delete | Bitcointalksearch.org

OSCA

newbie

Activity: 34

Merit: 0

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on July 15, 2015, 09:00:04 PM

Anyone with more than two brain cells not fighting each other for survival of the fittest can clearly see Quickseller is -snip-
Therefore I nominate Quickseller for consideration of Moderator or Staff.

Thoughts

~BCX~

Is this still on? Because if yes, +100000!
Quickseller: The hero bitcointalk deserves

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Quote from: ?? on ??

I thought QS was a little harsh sometimes but excellent at busting scammers.

The dude's name is Quickseller.

He SELLS ACCOUNTS FOR A LIVING!!

He perpetuated an untold amount of fraud on this forum - on one hand by selling accounts to scammers and on the other by using this information to conduct his own scams - all under the pretense of being a good samaritan detective.

If that isn't a big red flag waving in the community's face, I really can't imagine what is.

In any case, thanks for reconciling your cognitive dissonance

Linuld

sr. member

Activity: 473

Merit: 250

Quote from: ndnh on July 17, 2015, 01:58:57 AM

I would say no.

I had typed in everything here, but when I posted it, it kept loading for some 2 minutes. I clicked Back, and wow, everything was empty. Sad

Checked drafts too. Gone, lol. Wink

[Bits and parts that I could remember:]

You probably use firefox then since chrome does not delete the formular contents.

If this happens again then go back and if the form is empty go forward one page in history. Firefox will then ask you to resend the content. If you do then you might get your post sent.

Another tip is that you should install the firefox extension lazarus. It is an extremely valuable extension which saved me a lot of data already, not only on this forum. Wink

Brad Harrison

full member

Activity: 168

Merit: 100

Quote from: ajrah on September 15, 2015, 09:24:16 PM

Maybe it's about time to lock this thread since his/her chances to be a moderator in this forum is gone, unless BitcoinEXpress still wan'ts to nominate Quickseller as Moderator

I think that would be highly unlikely

ajrah

sr. member

Activity: 350

Merit: 250

Maybe it's about time to lock this thread since his/her chances to be a moderator in this forum is gone, unless BitcoinEXpress still wan'ts to nominate Quickseller as Moderator

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: unholycactus on September 15, 2015, 09:15:28 PM

Quote from: Vod on September 15, 2015, 09:10:44 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I openly admit my mistake here.

That's one thing QS never did.

Because he doesn't think it was a mistake.
However, it's nice to see signs of maturity on bitcointalk like BitcoinEXpress's once in a while.

He got caught lying outright. He never once apologized. If he doesn't think lying is wrong, then I feel sorry for his future.

unholycactus

legendary

Activity: 1078

Merit: 1024

Quote from: Vod on September 15, 2015, 09:10:44 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

I openly admit my mistake here.

That's one thing QS never did.

Because he doesn't think it was a mistake.
However, it's nice to see signs of maturity on bitcointalk like BitcoinEXpress's once in a while.

Vod

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 3010

Licking my boob since 1970

Quote from: ?? on ??

I openly admit my mistake here.

That's one thing QS never did.

nutildah

legendary

Activity: 3010

Merit: 8114

Now this thread is just about how Bitcoin Express is a terrible judge of character.

everaja

hero member

Activity: 490

Merit: 500

~ScapeGoat~

Quote from: Omikifuse on September 15, 2015, 04:27:01 AM

Are people still considering QS for moderator Huh

Nah.. now the Flow direction has been changed, he has already been in a lots of shit and probably now not suitable to become a Moderator.
I guess Op should change the Tittle of the Thread.

hilariousandco

global moderator

Activity: 4018

Merit: 2728

Join the world-leading crypto sportsbook NOW!

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Badbear link=topic=1171059.msg12358580#msg12358580

I removed Quickseller because he was acting to deceive people, and I can't, and won't, be a part of that (he wasn't banned) if I know about it.

So, it's not a bannable offence to abuse the trust system by building up false/fake trust with the intention of deceiving members of BCT?

Scams aren't moderated and scammers aren't banned so this wouldn't be any different.

tspacepilot

legendary

Activity: 1456

Merit: 1081

I may write code in exchange for bitcoins.

Quote from: erikalui on September 15, 2015, 04:50:40 AM

What's the point of bumping this thread? He can NEVER be a MOD now (atleast if the forum needs to be in a TRUSTWORTHY member's hands then he won't be appointed as one).

BCX bumped it. I think he was sorta trying to take blame for this suggestion, which is actually very big of him considering how often he acted like a blind cheerleader for anything that QS proclaimed.

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: BitcoinEXpress on July 15, 2015, 09:00:04 PM

Love him or hate him

Anyone with more than two brain cells not fighting each other for survival of the fittest can clearly see Quickseller is a major positive for the forum.

I have seen numerous times that he has helped newbies and accurately answered hundreds of questions.

Undeniably the King of Scam Busing post Phinaeus Gage (RIP) and Vod.

He/She/It apparently has plenty of time to dedicate.

Therefore I nominate Quickseller for consideration of Moderator or Staff.

Thoughts

~BCX~

Quote from: Badbear link=topic=1171059.msg12358580#msg12358580

I removed Quickseller because he was acting to deceive people, and I can't, and won't, be a part of that (he wasn't banned) if I know about it.

Such an effen waste of potential.

Shame.

~BCX~

Am I allowed to say "I told you so"?

--Encrypted--

copper member

Activity: 924

Merit: 1007

hee-ho.

Quote from: Omikifuse on September 15, 2015, 06:25:40 AM

Doods, this is a topic about nominating QS to staff, not to post your report accuracy.

(what would be a good idea for another topic, anyway)

there's a thread exactly for that.
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/how-many-posts-did-you-report-and-with-what-accuracy-1129097

Omikifuse

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1009

Doods, this is a topic about nominating QS to staff, not to post your report accuracy.

(what would be a good idea for another topic, anyway)

tmfp

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 1737

"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."

Quote

you have reported 1,234,724 posts with 99.9% accuracy

see my previous post.

tmfp

legendary

Activity: 1932

Merit: 1737

"Common rogue from Russia with a bare ass."

Quote from: erikalui on September 15, 2015, 04:50:40 AM

What's the point of bumping this thread? He can NEVER be a MOD now (atleast if the forum needs to be in a TRUSTWORTHY member's hands then he won't be appointed as one).

Maybe it's a useful bump just to remind us that, as the man/woman/child says him/herself:

Quote from: Quickseller on September 14, 2015, 03:49:27 PM

You shouldn't believe everything that others tell you on the internet

erikalui

legendary

Activity: 2632

Merit: 1094

What's the point of bumping this thread? He can NEVER be a MOD now (atleast if the forum needs to be in a TRUSTWORTHY member's hands then he won't be appointed as one).

Omikifuse

legendary

Activity: 1834

Merit: 1009

Are people still considering QS for moderator Huh

ndnh

legendary

Activity: 1302

Merit: 1005

New Decentralized Nuclear Hobbit

Quote from: LFC_Bitcoin on September 15, 2015, 12:43:16 AM

Quote from: Blazed on September 14, 2015, 10:48:29 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Vod on September 14, 2015, 10:29:38 PM

I have reported 408 posts with 98% accuracy.

Can't get much more accurate than that baby! Wink

That is indeed good but ckolivas had over 1000 reported post with a 99.4% accuracy rate when he was promoted to Staff!

~BCX~

You have reported 15 posts with 84% accuracy

Guessing I might not make the cut as the next Staff member? Embarrassed

Me neither Grin

- You have reported 50 posts with 88% accuracy

You have reported 61 posts with 78% accuracy (from 40% one or two years ago, that is pretty goood Wink

)

May be I should have stopped at "You have reported 1 posts with 100% accuracy" Grin

LFC_Bitcoin

legendary

Activity: 3556

Merit: 9709

#1 VIP Crypto Casino

Quote from: Blazed on September 14, 2015, 10:48:29 PM

Quote from: ?? on ??

Quote from: Vod on September 14, 2015, 10:29:38 PM

I have reported 408 posts with 98% accuracy.

Can't get much more accurate than that baby! Wink

That is indeed good but ckolivas had over 1000 reported post with a 99.4% accuracy rate when he was promoted to Staff!

~BCX~

You have reported 15 posts with 84% accuracy

Guessing I might not make the cut as the next Staff member? Embarrassed

Me neither Grin

- You have reported 50 posts with 88% accuracy

Topic: delete (Read 7313 times)