I know that www.multifaucet.tk lists Block Explorers & Faucets together once listed.
Perhaps send them an email regarding ILT and they should set one up.
Topic: DEAD - page 65. (Read 79217 times)
Once again with these new coins I am playing it backwards.
Mined a boat load of ILT, now trying to figure out if coin is worth holding.
These short POW stage coins have forced me into this methodology that I would have yelled at myself for even thinking about even a few months ago.
Although, 2 of the last 3 have worked out well for me. BITB and ECASH.
However, still nervous when I have to operate this way after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
Mined a boat load of ILT, now trying to figure out if coin is worth holding.
These short POW stage coins have forced me into this methodology that I would have yelled at myself for even thinking about even a few months ago.
Although, 2 of the last 3 have worked out well for me. BITB and ECASH.
However, still nervous when I have to operate this way after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
when all else fails, you can at least take profit on 50% now, and keep 50% of your holdings to gamble on hoping for a rise after the POW Stage.
You can never really tell in the crypto world!
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves.
but the point is spread the hash around, not centralized coin to just one pool, there is nothing bad in that
nononono you are absolutely right on that. In a perfect crypto world, no one pool should have more than 10% ish of the nethash BUT also in said perfect cryptoworld, there would be not be a rampant plague of scammers and thieves itching to steal every fiat cent you have. With that in mind, given the choice of the two, I would whole heartedly go with ocminer just cause I've used him before countless times and wouldn't go with a pool merely saying 'spread the hash to us'. THAT is not a convincing reason to use said pool. A better arguement/advert needs to be made to convince folks to switch.
and this coin is too short to centralized it, I mean on just 4550 blocks or so
and I agree, right now no one can measure with OCminer ! and the most after all this s*** what happened with "some" coin/s
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves.
but the point is spread the hash around, not centralized coin to just one pool, there is nothing bad in that
nononono you are absolutely right on that. In a perfect crypto world, no one pool should have more than 10% ish of the nethash BUT also in said perfect cryptoworld, there would be not be a rampant plague of scammers and thieves itching to steal every fiat cent you have. With that in mind, given the choice of the two, I would whole heartedly go with ocminer just cause I've used him before countless times and wouldn't go with a pool merely saying 'spread the hash to us'. THAT is not a convincing reason to use said pool. A better arguement/advert needs to be made to convince folks to switch.
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves.
point is spread the hash around, not centralized coin to just one pool, there is nothing bad in that
after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
tsk tsk, obvious scam coin was obvious from the start
Once again with these new coins I am playing it backwards.
Mined a boat load of ILT, now trying to figure out if coin is worth holding.
These short POW stage coins have forced me into this methodology that I would have yelled at myself for even thinking about even a few months ago.
Although, 2 of the last 3 have worked out well for me. BITB and ECASH.
However, still nervous when I have to operate this way after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
Mined a boat load of ILT, now trying to figure out if coin is worth holding.
These short POW stage coins have forced me into this methodology that I would have yelled at myself for even thinking about even a few months ago.
Although, 2 of the last 3 have worked out well for me. BITB and ECASH.
However, still nervous when I have to operate this way after getting royally burned by holding XPY.
guys spread hash on our pool
I hate to be the person who breaks the bad news, BUT, ocminer is an established purveyor of pools and I have not heard of you. If I had to pick, I would go with the pro I know, and not the cat saying 'spread the hash around' giving no reasons whatsoever as to why this would be a good thing to do other than to enrich themselves.
Which error do you get ?
An error occurred during a connection to ilt.suprnova.cc.
Cannot communicate securely with peer: no common encryption algorithm(s).
(Error code: ssl_error_no_cypher_overlap)
Yes, thats a big fat bug in Firefox:
https://blog.mozilla.org/security/2014/10/14/the-poodle-attack-and-the-end-of-ssl-3-0/
Upgrade your Browser
EDIT: tbh the bug is/was in SSLv3
Which error do you get ?
An error occurred during a connection to ilt.suprnova.cc.
Cannot communicate securely with peer: no common encryption algorithm(s).
(Error code: ssl_error_no_cypher_overlap)
Which error do you get ?
Firefox 36 works but laggy.
Lol mod, it was sarcasm about dump.
{
"blocks" : 3757,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 493.17890529,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 14000000000,
"netmhashps" : 64187.49300843,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 1000000,
"testnet" : false
}
{
"blocks" : 3757,
"currentblocksize" : 0,
"currentblocktx" : 0,
"difficulty" : {
"proof-of-work" : 493.17890529,
"proof-of-stake" : 0.00024414,
"search-interval" : 0
},
"blockvalue" : 14000000000,
"netmhashps" : 64187.49300843,
"netstakeweight" : 0.00000000,
"errors" : "",
"pooledtx" : 0,
"stakeweight" : {
"minimum" : 0,
"maximum" : 0,
"combined" : 0
},
"stakeinterest" : 1000000,
"testnet" : false
}
Yeah... bittrex will probably add it soon now that there is a blockexplorer!
Looks great, bought some today.
Bring it to the public, bring it to Bittrex!
Jump to: