I think that this development will be of interest to some game developers, as it will attract more interest in their games from the cryptocurrency community. For a long time I thought that it would be better for game developers to use cryptocurrencies that already exist on the market instead of internal currency or game points. This would increase the liquidity of most of the coins and tokens involved in games.
Projects like these can really have a positive impact on the gaming and cryptocurrency industries. Therefore, I support this idea and want to see its implementation. 
Topic: Decentralized Game framework - page 5. (Read 847 times)
Do you have a prototype of your game already or it's still in the planning mode? That's an ideal game if it's able to integrate with crypto wallets and you can earn and sell your in-game tokens and exchange it to the most accepted or adopted cryptocurrency.
It will be a gamers haven if that integration and feature will come into reality. Your players will be serious about it because they have the means to exchange something valuable that they earn into real-world money through crypto.
It will be a gamers haven if that integration and feature will come into reality. Your players will be serious about it because they have the means to exchange something valuable that they earn into real-world money through crypto.
I think that this development will be of interest to some game developers, as it will attract more interest in their games from the cryptocurrency community. For a long time I thought that it would be better for game developers to use cryptocurrencies that already exist on the market instead of internal currency or game points. This would increase the liquidity of most of the coins and tokens involved in games.
Sounds interesting, But the crypto game market has no user right now. It is so hard for game developer join the Crypto world.
Who say it can't be the next Uniswap? Demand and supply decide the price of anything.
Who say it can't be the next Uniswap? Demand and supply decide the price of anything.
I think you are mistaken about crypto game market having no user. Probably you have not taken interest to the existing crypto games. If you browse crypto games, there are many player spending their ETH, or other token to take part on that game.
The capitalization of stablecoins is constantly growing, so I think it is a good idea to create something like STONE and increase the liquidity of most tokens. But I would like to see how this framework will be implemented.
First, developers need to start somewhere, since I still don't see an account on GitHub and start the development processThe capitalization of stablecoins is constantly growing, so I think it is a good idea to create something like STONE and increase the liquidity of most tokens. But I would like to see how this framework will be implemented.
First, developers need to start somewhere, since I still don't see an account on GitHub and start the development process I read about this "x*y=k market maker" idea in one of the posts Buterin wrote, but then it looked like just an idea that a small number of people could understand. With the advent of Uniswap, this idea has received a real shell and has shown itself in action.
At that time, many projects did not seem as promising as they are now, so it takes time to implement this idea in a finished product in order to assess its perspective. But I have no doubt that this is a useful tool to help cryptocurrencies and the gaming industry grow. The bandwidth problems of the Ethereum network have indeed caused some projects to fail to grow and scale. Therefore, everything must develop and grow at the same time.
I do not see any problems switching to another blockchain, now there is a large selection of different blockchains with better characteristics and more suitable for projects that require high transaction speed and low cost.Talking about your project on bitcointalk is not really a great idea, if it was for people here they would have said satoshi was an idiot for working on bitcoin before he released it if he ended up asking their advice here and they would have laughed at his face and few years later try to get as much bitcoin as they can.
However you have to actually work on something a bit further than just half a page of explanation before you can get a good review as well, even if what you are working on is bad or great it needs to be a bit further developed in, otherwise it is just an idea and we all know ideas worth absolutely zero and all ideas are horrible until execution shows how it is not bad. So I would say work on this a bit more, have some design and some details and share it again, that might get different results.
I agree with you, I also lack more information about this project, but I think this guy needs to be given the opportunity to implement a prototype and show the implementation of this idea. Overall it looks good.However you have to actually work on something a bit further than just half a page of explanation before you can get a good review as well, even if what you are working on is bad or great it needs to be a bit further developed in, otherwise it is just an idea and we all know ideas worth absolutely zero and all ideas are horrible until execution shows how it is not bad. So I would say work on this a bit more, have some design and some details and share it again, that might get different results.
The bandwidth problems of the Ethereum network have indeed caused some projects to fail to grow and scale. Therefore, everything must develop and grow at the same time.
I do not see any problems switching to another blockchain, now there is a large selection of different blockchains with better characteristics and more suitable for projects that require high transaction speed and low cost.
I read about this "x*y=k market maker" idea in one of the posts Buterin wrote, but then it looked like just an idea that a small number of people could understand. With the advent of Uniswap, this idea has received a real shell and has shown itself in action.
If I understand correctly, then you want to combine wallets with different chains. I'm wondering which protocol wallets do you want to connect first?
I think that the Ethereum protocol will be the first to be used based on what the author of the topic wrote at the very beginning.
If I understand correctly, then you want to combine wallets with different chains. I'm wondering which protocol wallets do you want to connect first?
I remember the CryptoKitties project, it was very popular then, I would say that it was a hype. But it seems to me that the problem due to which the project did not become successful was in the throughput of the Ethereum network, since it is not adapted to a large number of transactions per second, and also the commissions are too high for making micropayments. This year, commissions on the Ethereum network have broken all previous records, so I think that the launch of any projects using Ethereum should be postponed until the transition to Ethereum 2.0, then the network bandwidth will be higher and the commissions will be lower, which will have a positive effect on the development of all dApps.
The bandwidth problems of the Ethereum network have indeed caused some projects to fail to grow and scale. Therefore, everything must develop and grow at the same time.Talking about your project on bitcointalk is not really a great idea, if it was for people here they would have said satoshi was an idiot for working on bitcoin before he released it if he ended up asking their advice here and they would have laughed at his face and few years later try to get as much bitcoin as they can.
However you have to actually work on something a bit further than just half a page of explanation before you can get a good review as well, even if what you are working on is bad or great it needs to be a bit further developed in, otherwise it is just an idea and we all know ideas worth absolutely zero and all ideas are horrible until execution shows how it is not bad. So I would say work on this a bit more, have some design and some details and share it again, that might get different results.
However you have to actually work on something a bit further than just half a page of explanation before you can get a good review as well, even if what you are working on is bad or great it needs to be a bit further developed in, otherwise it is just an idea and we all know ideas worth absolutely zero and all ideas are horrible until execution shows how it is not bad. So I would say work on this a bit more, have some design and some details and share it again, that might get different results.
The forum was created to discuss cryptocurrencies and projects associated with them. Therefore, it seems to me that if this project is related to cryptocurrencies, then it should be on bitcointalk. I'm interested in reading about ideas like the one suggested by the author of this topic.
I have always liked projects that are trying to combine cryptocurrencies with the gaming industry, as cryptocurrencies need liquidity and wider application, and the in-game industry is one of the fastest growing industries in the world.
Yes, you are right, it is a good idea to integrate cryptocurrencies with the gaming framework, but I would like to see more information about STONE. I saw similar frameworks, but they all had a bad implementation, let's see how this framework will be implemented.Great idea. There is only a little left. Find someone who will do all this: write code, solve legal issues, engage in promotion, etc.
I agree with you, for the implementation of this framework it is necessary to have knowledge in development, programming, solve legal aspects and work on marketing so that as many people as possible know about this product.
This actually sounds like you really know so much about this but it doesn't most of the time work that way. People will not buy a game coin just for game sake but because of other utilities it can serve. I as a person is going to follow this your project to see what becomes of it in the future.
The capitalization of stablecoins is constantly growing, so I think it is a good idea to create something like STONE and increase the liquidity of most tokens. But I would like to see how this framework will be implemented.
I remember the CryptoKitties project, it was very popular then, I would say that it was a hype. But it seems to me that the problem due to which the project did not become successful was in the throughput of the Ethereum network, since it is not adapted to a large number of transactions per second, and also the commissions are too high for making micropayments. This year, commissions on the Ethereum network have broken all previous records, so I think that the launch of any projects using Ethereum should be postponed until the transition to Ethereum 2.0, then the network bandwidth will be higher and the commissions will be lower, which will have a positive effect on the development of all dApps.
The bandwidth problems of the Ethereum network have indeed caused some projects to fail to grow and scale. Therefore, everything must develop and grow at the same time. Jump to: