at 100x emission and then drastically reduced the supply and emission rate once they had their fill. What a scam!
Spread the word, research.
2+ million Darkcoin/DASH were instamined in the first
After the initial 2+ million coin instamine, they start using private GPU miners while convincing everyone else it's still a CPU only coin.
In addition, they:
- Lower the block emission 100x (500 coins per block to 5 coins per block)
- Lower the total coin supply that can ever exist from 80 million to 20 million
- Try and fail to bury the instamine by not mentioning it on the OP or the website
- Try to distance themselves from these facts by going through two rebrandings
They instamined at 100x emission and then drastically reduced the supply and emission rate once they had their fill. What a scam!
Spread the word, research.
To be convincing you should at least try to find some evidence before starting to accuse. Can you at least post some proof of what you are saying is true?
It seems that the OP is very convinced that he has proof that Evan Duffield is a scammer.
If his proofs are that good he should sue him and the Darkcoin Foundation. All information necessary is on their website: https://www.darkcoinfoundation.org/about/team/
If his proofs are made up he should think about stopping his accusations.
I did not talk about the technology at all, i was asking for a proposal how to mitigate the instamine incident.
And why should someone admit something he did not do? Will you admit that you killed John Lennon?
And why should someone admit something he did not do? Will you admit that you killed John Lennon?
I threw in the bit about technology for good measure.
So you know for an absolute fact he didn't? Are you eduffield? What qualifies you to speak for him?
There is no way to know what happend until you are Evan - this applies to you and me. Judging on forum posts in hindsight and out of context is not a valid proof, for none of our or anyones theories.
And I did not speak for Evan - i just asked the question "why should someone admit to something he did not do" - in general.
Theoretically speaking:
Given that the instamine was a flaw/bug, Evan was totally overworked, glad he finally solved it by tweaking the code instead of relaunching it, mined a lot of coins, sold some, bought some - what should he do today?
Yes, people are very fond of making excuses for him like you've just done here
Like i said, a trivial amount of research reveals the many inconsistencies and so-called coincidences that enabled eduffield to benefit greatly from the instamine.. his deception about the launch time and lack of windows wallet both support the intentional instamine argument. Also, his gross overstatement about "inventing" X11 is a good indicator of his complete lack of ethics
tl;dr: if it smells like shit it most likely is.
Once again: What mitigation plan would suit you?
This thread is to spread the word.
2+ million Darkcoin/DASH were instamined in the first48 hours30 hours of launch. (1.5 million in the first 8 hours) Dev tries to make everyone believe it was an accident.
After the initial 2+ million coin instamine, they start using private GPU miners while convincing everyone else it's still a CPU only coin.
In addition, they:
- Lower the block emission 100x (500 coins per block to 5 coins per block)
- Lower the total coin supply that can ever exist from 80 million to 20 million
- Try and fail to bury the instamine by not mentioning it on the OP or the website
- Try to distance themselves from these facts by going through two rebrandings
They instamined at 100x emission and then drastically reduced the supply and emission rate once they had their fill. What a scam!
Spread the word, research.
2+ million Darkcoin/DASH were instamined in the first
After the initial 2+ million coin instamine, they start using private GPU miners while convincing everyone else it's still a CPU only coin.
In addition, they:
- Lower the block emission 100x (500 coins per block to 5 coins per block)
- Lower the total coin supply that can ever exist from 80 million to 20 million
- Try and fail to bury the instamine by not mentioning it on the OP or the website
- Try to distance themselves from these facts by going through two rebrandings
They instamined at 100x emission and then drastically reduced the supply and emission rate once they had their fill. What a scam!
Spread the word, research.
To be convincing you should at least try to find some evidence before starting to accuse. Can you at least post some proof of what you are saying is true?
I did not talk about the technology at all, i was asking for a proposal how to mitigate the instamine incident.
And why should someone admit something he did not do? Will you admit that you killed John Lennon?
And why should someone admit something he did not do? Will you admit that you killed John Lennon?
I threw in the bit about technology for good measure.
So you know for an absolute fact he didn't? Are you eduffield? What qualifies you to speak for him?
There is no way to know what happend until you are Evan - this applies to you and me. Judging on forum posts in hindsight and out of context is not a valid proof, for none of our or anyones theories.
And I did not speak for Evan - i just asked the question "why should someone admit to something he did not do" - in general.
Theoretically speaking:
Given that the instamine was a flaw/bug, Evan was totally overworked, glad he finally solved it by tweaking the code instead of relaunching it, mined a lot of coins, sold some, bought some - what should he do today?
I did not talk about the technology at all, i was asking for a proposal how to mitigate the instamine incident.
And why should someone admit something he did not do? Will you admit that you killed John Lennon?
And why should someone admit something he did not do? Will you admit that you killed John Lennon?
I threw in the bit about technology for good measure.
So you know for an absolute fact he didn't? Are you eduffield? What qualifies you to speak for him?
We get it you invested everything you got on Monero when it was high and we have this on this forum before you deleted that post "Even though it was deleted we can still check it lol"
Then you invested on Dashcoin and it went crap....Ok WE GET IT you hate Evan because he delivers and Smooth/Fluffy Don't bad choice by you we feel sorry I really do.
Jump to: