Pages:
Author

Topic: delete (Read 3602 times)

sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 11, 2011, 08:31:57 PM
#35
-snerks- ew...
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Posts: 69
October 11, 2011, 07:36:04 PM
#34
indeed... Or just a comic with a few of the known, belligerent folks on here arguing over bitcoin... :p

I imagine before we got here, Satoshi had a Tom Cruise avatar with some guy named RipplePayExpress shitting on him at every chance he got.

Dear lord I am not saying CoinHunter is Satoshi or an equivalent, just jokes
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 11, 2011, 06:47:32 PM
#33
indeed... Or just a comic with a few of the known, belligerent folks on here arguing over bitcoin... :p
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 500
Posts: 69
October 11, 2011, 06:06:01 PM
#32
I love sitting back and watching the progression of alternative cryptocurrencies as they march past.
I swear to Christ someone needs to get http://z1x.dk/ on the blower to do a webcomic showing the presidents or governement or somebody putting together the american dollar bill, except it is being done out of spite of other peoples dollars and there is a flame war going on.  Would make for a funny ass webcomic.
sr. member
Activity: 420
Merit: 250
October 11, 2011, 05:25:13 PM
#31
I love sitting back and watching the progression of alternative cryptocurrencies as they march past.
hero member
Activity: 518
Merit: 500
October 11, 2011, 05:15:08 PM
#30
Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.

Why would anyone clone a stupid central control mechanism for what should be a peer to peer currency?
Why would anyone clone a retarded difficulty adjustment mechanism?
Why would anyone clone your retarded fixed cost transactions?
No-one wants to clone your unstable rubbish. You are only leading the way to your cultist followers all of whom are likely to be your aliases.

If all you have is crappy design, crappy code, lemon party man, and anti-japan rant man Grin you better give up now. You are already beyond a joke.


LOL man thank you. Made my day. This forum is just too good to be true. Everyday there is somebody like this guy. High 5 !
sd
hero member
Activity: 730
Merit: 500
October 11, 2011, 04:05:49 PM
#29
Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.

Why would anyone clone a stupid central control mechanism for what should be a peer to peer currency?
Why would anyone clone a retarded difficulty adjustment mechanism?
Why would anyone clone your retarded fixed cost transactions?
No-one wants to clone your unstable rubbish. You are only leading the way to your cultist followers all of whom are likely to be your aliases.

If all you have is crappy design, crappy code, lemon party man, and anti-japan rant man you better give up now. You are already beyond a joke.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
October 11, 2011, 12:40:27 PM
#28
Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.
Pretty hypocritical of you to cry about copying when it was you that copied Bitcoin.
Simple fact of the matter is that this is the most divergent chain from Bitcoin to date, at best some structure and core code and the fundamental idea lives on in solid coin.  There are lots of changes to this chain that would require decent amounts of rework so at what point do you still call it "copying"
At what point? Never. He copied Bitcoin to start SolidCoin. Until he throws out 100% of the Bitcoin source code and starts from scratch, he copied Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1193
October 11, 2011, 12:05:35 PM
#27
Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.
Pretty hypocritical of you to cry about copying when it was you that copied Bitcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
October 11, 2011, 10:55:47 AM
#26
If you guys could be any more bitter we'd be making lemon juice in here. Until the algorithm is released what is the point in making judgements on things you know nothing about? Theorize what it could be sure but the implications are a bit ridiculous and designed to spread disinformation.

For the amount of time some of you spend thinking about what SC2 could be doing you could be looking at the block chain and figuring it out. But that would require actual work eh?

Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.


Or we could be disassembling your source code.

Using 64-bit registers...?
legendary
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
October 11, 2011, 10:12:41 AM
#25
If you guys could be any more bitter we'd be making lemon juice in here. Until the algorithm is released what is the point in making judgements on things you know nothing about? Theorize what it could be sure but the implications are a bit ridiculous and designed to spread disinformation.

For the amount of time some of you spend thinking about what SC2 could be doing you could be looking at the block chain and figuring it out. But that would require actual work eh?

Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.

Heh I'll keep a copy of that comment for the possibility that one day it may be released and may actually be all the real code and then ...
well based on how much you hyped up SC1.0 with lies and then what happened to it, I certainly know what to expect.
People don't change.
sr. member
Activity: 252
Merit: 251
October 11, 2011, 09:57:41 AM
#24
If you guys could be any more bitter we'd be making lemon juice in here. Until the algorithm is released what is the point in making judgements on things you know nothing about? Theorize what it could be sure but the implications are a bit ridiculous and designed to spread disinformation.

For the amount of time some of you spend thinking about what SC2 could be doing you could be looking at the block chain and figuring it out. But that would require actual work eh?

Here is a theory, once the SC2 algorithm is out people will start cloning it into their chains, just like other parts of SolidCoin. There is a reason for this, we are leading the way.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 11, 2011, 09:18:50 AM
#23
Security through obscurity is no security.

Hashes go in, Coins come out

You can't explain that.
sr. member
Activity: 313
Merit: 251
Third score
October 11, 2011, 09:04:23 AM
#22
I agree with the implication. A serious currency would at least test this strategy extensively, and discuss it openly in the developer forums for quite some time, in case something has slipped their attention, and ends in Fkin UP their currency.

Can you see any way for it to be gamed?
No, I can't at the moment, but with things like this 400 eyes and 200 brains are better than 2 and 1 respectively. That was my point.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
Hillariously voracious
October 11, 2011, 09:00:59 AM
#21
You have a small cohort of nodes mining the specialsauce blocks

Attacker just gotta catch them all...
sr. member
Activity: 313
Merit: 251
Third score
October 11, 2011, 08:41:39 AM
#20
Sure, eat this, 51% attackers. No one can perform a network overtake, because the actual network actually produces only 50% of the coins.
That would be 50% of the blocks, not 50% of the coins wouldn't it? The 1 difficulty even blocks are for less coins - they are the protection fund coins IIUC.

So does this system actually protect against 51% attacks? If so then a serious currency could implement this with difficulty 1 blocks that don't generate any coins.

I agree with the implication. A serious currency would at least test this strategy extensively, and discuss it openly in the developer forums for quite some time, in case something has slipped their attention, and ends in Fkin UP their currency.
legendary
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1005
October 11, 2011, 08:24:46 AM
#19
well, it's good to see sc2's launch is going as smoothly as sc1.

If that's the way 51% attacks are prevented, it's really half assed if not uncreative.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
October 11, 2011, 08:10:23 AM
#18
TBX and SLC are really the only 2 legit players now.

SC is nowhere near 'legit' until it's difficulty gets situated.  From where I'm sitting, the difficulty is borked.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
Hillariously voracious
October 11, 2011, 08:09:58 AM
#17
TBX and SLC merge-mining is unlikely, assuming the PoW algos are different.

Anyway, I find the hypothesis that this spike is legitimate miners to be fairly implausible, but I guess we will have to wait and see how it will play out.
member
Activity: 112
Merit: 11
Hillariously voracious
October 11, 2011, 07:53:44 AM
#16
Well, your chain will soon have about a million rapidmined coins that are guaranteed to flood the market

Good game, SC2

Lolcust I thought you were at least reasonably psuedo-sane... not expecting you to be pro-solidcoin but even in discussions I have seen you have and your adoption of my language on how to describe the fixed "inflation" rate to people who don't understand the difference in "inflation" and coin growth should know that the first couple weeks, heck the first couple months or years are a hiccup in the pricing model....

At this point it's not an inflation issue.

It's a "dude(s?) with absurd amount of coins, absolutely no long-term plan, and openly hostile attitude" issue, unless you are willing to claim that the current state of affairs is primarily due to legitimate miners and not shenanigans on part of a hostile party.
Pages:
Jump to: