you think they are better but in fact if they were really better they would have already gotten big in the past 8 years.
do you really think bitcoin was the first?
there were other altcoins around when bitcoin came out, and it crushed all of them because it was decentralized, had a good distribution plan and was secure because giant security experts had checked the code.
all the altcoins you find these days are either premined obviously or premined in a hidden way so they don't have a fair distribution.
when someone controls over 70% of the supply of an altcoin, that altcoin can never succeed. and that is because of the decentralization and security that i mentioned above. with bitcoin everything has always been transparent from day one. you could mine the first blocks and get the reward like anybody else. the coins satoshi and Hal mined are still there and have not moved all these years. but you can't say the same thing about most altcoins.
bitcoin was indeed the first, unless you think that gold reserve or other centralized currency that were shut down by the government have somethign to do with bitcoin, which is not true!, but litecoin was not the second that is something that people think and it's wrong, bitcoin also started with 70% of supply or even more in the hands of few people, but it got distributed as the time pass and now we have a better distrubution and better value, but it took many years, from 2009 to 2017, all other altcoin are younger than bitcoin this is a big difference