Pages:
Author

Topic: delete (Read 3184 times)

legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
October 27, 2011, 12:38:23 AM
#25
Right, and I am Jeri Ellsworth.

lol

You know how it's done, several photos with a written timestamp posted on an anonymous messagboard would suffice. But we all know this will never gonna happen Smiley
you're forgetting watermelon helmet, a shoe on the left hand, and a pineapple on the right hand.

He already has the pineapple, but it's stuck on his ass, not on his right hand... Roll Eyes
God forbid if we ever lay our eyes on something as horrendous as that.
you mean, up your ass?

...or probably, solidcoin.

Hello BCX puppy, how are you?
bcx puppy?

who?
me?

you must be mistaken.
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
October 26, 2011, 06:06:43 PM
#24
Right, and I am Jeri Ellsworth.

lol

You know how it's done, several photos with a written timestamp posted on an anonymous messagboard would suffice. But we all know this will never gonna happen Smiley
you're forgetting watermelon helmet, a shoe on the left hand, and a pineapple on the right hand.

He already has the pineapple, but it's stuck on his ass, not on his right hand... Roll Eyes
God forbid if we ever lay our eyes on something as horrendous as that.
you mean, up your ass?

...or probably, solidcoin.

Hello BCX puppy, how are you?
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
October 26, 2011, 05:31:07 PM
#23
Right, and I am Jeri Ellsworth.

lol

You know how it's done, several photos with a written timestamp posted on an anonymous messagboard would suffice. But we all know this will never gonna happen Smiley
you're forgetting watermelon helmet, a shoe on the left hand, and a pineapple on the right hand.

He already has the pineapple, but it's stuck on his ass, not on his right hand... Roll Eyes
God forbid if we ever lay our eyes on something as horrendous as that.
you mean, up your ass?

...or probably, solidcoin.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
October 26, 2011, 04:02:22 PM
#22
What's up with the pineapple anyway?

I mean the rest seems to be a welcome variation but srsly? what?  Huh
legendary
Activity: 1358
Merit: 1002
October 26, 2011, 03:59:46 PM
#21
Right, and I am Jeri Ellsworth.

lol

You know how it's done, several photos with a written timestamp posted on an anonymous messagboard would suffice. But we all know this will never gonna happen Smiley
you're forgetting watermelon helmet, a shoe on the left hand, and a pineapple on the right hand.

He already has the pineapple, but it's stuck on his ass, not on his right hand... Roll Eyes
God forbid if we ever lay our eyes on something as horrendous as that.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 500
Wat
October 26, 2011, 03:50:10 PM
#20
You two need to get a room then lol
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
October 26, 2011, 03:40:12 PM
#19
Right, and I am Jeri Ellsworth.

lol

You know how it's done, several photos with a written timestamp posted on an anonymous messagboard would suffice. But we all know this will never gonna happen Smiley
you're forgetting watermelon helmet, a shoe on the left hand, and a pineapple on the right hand.


That would be the ticket  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1006
October 26, 2011, 03:32:07 PM
#18
Right, and I am Jeri Ellsworth.

lol

You know how it's done, several photos with a written timestamp posted on an anonymous messagboard would suffice. But we all know this will never gonna happen Smiley
you're forgetting watermelon helmet, a shoe on the left hand, and a pineapple on the right hand.

legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
October 26, 2011, 03:18:14 PM
#17
Right, and I am Jeri Ellsworth.

lol

You know how it's done, several photos with a written timestamp posted on an anonymous messagboard would suffice. But we all know this will never gonna happen Smiley
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
October 26, 2011, 02:46:11 PM
#16
But I'm willing to bet one of these 3 possibilities holds true.

So put your money where your mouth is. I'll bet against you.

https://btfuture.com/
Again,
I would be willing to do that but how do we find out?
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 252
October 26, 2011, 02:44:47 PM
#15
But I'm willing to bet one of these 3 possibilities holds true.

So put your money where your mouth is. I'll bet against you.

https://btfuture.com/
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1057
Marketing manager - GO MP
October 26, 2011, 02:38:08 PM
#14
BTCX, Artforz and CH are either buddies or possible only 1 or 2 persons, I can't decide exactly which is the case.

But I'm willing to bet one of these 3 possibilities holds true.
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
October 26, 2011, 02:34:17 PM
#13
You know would be cool? Is if we waited until someone actually tries an attack against the sc2 chain before we try to blame it on someone.

Mining more than everyone else isn't an attack.


+1

nowt wrong with having more hash than others Smiley

depends on what country you're in and how butt hurt people get that you're not sharing.
sr. member
Activity: 464
Merit: 250
October 26, 2011, 02:32:21 PM
#12
You know would be cool? Is if we waited until someone actually tries an attack against the sc2 chain before we try to blame it on someone.

Mining more than everyone else isn't an attack.


+1

nowt wrong with having more hash than others Smiley
member
Activity: 295
Merit: 98
October 26, 2011, 10:34:15 AM
#11
You know would be cool? Is if we waited until someone actually tries an attack against the sc2 chain before we try to blame it on someone.

Mining more than everyone else isn't an attack.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
October 26, 2011, 09:26:38 AM
#10
Good for RS, Artforz attempts another attack and this time is less than successful.  I for one am glad his ill gotten gains are for naught.  Artforz is a F*tard and this is further alleged proof.  Granted I have not seen definitive proof one way or another that Artforz did it but in this case history sets a precedent.

No, Artforz seems ok, he challanges the technical aspects. He is working together with RS to make SC better. It's just BCX who is the clown Smiley
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 564
October 26, 2011, 08:35:53 AM
#9
OK, so finally asked RealSolid and my guess was correct: his changes intentionally rendered unspendable the generation transactions of some blocks that are still in the current longest chain and meet all the validation rules at the time, but have timestamps that have retroactively been declared too wonky:

Quote
14:21 < makomk> RealSolid: so to be entirely clear, have you rendered any existing generation transactions that are still in the longest chain unspendable as part of your removal of ArtForz's generates?
14:22 <@RealSolid> what
14:23 <@RealSolid> anyone who doesnt hack their "time" wont have unspendable generates
14:23 <@RealSolid> people must remember now we have accurate ways to detect time infringements and artforz was abusing it
14:23 < bulanula> this was introduced in b7 right ?
14:23 < makomk> So ArtForz does have generates that are still part of blocks in the longest chain but are unspendable?
14:24 <@RealSolid> because he was wilfully abusing it those blocks which abused it are now unable to be spent, it isnt an artforz deny but a general "dont have shit time" deny
14:25 <@RealSolid> makomk: his generates are in the blockchain, but unable to be used
14:26 <@RealSolid> at least the ones which were "Faked"
14:26 <@RealSolid> in regards to time
14:26 <@RealSolid> anyone who wants to fuck with the SC protocol will pay
14:26 <@RealSolid> and artforz attempted to fuck with (did no damage but he attempted to)

That's why ArtForz's wallet is "corrupt"; some of the generate transactions that are in it and are still in the blockchain have since been declared invalid, which isn't something the Bitcoin code is ever designed to handle for the simple reason that it's impossible in Bitcoin.

Edit: The fun part is that of course pools get their timestamps from their workers, which means that if any pool solved a block using work with a timestamp that matches RealSolid's "shit time" criteria their wallet is now corrupt. I don't think he'd be daft enough to roll out this change without checking that first, though.
hero member
Activity: 481
Merit: 502
October 26, 2011, 06:25:07 AM
#8
Why do people still use SC. I don't get it.
It's completely centralized around CoinHunter, and thus when it becomes big enough the powers that be can squash it completely, defeating the entire point of BitCoin. Think e-gold and napster.
hero member
Activity: 686
Merit: 564
October 26, 2011, 04:28:48 AM
#7
This was originally an aside in the thread about Coinotron appearing to find even blocks which it shouldn't have been able to find, hence the lack of detail. From IRC on the 24th:

Quote
22:39 <@RealSolid> ah shit
22:40 <@RealSolid> looks like the artforz went away
22:40 < TimothyA> RealSolid: and the blockchain got hacked
22:40 <@AhimothMobile> yeah
22:40 <@RealSolid> oh?
22:40 <@RealSolid> hacked?
22:40 <@AhimothMobile> not hacked
22:41 < Sharky112065> !blockcount
22:41 < SCBot> The Current Block Is: 40106
22:41 <@RealSolid> it just got slower because his geforce 4 army went away
22:41 <@RealSolid> difficulty will adjust to it soon
...
22:55 <@RealSolid> the b7 just fucked over artforz and his polluting node
22:55 <@pho|> no, works perfect
22:55 <@mtrlt> wtf
22:55 < BrightSky> RealSolid: What exactly was wrong with before b7 nodes?
22:55 <@RealSolid> we now have capability to remove his malformed time blocks
22:55 <@mtrlt> it shouldn't matter at all what pool it is, for detecting hardware errors
22:55 <@RealSolid> BrightSky: artforz was setting time+1 on old block because there was no way to detect "oldblocks"
22:56 <@RealSolid> so if he took 40s to solve it, he was effectively saying it was only 1s
22:56 < BrightSky> lol
22:56 <@RealSolid> its just a minor thing really, not much damage can be done with it, difficulty gets a few percent higher than it should
22:57 <@RealSolid> but its a malformed time, so b7 added code to detect malformed time and deny the generates
22:57 <@RealSolid> and we can now also detect "old blocks" live, we will enable this sometime today
22:57 < Hadri3n> Hey at least their hatred causes bug fixes Smiley
22:57 <@RealSolid> yah well hes out a few thousand SC now
22:58 < dribbits> mtrlt: should squid and coino show the same target shares? its the only thing I see different between the two pools in reaper
22:58 <@RealSolid> and a corrupted wallet he will have to hand clean
I'm not exactly sure how RealSolid is remotely corrupting ArtForz's wallet; retroactively invalidating previously-confirmed generates is probably the obvious answer but if RealSolid can do that then we're all in big trouble. More from a couple of hours later:

Quote
00:04 <@RealSolid> we'll have to find out later how many blocks of artforz were "nulled" due to the change
00:04 <@RealSolid> seems he didnt realize for some time after the switch
00:04 < TimothyA> RealSolid: he probably doesn't know now..
00:05 <@RealSolid> TimothyA: well hes stopped mining
00:07 <@RealSolid> his last block 40055
00:07 <@pho|> rjb82: every hash you can squeeze out is worth it if you dont care aboot cost overhead (electricity)
00:07 <@RealSolid> hilarious
00:08 <@pho|> what did artforz do? i musta missed some drama?
00:08 <@RealSolid> hes been mining with incorrect times trying to drive difficulty about 5% higher than it should be
00:08 <@RealSolid> its not that big a deal in the scheme of things but i added code to null any shit blocks like that

Then really interesting bit is this:
Quote
00:10 <@RealSolid> so now we wait and see if he comes back to enable more measures that are in b7
00:11 <@RealSolid> shall be interesting
00:11 <@RealSolid> i enjoy wasting his time and money
Which implies that there are more "measures" in the latest SolidCoin that RealSolid can use to invalidate ArtForz's blocks. And then, a few hours later:
Quote
08:50 <@RealSolid> artforz is back it seems using coinotron minerid
08:50 <@RealSolid> "fooled us'
08:52 <@RealSolid> see how we make artforz behave?
08:52 <@RealSolid> no much malformed time
08:52 <@RealSolid> good boy artforz
Entirely coincidentally, later that day trusted nodes later started intermittently refusing to approve blocks actually mined by Coinotron:
Quote
23:05 < TheHarbinger> Coinotron, but it's still not showing any rewards for the current round.
23:05 < Coinotron> That is completly different issue
23:06 < TheHarbinger> Well, fix it.  Tongue
23:07 < Coinotron> We are currently in mode "Trusted node doesn't like Coinotron's blocks"
23:08 < d34th> OH SHI
23:08 < Coinotron> Only RealSolid can fix it
23:08 < TheHarbinger> Sigh, back to solo mining.  lol
23:08 < d34th> become trusted node
23:08 < d34th> sign own blocks
23:09 < bulanula> how do you become  a trusted node without the 1.2 million coins ? impossible ?
23:09 < Coinotron> but after a while our blocks will be accepted again, then not accepted  and so on
23:09 < BrightSky> what did you do to piss of RealSolid, Coinotron?
23:10 < Coinotron> Maybe this small pool of  LiteCoins ? Wink
sr. member
Activity: 327
Merit: 250
we are legion
October 26, 2011, 12:46:32 AM
#6
It would be great if certain people were blocked from the SC2 Network,
but i dont believe that this is the Case.
Pages:
Jump to: