Just like dogecoin this will soon come to a crash
The hype will die soon
The hype will die soon
Topic: Darkcoin Explodes +180.09 % in 1 day! (Read 2298 times)
It is possible, but Dogecoin was pure hype, at least Darkcoin had some interesting features that can be applicable in the real world.
This and https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/why-you-should-be-buying-darkcoin-468804 are gold... 
There are epic quotes like "0.35$? nahh"
There are epic quotes like "0.35$? nahh"
Man, I forgot about this thread. 
Price seems fine... Check
Spikes like these are nothing to be noted. Come back in 3 months and see where price is.
Price seems fine... Check
Spikes like these are nothing to be noted. Come back in 3 months and see where price is.
Price seems fine... Check
There are many legitimate reasons to have a fully anonymous currency. All the reasons TOR is usefull, the same apply to Darkcoin.
There is no different from cash as far as the anon respect, however you don't have to convince me. You will need to convince them.
Besides transfering very large chunks of cash presents problems. Transfering large amounts of dark currency does not have these problems.
I am NOT on the side of anyone except myself. I legitimately worry dark anon currency is a big threat to crypto at this stage. You don't see it that way but i think you under estimate how quickly they can crush the flourishing interest in crypto.
I agree someone will always want to create anon currency, but it must be a minority not become the norm if you want crypto accepted mainstream. This is just a fact not my opinion.
Do you honestly believe anon currency will meet with any gov approval?? please you have to be realistic.
I know it is hard to create a coin that stand out from being copy and paste and this is dark coins way of trying to stand out.
However people need to understand that although it is a cool feature and for most they would not abuse, but it has a big downside which far outweighs the upside.
Sure if darkcoin does not do it others will so they may as well go first...... i hope others see that it is not really essential and provides no upside for the average user.
When anoncoin came out i was onside thinking too what a cool feature, after watching the hearings i see now that feature is not worth the risk to crypto.
Cryptohunter, if this become possible - what's the difference to cash money? This movement is much bigger than bitcoin, it's an evolution of technology and a loophole in our current dying era that has been corrupted and controlled by our 'real'(FRB) economies for centuries.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
There is no different from cash as far as the anon respect, however you don't have to convince me. You will need to convince them.
Besides transfering very large chunks of cash presents problems. Transfering large amounts of dark currency does not have these problems.
I am NOT on the side of anyone except myself. I legitimately worry dark anon currency is a big threat to crypto at this stage. You don't see it that way but i think you under estimate how quickly they can crush the flourishing interest in crypto.
I agree someone will always want to create anon currency, but it must be a minority not become the norm if you want crypto accepted mainstream. This is just a fact not my opinion.
Do you honestly believe anon currency will meet with any gov approval?? please you have to be realistic.
I know it is hard to create a coin that stand out from being copy and paste and this is dark coins way of trying to stand out.
However people need to understand that although it is a cool feature and for most they would not abuse, but it has a big downside which far outweighs the upside.
Sure if darkcoin does not do it others will so they may as well go first...... i hope others see that it is not really essential and provides no upside for the average user.
When anoncoin came out i was onside thinking too what a cool feature, after watching the hearings i see now that feature is not worth the risk to crypto.
Cryptohunter, if this become possible - what's the difference to cash money? This movement is much bigger than bitcoin, it's an evolution of technology and a loophole in our current dying era that has been corrupted and controlled by our 'real'(FRB) economies for centuries.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
There is no different from cash as far as the anon respect, however you don't have to convince me. You will need to convince them.
Besides transfering very large chunks of cash presents problems. Transfering large amounts of dark currency does not have these problems.
I am NOT on the side of anyone except myself. I legitimately worry dark anon currency is a big threat to crypto at this stage. You don't see it that way but i think you under estimate how quickly they can crush the flourishing interest in crypto.
I agree someone will always want to create anon currency, but it must be a minority not become the norm if you want crypto accepted mainstream. This is just a fact not my opinion.
Do you honestly believe anon currency will meet with any gov approval?? please you have to be realistic.
I know it is hard to create a coin that stand out from being copy and paste and this is dark coins way of trying to stand out.
However people need to understand that although it is a cool feature and for most they would not abuse, but it has a big downside which far outweighs the upside.
Sure if darkcoin does not do it others will so they may as well go first...... i hope others see that it is not really essential and provides no upside for the average user.
When anoncoin came out i was onside thinking too what a cool feature, after watching the hearings i see now that feature is not worth the risk to crypto.
I agree, this whole movement has implications not just for money, the blockchain technology of Bitcoin can be applied to many other things. Many people have not
come to grips with this yet. This is not just about money or currencies.
come to grips with this yet. This is not just about money or currencies.
Cryptohunter, if this become possible - what's the difference to cash money? This movement is much bigger than bitcoin, it's an evolution of technology and a loophole in our current dying era that has been corrupted and controlled by our 'real'(FRB) economies for centuries.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
Cryptohunter, if this become possible - what's the difference to cash money? This movement is much bigger than bitcoin, it's an evolution of technology and a loophole in our current dying era that has been corrupted and controlled by our 'real'(FRB) economies for centuries.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
You just sound like an old aunty when you try to prevent this movement from it's natural development. What's happening is not in the control of anyone, its inevitable.
Gambling!
the implications seem dangerous/risky and already essentially pre-banned .... what positive implications do you see for the average user of having a dark currency?
Just one useful purpose for having it non traceable for the average person?
We are not talking about the price spike, that is just the after effect. The main thing is the anon blockchain and "coinjoin" making fully anonymous. The implications are pretty interesting to say the least.
Spikes like these are nothing to be noted. Come back in 3 months and see where price is.
the implications seem dangerous/risky and already essentially pre-banned .... what positive implications do you see for the average user of having a dark currency?
Just one useful purpose for having it non traceable for the average person?
Gambling.... yes i guess so, that could be useful to some people i guess. Then again that is all they want to hear, the one use is so that you can bypass their anti online gambling laws... therefore using for illegal reasons. I should have been more clear. 1 useful legal purpose for the average user to have anon currency??
I mean this is the question they will be asking, 1 legitimate legal reason for the average person to have anon currency. ? against their argument that it will allow pedo drug touting terrorists to flourish.
Well let's wait and see, you think anon currency will be allowed, i believe they meant it when they said they will NEVER permit anon currency, i just hope they don't think it all has too much downside and say sorry we decided crypto is a bad idea after all.
Gambling!
the implications seem dangerous/risky and already essentially pre-banned .... what positive implications do you see for the average user of having a dark currency?
Just one useful purpose for having it non traceable for the average person?
We are not talking about the price spike, that is just the after effect. The main thing is the anon blockchain and "coinjoin" making fully anonymous. The implications are pretty interesting to say the least.
Spikes like these are nothing to be noted. Come back in 3 months and see where price is.
the implications seem dangerous/risky and already essentially pre-banned .... what positive implications do you see for the average user of having a dark currency?
Just one useful purpose for having it non traceable for the average person?
I think the politicians have a lot to gain from cryptos even more so the anon types. Did you think of that? Publicly they can make all kinds of claims and strong worded statements, but behind the scenes is a very different story. Those public hearings are nothing but BS and theater.
If the US gov come out swinging at crypto.... crypto gets crushed back to being a very fringe interest. Think BTC back at $1-$20 range or less.
In the hearing over and over it was said.......... we will NEVER permit anon currency. That was crystal clear. I see more and more of this anon fascination, which really for most of us is not actually essential. Why even jeopardise a good thing we have going here. I am totally shocked the US has been as open about it as they have. I though a big slap down was coming on the first hearing. So did a lot of others but then when it was positive 100>>>>1000 in days.
Let's not rock the boat, .... those that need to have anon currency even at the cost of losing out on early adoption to crypto need to be separated as far from mainstream crypto as possible.
BTC is moving towards full transparency ... alts need to stay as they but certainly not all start implementing dark measures or else you will see ALTS or even crypto get the axe in short order.
If you think the gov is risking anything at all by slapping BTC and alts into oblivion you are wrong. They risk nothing, most people don't even understand what btc is or are not interested.
I hope people wake up to this very fast before alts and maybe even btc meets a swift end.
If there was any real need for dark currency then i can see the point in risking it, but since for 99.9999% of people just mining a few coins to get some beer money or a new car or even a deposit on a home.....there is no point risking it for no gain.
Anyway i leave it there, i don't support dark currency at this point since i see not reason to have it and the US gov have made things clear, remain transparent and traceable or else you're going down. I would rather not pull the dragons tail.
I agree with you on the whole anon issue. But histroy has shows that once something is banned it grows even more. I think Governments are treading very
carefully because they realize how the precarious the whole situation is for them. Right now distrust of Gov is at all time high, if they come out swinging big against crypto there is a big chance it will backfire in a big way. I think we are in uncharted waters here. How this whole thing will develop is any one's guess.
carefully because they realize how the precarious the whole situation is for them. Right now distrust of Gov is at all time high, if they come out swinging big against crypto there is a big chance it will backfire in a big way. I think we are in uncharted waters here. How this whole thing will develop is any one's guess.
sounds another vertcoin chart..... up up up .......weeeeeee......................................
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
If the US gov come out swinging at crypto.... crypto gets crushed back to being a very fringe interest. Think BTC back at $1-$20 range or less.
In the hearing over and over it was said.......... we will NEVER permit anon currency. That was crystal clear. I see more and more of this anon fascination, which really for most of us is not actually essential. Why even jeopardise a good thing we have going here. I am totally shocked the US has been as open about it as they have. I though a big slap down was coming on the first hearing. So did a lot of others but then when it was positive 100>>>>1000 in days.
Let's not rock the boat, .... those that need to have anon currency even at the cost of losing out on early adoption to crypto need to be separated as far from mainstream crypto as possible.
BTC is moving towards full transparency ... alts need to stay as they but certainly not all start implementing dark measures or else you will see ALTS or even crypto get the axe in short order.
If you think the gov is risking anything at all by slapping BTC and alts into oblivion you are wrong. They risk nothing, most people don't even understand what btc is or are not interested.
I hope people wake up to this very fast before alts and maybe even btc meets a swift end.
If there was any real need for dark currency then i can see the point in risking it, but since for 99.9999% of people just mining a few coins to get some beer money or a new car or even a deposit on a home.....there is no point risking it for no gain.
Anyway i leave it there, i don't support dark currency at this point since i see not reason to have it and the US gov have made things clear, remain transparent and traceable or else you're going down. I would rather not pull the dragons tail.
We are not talking about the price spike, that is just the after effect. The main thing is the anon blockchain and "coinjoin" making fully anonymous. The implications are pretty interesting to say the least.
Spikes like these are nothing to be noted. Come back in 3 months and see where price is.
the implications seem dangerous/risky and already essentially pre-banned .... what positive implications do you see for the average user of having a dark currency?
Just one useful purpose for having it non traceable for the average person?
The reason is clear - yes nobody can see where you got your coins from or where you sent them? - that is it. That is the benefit, i agree it's really a good thing and if the gov loved this or didn't mind it then sure let's do it. However they don't love it , they HATE it and will crush it and say therefore crypto is no longer something they will allow.
So the risk reward is this.... wow this is cool nobody can see where i get my coins or where i send them..... that was fun. Next day boring forgot about how cool it was to have anon coins. Third day ...crypto gone/worthless ... not cool anymore ....perhaps anon currency was not such a good plan. That is the quick version of the future of dark currency.
We are not talking about the price spike, that is just the after effect. The main thing is the anon blockchain and "coinjoin" making fully anonymous. The implications are pretty interesting to say the least.
Spikes like these are nothing to be noted. Come back in 3 months and see where price is.
I agree with you on the whole anon issue. But histroy has shows that once something is banned it grows even more. I think Governments are treading very
carefully because they realize how the precarious the whole situation is for them. Right now distrust of Gov is at all time high, if they come out swinging big against crypto there is a big chance it will backfire in a big way. I think we are in uncharted waters here. How this whole thing will develop is any one's guess.
carefully because they realize how the precarious the whole situation is for them. Right now distrust of Gov is at all time high, if they come out swinging big against crypto there is a big chance it will backfire in a big way. I think we are in uncharted waters here. How this whole thing will develop is any one's guess.
sounds another vertcoin chart..... up up up .......weeeeeee......................................
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
If the US gov come out swinging at crypto.... crypto gets crushed back to being a very fringe interest. Think BTC back at $1-$20 range or less.
In the hearing over and over it was said.......... we will NEVER permit anon currency. That was crystal clear. I see more and more of this anon fascination, which really for most of us is not actually essential. Why even jeopardise a good thing we have going here. I am totally shocked the US has been as open about it as they have. I though a big slap down was coming on the first hearing. So did a lot of others but then when it was positive 100>>>>1000 in days.
Let's not rock the boat, .... those that need to have anon currency even at the cost of losing out on early adoption to crypto need to be separated as far from mainstream crypto as possible.
BTC is moving towards full transparency ... alts need to stay as they but certainly not all start implementing dark measures or else you will see ALTS or even crypto get the axe in short order.
If you think the gov is risking anything at all by slapping BTC and alts into oblivion you are wrong. They risk nothing, most people don't even understand what btc is or are not interested.
I hope people wake up to this very fast before alts and maybe even btc meets a swift end.
If there was any real need for dark currency then i can see the point in risking it, but since for 99.9999% of people just mining a few coins to get some beer money or a new car or even a deposit on a home.....there is no point risking it for no gain.
Anyway i leave it there, i don't support dark currency at this point since i see not reason to have it and the US gov have made things clear, remain transparent and traceable or else you're going down. I would rather not pull the dragons tail.
Spikes like these are nothing to be noted. Come back in 3 months and see where price is.
I agree with you on the whole anon issue. But histroy has shows that once something is banned it grows even more. I think Governments are treading very
carefully because they realize how the precarious the whole situation is for them. Right now distrust of Gov is at all time high, if they come out swinging big against crypto there is a big chance it will backfire in a big way. I think we are in uncharted waters here. How this whole thing will develop is any one's guess.
carefully because they realize how the precarious the whole situation is for them. Right now distrust of Gov is at all time high, if they come out swinging big against crypto there is a big chance it will backfire in a big way. I think we are in uncharted waters here. How this whole thing will develop is any one's guess.
sounds another vertcoin chart..... up up up .......weeeeeee......................................
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
sounds another vertcoin chart..... up up up .......weeeeeee......................................
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
Where are the vertcoin pumpers that showed up after the first nudge up?
The US seems to be the only pro crypto gov, the others are not issuing outright bans because they believe they could lose out against the US.
The US do not like the sound of dark currency. You piss them off, they ban. The others ban next.... end of crypto.
Pushing anon currency is not a wise move, unless you need to remain anon. If you just want to see crypto advance and make some money along the way....forget pushing too hard in that direction.
I'm not one for all this gov spying on us in everything we do for no reason, but encrypted dark currency?? ....this will not be permitted you can be sure. Dark coin and others now coming with coin mixing etc are good ideas but really if they get too big you can be sure they will damage crypto. They will get taken down and if it seems difficult to weed them out from BTC and the others ...expect a blanket ban.
If you watched those hearings....again and again......we will not accept anon currency their message was crystal clear.
For all those saying what can they do about it.....they could smash crypto like a fly right now. The currency is decentralised but every mechanism it relies upon to make it useful in anyway are not.
Take this forum out and banks complete ban on anything crypto related = the end.
Darkcoin is another pump over nothing any coin can work on achieving the same thing, bitcoin/ltc is they wished. It could go up another couple of days before the big smack down like i said would happen with vert.
Thanks Heskey,
From my understand of the preliminary tests the technology is already working, it just needs to be tweaked and some bugs that came up during the testing phase needs to be ironed out. So it seems it is almost there!
Well, if it succeeds, I think we have a big one. It's already more secure than Quark from what I've understood. From my understand of the preliminary tests the technology is already working, it just needs to be tweaked and some bugs that came up during the testing phase needs to be ironed out. So it seems it is almost there!
http://razorsforex.blogspot.se/2014/02/darkcoin-anonymous-cryptocurrency.html
Great article!
Remember people, the anonymity is not yet fully implmented, it's still highly speculative to invest in this coin.
Great article!
Remember people, the anonymity is not yet fully implmented, it's still highly speculative to invest in this coin.
Thanks Heskey,
From my understand of the preliminary tests the technology is already working, it just needs to be tweaked and some bugs that came up during the testing phase needs to be ironed out. So it seems it is almost there!
From my understand of the preliminary tests the technology is already working, it just needs to be tweaked and some bugs that came up during the testing phase needs to be ironed out. So it seems it is almost there!
http://razorsforex.blogspot.se/2014/02/darkcoin-anonymous-cryptocurrency.html
Great article!
Remember people, the anonymity is not yet fully implmented, it's still highly speculative to invest in this coin.
Great article!
Remember people, the anonymity is not yet fully implmented, it's still highly speculative to invest in this coin.
http://razorsforex.blogspot.se/2014/02/darkcoin-anonymous-cryptocurrency.html
Great article!
Remember people, the anonymity is not yet fully implmented, it's still highly speculative to invest in this coin.
Great article!
Remember people, the anonymity is not yet fully implmented, it's still highly speculative to invest in this coin.
Jump to: