Maybe, OP means it like with decentralized exchanges?
I believe he meant dice on his post as he posted in the gambling section.
When we speak of decentralized, it's transparent, that's why he maybe thought if it's decentralized it will give him more chances to win or he will be luckier.
It's definitely wrong for me, dice does not need to be decentralized because they already come up with a provably fair which makes their system transparent and correct, so gamblers can trust
He meant dice and I meant dice too
I just brought forth the example of decentralized exchanges to show that it is possible to do. And as I see it, the problem is not with house edge and bets being provably fair as such but rather with funds being safe in the first place. Really, what difference would that make to you if you were to lose your money anyway? I think this is what OP had in his mind when he started this topic
The competition in dice sites is now based on house edge, the lesser the better, but they cannot operate without an edge because they are here to make profit
This matter had been extensively discussed over here a few years ago, and if I remember correctly, some dice sites actually offered zero house edge betting as a bonus feature (temporarily, of course). For blockchain-based gambling, transaction fees collected by the house may serve as a house edge of sorts