Pages:
Author

Topic: delete (Read 2071 times)

member
Activity: 109
Merit: 35
April 04, 2014, 04:04:50 PM
#34

This thread serves no purpose other than to illustrate what a narcissistic prick you really are. In reality, it's all about you. Yes, Bitcoins, altcoins, mining, this forum. It's all about you dude. All about you.




At least we are getting somewhere LOL


~BCX~

Sounds like an admission. You must be Satoshi?

Nah... that would be stupid. You're far more import than him.
member
Activity: 109
Merit: 35
April 04, 2014, 03:07:26 PM
#33
We've all witnessed coin launches where devs have fucked up releasing Windows Qt wallets that haven't been tested properly - but with all of the resources and hype behind Maxcoin, it seems a bit fishy why a working Windows client was not available on release. It's not that difficult to do, even for a serious miner.

But..... here we go again with the usual BCX "dick-shaking/look at me I'm an attention whore" rhetoric. For pity's sake, will you just get over yourself dude.

This thread serves no purpose other than to illustrate what a narcissistic prick you really are. In reality, it's all about you. Yes, Bitcoins, altcoins, mining, this forum. It's all about you dude. All about you.

jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 100
April 04, 2014, 03:04:31 PM
#32
I have been one of the most Anti Maxcoin proponents since the moment it launched.

Hopefully in time I can convince you of the virtues of MaxCoin... Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Crypto Knight
April 04, 2014, 02:30:14 PM
#31
Were you guys wondering why BitcoinExpress always backs up Max and trys to make him look better then he is? That's because BitcoinExpress is Max Keiser look at the thread I made a week ago proving this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinexpress-max-keiser-proof-548608 and now he makes this thread to clear Max Keisers (his) name.


Please put down the cryptometh pipe!

I have been one of the most Anti Maxcoin proponents since the moment it launched.


But ok, you got me, I am indeed Max Keiser  Grin Grin Grin


~BCX~

Yes you were anti Maxcoin from the start because you were using that point to make it look like you were unbiased so when you stood up for Max (yourself) people would think your being legitimate.
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 1000
April 04, 2014, 01:57:23 PM
#30
Were you guys wondering why BitcoinExpress always backs up Max and trys to make him look better then he is? That's because BitcoinExpress is Max Keiser look at the thread I made a week ago proving this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinexpress-max-keiser-proof-548608 and now he makes this thread to clear Max Keisers (his) name.

I doubt that BCX is Max Keiser but i think he may be connected to him through a deal to promote his coin. This would be a good intention of Max Keiser as his coin gets a beating in every thread and no one feels like to buy some coins now.
hero member
Activity: 616
Merit: 500
Crypto Knight
April 04, 2014, 11:13:48 AM
#29
Were you guys wondering why BitcoinExpress always backs up Max and trys to make him look better then he is? That's because BitcoinExpress is Max Keiser look at the thread I made a week ago proving this: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bitcoinexpress-max-keiser-proof-548608 and now he makes this thread to clear Max Keisers (his) name.
jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 100
April 04, 2014, 10:30:01 AM
#28
why not just kill it? a coin with such unfair origins needs to be disciplined, make an example of this and every coin that goes full instamine scam.

Can't someone loan me a botnet for a few days.... make it easy to use please... drop down menu for each coin ....and then a kill button or mine to max without killing button. I will save crypto single handed within a few weeks.

releasing MAX without a windows qt was disgusting.

I have some of them , but it's worth it to see that go down.

Then write to max on his twitter explaining how it is for his own good, he lost the crypto communities good will the day his team scammed everyone with that pile of shit.

MAX2 must be fair release or meet the same fate.

I don't think MAX really gives a shit about that coin anyway in terms of financials.... he would probably like to go back and relaunch if he could the backlash simply has not been worth it to him.

Do him a favour and give him a relaunch opportunity.


Please make sure that you loan this guy a bonnet with a QT gui so that he doesn't call you a disgusting scam artist for giving him something for nothing.
People like you are what is wrong with the financial system and why they have to have plunge protection teams so that n00bs don't go crying scam every time they make a bad investment.
You would't know what to do with true financial liberty even if it was handed to you on a plate.
sr. member
Activity: 288
Merit: 250
April 04, 2014, 07:41:46 AM
#27
Speaking in third person, now? Is it difficult to breath up there or what?

i just looked at your posts and stopped reading when i seen your supporting MAZA coin..

sorry but you don't have any footing to spout off about credibility.

First off, I have no idea what you're talking about in regards to credibility. I was simply implying that he was on his high horse.

Secondly, just because I play swings on any given coin, doesn't mean I support what I'm swinging. There are MANY here who have made money off of shit coins. I'm just man enough to admit it.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
April 04, 2014, 06:57:32 AM
#26
what if max keiser wanted to keep the price low? we live in a world of greed, survival of the fittest, you said it yourself he could get this coin to $100 in a week if he wanted maybe he knows this? keep the coin low buy up coins than bam he could make a ton of money, people dont get rich by being mr nice guy, i dont know where maxcoin is going to go but to not at least own a few hundred of the coin would seem like a mistake, just my personal opinion.
Max Keiser is already a very wealthy man and from what i know he left trading because he could not stand how immoral his surrounding were.
Also following his twitter i'm pretty sure he expect and expected MAX to be worth a lot more.

Then let him say that..

As it stands he put a coin out that ripped off a lot of people that he mega hyped and then let die.
People bought into the propaganda hard.. only to be left abandoned penniless.

Making up excuses for him is kind of dumb.. Let him speak like he loved doing so much and so loudly before when he was making money off it.
Price went down and he went silent about it eh ? hmmmm ya he's innocent lol

@m_murfy i can sell you an autograph for 0.1 BTC just pm me and i will make arrangements.
I am always willing to make my fans happy Smiley
member
Activity: 193
Merit: 10
April 04, 2014, 03:36:36 AM
#25
what if max keiser wanted to keep the price low? we live in a world of greed, survival of the fittest, you said it yourself he could get this coin to $100 in a week if he wanted maybe he knows this? keep the coin low buy up coins than bam he could make a ton of money, people dont get rich by being mr nice guy, i dont know where maxcoin is going to go but to not at least own a few hundred of the coin would seem like a mistake, just my personal opinion.
Max Keiser is already a very wealthy man and from what i know he left trading because he could not stand how immoral his surrounding were.
Also following his twitter i'm pretty sure he expect and expected MAX to be worth a lot more.
full member
Activity: 215
Merit: 100
April 04, 2014, 02:10:05 AM
#24
BCX, if you really do have the resources to attack and destroy MaxCoin, could you be persuaded to instead do the opposite and point some of that hashpower to a pool other than 1GH and help us fix the network problems MAX has been having? You would feel much better about yourself if you put your powers to good use rather than evil.
Nonsense.

The issue is with pools. If some are concerned with 1GH having so much of a network, then start offering more simple no-login pools, instead of the standard register/login MPOS.

RocketPool.co.uk is available and it is an anonymous pool just like 1GH and no login is required. Plus their fee is only 1%, and since this pool is run and operated by the developers of MaxCoin any revenues collected from fees will be going directly to people who are dedicated to the development of the MaxCoin ecosystem. So mining there not only generates you more revenue, it contributes to the development of the coin itself, increasing the value of your mining investment. Yet the market is choosing NOT to do this for some reason, and continue giving 1GH the power to 51% the coin. It is quite frustrating.

It's extremely unlikely 1GH would ever pull the trigger on a 51% however, because it is not in their interest to kill their cash-cow. It would be nice to see them at the very least contributing some of those revenues towards a development bounty program however, considering they have made out like bandits on MAX solely because the devs refrained from mining it themselves and provided 1GH with the fair platform they required in order to dominate the mining power. If the devs wanted to create a monopoly, they would have had their own pool up and running right from the start, but they chose not to do that and left it to the market to dictate the direction and fate of MAX. Perhaps this was the wrong decision, the jury is out on this one. If the situation does not resolve itself, it will severely dent my faith in the free market to come up with a distributed solution to problems like this, and it will also damage my perception of miners as self-interested individuals.

There is only two ways for the 1GH situation to be rectified.

1. 1GH themselves simply limit its hashing power. (Not happening)
2. Miners decide to leave 1GH  (Not happening)


No serious investor is going to invest in a situation where a single entity can control the whole network.

There is a third option. You could single handedly bring enough new hashpower online and mine at RocketPool.co.uk to dethrone 1GH from their position of dominance. Or at least you claim you could anyway.
Also, if 1GH went offline or their reputation was damaged in some way, it could precipitate a mass exodus from 1GH in favour of a developer owned an operated pool.

Bitcoin suffered these problems also in the early days, yet it still didn't stop people investing their time, energy and capital into the ecosystem.
The 1GH problem is a stable Nash equilibrium, and in of itself, doesn't pose a significant risk to the integrity of the blockchain.
If necessary, the devs could force a hard fork anyway. It would not kill max, just like the bitcoin hard fork had virtually no impact either.

I just don't understand why the miners on 1GH do not up and leave. A possible explanation is that those miners have an active interest in seeing MAX fail. This theory would explain a lot.
Ok, Rocketpool may be anonymous, no-login now, but it used to be MPOS, that much I remember. Perhaps even with forced 2FA.

Still, the fact of the matter is that 1GH deserves to have high hashrate and collect the fees. It is stable, very very convenient, with competent and skilled operators. What you're suggesting in that long post is pretty much punish a pool for doing something right, for being successful and competent.

However, to mine MAX, I suggest http://dwarfpool.com/max/. Also anonymous, no-login, low fee and failover.

Second that.  I've mined MAX a plenty at Dwarfpool and payout is as good as 1GH but with only 1% fee instead of 3% currently at 1GH.  Anyone mining with that fee long term is an idiot.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 501
April 03, 2014, 07:53:28 PM
#23
than if you give him a relaunch, than the other people heavily invested in original maxcoin will cry foul no matter which way you look at it, way more damage done, say he got people to invest in this coin like he says he has done, do you think those people will want to reinvest in another coin when the original dies out not a chance in hell.
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
April 03, 2014, 07:35:08 PM
#22
why not just kill it? a coin with such unfair origins needs to be disciplined, make an example of this and every coin that goes full instamine scam.

Can't someone loan me a botnet for a few days.... make it easy to use please... drop down menu for each coin ....and then a kill button or mine to max without killing button. I will save crypto single handed within a few weeks.



releasing MAX without a windows qt was disgusting.

I have some of them , but it's worth it to see that go down.


Then write to max on his twitter explaining how it is for his own good, he lost the crypto communities good will the day his team scammed everyone with that pile of shit.


MAX2 must be fair release or meet the same fate.

I don't think MAX really gives a shit about that coin anyway in terms of financials.... he would probably like to go back and relaunch if he could the backlash simply has not been worth it to him.


Do him a favour and give him a relaunch opportunity.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 501
April 03, 2014, 07:28:45 PM
#21
when crypto's really take off and if maxcoin is still there, do you think people will really care about the failed launch of the coin? Hate Maxcoin all you want but one thing it has over the majority of the coins is a powerful voice to go with it, Max Keiser doesnt have to own up to anything, the success-failure of this coins depends on how much he wants to do with it for the long run, if I were him id be buying up coins left and right than market the shit out of the coin and make a fortune, id be surprised if he wasnt doing this to begin with, watch wolf of wall street all the rich care about is getting richer fuck the little people.
jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 100
April 03, 2014, 07:04:31 PM
#20
ya and their official pool they asked everyone to sign up for never went online either !

and hey also don't forget guys there is one other key issue.. the whole exclusive exchange routine bullshit !
Supposedly Coins-E had an exclusive and were the only one who said they would have the coin on launch day..
And they added it alright but crippled the market view on that coin on their site so no one could see and buy or sell orders
and this went on for as long as i recall (unless they changed it recently) So if you wanted to see what any other buy or sell order was you couldn't
they had posted some dumbass excuse for that and strangely it was the only coin on that site with that problem..
and right away two other exchanges had the coin added with out any problem too so if there was such a problem
then why did BTER and mcxNOW have no problems at all adding the coin to their exchanges ?

So the exchange shit and their pool bullshit is two more reasons they are ultra scammy and i could prob think of more i bet too.
Max Keiser's coin shit is super suspicious and wrapped in so much fishy bullshit you have no choice but to wonder..

we're not even mentioning his antics with Quark either lol

scummy fuckers out there trying as hard as they can to peel the cash out for your wallet.. and blind and ignorant fanboyism runs rampant !
I seen soooo much butt kissing with Keiser and on days when price was down all these mouthy brats would bad mouth him..
then 24 hrs later all praise him as God etc in unison. AKA: The usual Troll box morons running their mouth ..Troll Box Mensa meetings.

edit:
Final thought.
If Keiser was at all innocent in any shady stuff with his coin then he should have spoke up about it at some point.. and said sorry to us all etc.
And lets also not forget he had at worst outright lied publicly about how his coin released gone down, saying it went perfect.
or at best he was heavily bending the truth in twitter comments etc a lot.. so you guys can defend him but he distanced himself hard from the coin
and spouted pro coin propaganda the whole time.. even though he knew it was going no where so investors were going to lose their money.
Bottom line is a ton of us lost a LOT of money !
Saying he's rich so he wouldn't scam us is dumb.. Google the scammer Kevin Trudeau who is now doing 10 years jail time and it took 30 years to catch the scammer
even though he was on TV for 30 years.. YOU ALL seen em lol and many of you might have bought his crap before too lol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Trudeau - This poor guy told the court he was broke while driving a Bentley and having his multi-million dollar summer house lined with goodies.
Bottom line i think is Keiser was repeatedly and endlessly spouting pure bullshit about his coin all along, so i don't think he can play innocent.

TL;DR - yada yada .. scam .. yada yada .. fishy bullshit .. yada yada .. scummy fuckers .. yada yada .. fanboys .. yada yada .. mouthy brats .. yada yada .. pure bullshit
Troll FUD of the highest order.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
April 03, 2014, 06:55:39 PM
#19
Speaking in third person, now? Is it difficult to breath up there or what?

i just looked at your posts and stopped reading when i seen your supporting MAZA coin..

sorry but you don't have any footing to spout off about credibility.
legendary
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
April 03, 2014, 06:31:20 PM
#18
all tru noticed the same thing dont forget all the denial of service attack that folowed on all pool that were public that was amusing to refresh also the twitter and frustrating at the same time when you follow the crypto world and see an opportunity like that.

i still think that max coin was launch badly but the coin as been distributed among a lot of people and to add some POS kind of feature would bring this coin to a new level.

max coin is nice to mine no asic for now (as far as i understand things) we just need a way for people who mined it to keep it to prevent an overflow of coin on the market

thats it say it im a newb and dont understand shit thats my second post after all Wink

ya and their official pool they asked everyone to sign up for never went online either !

and hey also don't forget guys there is one other key issue.. the whole exclusive exchange routine bullshit !
Supposedly Coins-E had an exclusive and were the only one who said they would have the coin on launch day..
And they added it alright but crippled the market view on that coin on their site so no one could see any buy or sell orders
and this went on for as long as i recall (unless they changed it recently) So if you wanted to see what any other buy or sell order was you couldn't
they had posted some dumbass excuse for that and strangely it was the only coin on that site with that problem..
and right away two other exchanges had the coin added with out any problem too so if there was such a problem
then why did BTER and mcxNOW have no problems at all adding the coin to their exchanges ?

So the exchange shit and their pool bullshit is two more reasons they are ultra scammy and i could prob think of more i bet too.
Max Keiser's coin shit is super suspicious and wrapped in so much fishy bullshit you have no choice but to wonder..

we're not even mentioning his antics with Quark either lol

scummy fuckers out there trying as hard as they can to peel the cash out for your wallet.. and blind and ignorant fanboyism runs rampant !
I seen soooo much butt kissing with Keiser and on days when price was down all these mouthy brats would bad mouth him..
then 24 hrs later all praise him as God etc in unison. AKA: The usual Troll box morons running their mouth ..Troll Box Mensa meetings.

edit:
Final thought.
If Keiser was at all innocent in any shady stuff with his coin then he should have spoke up about it at some point.. and said sorry to us all etc.
And lets also not forget he had at worst outright lied publicly about how his coin released gone down, saying it went perfect.
or at best he was heavily bending the truth in twitter comments etc a lot.. so you guys can defend him but he distanced himself hard from the coin
and spouted pro coin propaganda the whole time.. even though he knew it was going no where so investors were going to lose their money.
Bottom line is a ton of us lost a LOT of money !
Saying he's rich so he wouldn't scam us is dumb.. Google the scammer Kevin Trudeau who is now doing 10 years jail time and it took 30 years to catch the scammer
even though he was on TV for 30 years.. YOU ALL seen em lol and many of you might have bought his crap before too lol
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kevin_Trudeau - This poor guy told the court he was broke while driving a Bentley and having his multi-million dollar summer house lined with goodies.
Bottom line i think is Keiser was repeatedly and endlessly spouting pure bullshit about his coin all along, so i don't think he can play innocent.
hero member
Activity: 770
Merit: 501
April 03, 2014, 05:03:37 PM
#17
what if max keiser wanted to keep the price low? we live in a world of greed, survival of the fittest, you said it yourself he could get this coin to $100 in a week if he wanted maybe he knows this? keep the coin low buy up coins than bam he could make a ton of money, people dont get rich by being mr nice guy, i dont know where maxcoin is going to go but to not at least own a few hundred of the coin would seem like a mistake, just my personal opinion.
jr. member
Activity: 46
Merit: 100
April 03, 2014, 04:21:38 PM
#16
BCX, if you really do have the resources to attack and destroy MaxCoin, could you be persuaded to instead do the opposite and point some of that hashpower to a pool other than 1GH and help us fix the network problems MAX has been having? You would feel much better about yourself if you put your powers to good use rather than evil.
Nonsense.

The issue is with pools. If some are concerned with 1GH having so much of a network, then start offering more simple no-login pools, instead of the standard register/login MPOS.

RocketPool.co.uk is available and it is an anonymous pool just like 1GH and no login is required. Plus their fee is only 1%, and since this pool is run and operated by the developers of MaxCoin any revenues collected from fees will be going directly to people who are dedicated to the development of the MaxCoin ecosystem. So mining there not only generates you more revenue, it contributes to the development of the coin itself, increasing the value of your mining investment. Yet the market is choosing NOT to do this for some reason, and continue giving 1GH the power to 51% the coin. It is quite frustrating.

It's extremely unlikely 1GH would ever pull the trigger on a 51% however, because it is not in their interest to kill their cash-cow. It would be nice to see them at the very least contributing some of those revenues towards a development bounty program however, considering they have made out like bandits on MAX solely because the devs refrained from mining it themselves and provided 1GH with the fair platform they required in order to dominate the mining power. If the devs wanted to create a monopoly, they would have had their own pool up and running right from the start, but they chose not to do that and left it to the market to dictate the direction and fate of MAX. Perhaps this was the wrong decision, the jury is out on this one. If the situation does not resolve itself, it will severely dent my faith in the free market to come up with a distributed solution to problems like this, and it will also damage my perception of miners as self-interested individuals.

There is only two ways for the 1GH situation to be rectified.

1. 1GH themselves simply limit its hashing power. (Not happening)
2. Miners decide to leave 1GH  (Not happening)


No serious investor is going to invest in a situation where a single entity can control the whole network.

There is a third option. You could single handedly bring enough new hashpower online and mine at RocketPool.co.uk to dethrone 1GH from their position of dominance. Or at least you claim you could anyway.
Also, if 1GH went offline or their reputation was damaged in some way, it could precipitate a mass exodus from 1GH in favour of a developer owned an operated pool.

Bitcoin suffered these problems also in the early days, yet it still didn't stop people investing their time, energy and capital into the ecosystem.
The 1GH problem is a stable Nash equilibrium, and in of itself, doesn't pose a significant risk to the integrity of the blockchain.
If necessary, the devs could force a hard fork anyway. It would not kill max, just like the bitcoin hard fork had virtually no impact either.

I just don't understand why the miners on 1GH do not up and leave. A possible explanation is that those miners have an active interest in seeing MAX fail. This theory would explain a lot.
Ok, Rocketpool may be anonymous, no-login now, but it used to be MPOS, that much I remember. Perhaps even with forced 2FA.

Still, the fact of the matter is that 1GH deserves to have high hashrate and collect the fees. It is stable, very very convenient, with competent and skilled operators. What you're suggesting in that long post is pretty much punish a pool for doing something right, for being successful and competent.

However, to mine MAX, I suggest http://dwarfpool.com/max/. Also anonymous, no-login, low fee and failover.

Im not suggesting 1GH is punished for doing a good job. I have mined with them myself and I agree that for the past couple of weeks, they have been the only game in town. What I'm trying to say is that individual miners would be better to pull their miners from 1GH and point them elsewhere until 1GH falls below the 51% attack threshold, otherwise any revenues generated will be subject to a certain element of counterparty risk, and it is in nobodies interest for this to be the case. Even 1GH.

RocketPool have jumped up the ranking in terms of hash power today. They went from a measly 0.5 GH/s to almost 70 GH/s in a single day, so it would appear that some miners are starting to pay attention and take action to remedy the situation.
sr. member
Activity: 840
Merit: 255
SportsIcon - Connect With Your Sports Heroes
April 03, 2014, 03:48:56 PM
#15
BCX, if you really do have the resources to attack and destroy MaxCoin, could you be persuaded to instead do the opposite and point some of that hashpower to a pool other than 1GH and help us fix the network problems MAX has been having? You would feel much better about yourself if you put your powers to good use rather than evil.
Nonsense.

The issue is with pools. If some are concerned with 1GH having so much of a network, then start offering more simple no-login pools, instead of the standard register/login MPOS.

RocketPool.co.uk is available and it is an anonymous pool just like 1GH and no login is required. Plus their fee is only 1%, and since this pool is run and operated by the developers of MaxCoin any revenues collected from fees will be going directly to people who are dedicated to the development of the MaxCoin ecosystem. So mining there not only generates you more revenue, it contributes to the development of the coin itself, increasing the value of your mining investment. Yet the market is choosing NOT to do this for some reason, and continue giving 1GH the power to 51% the coin. It is quite frustrating.

It's extremely unlikely 1GH would ever pull the trigger on a 51% however, because it is not in their interest to kill their cash-cow. It would be nice to see them at the very least contributing some of those revenues towards a development bounty program however, considering they have made out like bandits on MAX solely because the devs refrained from mining it themselves and provided 1GH with the fair platform they required in order to dominate the mining power. If the devs wanted to create a monopoly, they would have had their own pool up and running right from the start, but they chose not to do that and left it to the market to dictate the direction and fate of MAX. Perhaps this was the wrong decision, the jury is out on this one. If the situation does not resolve itself, it will severely dent my faith in the free market to come up with a distributed solution to problems like this, and it will also damage my perception of miners as self-interested individuals.

There is only two ways for the 1GH situation to be rectified.

1. 1GH themselves simply limit its hashing power. (Not happening)
2. Miners decide to leave 1GH  (Not happening)


No serious investor is going to invest in a situation where a single entity can control the whole network.

There is a third option. You could single handedly bring enough new hashpower online and mine at RocketPool.co.uk to dethrone 1GH from their position of dominance. Or at least you claim you could anyway.
Also, if 1GH went offline or their reputation was damaged in some way, it could precipitate a mass exodus from 1GH in favour of a developer owned an operated pool.

Bitcoin suffered these problems also in the early days, yet it still didn't stop people investing their time, energy and capital into the ecosystem.
The 1GH problem is a stable Nash equilibrium, and in of itself, doesn't pose a significant risk to the integrity of the blockchain.
If necessary, the devs could force a hard fork anyway. It would not kill max, just like the bitcoin hard fork had virtually no impact either.

I just don't understand why the miners on 1GH do not up and leave. A possible explanation is that those miners have an active interest in seeing MAX fail. This theory would explain a lot.
Ok, Rocketpool may be anonymous, no-login now, but it used to be MPOS, that much I remember. Perhaps even with forced 2FA.

Still, the fact of the matter is that 1GH deserves to have high hashrate and collect the fees. It is stable, very very convenient, with competent and skilled operators. What you're suggesting in that long post is pretty much punish a pool for doing something right, for being successful and competent.

However, to mine MAX, I suggest http://dwarfpool.com/max/. Also anonymous, no-login, low fee and failover.
Pages:
Jump to: