Pages:
Author

Topic: delete (Read 2648 times)

legendary
Activity: 1204
Merit: 1015
October 09, 2011, 10:08:06 PM
#29
BitcoinEXpress,

I am this close to having you banned. Stop this shit. I don't care if you dox CH, but you need to stop making threads and otherwise troll about it.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 09, 2011, 02:15:05 PM
#28
Quote
SC2.0 isn't vulnerable to the 51% attacks
This is one of the very interesting aspects of SolidCoin, but I haven't seen any official info anyhere on how SolidCoin defeats the 51% problem.  Could you tell more?

System of trusted peers. Enough said.
full member
Activity: 127
Merit: 100
October 09, 2011, 02:14:32 PM
#27
Quote
SC2.0 isn't vulnerable to the 51% attacks
This is one of the very interesting aspects of SolidCoin, but I haven't seen any official info anyhere on how SolidCoin defeats the 51% problem.  Could you tell more?
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 09, 2011, 01:57:34 PM
#26
It is not in a companies best interest to make the bitcoin client user friendly because that means there is less need for a third party to hold youre coins. The third parties are ewallet providers such as mt gox et al. Ever wondered why they dont spend anything on improving the mainline client ?

It is not in their interest to do so. CH is not paid by a company so he can work on solidcoin and not give a flying fux what these same companies want. They hate sc2 for the same reason...less need for them.

Im sure a company would never hire Gavin just to slow down coding on bitcoin....


Exactly, the main client SUCKS and development is so damn slow, it really is unbelievable !!!
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
October 09, 2011, 01:55:00 PM
#25
It is not in a companies best interest to make the bitcoin client user friendly because that means there is less need for a third party to hold youre coins. The third parties are ewallet providers such as mt gox et al. Ever wondered why they dont spend anything on improving the mainline client ?

It is not in their interest to do so. CH is not paid by a company so he can work on solidcoin and not give a flying fux what these same companies want. They hate sc2 for the same reason...less need for them.

Im sure a company would never hire Gavin just to slow down coding on bitcoin....





hero member
Activity: 532
Merit: 500
October 09, 2011, 01:23:48 PM
#24
God this ugly.  On both sides.  How can you win?  What would be the endgame?
The only thing I can think of is they flip a coin for pistols at dawn,but the argument might even come down to "What coin ?" !
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 09, 2011, 12:55:22 PM
#23
Gavin may code a new version but if the community and major pools think it wont be fit for the network it aint going to be adopted. Why do you think its a tedicous proces to make any fundamental changes? solidcoin doesnt have this issue with its central authority tho yknow Wink

SC2 has no central authority, a word of advice if you see the name Lolcust/artforz/bitcoinexpress/sac posting anything regarding SolidCoin you can be clear there is a motive other than the truth. If you want to continue to believe lies then I guess you're one of "them" Smiley

SC2.0 isn't vulnerable to the 51% attacks bitcoin is, so if Bitcoin is attacked in the near future and loses all it's wealth what will people be saying then about the lack of changes? The average person doesn't care about the pools/gavin/etc bickering about which changes to take and which to not. They simply expect one thing, that their BTC will be there tomorrow. And they cannot rely on that, it is why I think the bitcoin price has dropped recently.

There is more education getting out there on how much work needs to go into BTC and it isn't being done. I've seen the same thing prior to starting SolidCoin with no one caring about the problems I raised. So I developed the solution, unlike most people I have the luxury of the skillset and the time to do it.

Exactly. As soon as the bitcoin price falls below a certain threshold ( past the point of being profitable ) people will start pulling out en-masse. This will result in the network being very weak so anybody like BitcoinExpress ( has 68 ghash/s of power available anytime ) or the government can attack it and wipe out all of your fairy imaginary money. This will make Bitcoin worthless. The attacks on various exchanges etc. also contributes to the price falling as people are dumping the stolen BTC ASAP. Enjoy holding the bag folks.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
October 09, 2011, 12:48:16 PM
#22
Gavin may code a new version but if the community and major pools think it wont be fit for the network it aint going to be adopted. Why do you think its a tedicous proces to make any fundamental changes? solidcoin doesnt have this issue with its central authority tho yknow Wink

SC2 has no central authority, a word of advice if you see the name Lolcust/artforz/bitcoinexpress/sac posting anything regarding SolidCoin you can be clear there is a motive other than the truth. If you want to continue to believe lies then I guess you're one of "them" Smiley

SC2.0 isn't vulnerable to the 51% attacks bitcoin is, so if Bitcoin is attacked in the near future and loses all it's wealth what will people be saying then about the lack of changes? The average person doesn't care about the pools/gavin/etc bickering about which changes to take and which to not. They simply expect one thing, that their BTC will be there tomorrow. And they cannot rely on that, it is why I think the bitcoin price has dropped recently.

There is more education getting out there on how much work needs to go into BTC and it isn't being done. I've seen the same thing prior to starting SolidCoin with no one caring about the problems I raised. So I developed the solution, unlike most people I have the luxury of the skillset and the time to do it.
sr. member
Activity: 369
Merit: 250
October 09, 2011, 12:37:17 PM
#21
Good one, CH.

Seems like our 8 Japanese scammers ( Satoshi = kano = BitcoinExpress = ArtForz = lolcust = SAC = MtGox = coblee ) are getting a little bit scared of SC2 and its upcoming success. Their failcoins scamcoins : Bitcoin, Tenebrix, Fairbrix, Litecoin, I0coin etc. are getting less and less attention by day.

BitcoinExpress saw he cannot hack the new SC2 and balled out of the challenge. What a loser. Also, why the fuck do people care there are nodes in the system. Bitcoin is decentralized MY ARSE !!! Gavin makes the rules, "Satoshi" holds more coins than anyone here, mtgox is the only major exchange -> yep sounds pretty damn decentralized to me. Normal people don't care about this ideological BS they just want a system that works only idiot living in the basement geeks care about "decentralized". Nothing is truly decentralized fools, it is only an ilusion.

What bollocks. ive spent a lot of time reading this forum and that, is just garbage.

The reason mtgox is the main exchange is cause everyone uses it. I dont. Do you?

Gavin may code a new version but if the community and major pools think it wont be fit for the network it aint going to be adopted. Why do you think its a tedicous proces to make any fundamental changes? solidcoin doesnt have this issue with its central authority tho yknow Wink

hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 09, 2011, 10:51:30 AM
#20
Good one, CH.

Seems like our 8 Japanese scammers ( Satoshi = kano = BitcoinExpress = ArtForz = lolcust = SAC = MtGox = coblee ) are getting a little bit scared of SC2 and its upcoming success. Their failcoins scamcoins : Bitcoin, Tenebrix, Fairbrix, Litecoin, I0coin etc. are getting less and less attention by day.

BitcoinExpress saw he cannot hack the new SC2 and balled out of the challenge. What a loser. Also, why the fuck do people care there are nodes in the system. Bitcoin is decentralized MY ARSE !!! Gavin makes the rules, "Satoshi" holds more coins than anyone here, mtgox is the only major exchange -> yep sounds pretty damn decentralized to me. Normal people don't care about this ideological BS they just want a system that works only idiot living in the basement geeks care about "decentralized". Nothing is truly decentralized fools, it is only an ilusion.
sr. member
Activity: 266
Merit: 254
October 09, 2011, 09:23:35 AM
#19
Quote from: Matthew N. Wright
Stop wasting the internet.

rofl...

sig

|
V
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
October 09, 2011, 04:40:40 AM
#18
Jesus christ I take it all back, how do I unsubscribe to this elementary trash.

It's like listening to two McDonalds employees arguing about the 'real path to success'.

McDonalds sell crappy food but they are known for giving fair chances and good training to their employees.

even if you're a manager and make a decent living

when a girl asks what you do and you say you work at McDonald's...
sd
hero member
Activity: 730
Merit: 500
October 09, 2011, 04:30:40 AM
#17
Jesus christ I take it all back, how do I unsubscribe to this elementary trash.

It's like listening to two McDonalds employees arguing about the 'real path to success'.

McDonalds sell crappy food but they are known for giving fair chances and good training to their employees. I think you have a bad example there.

Lets all just leave CoinHunter alone to do his thing. His coin has a worse design than BitCoin and it will fail due to its own lack of merits. Any centrally controlled peer to peer network is fundamentally sick.
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
October 09, 2011, 04:14:16 AM
#16
God this ugly.  On both sides.  How can you win?  What would be the endgame?
The best coin wins. All the battles in the middle are just a distraction from the truth.

So..bitcoin then?
Bitcoin has already won as far as I'm concerned Wink.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
Hillariously voracious
October 09, 2011, 04:13:01 AM
#15

The product being good has nothing to do with it if others can take the source and copy it. Which is what idiots like yourself will do for "fun".

Yes, I do what I do almost exclusively for fun and think that the "I R GR8 DEV, THIS R SRS BZ" attitude is stale and does not contribute to interesting and novel things happening.

Alt coins are an interesting barrel of fish because they have less of this self-important mindset going on.


The fact is you're witnessing a true developer release something and you realize the shortcomings with your own skillset.  

Sorry man, if anything, the only True Developer Release in this community was Satoshi's initial release, and IIRC it had sources available

 
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1015
October 09, 2011, 04:11:26 AM
#14
God this ugly.  On both sides.  How can you win?  What would be the endgame?
The best coin wins. All the battles in the middle are just a distraction from the truth.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
October 09, 2011, 04:07:53 AM
#13
God this ugly.  On both sides.  How can you win?  What would be the endgame?
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
October 09, 2011, 04:06:18 AM
#12
But if your product is so good, replicas couldn't subtract from its position (also, do note that original BTC sources were available pretty much from day 1)

Your argument does not appear convincing.

The product being good has nothing to do with it if others can take the source and copy it. Which is what idiots like yourself will do for "fun". If you think I'm that foolish to release source prior to a proper release so that you can search/replace the name and release "FlyingPigShix" as your new coin with 14 million premined coins then there's not much I can say to you.

The fact is you're witnessing a true developer release something and you realize the shortcomings with your own skillset. Yes you can copy, but you cannot create, that's your weakness not mine. It's sad that the SC2 testnet in 24 hours has nearly matched the TBX proper network, you better sell your premined coins before they are worthless in the coming days.

member
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
Hillariously voracious
October 09, 2011, 04:00:32 AM
#11
No offense mister CH, and not to be abrasive, but if SC is so strong and solid, why are you hiding the source code ?

Yes you don't mean offense do you trollmaster. Source isn't being released yet because idiots like yourself and artforz like to steal ideas and source code to attempt to "one up" the SolidCoin project by releasing buggy, crappier products (shitbrix, ghostgold). So if anyone wants to know why, they can look to your little gang of highschool kids trying to play with the big boys.

But if your product is so good, replicas couldn't subtract from its position (also, do note that original BTC sources were available pretty much from day 1)

Your argument does not appear convincing.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
October 09, 2011, 03:56:18 AM
#10
No offense mister CH, and not to be abrasive, but if SC is so strong and solid, why are you hiding the source code ?

Yes you don't mean offense do you trollmaster. Source isn't being released yet because idiots like yourself and artforz like to steal ideas and source code to attempt to "one up" the SolidCoin project by releasing buggy, crappier products (shitbrix, ghostgold). So if anyone wants to know why, they can look to your little gang of highschool kids trying to play with the big boys.
Pages:
Jump to: