Author

Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 186. (Read 1601343 times)

member
Activity: 80
Merit: 10
off current topic.


I currently mine at 930mh

Why does my speed vary so much in the statistics on the side of the page? I see 1200mh sometimes for a round and 600mh others. I am sure this is a easy question, please advise.

Thank you.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
How does the site calculate stales? How often/at what intervals?
Instantly on receiving.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
wanted to say thanks to tycho for the service, but at such a high fee I decided to move to another low fee pool (just thought you should know why) also i tried to transfer 1.10197724 BTC but it only transferred 1.10 BTC leaving the remainder with tycho, is this a bitcoin limitation (not being able to transfer the full amount) or a deepbit problem?
...sends the nickles (µbtc) with no issues. Not sure why deepbit isn't sending it. I guess he makes a few extra BTC that way. Can't be that much tho
No, I'm not making any profit with this because those subcents are still on the user's balance and I can't take them.

Already answered a couple of pages ago.
I'm not sending the subcents because old versions of bitcoin client may lose them, won't show on user's wallet balance or add them to fees in some cases (without telling the user about this).
I'll think about adding subcent transfers as an option for those who know that they can handle it.

For example, if someone uses .19 version, gets 1.10197724 BTC and tries to send all his money to the exchange, the client will try to send only 1.10 (because subcents are not visible in the interface). But then it has to get a change (0.00197724 BTC) back to a new user's address, which is less than 0.01 BTC (minimal output size for that version). Since this is less than the mininal fee of .19 version - 0.01 BTC, all 0.00197724 would be just discarded and become the fee to the block creator.
member
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
wanted to say thanks to tycho for the service, but at such a high fee I decided to move to another low fee pool (just thought you should know why)

also i tried to transfer 1.10197724 BTC but it only transferred 1.10 BTC leaving the remainder with tycho, is this a bitcoin limitation (not being able to transfer the full amount) or a deepbit problem?

swepool.net sends the nickles (µbtc) with no issues. Not sure why deepbit isn't sending it. I guess he makes a few extra BTC that way. Can't be that much tho.
newbie
Activity: 41
Merit: 0
How does the site calculate stales? How often/at what intervals?
newbie
Activity: 10
Merit: 2
Has the stale percentage for anyone else greatly jumped or is it just me?
yes, for me to.
yesterday I had 1.08% stale shares. (mining with poclbm ~100MH/s)
full member
Activity: 126
Merit: 100
wanted to say thanks to tycho for the service, but at such a high fee I decided to move to another low fee pool (just thought you should know why)

also i tried to transfer 1.10197724 BTC but it only transfered 1.10 BTC leaving the remainder with tycho, is this a bitcoin limitation (not being able to transfer the full amount) or a deepbit problem?
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
How long does it typically take to send a confirmation email regarding account's primary email from your servers?
If you could add this time-information to the help section and the page that shows when we update our bitcoin account addresses that would be great.
Usually it's delivered instantly.
There are some problems with @yahoo.com sometimes and may be @sbcglobal.net, but other servers work fine.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
Hey Tycho,

How long does it typically take to send a confirmation email regarding account's primary email from your servers?

If you could add this time-information to the help section and the page that shows when we update our bitcoin account addresses that would be great.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
I have not received their payments twice
Have you entered wrong bitcoin address ? PM me your login so I can check it.

UPD: Just checked. Both your transactions were delivered already.
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
I have not received their payments twice
newbie
Activity: 35
Merit: 0
Has the stale percentage for anyone else greatly jumped or is it just me?
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
I've almost confirmed it, but I can't figure out where the bug is. But at least when some silly Phoenix user says "waaah Phoenix is faster than DiabloMiner" I can laugh at them while I have sexual relations with their female parental units.

Sorry to go off topic, but even though I'm sure you love fucking my mom  Grin, phoenix *is* actually faster than Diablo for me, as your kernel has problems with my hardware and -v 19, even using the latest fix for that 0.5% speedup patch. So it's actually diablo showing a high hashrate but using 1/3 of that hashrate to calculate crap that isn't worth a penny. I guess it's my setup as I know there are many people using diablo without problems. (-v 2 or -v 3 seem slower than phoenix as well, although I'm not THAT sure about this. The hash meter shows ~15mhash/s less AFAIR. Not sure if I should trust it.)

The phoenix hashmeter can't be too far off for me, as the luck meters (on deepbit and BTC guild) average out at about the correct rate. Even if it is slightly less than what is shown by phoenix, that's still better than the 30% from diablo.

Now please refrain from calling me silly. Thanks. Smiley
hero member
Activity: 602
Merit: 500
You're assuming that if a pool goes down people wouldn't switch to a backup pool, or just go solo until it was back up.  DDoS attacks by an indivual miner or pool wouldn't serve much of a benefit to them.  I figure this is an external attack to disrupt a digital currency not controlled by "them".

Then again once Internet 2 hits, Coining may very well dissapear(in its current form anyway) so attacking it might be pointless right now.

Wouldn't taking out some of the larger pools to some extent be profitable for smaller miners?  The DDoS'ers don't necessarily have to be against bitcoin itself.
newbie
Activity: 11
Merit: 0
Wouldn't taking out some of the larger pools to some extent be profitable for smaller miners?  The DDoS'ers don't necessarily have to be against bitcoin itself.
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
Code:
11/06/2011 13:54:48, long poll: backend error

Got about 4 of these in a row.

Same.
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500
Code:
11/06/2011 13:54:48, long poll: backend error

Got about 4 of these in a row.
legendary
Activity: 1162
Merit: 1000
DiabloMiner author
i started using guiminer but when comparing my speeds with the chart i knew i could get allot more out of my card,
so i switched to try out phoenix and im getting like +90ish mh/s more.
Some users think that Phoenix shows more hashrate than it really does. But this is not verified yet.

I've almost confirmed it, but I can't figure out where the bug is. But at least when some silly Phoenix user says "waaah Phoenix is faster than DiabloMiner" I can laugh at them while I have sexual relations with their female parental units.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
i started using guiminer but when comparing my speeds with the chart i knew i could get allot more out of my card,
so i switched to try out phoenix and im getting like +90ish mh/s more.
Some users think that Phoenix shows more hashrate than it really does. But this is not verified yet.
hero member
Activity: 742
Merit: 500
Jump to: