It'd be even better if there was a way to get rid of it completely. The placement and size are annoying as heck!
I knew that everyone will like it :)Now you can disable it in advanced settings.
Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 277. (Read 1601433 times)
April 30, 2011, 06:03:49 PM
Now you can disable it in advanced settings.
April 30, 2011, 02:03:14 PM
your pool luck is really, really sucking right now ... +35%.
I thought you said somewhere that it can't get worse than +15%?
Is it time to consider that someone is performing the "hide the golden ticket" attack on your pool?
In theory it can be better or worse to any extent.I thought you said somewhere that it can't get worse than +15%?
Is it time to consider that someone is performing the "hide the golden ticket" attack on your pool?
I'm constantly monitoring all stats and everything is running as it should.
Do you know that such attacker would need to have 35% of pool speed to do this ? That's 70 GH/s, even ArtForz can't do this yet
The fastest users are crunching at only 2.5% of pool's speed, and there aren't many of them. I don't think that 30+ top users can cooperate in such anti-pool effort and lose their 35% (25 GH/s) too.Cost of such attack thus would be $700 per day not to mention enormous hardware resources.
So let's crunch trought this to the brilliant future
Yes, and at which point they may as well form a small pool and mine amongst themselves ... or am I missing something?
April 30, 2011, 11:18:41 AM
Thanks to [Tycho] for all his hard work! 
I just joined the pool a few days go with my lowly Macbook Pro, but I go back to work today and will add my iMac and my co-lo boxes to the effort. I just started learning coding with the REALStudio suite, and am considering writing a cross platform GUI as a project. Unfortunately, Mac's seem to be low man on the Bitcoin mining totem pole, I need to dig further in the forums to find out what specifically is the issue. I'm wondering if running this hardware with Linux instead of OS X would make a difference?
The problem is probably shitty hardware, really. Macs never, ever came with great GPUs, which is what you need to excel. I just joined the pool a few days go with my lowly Macbook Pro, but I go back to work today and will add my iMac and my co-lo boxes to the effort. I just started learning coding with the REALStudio suite, and am considering writing a cross platform GUI as a project. Unfortunately, Mac's seem to be low man on the Bitcoin mining totem pole, I need to dig further in the forums to find out what specifically is the issue. I'm wondering if running this hardware with Linux instead of OS X would make a difference? April 30, 2011, 10:25:48 AM
Thanks to [Tycho] for all his hard work! I just joined the pool a few days go with my lowly Macbook Pro, but I go back to work today and will add my iMac and my co-lo boxes to the effort. I just started learning coding with the REALStudio suite, and am considering writing a cross platform GUI as a project. Unfortunately, Mac's seem to be low man on the Bitcoin mining totem pole, I need to dig further in the forums to find out what specifically is the issue. I'm wondering if running this hardware with Linux instead of OS X would make a difference?
I just joined the pool a few days go with my lowly Macbook Pro, but I go back to work today and will add my iMac and my co-lo boxes to the effort. I just started learning coding with the REALStudio suite, and am considering writing a cross platform GUI as a project. Unfortunately, Mac's seem to be low man on the Bitcoin mining totem pole, I need to dig further in the forums to find out what specifically is the issue. I'm wondering if running this hardware with Linux instead of OS X would make a difference? April 30, 2011, 05:43:29 AM
We are officially the biggest pool 
April 30, 2011, 03:06:19 AM
Okay so just bad timing? lol damn.
Welp. What's the production difference in the long run between using larger/smaller work sizes? I tried 64 for a few hours, the Mh/s was peaking higher at 340Mh/s per mining client, but it would wildly swing from 340, 330, down to 325... using 128 seems more stable as it holds steady at 324-330, staying at 330 most often.
I tried 256 and it seemed slower at 329...
Anyhow, Thanks for fast replies
Welp. What's the production difference in the long run between using larger/smaller work sizes? I tried 64 for a few hours, the Mh/s was peaking higher at 340Mh/s per mining client, but it would wildly swing from 340, 330, down to 325... using 128 seems more stable as it holds steady at 324-330, staying at 330 most often.
I tried 256 and it seemed slower at 329...
Anyhow, Thanks for fast replies
April 30, 2011, 02:58:30 AM
Why was my last payout so low? I paused my client for ~5 minutes to reboot, I change a flag -w to test it out for a few hours, realtime MH/s wasn't different... I changed it back about 20 minutes ago
That was a very short block - it took only a few seconds to solve, so your chances to send a share in exact those seconds aren't 100%It's normal.
April 30, 2011, 02:58:07 AM
Can someone explain what is going on here? Where are all my shares going? The whole time I been producing at 660 MH/S!!
Why was my last payout so low? I paused my client for ~5 minutes to reboot, I change a flag -w to test it out for a few hours, realtime MH/s wasn't different... I changed it back about 20 minutes ago
It was a really short round and you only got a few of the shares that were submitted ... the very short rounds it is a crap shoot who gets the most shares in and doesn't have time to even out to reflect average hashrates .... if you hang around for enough short rounds it will even out when totalled over all of them.
Next time just hope the short round are all your shares going in ... !
April 30, 2011, 02:52:31 AM
Can someone explain what is going on here? Where are all my shares going? The whole time I been producing at 660 MH/S!!
Why was my last payout so low? I paused my client for ~5 minutes to reboot, I change a flag -w to test it out for a few hours, realtime MH/s wasn't different... I changed it back about 20 minutes ago
April 30, 2011, 02:51:04 AM
Can someone explain what is going on here? Where are all my shares going? The whole time I been producing at 660 MH/S!!
April 30, 2011, 02:18:54 AM
deepbit has hit the motherlode
on the new difficulty too ... how long can this last i wonder?
April 30, 2011, 02:12:03 AM
-50% !!!!!
this shows that the difficulty of the pool is 50% lower than the general difficulty
this shows that the difficulty of the pool is 50% lower than the general difficulty
April 30, 2011, 01:49:35 AM
-39% WTF???
it would be nice if we just get the 50% of the whole net force!
come on people
it would be nice if we just get the 50% of the whole net force!
come on people
Karma!
April 30, 2011, 01:45:53 AM
What is -39%??
April 30, 2011, 01:45:08 AM
-39% WTF???
it would be nice if we just get the 50% of the whole net force!
come on people
it would be nice if we just get the 50% of the whole net force!
come on people
April 29, 2011, 02:29:14 PM
I read that you can elongate the time sample for average hash rate from 7 minutes to ~30? for accuracy
"Averaging window" parameter in advanced settings page.Thanks, that took care of it!
Also, found a nice signature banner
Looking gooood April 29, 2011, 11:49:37 AM
I read that you can elongate the time sample for average hash rate from 7 minutes to ~30? for accuracy
"Averaging window" parameter in advanced settings page. April 29, 2011, 11:47:54 AM
I read that you can elongate the time sample for average hash rate from 7 minutes to ~30? for accuracy
how do i do this
how do i do this
April 29, 2011, 11:07:26 AM
it could be nice if we could select pps and prop for all the workers or some of them at once without clicking so many times!
April 29, 2011, 10:25:24 AM
Is the deepbit website down ? I can't seem to go onto it but my miners still crunching away ?
No, works fine for me. Jump to: