Topic: DCORP Venture Capitalism - page 4. (Read 127620 times)
People, watch out, DRP and DRPU are being DELISTED by Cryptopia that has already suspended markets. It seems the only other markets available are MercatoX for DRP and HitBTC for DRPU! Make your withdraw as soon as possible, it seems connections are at 0 level or almost, it won't be easy!
What’s new?
I hope theres also blog post campaign , already joined signature campaign and quite happy a
I have been on this project for a long time to get out of the money, I was caught, although I like this coin, but I do not like the days of no profit
Unlocking the token means it would be movable and will probably quickly be added to Etherdelta. This will probably happen before the fork. This means people can then buy more at low dumping prices before money flows back into alts after the fork.
I think that for a venture capital thing they sure do not make themselves very known into the community
How is it hard to not use blockchain for these activities or goals you have mentioned.
It looks like all these things can be achieved without the use of blockchain or crypto at all
It looks like all these things can be achieved without the use of blockchain or crypto at all
Yes of course lol. The are planning to run a Cryptocurrency Exchange, DCORP team please do this without crypto at all.
How is it hard to not use blockchain for these activities or goals you have mentioned.
It looks like all these things can be achieved without the use of blockchain or crypto at all
It looks like all these things can be achieved without the use of blockchain or crypto at all
DCORP exchange supported by local payment providers for instant payments - Bullex
added for voting, proof and forecast on YEENOT TODAY https://yeenot.today/catalog/news/212
added for voting, proof and forecast on YEENOT TODAY https://yeenot.today/catalog/news/212
Sounds like a good news...
DCORP exchange supported by local payment providers for instant payments - Bullex
added for voting, proof and forecast on YEENOT TODAY https://yeenot.today/catalog/news/212
added for voting, proof and forecast on YEENOT TODAY https://yeenot.today/catalog/news/212
The development of the project is a little bad, few transactions, but now the number of ICO is very large, the competition is really fierce, a lot of token value is rapidly declining or many times have not increased.
I think the devs has tried his bestThe project has 22 months of runway left in funds including two new hires. And a dedicated team.
I plan on hanging on at least to the exchange completion.
Is there any change to devs receiving tokens from funds, there was change to other things in whitepaper?
The development of the project is a little bad, few transactions, but now the number of ICO is very large, the competition is really fierce, a lot of token value is rapidly declining or many times have not increased.
I think the devs has tried his bestThe project has 22 months of runway left in funds including two new hires. And a dedicated team.
I plan on hanging on at least to the exchange completion.
The development of the project is a little bad, few transactions, but now the number of ICO is very large, the competition is really fierce, a lot of token value is rapidly declining or many times have not increased.
I think the devs has tried his best
The development of the project is a little bad, few transactions, but now the number of ICO is very large, the competition is really fierce, a lot of token value is rapidly declining or many times have not increased.
Removing Yasin and other newly minted Admins
Lately Yasin has been banning long-term investors. This isn't fud because its actually true and this post will most likely get deleted as well. Worried that most likely his thirst for control and power is at the fore-front to further devalue the teams efforts to solve communication issues by making these personal rash and unprofessional solutions for just banning the people speaking out. Personally it's an easy way out to not deal with serious concerns but unruly to a professional setting and business ethic.
Recent relentless banning and admin abuse is eminent. Numerous people have gotten and will get banned on the telegram channel for expressing their views as long-term investors who've been in the community since the start of the ICO whom disagree on the direction and execution. Usually it gets resolved through communication and listening on various topics but now it's boiled down to ignoring investors concerns, secret channels, unannounced admin rights, and authoritative demeanors of righteousness from the community whom have recently been empowered with admin rights to get rid of spam hand selected by Yasin. It's a pitty that a crucial part of communicating is blocked and information is withheld and given to a selected few which maybe useful for insider trading. Last words before I was banned from Yasin notes that he will never let me in a testers channel and will never share information again but wholeheartedly expressed there was no such channels previously.
It's disheartening to see that the quality level of communication, posts and updates have also dwindled and it's becoming more of a repetitive pattern thus hurting dcorp as it is officially at an all time low around .44 cents. It's a pitty because Frank Bonnet doesn't deserve sub-par team of communicators because in fact he is very communicative, straight forward, and addresses concerns promptly. Personally I wrote to him because there wasn't really much information given in the channel and had great conversations in which he expressed that he doesnt hold anything back. Im free to share what we discussed. Which leads to the conclusion that what Frank really shares is never something of a 'secret' or information released in a strategic manner. Maybe this will jeopardize the future of trust or relations between me as an investor but I strive for transparency and thorough communication with honesty in my daily life.
I think what ticked Yasin off was the DRPU/BNT Token relay information that Frank had told me. People have written on the VC platform and voted, also it was announced very early on at the beginning stages of DCORP in the slack channel in utilizing Bancor in the future. Yet when investors bring up the topic of not enough liquidity and difficulty with exchanges, I am appalled that no one would speak about it straightforwardly like its some secret and only a few should know. Now some who associate with DCORP were quiet angry at this. I don't see the logic in not revealing information in this digital age when accessibility is as valued as commodities. Also letting the community know this made a few at ease that there will be a better future.
There are other numerous issues like negligent on accounting and financial reporting, an actual strategic marketing frame work, and how to effectively communicate and promote DCORP by bringing in more interest and adaption to a constant changing environment. The excuse that ‘marketing’ without a viable product is completely false because the word ‘marketing’ is very vague and there are numerous ways in which the community can help find solutions without the cost of vertical marketing campaigns or paying for advertisement.
There is a very informative academy, future updates, upcoming exchange and suggest that it continually be promoted through various avenues with an emphasis of communicating and a campaign for awareness through peer to peer. If this company is touted as democratic, then the investors will be obliged by freedom of speech and rightfully be activists as well. If admins are given specific rights then give them actual tasks rather than attack people personally like ‘mental health issues’ or ‘multiple personalities’ it’s lame, a last resort, and immature. This type of behavior should actually be banned.
Why do we use it?
Its dividing the community, consolidating power to Yasin and his cyber bullying posse. They don't bring value to the community by banning long-term investors who want more transparency and communication. Red flags for authoritative dictatorial tendencies. Information is withheld when actually Frank is completely the opposite and wants more information to be shared. Hope people will vote and express their views to revamp the way communication is done and how it's held through the investor-community driven initiatives through inclusiveness not exclusiveness.
Lately Yasin has been banning long-term investors. This isn't fud because its actually true and this post will most likely get deleted as well. Worried that most likely his thirst for control and power is at the fore-front to further devalue the teams efforts to solve communication issues by making these personal rash and unprofessional solutions for just banning the people speaking out. Personally it's an easy way out to not deal with serious concerns but unruly to a professional setting and business ethic.
Recent relentless banning and admin abuse is eminent. Numerous people have gotten and will get banned on the telegram channel for expressing their views as long-term investors who've been in the community since the start of the ICO whom disagree on the direction and execution. Usually it gets resolved through communication and listening on various topics but now it's boiled down to ignoring investors concerns, secret channels, unannounced admin rights, and authoritative demeanors of righteousness from the community whom have recently been empowered with admin rights to get rid of spam hand selected by Yasin. It's a pitty that a crucial part of communicating is blocked and information is withheld and given to a selected few which maybe useful for insider trading. Last words before I was banned from Yasin notes that he will never let me in a testers channel and will never share information again but wholeheartedly expressed there was no such channels previously.
It's disheartening to see that the quality level of communication, posts and updates have also dwindled and it's becoming more of a repetitive pattern thus hurting dcorp as it is officially at an all time low around .44 cents. It's a pitty because Frank Bonnet doesn't deserve sub-par team of communicators because in fact he is very communicative, straight forward, and addresses concerns promptly. Personally I wrote to him because there wasn't really much information given in the channel and had great conversations in which he expressed that he doesnt hold anything back. Im free to share what we discussed. Which leads to the conclusion that what Frank really shares is never something of a 'secret' or information released in a strategic manner. Maybe this will jeopardize the future of trust or relations between me as an investor but I strive for transparency and thorough communication with honesty in my daily life.
I think what ticked Yasin off was the DRPU/BNT Token relay information that Frank had told me. People have written on the VC platform and voted, also it was announced very early on at the beginning stages of DCORP in the slack channel in utilizing Bancor in the future. Yet when investors bring up the topic of not enough liquidity and difficulty with exchanges, I am appalled that no one would speak about it straightforwardly like its some secret and only a few should know. Now some who associate with DCORP were quiet angry at this. I don't see the logic in not revealing information in this digital age when accessibility is as valued as commodities. Also letting the community know this made a few at ease that there will be a better future.
There are other numerous issues like negligent on accounting and financial reporting, an actual strategic marketing frame work, and how to effectively communicate and promote DCORP by bringing in more interest and adaption to a constant changing environment. The excuse that ‘marketing’ without a viable product is completely false because the word ‘marketing’ is very vague and there are numerous ways in which the community can help find solutions without the cost of vertical marketing campaigns or paying for advertisement.
There is a very informative academy, future updates, upcoming exchange and suggest that it continually be promoted through various avenues with an emphasis of communicating and a campaign for awareness through peer to peer. If this company is touted as democratic, then the investors will be obliged by freedom of speech and rightfully be activists as well. If admins are given specific rights then give them actual tasks rather than attack people personally like ‘mental health issues’ or ‘multiple personalities’ it’s lame, a last resort, and immature. This type of behavior should actually be banned.
Why do we use it?
Its dividing the community, consolidating power to Yasin and his cyber bullying posse. They don't bring value to the community by banning long-term investors who want more transparency and communication. Red flags for authoritative dictatorial tendencies. Information is withheld when actually Frank is completely the opposite and wants more information to be shared. Hope people will vote and express their views to revamp the way communication is done and how it's held through the investor-community driven initiatives through inclusiveness not exclusiveness.
This project has many competitors in the industry which have already tied their ropes in the world and also offering similar services to many people 
Who else is doing decentralized vc backed by an exchange with continuous airdrops to coin holders from token partners?
More information released today
Gladius airdrop to drpu holders soon
https://mailchi.mp/5d6654c3707d/newsletter-april-22?e=b3e4d4c888
Gladius airdrop to drpu holders soon
https://mailchi.mp/5d6654c3707d/newsletter-april-22?e=b3e4d4c888
Marinecoín - I want to tell you about one of them - marinecoín. For more information you can click marineco.ín. Briefly, it is time tested fast and developed blockchain, many other features in itself. And right now they are providing absolutely free ICO and giving away 450 000 marine coins for everybody, who would like to join community!!! Payment System in Internet Artificial Intelligence (AI) of Things (IoT). time dilution technology. time dilution technology - artificial intelligence - self sustaining - community - fair distribution - iot. I’m absolutely so serious about this a 20 000 coins for everyone who join!!! Check it here marineco.ín/ico. Don’t miss it
According to the whitepaper, the derivative exchange should now be ready for review by community. Where can I test the derivate exchange? Nothing is like stated in the whitepaper anymore.
Things have changed, I think you missed the part that the Derivates Exchange is cancelled for now, maybe they will do it somedays ... or maybe never. Now they want to run a Crypto Exchange located in the Netherlands with Fiat Gateway, have a look at the Proposal: https://drive.google.com/file/d/19qlBKQbVas7t_AAynZ6Jy6kZO3hlN4vR/view
Well, that was not what I invested in originately. I was not happy about all changes and delays from Ico start. Sold my tokens and found more interesting things to focus on.
I invested primarily for the Derivates Exchange too but I will still keep my share on DCORP for now. I fully understand your decision and wish you good luck with these new things.
According to the whitepaper, the derivative exchange should now be ready for review by community. Where can I test the derivate exchange? Nothing is like stated in the whitepaper anymore.
Things have changed, I think you missed the part that the Derivates Exchange is cancelled for now, maybe they will do it somedays ... or maybe never. Now they want to run a Crypto Exchange located in the Netherlands with Fiat Gateway, have a look at the Proposal: https://drive.google.com/file/d/19qlBKQbVas7t_AAynZ6Jy6kZO3hlN4vR/view
Well, that was not what I invested in originately. I was not happy about all changes and delays from Ico start. Sold my tokens and found more interesting things to focus on.
Jump to: