There's no such thing as unbiased reviews. The act of reviewing DeepOnion above all other coins is biased in itself. My real opinion on this, is that you're trying to acquire more coins, or apart of the VIP dominator shit, but that can never be proven and is strictly my opinion/conspiracy.
decent read with all things considered, but DeepOnion's team and early adopters still remains one of the most arrogant and foolish individuals, out of any cryptocurrency, i've ever seen. The admins have relaxed a bit, but the whole show remains a rodeo of whores, hotheaded fools and mooners.
And because of that fact, half of DeepOnion's potential will be lost, no matter what advancements occur or how inciting the coin itself is.
I agree that it is hard to stay objective and that most people have done reviews on coins that they find interesting. I think that hotheads and mooners can be found in almost any coin, it is true because of their choice for a marketing campaign with AirDrops and Bounties these "hotheads and mooners" might be a bit more vocal than usual.
Not sure what you are refering to in regards to the admins and early adopters since all I have met in the DeepOnion community has been a warm welcome and open to different views and questions.
If you read my Part 1 I try to be open that I am an investor in the coin but I am trying to take into account the remarks I have heard about DeepOnion. I actually focused on the negative remarks and try to meet them head on and explain my thinking and why I am still an investor in the coin.
Since you don't seem overly sold on the project I am actually feeling that "decent read" is a good compliment and I will take it to heart. If there are any faults in my reasoning, please bring that to bear. I try to consider all opinions (unless it is unbased Hype or FUD) when making my investment decisions and reviews.