Topic: [DEAD] DeepBit.net PPS+Prop,instant payouts, we pay for INVALID BLOCKS too - page 299. (Read 1601343 times)
March 30, 2011, 01:06:29 PM
yes, but it's 1,4Mhash/s w/ LP vs. 3,8Mhash/s w/o LP on one core E7200@3,16Mhz
March 30, 2011, 12:58:36 PM
I wanted long pool cpu miner before summer comes 
cpuminer already supports long polling.
March 30, 2011, 12:18:26 PM
Tycho, why you waste money on google adwords, give'em to me 
cpuminer's sse2_64 should be the fastest, but it only works on 64-bit Linux (sse2_64 is a port of ufasoft's code).
ufasoft's miner works on Windows.
puddinpop's stuff can do CPU mining, but is slower than cpuminer or ufasoft.
how about borrowing the code I wanted long pool cpu miner before summer comes
cpuminer's sse2_64 should be the fastest, but it only works on 64-bit Linux (sse2_64 is a port of ufasoft's code).
ufasoft's miner works on Windows.
puddinpop's stuff can do CPU mining, but is slower than cpuminer or ufasoft.
how about borrowing the code
I wanted long pool cpu miner before summer comes March 30, 2011, 12:08:48 PM
cpuminer's sse2_64 should be the fastest, but it only works on 64-bit Linux (sse2_64 is a port of ufasoft's code).
ufasoft's miner works on Windows.
puddinpop's stuff can do CPU mining, but is slower than cpuminer or ufasoft.
March 30, 2011, 11:13:50 AM
I'm using puddinpop's cpu miner (only one CPU at home, 2 at work). How do I change algorithms? Which CPU miner would you say is best?
March 30, 2011, 06:09:35 AM
Ufasoft's SSE2 CPU Miner gets me about 2.5MHash/s per core on a 2.2ghz Core2 Duo. ~5MHash/sec total.
Same with cpuminer's "sse2_64" algorithm.
well I can only run it with those algorithms(showing on help screen)
c, 4way, cryptopp, cryptopp_asm32
and it's not fast enough
win xp 32bit, intel E7200* and Q6600
* - 1,4Mhash/s
March 30, 2011, 01:20:04 AM
Ufasoft's SSE2 CPU Miner gets me about 2.5MHash/s per core on a 2.2ghz Core2 Duo. ~5MHash/sec total.
Same with cpuminer's "sse2_64" algorithm.
March 30, 2011, 12:06:31 AM
BTW if you are CPU mining, try playing with the different algorithm settings. I found with the quad core i can get 1.2mh/s/core with cryptopp_asm32 and only 880kh/s/core with 4 way or c.....
Ufasoft's SSE2 CPU Miner gets me about 2.5MHash/s per core on a 2.2ghz Core2 Duo. ~5MHash/sec total.
March 29, 2011, 10:02:24 PM
Hi, I'm a new bitcoin user and joining your pool with my (not so) hefty ~890 kh/s (peak). I have question/suggestion for you: would it not make more sense for the payments on the Payments page to be in reverse chronological sequence, with the most recent at the top and oldest at the bottom?
Yes, it may be better that way.It would to me. As for the "Your part in the pool's current speed" measure, I've only ever seen it read 0%, diverging occasionally/briefly to some impossibly high value. Same for "average speed in last 7 minutes" actually. To me, those could both be removed because they seem useless and uninformative.
"average speed in last 7 minutes" or luck meter works for fast miners. I'll add time window adjustment for it to work with CPU miners too.That sounds great.
Feel free to donate btw. 
System upgrades aren't cheap. :SOh wow that was quick! The sequence in the payments window is already changed.
I think I'm going to like this pool. BTW if you are CPU mining, try playing with the different algorithm settings. I found with the quad core i can get 1.2mh/s/core with cryptopp_asm32 and only 880kh/s/core with 4 way or c.....
March 29, 2011, 10:48:32 AM
Hey. I'm new here. It says "Balance is updated once per hour" but I've been at it for several hours and no update. What gives ?
EDIT: It seems a block wasn't found in quite a bit. I assume that must be the reason. :|
EDIT: It seems a block wasn't found in quite a bit. I assume that must be the reason. :|
March 29, 2011, 03:35:05 AM
add stats page with earned btc per day(noting client timezone) something like @ payment log
add option to input user Mhash/s next to Average speed in last 7 minutes and under user speed recalculate Your part in the pool's current speed based on user value
81.14 MH/s 95 MH/s
Average speed in last 7 minutes
0.11 % 0.13%
Your part in the pool's current speed
add more columns for shares
Shares /Shares per day/Shares per hour/(stale)
3240 (0.67%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
add option to input user Mhash/s next to Average speed in last 7 minutes and under user speed recalculate Your part in the pool's current speed based on user value
81.14 MH/s 95 MH/s
Average speed in last 7 minutes
0.11 % 0.13%
Your part in the pool's current speed
add more columns for shares
Shares /Shares per day/Shares per hour/(stale)
3240 (0.67%)
0 (0.00%)
0 (0.00%)
March 29, 2011, 01:02:32 AM
Hi, I'm a new bitcoin user and joining your pool with my (not so) hefty ~890 kh/s (peak). I have question/suggestion for you: would it not make more sense for the payments on the Payments page to be in reverse chronological sequence, with the most recent at the top and oldest at the bottom?
Yes, it may be better that way.It would to me. As for the "Your part in the pool's current speed" measure, I've only ever seen it read 0%, diverging occasionally/briefly to some impossibly high value. Same for "average speed in last 7 minutes" actually. To me, those could both be removed because they seem useless and uninformative.
"average speed in last 7 minutes" or luck meter works for fast miners. I'll add time window adjustment for it to work with CPU miners too.That sounds great.
Feel free to donate btw. System upgrades aren't cheap. :SOh wow that was quick! The sequence in the payments window is already changed.
I think I'm going to like this pool. 
March 29, 2011, 12:56:16 AM
Hi, I'm a new bitcoin user and joining your pool with my (not so) hefty ~890 kh/s (peak). I have question/suggestion for you: would it not make more sense for the payments on the Payments page to be in reverse chronological sequence, with the most recent at the top and oldest at the bottom?
Granted.It would to me. As for the "Your part in the pool's current speed" measure, I've only ever seen it read 0%, diverging occasionally/briefly to some impossibly high value. Same for "average speed in last 7 minutes" actually. To me, those could both be removed because they seem useless and uninformative.
"average speed in last 7 minutes" or luck meter works for fast miners. I'll add time window adjustment for it to work with CPU miners too. March 29, 2011, 12:48:19 AM
I like more info rather than less, perhaps a +/- button to expand/collapse the "Your part in the pool's current speed" info?
March 29, 2011, 12:39:57 AM
Hi, I'm a new bitcoin user and joining your pool with my (not so) hefty ~890 kh/s (peak). I have a question/suggestion for you: would it not make more sense for the payments on the Payments page to be in reverse chronological sequence, with the most recent at the top and oldest at the bottom? It would to me, if not for ease of readability, then to match the sort order of the official bitcoin client. As for the "Your part in the pool's current speed" measure, I've only ever seen it read 0%, diverging occasionally/briefly to some impossibly high value. Same for "average speed in last 7 minutes" actually. To me, those could both be removed because they seem useless and uninformative.
Thanks!
Thanks!
March 29, 2011, 12:31:26 AM
Yes, I would like to see how many shares each user has contributed and how many actual blocks they have solved ... (do not need to know who the users are they can remain anonymous). Just to get an idea of distribution of proof of work difficulty 1 versus network difficulty randomness.
Can you explain further what do you mean ?You want a list of all users, their submitted shares and found blocks ? But it would be the same as existing statistics page.
The idea of having multiple addresses I talked about earlier and randomization of the minimum value for automatic payment would help with anonymity.
Or, if you'd rather the client handle it, perhaps a lightweight RPC/SOAP API for changing address/minimum value?
Technically it's possible, but how this can improve anonymity ? Your address is anonymous already and you can split/merge received coins by yourself with same results.Or, if you'd rather the client handle it, perhaps a lightweight RPC/SOAP API for changing address/minimum value?
Does anyone finds "Your part in the pool's current speed" meter useful ? Can i remove it from account page ?
I'd like to free up some space for additional features.
The % of pools current speed could be removed, noone will really miss it
March 29, 2011, 12:28:54 AM
Quote
Can you explain further what do you mean ?
You want a list of all users, their submitted shares and found blocks ? But it would be the same as existing statistics page.
You want a list of all users, their submitted shares and found blocks ? But it would be the same as existing statistics page.
No, the statistics page only has the total shares that the pool found for each block. I would like running totals since forever.
If we had table with breakdown as follows;
User | Total Shares Submitted | Total Blocks Found
----------------------------------------------------------------------
user1 1048576 20
user2 32768 15
.
.
.
userN 2 0
You could put a fourth column with ratio of total_shares_submitted:total_blocks_found if you like but that would be gravy.
March 28, 2011, 11:26:09 PM
Yes, I would like to see how many shares each user has contributed and how many actual blocks they have solved ... (do not need to know who the users are they can remain anonymous). Just to get an idea of distribution of proof of work difficulty 1 versus network difficulty randomness.
Can you explain further what do you mean ?You want a list of all users, their submitted shares and found blocks ? But it would be the same as existing statistics page.
The idea of having multiple addresses I talked about earlier and randomization of the minimum value for automatic payment would help with anonymity.
Or, if you'd rather the client handle it, perhaps a lightweight RPC/SOAP API for changing address/minimum value?
Technically it's possible, but how this can improve anonymity ? Your address is anonymous already and you can split/merge received coins by yourself with same results.Or, if you'd rather the client handle it, perhaps a lightweight RPC/SOAP API for changing address/minimum value?
Does anyone finds "Your part in the pool's current speed" meter useful ? Can i remove it from account page ?
I'd like to free up some space for additional features.
March 28, 2011, 11:21:36 PM
I would like to hear your suggestions about adding new features to deepbit.net
Is there something you want to see in my pool ?
Is there something you want to see in my pool ?
The idea of having multiple addresses I talked about earlier and randomization of the minimum value for automatic payment would help with anonymity.
Or, if you'd rather the client handle it, perhaps a lightweight RPC/SOAP API for changing address/minimum value?
March 28, 2011, 11:17:20 PM
Yes, I would like to see how many shares each user has contributed and how many actual blocks they have solved ... (do not need to know who the users are they can remain anonymous). Just to get an idea of distribution of proof of work difficulty 1 versus network difficulty randomness.
Jump to: