Actually, Darkcoin has the technical credibility. What is not news though, is that clueless bagholders of other coins will try to talk it down - but I guess that comes with the territory of being the first mover and market leader.
Hu... technical credibility ? Are you smoking, man ?
DRK is not credible at all from the beginning:
- INSTAMINED BY DEV
I'm sorry you missed the lunch. I really am. Pay attention next time. I'm not the dev, but I managed to mine just fine.
- pump and dumped like never seen on any crypto coin
You haven't seen much then I suppose.
- shitty master node architecture
Says who? You? LOL
Masternode architecture is awesome, it enables decentralized trustless offchain mixing, and a whole plethora of other features, like instant transaction confirmations.
- Constant price decline after the pump and dump
And this has to do with technical credibility, exactly what? Usually after a bubble forms, it has to come down to reasonable levels.
DRK is a (very bad) joke and give a very bad image of the crypto scene.
Again, says who? You? LOL
Try harder, troll.
And now that the code is open sourced, there will be episode like this one more and more often. Prepare for the big slide ;-)
Episode "like this one" is nothing, someone manages to get higher percentage of rewards for a while, so what? Bugs are found, bugs are getting fixed. I am sure more bugs will be found, no doubt. All crypto is still basically beta software (and a lot of it is alpha, and a lot of it is vaporware). Only ones getting a hard-on out of this are trolls who think they missed the train and are just jelly people aren't buying into their shitcoin.
