Topic: delete (Read 5482 times)
Quote from: subSTRATA
Guys, do not bother with FUD by BitcoinEXpress. He is old member of this forum and he perfectly knows how cryptocoins work which means he
knows stuff he posted here about MAX are bullshit. There can not be hard-fork if nodes on network use the same version! ...
Is it possible you could be any more wrong?
Ohh, so you actualy do not know how cryptocoins work, cool.
I thought you would get a kick out that. 
Guys, do not bother with FUD by BitcoinEXpress. He is old member of this forum and he perfectly knows how cryptocoins work which means he
knows stuff he posted here is not all true. There can not be hard-fork if nodes on network use the same version! What happened (again) is 1GH
pool, people who were behind 51% attack on Bter, attempted and successfuly completed another 51% attack but this time revealing the origin
of it e.g. made it obvious it is they who are doing shits. Basically, what happened is large blockchain reorganization. At some point 1GH stopped
mining on legit blockchain, went off the network and used combined hashpower of miners (yes, you retards still mining there) to create second
version of blockchain which, due to them having way over 51% of total hashpower, became longer than legit blockchain (more work done). In the
meantime they made some transactions on legit blockchain, most likely sent MAX to exchanges to dump them, and once they dumped those coins
they withdrew BTC from exchanges and connected back to network. Since their node has version of blockchain longer (more work done) than all
other nodes, 1GH's version of blockchain started propagating through Maxcoin network, overwritting blocks and thus transactions that happened
on legit blockchain since 1GH went off network (that means transaction which moved 1GH's coins to exchange never happened and that means
exchange lost BTC). Due to size of new version of blockchain (in megabytes) and generaly very bussy MAX network (30 seconds blocktime is still
an overkill), what happened is that slower nodes switched to 1GH's version of blockchain with very noticable delay. Not everyone use super fast
Internet connection so 1GH's version of blockchain could not propagate to all nodes in a second! To put things for you into perspective, on Bitcoin
network which uses 10 minutes block time (much less traffic than with Maxcoin) it is observed that it can take up to 40 seconds for data to reach
all nodes. Now imagine Maxcoin where network activity is high by default due to 30 seconds block time then add megabytes more in an instant! Of
course, some nodes will almost halt, especially nodes run on slow computers. But after a while all nodes will have the same version of blockchain,
in this case 1GH's version. To sum it up, what happened is perfectly normal considering that Maxcoin uses 30 seconds block time. There is no need
for dev to add checkpoints. What is needed is that idiots still mining at 1GH move to some other pools.
TLDR - BitcoinEXpress wants to negatively affect MAX price or he is pissed off cause blocks he mined ended up orphaned by blocks mined by 1GH.
It is not called merging but overwritting. Unless there are checkpoints added at certain block heights, attacker can overwrite all blocks down to but
excluding genesis block. In other words, if there are no checkpoints, genesis block is the only block hard-coded in wallet and thus permanent for
that version of wallet. All other blocks can be overwritten and that is the reason why any decent cryptocoin dev occassionaly adds checkpoints. As
for the no orphans shown at other pools, since 1 GH has massive hashrate once they went off network other pools mined not so many blocks. Some
pools mined maybe a block or two. If those blocks are later labeled as orphans no one would notice something very unusual. Given that orphans are
not so uncommon with 30 second block times, you would not notice a long serie of orphans (long reorg) anywhere except in wallet's debug.log file.
"He's currently DDoS'ing pools! And likes to impersonate Asian women!" by Simran
"I call for death penalty" by Satoshi
knows stuff he posted here is not all true. There can not be hard-fork if nodes on network use the same version! What happened (again) is 1GH
pool, people who were behind 51% attack on Bter, attempted and successfuly completed another 51% attack but this time revealing the origin
of it e.g. made it obvious it is they who are doing shits. Basically, what happened is large blockchain reorganization. At some point 1GH stopped
mining on legit blockchain, went off the network and used combined hashpower of miners (yes, you retards still mining there) to create second
version of blockchain which, due to them having way over 51% of total hashpower, became longer than legit blockchain (more work done). In the
meantime they made some transactions on legit blockchain, most likely sent MAX to exchanges to dump them, and once they dumped those coins
they withdrew BTC from exchanges and connected back to network. Since their node has version of blockchain longer (more work done) than all
other nodes, 1GH's version of blockchain started propagating through Maxcoin network, overwritting blocks and thus transactions that happened
on legit blockchain since 1GH went off network (that means transaction which moved 1GH's coins to exchange never happened and that means
exchange lost BTC). Due to size of new version of blockchain (in megabytes) and generaly very bussy MAX network (30 seconds blocktime is still
an overkill), what happened is that slower nodes switched to 1GH's version of blockchain with very noticable delay. Not everyone use super fast
Internet connection so 1GH's version of blockchain could not propagate to all nodes in a second! To put things for you into perspective, on Bitcoin
network which uses 10 minutes block time (much less traffic than with Maxcoin) it is observed that it can take up to 40 seconds for data to reach
all nodes. Now imagine Maxcoin where network activity is high by default due to 30 seconds block time then add megabytes more in an instant! Of
course, some nodes will almost halt, especially nodes run on slow computers. But after a while all nodes will have the same version of blockchain,
in this case 1GH's version. To sum it up, what happened is perfectly normal considering that Maxcoin uses 30 seconds block time. There is no need
for dev to add checkpoints. What is needed is that idiots still mining at 1GH move to some other pools.
TLDR - BitcoinEXpress wants to negatively affect MAX price or he is pissed off cause blocks he mined ended up orphaned by blocks mined by 1GH.
There were two forks and 1GH was aware of it. 1GH was DDoS'd for a while till they pulled back below 50% for a while to allow the chain to merge. The Maxcointicker and Rocketpool both went off line for about two hours.
Bullshit, you cannot merge the chain back in time. Besides, none of the pools shows the chain of orphans that a 'wrong' fork would become.It is not called merging but overwritting. Unless there are checkpoints added at certain block heights, attacker can overwrite all blocks down to but
excluding genesis block. In other words, if there are no checkpoints, genesis block is the only block hard-coded in wallet and thus permanent for
that version of wallet. All other blocks can be overwritten and that is the reason why any decent cryptocoin dev occassionaly adds checkpoints. As
for the no orphans shown at other pools, since 1 GH has massive hashrate once they went off network other pools mined not so many blocks. Some
pools mined maybe a block or two. If those blocks are later labeled as orphans no one would notice something very unusual. Given that orphans are
not so uncommon with 30 second block times, you would not notice a long serie of orphans (long reorg) anywhere except in wallet's debug.log file.
"He's currently DDoS'ing pools! And likes to impersonate Asian women!" by Simran
"I call for death penalty" by Satoshi
This is funny shit. . . . . . .
http://www.change.org/petitions/bitcoinexpress-have-him-arrested
Reached 10 signatures, LULZ!
Filing a case IRL seems to be more effective. http://www.change.org/petitions/bitcoinexpress-have-him-arrested
Reached 10 signatures, LULZ!
This is funny shit. . . . . . .
http://www.change.org/petitions/bitcoinexpress-have-him-arrested
Reached 10 signatures, LULZ!
http://www.change.org/petitions/bitcoinexpress-have-him-arrested
Reached 10 signatures, LULZ!
I wish it was forked.
I notice the bitcoinFUDexpress has gone silent, what a surprise.
Yes it's called sleep moron. Some of us don't mine to support out crystal meth habit.
There were two forks and 1GH was aware of it. 1GH was DDoS'd for a while till they pulled back below 50% for a while to allow the chain to merge. The Maxcointicker and Rocketpool both went off line for about two hours.
1GH is the issue and it will happen again at some point when they have more than 51% and another pool or entity starts gaining in hash rate.
~BCX~
What a surprise that the bitcoinFUDexpress cannot admit to being wrong and instead resorts to name calling. An apology for the lies would have been nice but the FUD train just rolls on.
@Herp
How many sock puppets do you have?
You're shit was forked.
Even the great RS of mcxNOW seen it.
Maxcointicker and Rocket Pool certainly did go offline due to the fork.
1GH was DDoS'd for a short while to knock them back.
All of that said, glad you guys recovered.
If I wanted your chain dead, I can assure it would be dead.
~BCX~
is true Maxcoin forked the moon
I notice the bitcoinFUDexpress has gone silent, what a surprise.
Yes it's called sleep moron. Some of us don't mine to support out crystal meth habit.
There were two forks and 1GH was aware of it. 1GH was DDoS'd for a while till they pulled back below 50% for a while to allow the chain to merge. The Maxcointicker and Rocketpool both went off line for about two hours.
1GH is the issue and it will happen again at some point when they have more than 51% and another pool or entity starts gaining in hash rate.
~BCX~
What a surprise that the bitcoinFUDexpress cannot admit to being wrong and instead resorts to name calling. An apology for the lies would have been nice but the FUD train just rolls on.
@Herp
How many sock puppets do you have?
You're shit was forked.
Even the great RS of mcxNOW seen it.
Maxcointicker and Rocket Pool certainly did go offline due to the fork.
1GH was DDoS'd for a short while to knock them back.
All of that said, glad you guys recovered.
If I wanted your chain dead, I can assure it would be dead.
~BCX~
But everyone should worship him and his botnet farm. He is so cool that he can bring down new coins just because he can and to teach the coin dev a "lesson".
much puppet, so wow..
one day in many months from now everyone will be wondering why they didn't get into iCoin sooner BUT until that day comes keep on buying up these coins that have no hope of ever making into mainstream .
I notice the bitcoinFUDexpress has gone silent, what a surprise.
Yes it's called sleep moron. Some of us don't mine to support out crystal meth habit.
There were two forks and 1GH was aware of it. 1GH was DDoS'd for a while till they pulled back below 50% for a while to allow the chain to merge. The Maxcointicker and Rocketpool both went off line for about two hours.
1GH is the issue and it will happen again at some point when they have more than 51% and another pool or entity starts gaining in hash rate.
~BCX~
What a surprise that the bitcoinFUDexpress cannot admit to being wrong and instead resorts to name calling. An apology for the lies would have been nice but the FUD train just rolls on.
I notice the bitcoinFUDexpress has gone silent, what a surprise.
Yes it's called sleep moron. Some of us don't mine to support out crystal meth habit.
There were two forks and 1GH was aware of it. 1GH was DDoS'd for a while till they pulled back below 50% for a while to allow the chain to merge. The Maxcointicker and Rocketpool both went off line for about two hours.
1GH is the issue and it will happen again at some point when they have more than 51% and another pool or entity starts gaining in hash rate.
~BCX~
What a surprise that the bitcoinFUDexpress cannot admit to being wrong and instead resorts to name calling. An apology for the lies would have been nice but the FUD train just rolls on.
Hi AKC team,
The original DEV started to develop it's own BTC/AKC exchange and posted some picture on Tweeter. Are you going to finish development on this or you will rely on having AKC listed on some existing exchanges? Here is the tweet: https://twitter.com/AntiKeiser/status/434129687711711232/photo/1. Was it some kind of OpenSource exchange system which AKC dev tried to adopt for AKC or was this development from scratch?
To all AKC followers:
have you voted today? I see the votes are increasing very slowly on Mintpal and AllCrypt. I noticed on pools cca 10 stable miners alltogether so on Mintpal we should be able to make at least cca 300 votes everyday (5 hours x 6 votes x 10 miners = 300) but total votes on sites are increasing much slower. I personally try to make at least 60 votes everyday on Mintpal.
Whoever of you already wasted couple of KiloWat mining few AKC milions, don't be lazy and go vote. Nobody else will ever make this coin valuable and exchangeable other than its community.
What is positive is that we are keeping ahead of MAX on both sites. I am clicking like insane whenever I have time...
Once again the links:
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
http://www.allcrypt.com/beta/voting.php
The original DEV started to develop it's own BTC/AKC exchange and posted some picture on Tweeter. Are you going to finish development on this or you will rely on having AKC listed on some existing exchanges? Here is the tweet: https://twitter.com/AntiKeiser/status/434129687711711232/photo/1. Was it some kind of OpenSource exchange system which AKC dev tried to adopt for AKC or was this development from scratch?
To all AKC followers:
have you voted today? I see the votes are increasing very slowly on Mintpal and AllCrypt. I noticed on pools cca 10 stable miners alltogether so on Mintpal we should be able to make at least cca 300 votes everyday (5 hours x 6 votes x 10 miners = 300) but total votes on sites are increasing much slower. I personally try to make at least 60 votes everyday on Mintpal.
Whoever of you already wasted couple of KiloWat mining few AKC milions, don't be lazy and go vote. Nobody else will ever make this coin valuable and exchangeable other than its community.
What is positive is that we are keeping ahead of MAX on both sites. I am clicking like insane whenever I have time...
Once again the links:
https://www.mintpal.com/voting
http://www.allcrypt.com/beta/voting.php
I notice the bitcoinFUDexpress has gone silent, what a surprise.
Yes it's called sleep moron. Some of us don't mine to support out crystal meth habit.
There were two forks and 1GH was aware of it. 1GH was DDoS'd for a while till they pulled back below 50% for a while to allow the chain to merge. The Maxcointicker and Rocketpool both went off line for about two hours.
1GH is the issue and it will happen again at some point when they have more than 51% and another pool or entity starts gaining in hash rate.
~BCX~
So, what happens to the exchanges?
Depends on which fork they are on.Interesting given what's happened at MtGox; I guess that would look the same to those who suffered an exchange following through on a fork like this.
Glad to see it's MaxCoin that's suffering this first. Sometimes you just have to watch others piss on the electric fence.
https://twitter.com/maxcoinproject
'MaxCoin @maxcoinproject 10m
Don't listen to the FUD. MaxCoin is working! keep calm and carry on maxcoining.'
Can we end the FUD campaign now?
Would anyone like to apologize for spreading lies?
I notice the bitcoinFUDexpress has gone silent, what a surprise.
'MaxCoin @maxcoinproject 10m
Don't listen to the FUD. MaxCoin is working! keep calm and carry on maxcoining.'
Can we end the FUD campaign now?
Would anyone like to apologize for spreading lies?
I notice the bitcoinFUDexpress has gone silent, what a surprise.
What you linked isn't a proof, just another rumors. We'll see soon if it's really forked.
I hope you're joking
I self mined on release using a gtx670 and sold high due to demand - unless I am missing something obvious but the process was very simple.
Anyway is this Fork talk Real or just Fud?
Jump to: