Please speak for yourself. I'm not a beta tester.
Whether or not you perceive you are doesn't change the fact that you are, everyone in cryptos is a beta tester.
Topic: delete - page 8. (Read 34074 times)
Whether or not you perceive you are doesn't change the fact that you are, everyone in cryptos is a beta tester.
I am always amazed how quickly serendipitous wealth corrupts the character of grown men and turns them into truculent self absorbed bullies and taunts.
Bitcoin is obviously in the wrong hands for the next stage of its evolution.
~WOW~
+1 Bitcoin is obviously in the wrong hands for the next stage of its evolution.
~WOW~
s1gs3gv sorry few steps back btw what private property is BCX being destructive of? He's just doing some security testing, and even explained how to secure your coins until testing phase is over.
If the coin doesn't recover from the testing I'd say its the devs issue.
If the coin doesn't recover from the testing I'd say its the devs issue.
"Judge, I exploited fake money (that a few people where trying to make real money out of) on the internet..."....hmmmmm
"Judge. All I did was exploit a design flaw in a door with a lock pick I invented myself and smashed up a few things because I didn't like the way the house was built..
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
Ok, lets talk about whether crypto-currencies are fake money or represent value (property) that some people may have spent time or money to acquire.
More to the point is how a present day judge would perceive it; on that note (and the fact we are talking Auroracoin here) I'm willing to stick with the fake money.
Your remarks trivialize the very real and significant issues surrounding the ~BCX~ announcement regarding crypto, property, and individual rights.
Are you justifying the destruction of private property on the basis that you don't think this particular coin has any value ?
Prisoner: "Judge, the house I smashed up wasn't a real house, it was a fake house"
Judge: "Prisoner and council are *both* remanded in custody for psychological evaluation"
"Judge, I exploited fake money (that a few people where trying to make real money out of) on the internet..."....hmmmmm
"Judge. All I did was exploit a design flaw in a door with a lock pick I invented myself and smashed up a few things because I didn't like the way the house was built..
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
Ok, lets talk about whether crypto-currencies are fake money or represent value (property) that some people may have spent time or money to acquire.
More to the point is how a present day judge would perceive it; on that note (and the fact we are talking Auroracoin here) I'm willing to stick with the fake money.
So are you going to do it or what?
Yes, when block 5400 or KGW gets deployed.
Which ever comes first.
~BCX~
I still don't get what you get out of this ? are you seeking validation, attention ? you come across very full of yourself and smug. like i said before, I have no idea of whether or not you have the skill set to do what you indicate; what I do know is you are coming across like a total hater and are the equiv. to an internet terrorist of sorts.
"Judge, I exploited fake money (that a few people where trying to make real money out of) on the internet..."....hmmmmm
"Judge. All I did was exploit a design flaw in a door with a lock pick I invented myself and smashed up a few things because I didn't like the way the house was built..
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
Ok, lets talk about whether crypto-currencies are fake money or represent value (property) that some people may have spent time or money to acquire.
"Judge, I exploited fake money (that a few people where trying to make real money out of) on the internet..."....hmmmmm
"Judge. All I did was exploit a design flaw in a door with a lock pick I invented myself and smashed up a few things because I didn't like the way the house was built..
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
"Judge remands prisoner for a psychological evaluation before sentencing."
"Judge. All I did was exploit a design flaw in a door with a lock pick I invented myself and smashed up a few things because I didn't like the way the house was built..
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
So, you see, its all the door's fault.
~~XCB~~
Testing that has the potential to destroy private property should not be done on the public block chains.
Last I checked, everything about the coin was public and based on open source.
Besides, all I am going to do is mine it in a different way, I'm not responsible for design flaws LOL
If the devs were smart, they would fix this before block 5400.
Keep in mind I simply could have ambushed this chain, like I have done in the past to others.
Just trying to be polite and a good netizen.
~BCX~
Your motive and excuses are irrelevant.
What don't you understand about property crime ?
~~XCB~~
Testing that has the potential to destroy private property should not be done on the public block chains.
Last I checked, everything about the coin was public and based on open source.
Besides, all I am going to do is mine it in a different way, I'm not responsible for design flaws LOL
If the devs were smart, they would fix this before block 5400.
Keep in mind I simply could have ambushed this chain, like I have done in the past to others.
Just trying to be polite and a good netizen.
~BCX~
So are you going to do it or what?
As someone who has lost out in BCX testing methods (I'll ignore the 'LOL' arrrrg) , I say thanks for the headsup this time 
Well if there is a possible exploit the sooner its tested out the better for everyone. We're all beta testers here, all fun and games when we are making nice profits, but few can handle the downside
Want less risk, DYOR and avoid dodgy (well the dodgiest) coins.
, I say thanks for the headsup this time Well if there is a possible exploit the sooner its tested out the better for everyone. We're all beta testers here, all fun and games when we are making nice profits, but few can handle the downside
Want less risk, DYOR and avoid dodgy (well the dodgiest) coins.
Please speak for yourself. I'm not a beta tester.
Testing that has the potential to destroy private property should not be done on the public block chains.
As someone who has lost out in BCX testing methods (I'll ignore the 'LOL' arrrrg) , I say thanks for the headsup this time
Well if there is a possible exploit the sooner its tested out the better for everyone. We're all beta testers here, all fun and games when we are making nice profits, but few can handle the downside
Want less risk, DYOR and avoid dodgy (well the dodgiest) coins.
, I say thanks for the headsup this time Well if there is a possible exploit the sooner its tested out the better for everyone. We're all beta testers here, all fun and games when we are making nice profits, but few can handle the downside
Want less risk, DYOR and avoid dodgy (well the dodgiest) coins.
Pretty Bold Stuff Going on here, the truth of the Matter is that A lot of people would loose Coin From this.
this ^
Premeditated and willful destruction of private property. That's been a crime almost everywhere for almost forever. The motive isn't relevant.
~~XCB~~
wingdings / coffee ;
12* BCX likes flexxun;
AUR sux = true
fart
12* BCX likes flexxun;
AUR sux = true
fart
Fix zeitgeist2 attack
return pindexLast->nBits;
etc.
return pindexLast->nBits;
etc.
lol. no.
public bool yes_no;
yes_no = true;
sharp
Edit: when you are inside your own blockchain, you can actually generate blocks faster than outside word. Generate 11 blocks at 5 min interval, get halfway back in time with one block, generate next 11 blocks etc.
Don't know if this is the hole BCX is planning to use, but I think it would be closed, if algorithm would not allow blocks going back in time?
You still could get lower diff by going to the future, but you could not get back to sync to real word.. unless you find another hole which allows you to generate more blocks than designed.
Fix zeitgeist2 attack
return pindexLast->nBits;
etc.
return pindexLast->nBits;
etc.
lol. no.
thanks for mentioning this.
Jump to: